Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Religious and Spiritual Beliefs Uniquely Predict Poverty Attributions

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we investigated how religion and spirituality were associated with internal and external attributions for the causes of poverty. Such attributions are important as they may shape the types of policies and interventions that individuals support to alleviate poverty. Across two studies with samples of Christian students from a Catholic university in the Midwest (Study 1: n = 189) and a large public Midwestern university (Study 2: n = 646), hierarchical regression analyses revealed that a religious variable, religious conservatism, was positively associated with internal poverty attributions. A spirituality variable, universality (i.e., a sense of shared connection and interdependence with others), was positively associated with external poverty attributions. These findings were present while controlling for demographic variables, political conservatism, and the Protestant work ethic and were consistent across Study 1 and Study 2. Overall, this shows the unique ability of religious and spiritual variables to predict these different types of poverty attributions, and that spirituality was a unique predictor for external poverty attributions over-and-above religious variables. These findings suggest the importance of considering both religion and spirituality when working with individuals and religious communities to alleviate poverty. Limitations and directions for future research and for working with religious and spiritual communities are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the current study, we focused on internal and external poverty attributions as we were interested in comparing the distinction between individualistic versus structural explanations for poverty. Cozzarelli et al. (2001) also identified “cultural attributions” as a third type of poverty attribution with explanations for poverty such as family breakdown or being born into poverty. Although we collected the cultural attributions subscale in Study 1, it had less than adequate reliability (α = 0.56) and did not fit within our conceptualization for the current study, and thus, we do not report these data. Moreover, other research has examined fatalistic poverty attributions (e.g., Feagin, 1972) though Cozzarelli et al. (2001) were not able to find evidence for this fatalistic factor in their work, and they also noted previous research had found low internal consistency for measures of fatalistic attributions. Thus, we also did not focus on fatalistic types of attributions. Future research should expand on the current study to examine links between religion and spirituality and these other types of poverty attributions.

  2. See footnote 1.

  3. In Study 1, we also had a self-created measure of biblical literalism that we had intended to use as a second indicator of religious conservatism in our models (in addition to self-identification as conservative). In Study 2, we used the Intratextual Fundamentalism scale (Williamson, Hood, Ahmad, Sadiq, & Hill, 2010) to assess literal interpretation of sacred text; again with the intention of using this scale as a second indicator of religious conservatism in our models in addition to self-identification as conservative. Ultimately, we decided not to include these scales due to issues of measurement (one measure was not validated) and conceptualization (the second measure also could have been conceptualized as a measure of religious fundamentalism). Also, including or not including these scales did not alter the general findings of the current study. These analyses are available upon request.

  4. Readers may be curious how results may change (a) if internal poverty attributions were included as a control variable in the models predicting external poverty attributions, and (b) if external poverty attributions were included as a control variable in the models predicting internal poverty attributions. We thus examined all models in Tables 2 and 3 including these controls in relevant models (analyses available upon request). Overall, the direction and significance of study findings remained unchanged. The only difference across all models was that universality was no longer a significant predictor of internal poverty attributions in Study 2.

