Abstract
Coverage by international broadcasters and other media of the terrorist attacks in Paris in November 2015 made extensive use of mainstream diversity discourse to describe the victims and venues targeted by jihadists, emphasizing the unique preferences, unconventional life plans and individuality of victims. Based on sociological accounts, this paper sees that discourse as part and parcel of an individualistic ideology of diversity, which celebrates individual uniqueness and espouses relativism on the value of differences across individuals and groups. The two studies presented here address the consequences of framing the events in Paris in individual diversity (ID) ideological terms and question their impact on lay representations of the events and on support for antiterrorist policies by Greek university students. In Study 1, personal endorsement of ID ideology was associated with indirect support for strict border controls. Study 2 manipulated descriptions of victims and found that priming ID themes directly produced increased support for strict border controls and an increased understanding of the main symbolic target of the attacks as an assault against the West. The results extend the past work on the effects of ID ideas on lay representations of social discrimination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Another item, pursuing the end of the war in Syria, was not represented well by any of these factors.
One item was not represented well by the three-factor structure: capitalism.
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Augoustinos, M., Tuffin, K., & Every, D. (2005). New racism, meritocracy and individualism: Constraining affirmative action in education. Discourse & Society, 16, 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505051168.
Bajekal, N. (2015, November 20). France’s ‘Generation Bataclan’ hasn’t lost its joie de vivre. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Bauman, Z. (2001). Identity in the globalizing world. Social Anthropology, 9, 121–129.
Boli, J., & Elliott, M. A. (2008). Façade diversity: The individualization of cultural difference. International Sociology, 23, 540–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580908090727.
Bradley, H. (2016). Fractured identities: Changing patterns of inequality (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
Choma, B. L., & Hodson, G. (2017). Right-wing ideology: Positive (and negative) relations to threat. Social Cognition, 35, 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.415.
Crawford, J. T. (2017). Are conservatives more sensitive to threat than liberals? It depends on how we define threat and conservatism. Social Cognition, 35, 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.354.
Dubois, N., & Beauvois, J. L. (2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.236.
Dumont, L. (1986). Essays on individualism: Modern ideology in anthropological perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20, 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176.
Faucher, F., & Boussaguet, L. (2017). The politics of symbols: Reflections on the French Government’s framing of the 2015 terrorist attacks. Parliamentary Affairs, 71, 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx013.
Gailliot, M. T., Stillman, T. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Maner, J. K., & Plant, E. A. (2008). Mortality salience increases adherence to salient norms and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316791.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Guimond, S., Crisp, R. J., De Oliveira, P., Kamiejski, R., Kteily, N., Kuepper, B., et al. (2013). Diversity policy, social dominance, and intergroup relations: Predicting prejudice in changing social and political contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032069.
Guimond, S., de la Sablonnière, R., & Nugier, A. (2014). Living in a multicultural world: Intergroup ideologies and the societal context of intergroup relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 142–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.957578.
Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Taber, C., & Lahav, G. (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00144.x.
Iatridis, T. (2017). Individual diversity and lay representations of racism: Persistence of the prejudice problematic. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 14, 242–259.
Iatridis, T. (2019a). The Janus of diversity: May the ideology of individual diversity rationalize social inequalities? Political Psychology, 40, 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12502.
Iatridis, T. (2019b). Assumptions of individual diversity ideology and controversial effects on acknowledging racism. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 24(2), 36–51.
Iyer, A., Webster, J., Hornsey, M. J., & Vanman, E. J. (2014). Understanding the power of the picture: The effect of image content on emotional and political responses to terrorism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12243.
Jonas, E., Martens, A., Kayser, D. N., Fritsche, I., Sullivan, D., & Greenberg, J. (2008). Focus theory of normative conduct and terror-management theory: The interactive impact of mortality salience and norm salience on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1239–1251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013593.
Jones, J. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2018). Change, challenge, and prospects for a diversity paradigm in social psychology. Social Issues and Policy Review, 12, 7–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12039.
