Skip to main content
Log in

Individual differences in motives for regulating affect intensity: positive trait affect and the value of trait-consistent affect

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined individual differences in the motivation to regulate affect intensity. In three samples (total n = 1082) we used structural equation modeling and found support for a serial mediation model in which positive trait affect predicted the motivation to increase the intensity of positive affect and decrease the intensity of negative affect, indirectly, through the commonality and value of positive affect. These findings indicate that trait affect drives regulation motives for multiple parameters of affect: people most value, and are motivated to feel, moods and emotions that match their typical experiences on intensity as well as valence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some findings support an affect-reactivity hypothesis in which extraverts (vs. introverts) are more sensitive to positive or appetitive stimuli (e.g., Lucas and Diener 2001; Smillie et al. 2015; Smillie et al. 2012), and other work supports an affect-level hypothesis suggesting that the core of extraversion involves a higher baseline level of pleasant affect (e.g., Hermes et al. 2011; Lucas and Baird 2004; Lucas et al. 2008). By contrast, instrumental approaches suggest that extraversion is associated with social behaviors that indirectly enhance pleasant affect (e.g., Ashton et al. 2002; Pavot et al. 1990; Watson et al. 1992).

  2. There is conceptual overlap between positive trait affect and positive affect commonality; however as measured here, positive trait affect is a broad personality characteristic representing a predisposition for positive affect, rather than the direct assessment of consistent affect. Indeed, unlike other commonly used measures of trait affect (e.g., Spielberger 1983, 1999) the measures of self-esteem and extraversion we used here did not include any items asking about affective experiences (with the single exception being the ‘cheerful person’ extraversion item). Our affect commonality measure is a direct assessment of consistent affective experiences, and represents a manifestation of the affective potential found in self-esteem and extraversion. These measurement choices were guided by our theoretically derived model and are supported by our CFA, which revealed the discriminant validity of these constructs (see Table 2). Finally, and further indicating its unique contributions to regulatory processes, in all 3 samples positive affect commonality was significantly correlated with all 3 forms of positive affect value and with PA/NA up, PA down (and NA Down in Samples 1, 3), even when controlling for extraversion and self-esteem (partial rs range from |.16 – .64|, all ps < .01).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott H. Hemenover.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author A declares that s/he has no conflict of interest. Author B declares that s/he has no conflict of interest. The research reported in this paper was not supported by any funding source.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study and all procedures performed in the studies reported here involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 57 kb)

Appendices

Appendix 1

Item-Total Correlations and Cronbach’s Alphas for the Affect Intensity Motive Items

 

Sample 1 (n = 320)

Sample 2 (n = 360)

Sample 3 (n = 402)

PA up items

   

 Make myself feel even better

0.76

0.72

0.72

 Strengthen my pleasant feelings

0.86

0.83

0.79

 Make my pleasant feelings even stronger

0.84

0.82

0.80

 Make my pleasant feelings grow

0.76

0.80

0.75

 Overall Cronbach’s Alpha

0.91

0.91

0.89

PA down items

   

 Decrease my pleasant feelings

0.51

0.58

0.50

 Weaken my pleasant feelings

0.59

0.61

0.63

 Make myself feel less pleasant

0.60

0.56

0.64

 Make my pleasant feelings weaker

0.63

0.65

0.69

 Overall Cronbach’s Alpha

0.77

0.76

0.79

NA up items

   

 Make my unpleasant feelings even stronger

0.74

0.82

0.80

 Strengthen my unpleasant feelings

0.67

0.72

0.73

 Make myself feel even worse

0.73

0.73

0.79

 Increase my unpleasant feelings

0.72

0.80

0.72

 Overall Cronbach’s Alpha

0.82

0.90

0.89

NA down items

   

 Make my unpleasant feelings weaker

0.54

0.51

0.55

 Decrease my unpleasant feelings

0.50

0.54

0.50

 Make myself feel less unpleasant

0.50

0.47

0.48

 Weaken my unpleasant feelings

0.54

0.54

0.56

 Overall Cronbach’s Alpha

0.73

0.72

0.73

  1. All items were preceded with the frame, ‘When experiencing pleasant or unpleasant feelings I typically want to…’.All items were preceded with the frame, ‘When experiencing pleasant or unpleasant feelings I typically want to…’.

Appendix 2

Item-total correlations and alphas for the positive affect commonality and value items

Positive affect commonality items

Sample 1 (n = 320)

Sample 2 (n = 360)

Sample 3 (n = 402)

It is rare for me to feel positive moods or emotions*

0.71

0.73

0.68

I almost never feel positive moods or emotions*

0.70

0.67

0.65

I am used to feeling positive moods or emotions

0.73

0.71

0.68

A regular part of my life is feeling positive moods or emotions

0.77

0.72

0.69

Overall Cronbach’s Alpha

0.87

0.86

0.84

Positive affect value items (general)

   

Positive feelings are a weakness humans have*

0.66

0.69

0.63

It is usually a waste of time to think about your positive feelings*

0.72

0.71

0.65

Positive moods and emotions are valuable in my life

0.54

0.51

0.56

The experience of positive emotions/moods seem pointless to me*

0.73

0.74

0.70

Overall Cronbach’s Alpha

0.83

0.83

0.81

Positive affect value items (epistemic)

   

Positive moods and emotions help me make sense of the person I am

0.57

0.45

0.54

Positive moods and emotions help me understand who I am

0.60

0.47

0.56

I gain a deeper sense of who I am ignoring my positive moods/emotions*

0.49

0.44

0.51

Positive moods and emotions rarely help me understand who I am*

0.48

0.39

0.45

Overall Cronbach’s Alpha

0.74

0.65

0.72

Positive affect value items (instrumental)

   

Positive moods and emotions help me function better in my life

0.65

0.61

0.69

Positive moods and emotions help me reach my goals

0.68

0.70

0.73

Whenever I need to get something done my positive feelings are helpful

0.66

0.61

0.71

My positive feelings often prevent me from performing at my best*

0.52

0.38

0.57

Overall Cronbach’s Alpha

0.80

0.77

0.83

  1. *Reverse scored item

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hemenover, S.H., Harbke, C.R. Individual differences in motives for regulating affect intensity: positive trait affect and the value of trait-consistent affect. Motiv Emot 44, 755–771 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09844-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09844-4

Keywords

Navigation