  5. See footnote 4.

References

  • Astin, A. W., Astin, H. S., & Lindholm, J. A. (2011). Cultivating the spirit: How college can enhance students’ inner lives. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Haigh, E. A. (2014). Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The Generic Cognitive Model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 1–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1979). Personal and social components of the Protestant ethic. The Journal of Social Psychology, 109, 263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, J. R., Fandetti, D., & Cole, D. (2004). Is Christian religious conservatism compatible with the liberal social welfare state? Social Work, 49, 269–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, H. E. (2017). The widening economic divide: Economic disparities and classism as critical community context. In M. A. Bond, C. Keys, & I. Serrano-García (Eds.), APA handbook of community psychology (pp. 353–368). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, H. E., Williams, W. R., & Limbert, W. M. (2003). Predicting support for welfare policies: The impact of attributions and beliefs about inequality. Journal of Poverty, 7(3), 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N., & Nelson, S. D. (1973). On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems. American Psychologist, 28, 199–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, M., & Tsitsos, W. (2001). Congregations and social services: What they do, how they do it, and with whom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 660–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, E. R., Case, K. A., Rios, D., & Curtin, N. (2011). Understanding what students bring to the classroom: Moderators of the effects of diversity courses on student attitudes. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 397–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V., & Tagler, M. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, T. C. (2009). Attributions for poverty among college students: The impact of service-learning and religiosity. College Student Journal, 43, 136–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M. O., & Smith, C. (2000). Divided by faith: Evangelical religion and the problem of race in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. D., Rosen, A. D., Kesten, S. M., & Moore, W. (2014). Miami thrives: Weaving a poverty reduction coalition. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53, 357–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, J. R. (1972). Poverty: We still believe that God helps those who help themselves. Psychology Today, 6, 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1982). Why are the poor always with us? Explanations for poverty in Britain. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, E. B., & Wolf, S. (2016). Developing critical consciousness or justifying the system? A qualitative analysis of attributions for poverty and wealth among low-income racial/ethnic minority and immigrant women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22, 93–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. L., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 126–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, J. B., Walberg, M. D., & Peterson, J. B. (2013). Spiritual liberals and religious conservatives. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M. O. (2002). Religion, race/ethnicity, and beliefs about poverty. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 810–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M. O. (2004). Race/ethnicity and beliefs about wealth and poverty. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 827–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M. O. (2007). African American, Hispanic, and White beliefs about Black/White inequality, 1977–2004. American Sociological Review, 72, 390–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Hawkins, C. B., Nosek, B., Hennes, E. P., Stern, C., Graham, J., et al. (2013). Belief in a just god (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34, 56–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapuscinski, A. N., & Masters, K. S. (2010). The current status of measures of spirituality: A critical review of scale development. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2, 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 992–1004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landmane, D., & Renge, V. (2010). Attributions for poverty, attitudes toward the poor and identification with the poor among social workers and poor people. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 11, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J. L., & Frederico, C. (1998). Ethic Identity, legitimization, and social status: A Matter of ideological symmetry. Political Psychology, 191, 373–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynam, D. R., Hoyle, R. H., & Newman, J. P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13, 328–341.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I., Domingo, M. R., & Westin, A. M. L. (2013). Addressing religion and psychology in communities: The congregation as intervention site, community resource, and community influence. In K. I. Pargament, A. Mahoney, & E. P. Shafranske (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 2, pp. 613–632). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, E. A., & Todd, N. R. (2015). Differences in White privilege attitudes and religious beliefs across racial affect types. The Counseling Psychologist, 43, 1135–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoskey, J. W. (1994). Factor structure of the Protestant Work Ethic Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirels, H. L., & Garrett, J. B. (1971). The Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parent, M. C. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 568–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., Mahoney, A., Exline, J. J., Jones, J. W., & Shafranske, E. P. (2013). Envisioning an integrative paradigm for the psychology of religion and spirituality. In K. I. Pargament, A. Mahoney, & E. P. Shafranske (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1, pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., & Maton, K. I. (2000). Religion in American life: A community psychology perspective. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 495–522). New York: Klewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R. I., Ciarrochi, J. E. G., Williams, J. E., & Dy-Liacco, G. S. (2009). The empirical and conceptual value of the Spiritual Transcendence and Religious Involvement scales for personality research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1(3), 162–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominate orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Religious Landscape Study. (2016). Pew research center. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/.

  • Robinson, J. W. (2009). American poverty cause beliefs and structured inequality legitimation. Sociological Spectrum, 29, 489–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, B. W. (2007). The call to justice: Social work in Catholic higher education. Social Work and Christianity, 34, 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shek, D. T. L. (2004). Beliefs about the causes of poverty in parents and adolescents experiencing economic disadvantage in Hong Kong. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 165, 272–291.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, M., & McCormack, M. M. (2017). Understanding and alleviating economic hardship: Contributions from community psychology. In M. A. Bond, C. Keys, & I. Serrano-García (Eds.), APA handbook of community psychology (pp. 345–359). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sider, R. J. (2005). Rich Christians in an age of hunger: Moving from affluence to generosity. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skitka, L. J., Mullen, E., Griffin, T., Hutchinson, S., & Chamberlin, B. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470–487.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. B., & Stone, L. H. (1989). Rags, riches, and bootstraps: Beliefs about the causes of wealth and poverty. The Sociological Quarterly, 30, 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, P. W., Peterson, N. A., Armstead, T. L., & Allen, C. T. (2013). The influence of participation, gender and organizational sense of community on psychological empowerment: The moderating effects of income. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 103–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steensland, B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, B. W., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79, 291–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarakeshwar, N., Stanton, J., & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Religion: An overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(4), 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, N. R., & Houston, J. D. (2013). Examining patterns of political, social service, and collaborative involvement of religious congregations: A latent class and transition analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 422–438.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, N. R., & Ong, K. S. (2012). Political and theological orientation as moderators for the association between religious attendance and attitudes toward gay marriage for White Christians. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4, 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toporek, R. L., & Pope-Davis, D. B. (2005). Exploring the relationships between multicultural training, racial attitudes, and attributions of poverty among graduate counseling trainees. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 11, 259–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tranby, E., & Hartmann, D. (2008). Critical Whiteness theories and the evangelical “race problem”: Extending Emerson and Smith’s Divided by Faith. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47, 341–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau. (2017, September). Income and poverty in the United States: 2017. Report no. P60-263. Retrieved from www.census.gov/library/publications/2018/demo/p60-262.html.

  • Williamson, W. P., Hood, R. W., Ahmad, A., Sadiq, M., & Hill, P. C. (2010). The Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale: Cross-cultural application, validity evidence, and relationship with religious orientation and the Big 5 factor markers. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 13(7–8), 721–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodberry, R. D., & Smith, C. S. (1998). Fundamentalism et al.: Conservative Protestants in America. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 25–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1996). Restructuring of American religion: Further evidence. Sociological Inquiry, 66(3), 303–329.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brett A. Boeh Bergmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bergmann, B.A.B., Todd, N.R. Religious and Spiritual Beliefs Uniquely Predict Poverty Attributions. Soc Just Res 32, 459–485 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00335-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00335-7

Keywords

Navigation