Skip to main content
Log in

The TriPM and MMPI-2-RF Tri-Scales: a Direct Construct Validity Comparison

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The triarchic psychopathy model has become a popular perspective from which psychopathic personality traits can be understood. Its constructs can be operationalized via multiple methods, including the scales developed for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form item pool (MMPI-2-RF; Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008)/2011. MMPI-2-RF: Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press. doi:10.1037/t15121-000). Early research has supported the validity and reliability of the MMPI-2-RF-Tri scales. However, no study has directly compared the concurrent validity of these indices with that of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM; Patrick, C. J. (2010). Operationalizing the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Preliminary description of brief scales for assessment of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition. Unpublished test manual, Florida State University, Tallahassee). The current study was conducted using a sample of over 1000 university students at a large midwestern university. All participants were administered both the TriPM and the MMPI-2-RF, as well as other concurrent measures relevant to psychopathy. We found that the MMPI-2-RF-Tri scale scores yielded similar correlation patterns to the TriPM scores from the same sample. Most notably, we found that there was a negligible difference amongst the boldness convergent associations across the TriPM and MMPI-2-RF-Tri measures. Implications of these findings and limitations of this study are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony M. Tarescavage.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Regarding conflicts of interest, Anthony Tarescavage, Danielle Burchett, Yossef Ben-Porath, and Martin Sellbom receive research funding from the MMPI-2-RF test publisher, the University of Minnesota Press. Martin Sellbom and Yossef Ben-Porath are paid consultants to the MMPI-2-RF publisher, the University of Minnesota Press, and distributor, Pearson Assessments. Yossef Ben-Porath also receives royalties on sales of MMPI-2-RF materials.

Experiment Participants

This study was approved by the Kent State University Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasula, K., Tarescavage, A.M., Ben-Porath, Y. et al. The TriPM and MMPI-2-RF Tri-Scales: a Direct Construct Validity Comparison. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 42, 666–676 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09825-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09825-4

Keywords

Navigation