Judkis, M., & Witte, G. (2015, November). String of Paris terrorist attacks leaves over 120 dead. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com.
Knowles, E. D., Lowery, B. S., Hogan, C. M., & Chow, R. M. (2009). On the malleability of ideology: Motivated construals of color blindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 857–869. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013595.
Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2011). The identifiable victim effect: Causes and boundary conditions. In D. M. Oppenheimer & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 133–148). New York NY: Psychology Press.
Lambert, A. J., Scherer, L. D., Schott, J. P., Olson, K. R., Andrews, R. K., O’Brien, T. C., et al. (2010). Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: An integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 886–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019086.
Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., et al. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204267988.
Lequesne, C. (2016). French foreign and security challenges after the Paris terrorist attacks. Contemporary Security Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1193976.
Levin, S., Matthews, M., Guimond, S., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Kteily, N., et al. (2012). Assimilation, multiculturalism, and colorblindness: Mediated and moderated relationships between social dominance orientation and prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.019.
Nail, P. R., & McGregor, I. (2009). Conservative shift among liberals and conservatives following 9/11/01. Social Justice Research, 22, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0098-z.
Noor, M., Kteily, N., Siem, B., & Mazziotta, A. (2019). “Terrorist” or “mentally ill”: Motivated biases rooted in partisanship shape attributions about violent actors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618764808.
Norris, P., Kern, M., & Just, M. R. (Eds.). (2003). Framing terrorism: The news media, the government, and the public. New York, NY: Routledge.
Nugier, A., & Guimond, S. (2016). «Je suis Charlie»: New findings on the social and political psychology of terrorism. International Review of Social Psychology, 29, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.60.
Nugier, A., Roebroeck, E., Anier, N., Kleinlogel, E., Chatard, A., & Guimond, S. (2016). The psychological effects of terrorism are moderated by cultural worldviews. International Review of Social Psychology, 29, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.61.
Papastamou, S., Prodromitis, G., & Iatridis, T. (2005). Perceived threats to democracy: An examination of political affiliation and beliefs about terrorism, state control, and human rights. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00070.x.
Plaut, V. C. (2010). Diversity science: Why and how difference makes a difference. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478401003676501.
Pratto, F., Çidam, A., Stewart, A. L., Zeineddine, F. B., Aranda, M., Aiello, A., et al. (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612473663.
Ramos, M. R., Hewstone, M., Barreto, M., & Branscombe, N. R. (2016). The opportunities and challenges of diversity: Explaining its impact on individuals and groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 793–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2261.
Rattan, A., & Ambady, N. (2013). Diversity ideologies and intergroup relations: An examination of colorblindness and multiculturalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1892.
Rosenthal, L., & Levy, S. R. (2013). Thinking about mutual influences and connections across cultures relates to more positive intergroup attitudes: An examination of polyculturalism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12043.
Tankard, J. W., Jr. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 111–121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thusu, D. K. (2006). Televising the “War on Terrorism”: The myths of morality. In A. A. Kavoori & T. Fraley (Eds.), Media, terrorism, and theory: A reader (pp. 3–18). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Press.
Uenal, F. (2016). Disentangling islamophobia: The differential effects of symbolic, realistic, and terroristic threat perceptions as mediators between social dominance orientation and islamophobia. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4, 66–90. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i1.463.
Unzueta, M. M., Knowles, E. D., & Ho, G. C. (2012). Diversity is what you want it to be: How social-dominance motives affect construals of diversity. Psychological Science, 23, 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611426727.
Vasta, E. (2007). From ethnic minorities to ethnic majority policy: Multiculturalism and the shift to assimilationism in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 713–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701491770.
Zhu, L. L., Kay, A. C., & Eibach, R. P. (2013). A test of the flexible ideology hypothesis: System justification motives interact with ideological cueing to predict political judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 755–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iatridis, T. Counterintuitive Effects of Individualistic Diversity Discourse on “Generation Bataclan”. Soc Just Res 33, 480–500 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-020-00355-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-020-00355-8