Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development as education for social justice

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 17 May 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

The correlation between education and development, with time, went through many changes along with the changes of perspectives. Since both of these concepts encompass wide ranges of social phenomena and factors, the analysis remains always complicated. However, in the era of SDGs and at the time when post-development debates have been raised, it is important to address this conceptual correlation through the conceptual analysis. Different development theories, as reflected in the discussion, have presented the vitality of education in development process from different angle, in deeper analysis it became clearer that actually two major trends exist—education ‘for’ development and education ‘in’ development—under which all can be grouped. However, the critics of those different development theories paint the picture with an assumption that the role of education in the process of development has been misunderstood and mis-presented to some extent. This poses the debate towards finding how the role of education to development process can be better realized and, therefore, this paper analysed it from three key thoughts towards redefining the paradigm. Goulet argues that development needs authentic in ethical way where Sen more freedom should be given by widening individual’s capability. However, in close analysis on Freirean thoughts, the limits of this relation remain un-encompassed as the definition of development is rather contextual and flexible for the discourses on the role of education for social justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 17 May 2020

    In the original publication of the article the fourth author name, Diego Andres Toca Bermeo was misspelled. The correct name is given in this Correction.

References

  • Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Astroulakis, N. (2011). The development ethics approach to international development. International Journal of Development Issues,10(3), 214–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astroulakis, N. (2013). Ethics and international development: The development ethics paradigm. Journal of Economics and Business,16(1), 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (Ed.). (1964). The other side: Perspectives on deviance (Vol. 90221). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, A., & Jacobsson, T. (2016). TheGoals.org: Mobile global education on the sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production,123, 227–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, B. M. (2010). Development and education. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, B. G., Jeon, I. S., Lee, R. H., Lee, I., & Yoo, S. S. (2018). Global governance of education and training: As reviewed from Jomtien via Incheon to New York. Asia Pacific Education Review,19(3), 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, D. (1991). Towards development ethics. World Development,19(5), 457–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, D. (2008). Ethics of global development: Agency, capability, and deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, D. (2014). Development and global ethics: Five foci for the future. Journal of Global Ethics,10(3), 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, D. & Schwenke, S. (2005). The relevance of development ethics for USAID.

  • Crocker, D., & Schwenke, S. (2006). The relevance of development ethics for USAID. Washington, DC: MSI. Retrieved from January 2, 2006.

  • Denison, E. F. (1962). Sources of economic growth in the United States and the alternatives before us.

  • Dower, N. (2008). The nature and scope of development ethics. Journal of Global Ethics,4(3), 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dower, N. (2010). Development and the ethics of the means. In C. K. Wilber, A. K. Dutt, & T. M. Hesburgh (Eds.), Development ethics new directions: Essays in honor of Denis Goulet (pp. 29–37). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (1989). India: Economic development and social opportunity. OUP Catalogue.

  • Escobar, A. (1995). Imagining a post-development era. In Power of development (pp. 211–227).

  • Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fägerlind, I., & Saha, L. J. (2016). Education and national development: A comparative perspective. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (Trans., Myra Bergman Ramos). New York: Continuum.

  • Gadotti, M., & Torres, C. A. (2009). Paulo Freire: Education for development. Development and Change,40(6), 1255–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (1999). Ethics and the conduct of international development aid: charity and obligation. In Forum for development studies (Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 23–57). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Gasper, D. (2008). Denis Goulet and the project of development ethics: Choices in methodology, focus and organization. Netherlands Journal of Human Development,9(3), 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. R., & Lera St Clair, A. (2010). The field of development ethics. ISS Staff Group 2: States, Societies and World Development.

  • Goulet, D. (1973). The cruel choice. A new concept in the theory of development. New York: Holiday House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulet, D. (1979). Development as liberation: Policy lessons from case studies. World Development,7(6), 555–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet, D. (1992). Development: Creator and destroyer of values. World Development,20(3), 467–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet, D. (1994). Participatory technology assessment: Institutions and methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,45, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet, D. (1997). Development ethics: A new discipline. International Journal of Social Economics,24(11), 1160–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn, G. (1988). The standard of living real author-name: Sen, Amartya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. VRÜ Verfassung und Recht in Übersee,3(2), 257–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malavisi, A. (2014). The need for an effective development ethics. Journal of Global Ethics,10(3), 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCowan, T. (2015). Theories of development (pp. 31–48). Education and international development: An introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, W. W. (2000). Education and development: Measuring the social benefits. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2016). Food security, land, and development. In J. Grugel & D. Hammett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of international development (pp. 671–693). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating development: An ethnography of aid policy and practice: an anthropology, culture and society series. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R., & Hartwick, E. (2009). Theories of development: Contentions, arguments.

  • Psacharopoulos, G., & Woodhall, M. (1993). Education for development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2007). Ten years on: Engaging the work of Paulo Freire in the 21st century. Studies in Philosophy and Education,26(6), 505–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2000). An unworkable idea or a promising alternative? Sen’s capability approach re-examined. Centre for Economic Studies, Discussion Paper Series.

  • Sanders, T. G. (1968). The Paulo Freire Method. American Universities Field Staff Reports.

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review,51(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., & Muellbauer, J. (1988). The standard of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., Stiglitz, J., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaaij, R., & Jeanes, R. (2013). Education for social change? A Freirean critique of sport for development and peace. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,18(4), 442–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St Clair, A. (2007). A methodological pragmatist approach to development ethics. Journal of Global Ethics,3, 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. V. (2014). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, C. A. (1994). Education and the archeology of consciousness: Freire and Hegel. Educational Theory,44(4), 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, C. A. (2007). Paulo Freire, education, and transformative social justice learning. Critique and utopia: New developments in the sociology of education in the twenty-first century (pp. 155–160).

  • Torres, C. A. (2014). First Freire: Early writings in social justice education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S. S., & Chun, Yujin. (2016). Education as a capability for community development with a case of community development model in Kerala, India. Korean Journal of Comparative Education,26, 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S. S., & Lee, Eunhye. (2016). Implication of Amartya Sen’s capability approach in education development cooperation. The SNU Journal of Education Research,25(1), 111–143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-Sang Yoo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoo, SS., Mosrur, R., Lee, E. et al. Development as education for social justice. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 20, 259–272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09603-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09603-2

Keywords

Navigation