Abstract
In this study, we investigated how religion and spirituality were associated with internal and external attributions for the causes of poverty. Such attributions are important as they may shape the types of policies and interventions that individuals support to alleviate poverty. Across two studies with samples of Christian students from a Catholic university in the Midwest (Study 1: n = 189) and a large public Midwestern university (Study 2: n = 646), hierarchical regression analyses revealed that a religious variable, religious conservatism, was positively associated with internal poverty attributions. A spirituality variable, universality (i.e., a sense of shared connection and interdependence with others), was positively associated with external poverty attributions. These findings were present while controlling for demographic variables, political conservatism, and the Protestant work ethic and were consistent across Study 1 and Study 2. Overall, this shows the unique ability of religious and spiritual variables to predict these different types of poverty attributions, and that spirituality was a unique predictor for external poverty attributions over-and-above religious variables. These findings suggest the importance of considering both religion and spirituality when working with individuals and religious communities to alleviate poverty. Limitations and directions for future research and for working with religious and spiritual communities are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the current study, we focused on internal and external poverty attributions as we were interested in comparing the distinction between individualistic versus structural explanations for poverty. Cozzarelli et al. (2001) also identified “cultural attributions” as a third type of poverty attribution with explanations for poverty such as family breakdown or being born into poverty. Although we collected the cultural attributions subscale in Study 1, it had less than adequate reliability (α = 0.56) and did not fit within our conceptualization for the current study, and thus, we do not report these data. Moreover, other research has examined fatalistic poverty attributions (e.g., Feagin, 1972) though Cozzarelli et al. (2001) were not able to find evidence for this fatalistic factor in their work, and they also noted previous research had found low internal consistency for measures of fatalistic attributions. Thus, we also did not focus on fatalistic types of attributions. Future research should expand on the current study to examine links between religion and spirituality and these other types of poverty attributions.
See footnote 1.
In Study 1, we also had a self-created measure of biblical literalism that we had intended to use as a second indicator of religious conservatism in our models (in addition to self-identification as conservative). In Study 2, we used the Intratextual Fundamentalism scale (Williamson, Hood, Ahmad, Sadiq, & Hill, 2010) to assess literal interpretation of sacred text; again with the intention of using this scale as a second indicator of religious conservatism in our models in addition to self-identification as conservative. Ultimately, we decided not to include these scales due to issues of measurement (one measure was not validated) and conceptualization (the second measure also could have been conceptualized as a measure of religious fundamentalism). Also, including or not including these scales did not alter the general findings of the current study. These analyses are available upon request.
Readers may be curious how results may change (a) if internal poverty attributions were included as a control variable in the models predicting external poverty attributions, and (b) if external poverty attributions were included as a control variable in the models predicting internal poverty attributions. We thus examined all models in Tables 2 and 3 including these controls in relevant models (analyses available upon request). Overall, the direction and significance of study findings remained unchanged. The only difference across all models was that universality was no longer a significant predictor of internal poverty attributions in Study 2.
See footnote 4.
References
Astin, A. W., Astin, H. S., & Lindholm, J. A. (2011). Cultivating the spirit: How college can enhance students’ inner lives. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Beck, A. T., & Haigh, E. A. (2014). Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The Generic Cognitive Model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 1–24.
Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1979). Personal and social components of the Protestant ethic. The Journal of Social Psychology, 109, 263–267.
Belcher, J. R., Fandetti, D., & Cole, D. (2004). Is Christian religious conservatism compatible with the liberal social welfare state? Social Work, 49, 269–276.
Bullock, H. E. (2017). The widening economic divide: Economic disparities and classism as critical community context. In M. A. Bond, C. Keys, & I. Serrano-García (Eds.), APA handbook of community psychology (pp. 353–368). Washington, DC: APA.
Bullock, H. E., Williams, W. R., & Limbert, W. M. (2003). Predicting support for welfare policies: The impact of attributions and beliefs about inequality. Journal of Poverty, 7(3), 35–56.
Caplan, N., & Nelson, S. D. (1973). On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems. American Psychologist, 28, 199–211.
Chaves, M., & Tsitsos, W. (2001). Congregations and social services: What they do, how they do it, and with whom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 660–683.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cole, E. R., Case, K. A., Rios, D., & Curtin, N. (2011). Understanding what students bring to the classroom: Moderators of the effects of diversity courses on student attitudes. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 397–405.
Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V., & Tagler, M. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 207–227.
Davidson, T. C. (2009). Attributions for poverty among college students: The impact of service-learning and religiosity. College Student Journal, 43, 136–144.
Emerson, M. O., & Smith, C. (2000). Divided by faith: Evangelical religion and the problem of race in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Evans, S. D., Rosen, A. D., Kesten, S. M., & Moore, W. (2014). Miami thrives: Weaving a poverty reduction coalition. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53, 357–368.
Feagin, J. R. (1972). Poverty: We still believe that God helps those who help themselves. Psychology Today, 6, 101–110.
Furnham, A. (1982). Why are the poor always with us? Explanations for poverty in Britain. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 311–322.
Godfrey, E. B., & Wolf, S. (2016). Developing critical consciousness or justifying the system? A qualitative analysis of attributions for poverty and wealth among low-income racial/ethnic minority and immigrant women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22, 93–103.
Hall, D. L., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 126–139.
Hirsh, J. B., Walberg, M. D., & Peterson, J. B. (2013). Spiritual liberals and religious conservatives. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 14–20.
