Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:50:54.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the Uniqueness of Child Second Language Acquisition (SLA): Learning, Teaching, Assessment, and Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2017

Jenefer Philp ,
Margaret Borowczyk  and
Alison Mackey
Jenefer Philp
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Margaret Borowczyk
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Alison Mackey
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This issue was designed to include a wide range of research on children's second language learning. Here we provide a short overview of each of the articles contained in this issue, many of which bring up novel ideas and topics, as well as new takes on familiar themes that sometimes challenge prior conceptions and, ideally, inspire new understandings of child language acquisition, and policies, and practices in instructed settings. The 15 articles in this issue are based in instructed and naturalistic settings and include reviews and experimental work, and collectively represent learners between 5 to 18 years old. The language backgrounds include Mandarin (first language [L1]), Arabic (L1), Basque (L1), Cantonese (L1), English (second language [L2]), Hebrew (L1, L2), Spanish (L1, L2), and Thai (L1). Topics include the uniqueness of child second language acquisition (SLA); learning in majority language classrooms; best practices in bilingual schooling, cognition, and SLA in younger learners; testing and assessment relating to age and language choice; and methodological contributions that arise from the particular challenges of researching child second language development in instructed and naturalistic settings.

Type
Introduction
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 37 , September 2017 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnard, R. (2009). Submerged in the mainstream? A case study of an immigrant learner in a New Zealand primary classroom. Language and Education, 23 (3), 233–248.Google Scholar
Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21 (1), 5–31.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2011). Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review, 2, 1.Google Scholar
Cánovas Guirao, J., Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y. (2015). The use of models as a written feedback technique with young EFL learners. System, 52, 63–77.Google Scholar
Cekaite, A., & Aronsson, K. (2005). Language play, a collaborative resources in children's L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 26 (2), 169–191.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J. (2003). The influence of age on the acquisition of English: General proficiency, attitudes and code-mixing. In Mayo, M. García, & Lecumberri, M. L. García (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language (pp. 77–93). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2011). Flexible and separate bilingualism in complementary schools. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1196–1208.Google Scholar
Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2015) Translanguaging and identity in educational settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 20–35.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1999). Alternative paradigms in bilingual education research: Does theory have a place? Educational Researcher, 28 (7), 26–41.Google Scholar
Cummins, J., Mirza, R., & Stille, S. (2012). English language learners in Canadian schools: Emerging directions for school-based policies. TESL Canada Journal, 29 (6), 25–48.Google Scholar
Damon, W. & Phelps, E. (1989a). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Education Research, 13, 9–19.Google Scholar
Day, E. (2002). Identity and the young English language learner. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Duchesne, S., & McMaugh, A. (2016). Educational psychology for learning and teaching (5th ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Fortune, T. W., & Tedick, D. J. (2015). Oral proficiency development of K-8 Spanish immersion students. Modern Language Journal, 99 (4), 637–655.Google Scholar
García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism, and education. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. (2003). Age, length of exposure and grammaticality judgements in the acquisition of English as a foreign language. In Mayo, M. García, & Lecumberri, M. L. García (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language (pp. 94–121). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hartup, W. W. (1989). Social relationships and their developmental significance. American Psychologist, 44 (2), 120–126.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H., & Link, H. (2012). Translanguaging and transnational literacies in multilingual classrooms: A biliteracy lens. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15 (3), 261–278.Google Scholar
Kiss, C., & Nikolov, M. (2005), Developing, piloting, and validating an instrument to measure young learners’ aptitude. Language Learning, 55, 99–150.Google Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research, 24 (1), 35–63.Google Scholar
Laursen, B., & Hartup, W. W. (2002). The origins of reciprocity and social exchange in friendships. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2002 (95), 27–40.Google Scholar
Lindholm-Leary, K., & Genesee, F. (2010). Alternative educational programs for English learners. In California Department of Education (Ed.), Improving education for English learners: Research-based approaches (pp. 323–382). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education Press.Google Scholar
MacSwan, J. (2017). A multilingual perspective on translanguaging. American Educational Review Journal, 54 (1), 167–201.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. (2011). Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2006). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2009). Input and long-term effects of early learning in a formal setting. In Nikolov, M. (Ed.), The age factor and early language learning (pp. 141–159). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2017). The development of language awareness at the transition from primary to secondary school (pp. 49–67). In Mayo, M. P. García (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2007). Second language acquisition in childhood. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (Eds.), Handbook of language development (pp. 387–406). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Jia, R. (2016). Bilingual children's long-term outcomes in English as a second language: Language environment factors shape individual differences in catching up with monolinguals. Developmental Science, 20 (1).Google Scholar
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2008). When the gate opens: The interaction between social and linguistic goals in child second language development. In Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (Eds.), Second language acquisition and the younger learners: Child's play? (pp. 83–104). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2008). Second language acquisition and the younger learner: Child's play? Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pinter, A. (2014). Child participant roles in applied linguistics research. Applied Linguistics, 35 (2), 168–183.Google Scholar
Ramίrez, J. D. (1992). Executive summary. Bilingual Research Journal, 16 (1–2), 1–62.Google Scholar
Rolstad, K., Mahoney, K., & Glass, G. V. (2005). The big picture: A meta-analysis of program effectiveness research on English language learners. Educational Policy, 19 (4), 572–594.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2009). Long-term crosslinguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2. Language Learning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies, 59 (1), 203–243.Google Scholar
Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at school: Identity, social relations, and classroom practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Toohey, K., & Day, E. (1999). Language learning: The importance of access to community. TESL Canada Journal, 17 (1), 40.Google Scholar
Williams, J. (2001). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 51, 303–346.Google Scholar
Wong Fillmore, L. (1979). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In Fillmore, C. J., Kempler, D., & Wang, W. S. Y. (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar