Skip to main content
Log in

Arguing Terror

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Caliphate of the Islamic State developed a complex system of online argumentation that mediated and spanned the whole spectrum of jihadist literacy, from glossy magazines to short messages on social networks, from combattant letters to multimedia postings, and from chants to battle-field harangues and sermons. The overall effect was “terrifying” in the etymological sense of the word as arguments served to establish a unique intellectual “territory” that redoubled the physical one. It was molded by a sustained rhetoric that incorporated traditional juristic or theological modes of reasoning, and verbal/visual artefacts. It created an argued literacy meant to endure after the loss of territory. This essay details the various argumentative components of this literacy while questioning the knowledge “we” have of it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by University of Cape Town (Grant No. 2018 URC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe-Joseph Salazar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salazar, PJ. Arguing Terror. Argumentation 34, 101–115 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09494-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09494-y

Keywords

Navigation