Abstract
For the entry guidance problem of hypersonic gliding vehicles (HGVs), an analytical predictor–corrector guidance method based on feedback control of bank angle is proposed. First, the relative functions between the velocity, bank angle and range-to-go are deduced, and then, the analytical relation is introduced into the predictor–corrector algorithm, which is used to replace the traditional method to predict the range-to-go via numerical integration. To eliminate the phugoid trajectory oscillation, a method for adding the aerodynamic load feedback into the control loop of the bank angle is proposed. According to the quasi-equilibrium gliding condition, the function of the quasi-equilibrium glide load along with the velocity variation is derived. For each guidance period, the deviation between the real-time load and the quasi-equilibrium gliding load is revised to obtain a smooth reentry trajectory. The simulation results indicate that the guidance algorithm can adapt to the mission requirements of different downranges, and it also has the ability to guide the vehicle to carry out a large range of lateral maneuvers. The feedback control law of the bank angle effectively eliminates the phugoid trajectory oscillation and guides the vehicle to complete a smooth reentry flight. The Monte Carlo test indicated that the guidance precision and robustness are good.
-
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
[1] S. Walker, J. Sherk, D. Shell, R. Schena, J. Bergmann, and J. Gladbach, “The DARPA/AF falcon program: The hypersonic technology vehicle #2 (HTV-2) flight demonstration phase,” in 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, 2008, p. 2539.10.2514/6.2008-2539Search in Google Scholar
[2] P. Lu, “Entry guidance: A unified method,” J. Guid. Contr. Dynam., vol. 37, pp. 713–728, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.62605.Search in Google Scholar
[3] X. Jianwei, Q. Jianzhong, G. Lei, and C. Wenhua, “Enhanced predictor–corrector mars entry guidance approach with atmospheric uncertainties,” IET Control Theory & Appl., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1612–1618, 2019.10.1049/iet-cta.2018.5782Search in Google Scholar
[4] R. C. Wingrove, “Survey of atmosphere re-entry guidance and control methods,” AIAA J., vol. 1, pp. 2019–2029, 1963, https://doi.org/10.2514/3.1987.Search in Google Scholar
[5] A. Saraf, J. A. Leavitt, D. T. Chen, and K. D. Mease, “Design and evaluation of an acceleration guidance algorithm for entry,” J. Spacecraft Rockets, vol. 41, pp. 986–996, 2004, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.11015.Search in Google Scholar
[6] G. Dukeman, “Profile-following entry guidance using linear quadratic regulator theory,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2002, p. 4457.10.2514/6.2002-4457Search in Google Scholar
[7] S. Li, H. Lei, L. Shao, and C. Xiao, “Multiple model tracking for hypersonic gliding vehicles with aerodynamic modeling and analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 28011–28018, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2899678.Search in Google Scholar
[8] F. Zheng, Y. F. Leung, J-B. Zhu, and Y-Y. Jiao, “Modified predictor–corrector solution approach for efficient discontinuous deformation analysis of jointed rock masses,” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods GeoMech., vol. 43, pp. 599–624, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2881.Search in Google Scholar
[9] P. Anderson, R. Schultz, and E. Stolarik, “A simple guidance scheme for lifting body reentry vehicles,” in 5th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1967, p. 136.10.2514/6.1967-136Search in Google Scholar
[10] C. A. Kluever, “Entry guidance using analytical atmospheric skip trajectories,” J. Guid. Contr. Dynam., vol. 31, pp. 1531–1535, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.32314.Search in Google Scholar
[11] A. J. Binder, L. Mitchell, and C. Ortner, “Analysis of a predictor-corrector method for computationally efficient modeling of surface effects in 1D,” Multiscale Model. Simul., vol. 15, pp. 892–919, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1137/16m1065884.Search in Google Scholar
[12] T. Wang, H. Zhang, and G. Tang, “Predictor–corrector guidance for entry vehicle based on fuzzy logic,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. J. Aero. Eng., vol. 233, pp. 472–482, 2019.10.1177/0954410017737574Search in Google Scholar
[13] A. Cordero, J. P. Jaiswal, and J. R. Torregrosa, “Stability analysis of fourth-order iterative method for finding multiple roots of non-linear equations,” Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 4, pp. 43–56, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2019.1.00005.Search in Google Scholar
[14] K. Kaladhar, E. Komuraiah, and K. M. Reddy, “Soret and Dufour effects on chemically reacting mixed convection flow in an annulus with Navier slip and convective boundary conditions,” Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 4, pp. 475–488, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2019.2.00045.Search in Google Scholar
[15] W. Yu, W. Chen, Z. Jiang, W. Zhang, and P. Zhao, “Analytical entry guidance for coordinated flight with multiple no-fly-zone constraints,” Aero. Sci. Technol., vol. 84, pp. 273–290, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.10.013.Search in Google Scholar
[16] J. Zhang, Z. She, Y. Fan, W. Nie, and K. Liu, “Numerical predictor-corrector re-entry guidance algorithm for aerospace vehicles,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS), IEEE, 2019, pp. 750–755.10.1109/ICUS48101.2019.8995963Search in Google Scholar
[17] G. Ning, S. Zhang, and Z. Fang, “Integrated entry guidance for reusable launch vehicle,” Chin. J. Aeronaut., vol. 20, pp. 1–8, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1000-9361(07)60001-6.Search in Google Scholar
[18] D. Ziane, M. Hamdi Cherif, C. Cattani, and K. Belghaba, “Yang-Laplace decomposition method for nonlinear system of local fractional partial differential equations,” Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 4, pp. 489–502, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2019.2.00046.Search in Google Scholar
[19] A. Sanjay Bharadwaj, V. Rao, and K. D. Mease, “Entry trajectory tracking law via feedback linearization,” J. Guid. Contr. Dynam., vol. 21, pp. 726–732, 2012.10.2514/2.4318Search in Google Scholar
[20] P. Lu, “Predictor-corrector entry guidance for low-lifting vehicles,” J. Guid. Contr. Dynam., vol. 31, pp. 1067–1075, 2012.10.2514/6.2007-6425Search in Google Scholar
[21] M. Liang Xu, K. J. Chen, L. H. Liu, and G. J. Tang, “Quasi-equilibrium glide adaptive guidance for hypersonic vehicles,” Sci. China, vol. 55, pp. 856–866, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4727-z.Search in Google Scholar
[22] M. Shvets and A. Makaseyev, “Deterministic chaos in pendulum systems with delay,” Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 4, pp. 1–8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2019.1.00001.Search in Google Scholar
[23] E. I. Eskitascioglu, M. B. Aktas, and H. M. Baskonus, “New complex and hyperbolic forms for Ablowitz–Kaup–Newell–Segur wave equation with fourth order,” Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 4, pp. 105–112, 2019.10.2478/AMNS.2019.1.00010Search in Google Scholar
[24] L. I. Guang-Hua, H. B. Zhang, and G. J. Tang, “Typical trajectory characteristics of hypersonic glide vehicle,” J. Astronaut., vol. 36, pp. 397–403, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
[25] Z. Shen and P. Lu, “Dynamic lateral entry guidance logic,” J. Guid. Contr. Dynam., vol. 27, pp. 949–959, 2012.10.2514/6.2004-4773Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