Hunt, M. O. (2002). Religion, race/ethnicity, and beliefs about poverty. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 810–831.
Hunt, M. O. (2004). Race/ethnicity and beliefs about wealth and poverty. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 827–853.
Hunt, M. O. (2007). African American, Hispanic, and White beliefs about Black/White inequality, 1977–2004. American Sociological Review, 72, 390–415.
Jost, J. T., Hawkins, C. B., Nosek, B., Hennes, E. P., Stern, C., Graham, J., et al. (2013). Belief in a just god (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34, 56–81.
Kapuscinski, A. N., & Masters, K. S. (2010). The current status of measures of spirituality: A critical review of scale development. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2, 191–205.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 992–1004.
Landmane, D., & Renge, V. (2010). Attributions for poverty, attitudes toward the poor and identification with the poor among social workers and poor people. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 11, 37–50.
Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J. L., & Frederico, C. (1998). Ethic Identity, legitimization, and social status: A Matter of ideological symmetry. Political Psychology, 191, 373–404.
Lynam, D. R., Hoyle, R. H., & Newman, J. P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13, 328–341.
Maton, K. I., Domingo, M. R., & Westin, A. M. L. (2013). Addressing religion and psychology in communities: The congregation as intervention site, community resource, and community influence. In K. I. Pargament, A. Mahoney, & E. P. Shafranske (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 2, pp. 613–632). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
McConnell, E. A., & Todd, N. R. (2015). Differences in White privilege attitudes and religious beliefs across racial affect types. The Counseling Psychologist, 43, 1135–1161.
McHoskey, J. W. (1994). Factor structure of the Protestant Work Ethic Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 49–52.
Mirels, H. L., & Garrett, J. B. (1971). The Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 40–44.
Parent, M. C. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 568–600.
Pargament, K. I., Mahoney, A., Exline, J. J., Jones, J. W., & Shafranske, E. P. (2013). Envisioning an integrative paradigm for the psychology of religion and spirituality. In K. I. Pargament, A. Mahoney, & E. P. Shafranske (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1, pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Pargament, K. I., & Maton, K. I. (2000). Religion in American life: A community psychology perspective. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 495–522). New York: Klewer.
Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985–1013.
Piedmont, R. I., Ciarrochi, J. E. G., Williams, J. E., & Dy-Liacco, G. S. (2009). The empirical and conceptual value of the Spiritual Transcendence and Religious Involvement scales for personality research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1(3), 162–179.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominate orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
Religious Landscape Study. (2016). Pew research center. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/.
Robinson, J. W. (2009). American poverty cause beliefs and structured inequality legitimation. Sociological Spectrum, 29, 489–518.
Shank, B. W. (2007). The call to justice: Social work in Catholic higher education. Social Work and Christianity, 34, 2–17.
Shek, D. T. L. (2004). Beliefs about the causes of poverty in parents and adolescents experiencing economic disadvantage in Hong Kong. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 165, 272–291.
Shinn, M., & McCormack, M. M. (2017). Understanding and alleviating economic hardship: Contributions from community psychology. In M. A. Bond, C. Keys, & I. Serrano-García (Eds.), APA handbook of community psychology (pp. 345–359). Washington, DC: APA.
Sider, R. J. (2005). Rich Christians in an age of hunger: Moving from affluence to generosity. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
Skitka, L. J., Mullen, E., Griffin, T., Hutchinson, S., & Chamberlin, B. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470–487.
Smith, K. B., & Stone, L. H. (1989). Rags, riches, and bootstraps: Beliefs about the causes of wealth and poverty. The Sociological Quarterly, 30, 93–107.
Speer, P. W., Peterson, N. A., Armstead, T. L., & Allen, C. T. (2013). The influence of participation, gender and organizational sense of community on psychological empowerment: The moderating effects of income. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 103–113.
Steensland, B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, B. W., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79, 291–318.
Tarakeshwar, N., Stanton, J., & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Religion: An overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(4), 377–394.
Todd, N. R., & Houston, J. D. (2013). Examining patterns of political, social service, and collaborative involvement of religious congregations: A latent class and transition analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 422–438.
Todd, N. R., & Ong, K. S. (2012). Political and theological orientation as moderators for the association between religious attendance and attitudes toward gay marriage for White Christians. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4, 56–70.
Toporek, R. L., & Pope-Davis, D. B. (2005). Exploring the relationships between multicultural training, racial attitudes, and attributions of poverty among graduate counseling trainees. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 11, 259–271.
Tranby, E., & Hartmann, D. (2008). Critical Whiteness theories and the evangelical “race problem”: Extending Emerson and Smith’s Divided by Faith. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47, 341–359.
US Census Bureau. (2017, September). Income and poverty in the United States: 2017. Report no. P60-263. Retrieved from www.census.gov/library/publications/2018/demo/p60-262.html.
Williamson, W. P., Hood, R. W., Ahmad, A., Sadiq, M., & Hill, P. C. (2010). The Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale: Cross-cultural application, validity evidence, and relationship with religious orientation and the Big 5 factor markers. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 13(7–8), 721–747.
Woodberry, R. D., & Smith, C. S. (1998). Fundamentalism et al.: Conservative Protestants in America. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 25–56.
Wuthnow, R. (1996). Restructuring of American religion: Further evidence. Sociological Inquiry, 66(3), 303–329.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bergmann, B.A.B., Todd, N.R. Religious and Spiritual Beliefs Uniquely Predict Poverty Attributions. Soc Just Res 32, 459–485 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00335-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00335-7