Abstract
Building on trait activation and attention capacity theories, we hypothesized and tested the moderating effect of task variety on the relationship between learning goal orientation and performance. The results of the analyses using multiple sources of data collected from 155 employees in nine South Korean firms showed that task variety significantly moderated this relationship. Specifically, learning goal orientation had an inverted U-shaped relationship with performance when task variety was high. However, we did not find a significant positive relationship between learning goal orientation and performance when task variety was low. Implications and future directions for this study were discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brett, J. F., & VandeWalle, D. (1999). Goal orientation and goal content as predictors of performance in a training program. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 863–873. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.863.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 552–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.552.
Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0063.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 687–732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661.
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. A., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.835.
Chen, G., & Mathieu, J. E. (2008). Goal orientation dispositions and performance trajectories: The roles of supplementary and complementary situational inducements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.11.001.
Chung, K. H., & Ross, M. F. (1977). Differences in motivational properties between job enlargement and job enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 2, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409178.
Converse, P. D., & DeShon, R. P. (2009). A tale of two tasks: Reversing the self-regulatory resource depletion effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1318–1324. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014604.
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., White, R. E., & Djurfeldt, L. (1995). Organizational learning: Dimensions for a theory. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028835.
Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 666–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.666.
Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.917.
Dean, J. W., & Snell, S. A. (1991). Integrated manufacturing and job design: Moderating effects of organizational inertia. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 776–804. https://doi.org/10.2307/256389.
DeShon, R. P., Brown, K. G., & Greenis, J. L. (1996). Does self-regulation require cognitive resources? Evaluation of resource allocation models of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 595–608. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.595.
DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivation action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1096–1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1096.
Dierdorff, E. C., Surface, E. A., & Brown, K. G. (2010). Frame-of-reference training effectiveness: Effects of goal orientation and self-efficacy on affective, cognitive, skill-based, and transfer outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020856.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999.
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501.
Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613.
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5.
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.
Farr, J. L., Hofmann, D. A., & Rigenbach, K. L. (1993). Goal orientation and action control theory: Implications for industrial and organizational psychology. In C. L. Cooper & L. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 8 (pp. 193–231). New York: Wiley.
Fisher, S. L., & Ford, J. K. (1998). Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 51, 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00731.x.
Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 765–778. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43670890.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7.
Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 280–293. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.37308035.
Hirst, W., & Kalmar, D. (1987). Characterizing attentional resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 3–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.116.1.68.
Hofmann, D., Griffin, M., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 423–468). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300602.
Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Theoretical and methodological implications for organizational science. Journal of Management, 24, 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400504.
Howard, A. (1995). A framework for work change. In A. Howard (Ed.), The changing nature of work (pp. 3–44). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332–1356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332.
Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 368–384.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657–690. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.657.
Ko, J. W., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1997). Assessment of Meyer and Allen's three-component model of organizational commitment in South Korea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 961–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.961.
Le, H., Oh, I.-S., Robbins, S. B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2011). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021016.
Lee, F. K., Sheldon, K. M., & Turban, D. B. (2003). Personality and the goal-striving process: The influence of achievement goal patterns, goal level, and mental focus on performance and enjoyment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.256.
Lee, J., Yun, S., Lee, S., & Lee, J. H. (2019). The curvilinear relationship between self-efficacy and creativity: The moderating role of supervisor close monitoring. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9546-9.
Lee, S., Cheong, M., Kim, M., & Yun, S. (2017). Never too much? The curvilinear relationship between empowering leadership and task performance. Group & Organization Management, 42, 11–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116646474.
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009.
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535.
Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.125.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.
Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321.
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247.
Narayanan, S., Balasubramanian, S., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2009). A matter of balance: Specialization, task variety, and individual learning in a software maintenance environment. Management Science, 55, 1861–1876. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1057.
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2010a). Organizational tenure and job performance. Journal of Management, 36, 1220–1250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309359809.
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2010b). The relationships of age with job attitudes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63, 677–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01184.x.
Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128.
Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (1997). Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 792–802. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.792.
Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39, 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410060.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Porath, C. L., & Bateman, T. S. (2006). Self-regulation: From goal orientation to job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.185.
Rapp, A. A., Bachrach, D. G., & Rapp, T. L. (2013). The influence of time management skill on the curvilinear relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031733.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (second ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rawsthorne, L. J., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_3.
Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., Tasa, K., & Latham, B. W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two divergent yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 227–239. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159574.
Smith, E. M., Ford, J. K., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1997). Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategies. In M. A. Quinones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 89–118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10260-004.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis. London, UK: Sage.
Spreitzer, G. M., Lam, C. F., & Fritz, C. (2010). Engagement and human thriving: Complementary perspectives on energy and connections to work. In A. B. Bakker & M. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 132–146). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Spreitzer, G. M., & Porath, C. L. (2014). Self-determination as nutriment for thriving: Building an integrative model of human growth at work. In M. Gagné (Ed.), Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 245–258). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Staats, B. R., & Gino, F. (2012). Specialization and variety in repetitive tasks: Evidence from a Japanese bank. Management Science, 58, 1141–1159. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1482.
Steele-Johnson, D., Beauregard, R. S., Hoover, P. B., & Schmidt, A. M. (2000). Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.724.
Sujan, H., Weitz, B. A., & Kumar, N. (1994). Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling. Journal of Marketing, 58, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252309.
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500.
Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2292.
VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006009.
VandeWalle, D., Brown, S. P., Cron, W. L., & Slocum Jr., J. W. (1999). The influence of goal orientation and self-regulation tactics on sales performance: A longitudinal field test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.249.
VandeWalle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum Jr., J. W. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.629.
Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0.
Winters, D., & Latham, G. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group and Organization Management, 21, 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601196212007.
Yeo, G., Loft, S., Xiao, T., & Kiewitz, C. (2009). Goal orientations and performance: Differential relationships across levels of analysis and as a function of task demands. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015044.
Yeo, G. B., & Neal, A. (2004). A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: Effects of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.231.
Funding
This study was funded by the 2019 Yeungnam University Research Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors equally contributed to the study, including study conception and design, data analysis, manuscript writing, and commenting and revising previous versions of the manuscript. Data collection was done by Soo Young Shin. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lim, H.S., Shin, S.Y. Effect of Learning Goal Orientation on Performance: Role of Task Variety as a Moderator. J Bus Psychol 36, 871–881 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09705-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09705-4