Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Model Fit and Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Short Form: a Comparison of Competing Models

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined the construct validity of the PPI-SF, testing both its factor structure and the convergent and discriminant validity. Using a community sample of 1257 community members (869 females, 378 males), we tested whether a three-factor or an eight-factor model best fit the data and tested the links between the resultant factor structures and external correlates. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) findings revealed an eight-factor model best fit the data, followed by a three-factor model. Next, comparisons were made regarding the convergent and discriminant validity of the competing three- and eight-factor models. Findings showed that both models had meaningful relations with external variables, such as neuroticism, stress tolerance, and lack of empathy. The three-factor model revealed psychometric problems with the fearless dominance (FD) scale which did not exhibit good convergent discriminant validity. However, the three-factor model may consolidate the adaptive healthy traits. The eight-factor model had some additional problems with the fearlessness factor, however, showing that adaptive traits were spread across several PPI-SF factors. These findings underscore not only the importance of examining factor structure fit statistics, but also convergent and discriminant validity. The current findings suggest that both the three-and eight-factor models are viable ways to interpret the PPI-SF. However, the factors vary in whether they index adaptive or maladaptive traits. We offer some recommendations for clinicians regarding how to interpret FD and fearlessness and other trait domains within the broader psychopathy framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, F., Amorim, I. S., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 758–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Wygant, D. B., & Edens, J. F. (2013). Examining the necessity for and utility of the psychopathic personality inventory-revised (PPI-R) validity scales. Law and Human Behavior, 37, 312–320.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Auckland, R. (2000). Roadsafe Auckland annual driver survey. Auckland: Auckland Regional Transport Authority.

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1991). Multitrait-multimethod matrices in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 426–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, R. (1997). The emotional quotient inventory (EQ-i). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Benning, S. D., Patrick, C. J., Hicks, B. M., Blonigen, D. M., & Krueger, R. F. (2003). Factor structure of the psychopathic personality inventory: Validity and implications for clinical assessment. Psychological Assessment, 15, 340–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benning, S. D., Patrick, C. J., Salekin, R. T., & Leistico, A. R. (2005). Convergent and discriminant validity of psychopathy factors assessed via self-report: A comparison of three instruments. Assessment, 12, 270–289.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Fit indexes, Lagrange multipliers, constraint changes and incomplete data in structural models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 163–172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. M., Hecht, L. K., Latzman, R. D., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2015). Examining the correlates of the coldheartedness factor of the psychopathic personality inventory-revised. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1494–1499.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. (1997). Adult attachment and personality: Converging evidence and a new measure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 865–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity (1st ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derefinko, K., & Lynam, D. (2006). Convergence and divergence among self-report psychopathy measures: A personality-based approach. Journal of Personality Disorders, 20, 261–280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drislane, L. E., Patrick, C. J., & Arsal, G. (2014). Clarifying the content coverage of differing psychopathy inventories through reference to the triarchic psychopathy measure. Psychological Assessment, 26, 350–362.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edens, J. F., & McDermott, B. E. (2010). Examining the construct validity of the psychopathic personality inventory-revised: Preferential correlates of fearless dominance and self-centered impulsivity. Psychological Assessment, 22, 32–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, R., Soames Job, R. F., & Hatfield, J. (2007). A challenge to the assumed generalizability of prediction and countermeasure for risky driving: Different factors predict different risky driving behaviors. Journal of Safety Research, 38, 59–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, C., Sijtsema, J. J., De Caluwé, E., Vaughn, M. G., & DeLisi, M. (2020). A latent profile analysis of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory in a representative sample of referred boys. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000393Abstract.

  • Gonsalves, V. M., McLawsen, J. E., Huss, M. T., & Scalora, M. J. (2013). Factor structure and construct validity of the psychopathic personality inventory in a forensic sample. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36, 176–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. R., Drislane, L. E., Patrick, C. J., Morano, M., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Poythress, N. G. (2014). Development and validation of Triarchic construct scales from the psychopathic personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035665.

  • Hare, R. D. (1985). Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 7–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare psychopathy checklist-revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare psychopathy checklist-revised (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D., Harpur, T. J., Hakstian, A. R., Forth, A. E., Hart, S. D., & Newman, J. P. (1990). The revised psychopathy checklist: Reliability and factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 2, 338–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2010). The role of antisociality in the psychopathy construct: Comment on Skeem and Cooke (2010). Psychological Assessment, 22, 446–454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harpur, T. J., Hare, R. D., & Hakstian, A. R. (1989). Two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: Construct validity and assessment implications. Psychological Assessment, 1, 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, N., Brandt, T., & Dawe, M. (2000). The development of risky driving in adolescence. Journal of Safety Research, 31, 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. (1990). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal populations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 488–524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., & Fowler, K. A. (2006). The self-report assessment of psychopathy: Problems, pitfalls, and promises. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. Guilford: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., & Hess, T. H. (2001). Psychopathic personality traits and somatization: Sex differences and the mediating role of negative emotionality. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychopathic personality inventory revised (PPI-R). Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, K., Felton, J. W., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Lejuez, C. W. (2014). The role of emotion regulation in the relations between psychopathy factors and impulsive and premeditated aggression. Personality Disorders, 5(4), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000085.

  • Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2007). Using a general model of personality to identify the basic elements of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 160–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malterer, M. B., Glass, S. J., & Newman, J. P. (2008). Psychopathy and trait emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 735–745.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, D. K., Fulton, J. J., & Edens, J. F. (2013). The two-factor model of psychopathic personality: Evidence from the psychopathic personality inventory. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, D. K., & Norris, L. (2014). A new measure of attitudes toward sexually predatory tactics and its relation to the Triarchic model of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 247–261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). An examination of the psychopathic personality Inventory’s nomological network. A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Advanced online publication.

  • Miller, J. D., Maples-Keller, J. L., & Lynam, D. R. (2016). An examination of the three components of the psychopathic personality inventory: Profile comparisons and tests of moderation. Psychological Assessment, 28, 692–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins-Nelson, J. L., Salekin, R. T., & Leistico, A. R. (2006). Psychopathy, empathy, and perspective-taking ability in a community sample: Implications for the successful psychopathy concept. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5, 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mplus (n.d.) (version 7.4) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Neumann, C. S., Malterer, M. B., & Newman, J. P. (2008). Factor structure of the psychopathic personality inventory (PPI): Findings from a large incarcerated sample. Psychological Assessment, 20, 169–174.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Panayiotou, G. (2015). The bold and the fearless among us: Elevated psychopathic traits and levels of anxiety and fear are associated with specific aberrant driving behaviors. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 79, 117–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, C. J., & Bernat, E. M. (2009). Neurobiology of psychopathy: A two-process theory. In G. G. Berntson & J. T. Cacioppo (Eds.), Handbook of neuroscience for the behavioral sciences (pp. 1110–1131). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, C. J., Edens, J., Poythress, N., Lilienfeld, S., & Benning, S. (2006). Construct validity of the psychopathic personality inventory two-factor model with offenders. Psychological Assessment, 18, 204–208.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. R., Benning, S. D., Patrick, C. J., Thompson, A., & Thurston, A. (2009). Factors of the psychopathic personality inventory: Criterion-related validity and relationship to the BIS/BAS and five-factor models of personality. Assessment, 1, 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruchensky, J. R., Edens, J. F., Corker, K. S., Donnellan, M. B., Witt, E. A., & Blonigen, D. M. (2018). Evaluating the structure of psychopathic personality traits: A meta-analysis of the psychopathic personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 30, 707–718.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salekin, R. T., Neumann, C. S., Leistico, A. R., & Zalot, A. A. (2004). Psychopathy in youth and intelligence: An investigation of Checkley’s hypothesis. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 33, 731–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). A 21 word solution. Dialogue, 23, 4–7. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588.

  • Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. (2010). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22, 433–445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. T., Edens, J. F., & Vaughn, M. G. (2011). Assessing the external correlates of alternative factor models of the psychopathic personality inventory-Short form across three samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 244–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Zapolski, T. C. B. (2009). On the value of homogeneous constructs for construct validation, theory testing, and the description of psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 21, 272–284.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Dearing, R., Wagner, P. E., & Gramzow, R. (2000). The test of self-conscious affect—3 (TOSCA-3). Fairfax: George Mason University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, S., & Salekin, R. T. (2019). The network of psychopathic personality traits: A network analysis of four self-report measures of psychopathy. Personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment, 10(3), 246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapnell, P., & Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Extension of the interpersonal adjectives scales to the big five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, M. G., Litschge, C., DeLisi, M., Beaver, K., & McMillen, C. (2008). Psychopathic personality features and risks for criminal justice system involvement among emancipating foster youth. Children & Youth Services Review, 30, 1101–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. L., Frick, P. J., & Clements, C. B. (1999). Gender, somatization, and psychopathic traits in a college sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN, USA

    Elizabeth W. Adams & Kristina Decker

  2. University of Alabama, Gordon Palmer Hall, 505 Hackberry Ln., Tuscaloosa, AL, 35209, USA

    Andrew P. Bontemps & Randall T. Salekin

  3. Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA

    Siny Tsang

Authors
  1. Elizabeth W. Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew P. Bontemps
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristina Decker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Siny Tsang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Randall T. Salekin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew P. Bontemps.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Elizabeth Adams, Andrew Bontemps, Kristina Decker, Siny Tsang, and Randall Salekin declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adams, E.W., Bontemps, A.P., Decker, K. et al. Model Fit and Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Short Form: a Comparison of Competing Models. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 42, 647–665 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09829-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09829-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation