Elsevier

Topology and its Applications

Volume 301, 1 September 2021, 107522
Topology and its Applications

Ribbonness of a stable-ribbon surface-link, I. A stably trivial surface-link

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2020.107522Get rights and content

Abstract

There is a question asking whether a handle-irreducible summand of every stable-ribbon surface-link is a unique ribbon surface-link. This question for the case of a trivial surface-link is affirmatively answered. That is, a handle-irreducible summand of every stably trivial surface-link is only a trivial 2-link. By combining this result with an old result of F. Hosowaka and the author that every surface-knot with infinite cyclic fundamental group is a stably trivial surface-knot, it is concluded that every surface-knot with infinite cyclic fundamental group is a trivial (i.e., an unknotted) surface-knot.

Introduction

A surface-link is a closed oriented (possibly disconnected) surface F embedded in the 4-space R4 by a smooth (or a piecewise-linear locally flat) embedding. When a (possibly disconnected) closed surface F is fixed, it is also called an F-link. If F is the disjoint union of some copies of the 2-sphere S2, then it is also called a 2-link. When F is connected, it is also called a surface-knot, and a 2-knot for F=S2.

Two surface-links F and F are equivalent by an equivalence f if F is sent to F orientation-preservingly by an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism (or piecewise-linear homeomorphism) f:R4R4. The notation FF is used for equivalent surface-links F, F. A trivial surface-link is a surface-link F which is the boundary of the union of mutually disjoint handlebodies smoothly embedded in R4, where a handlebody is a 3-manifold which is a 3-ball, a solid torus or a boundary-disk sum of some number of solid tori. A trivial surface-knot is also called an unknotted surface-knot. A trivial disconnected surface-link is also called an unknotted and unlinked surface-link. For any given closed oriented (possibly disconnected) surface F, a trivial F-link exists uniquely up to equivalences (see [6]). A ribbon surface-link is a surface-link F which is obtained from a trivial 2-link O by the surgery along an embedded 1-handle system (see [10], [11], [12], [13], [16, II]). A stabilization of a surface-link F is a connected sum F#sT=F#k=1sTk of F and a system of trivial torus-knots Tk(k=1,2,,s). By granting s=0, we understand that a surface-link F itself is a stabilization of F. The trivial torus-knot system Tk(k=1,2,...,s) is called the stabilizer on the stabilization F#sT of F.

A stable-ribbon surface-link is a surface-link F such that a stabilization F#sT of F is a ribbon surface-link. For every surface-link F, there is a surface-link F with minimal total genus such that F is equivalent to a stabilization of F. The surface-link F is called a handle-irreducible summand of F. The following question is a central question.

Question 1.0

A handle-irreducible summand of every stable-ribbon surface-link is a ribbon surface-link which is unique up to equivalences?

A stably trivial surface-link is a surface-link F such that a stabilization of F is a trivial surface-link.

In this paper, the following theorem is shown answering affirmatively this question for the case of a stably trivial surface-link. This question in the general case will be answered affirmatively in [15].

Theorem 1.1

Any handle-irreducible summand of every stably trivial surface-link is a trivial 2-link.

The following corollary is directly obtained from Theorem 1.1:

Corollary 1.2

Every stably trivial surface-link is a trivial surface-link.

If a surface-knot F has an infinite cyclic fundamental group, then F is a TOP-trivial surface-knot, which was shown by Freedman for a 2-knot and by [3], [9] for a higher genus surface-knot. In the case of a piecewise linear surface-knot (equivalent to a smooth surface-knot), it is known by [6] that a stabilization of the surface-knot F is a trivial surface-knot, namely the surface-knot F is a stably trivial surface-knot. Hence the following corollary is directly obtained from Corollary 1.2 answering the problem [17, Problem 1.55(A)] on unknotting of a 2-knot positively (see [14] for the surface-link version):

Corollary 1.3

A surface-knot F is a trivial surface-knot if the fundamental group π1(R4F) is an infinite cyclic group.

The exterior of a surface-knot F is the 4-manifold E=cl(R4N(F)) for a tubular neighborhood N(F) of F in R4. Then the boundary ∂E is a trivial circle bundle over F. A surface-knot F is of Dehn's type if there is a section F of F in the bundle ∂E such that the inclusion FE is homotopic to a constant map. By [3, Corollary 4.2], the fundamental group π1(R4F) of a surface-knot F of Dehn's type is an infinite cyclic group. Thus, we have the following corollary (answering the problem [17, Problem 1.51] on unknotting of a 2-knot of Dehn's type positively):

Corollary 1.4

A surface-knot of Dehn's type is a trivial surface-knot.

Unknotting Conjecture asks whether an n-knot Kn (i.e., a smooth embedding image of the n-sphere Sn in the (n+2)-sphere Sn+2) is unknotted (i.e., bounds a smooth (n+1)-ball in Sn+2) if and only if the complement Sn+2\Kn is homotopy equivalent to S1 (see [8] for example). This conjecture was previously known to be true for n>3 by [18], for n=3 by [20] and for n=1 by [5], [19]. The conjecture for n=2 was known only in the TOP category by [1] (see also [2]). Corollary 1.3 answers this finally remained smooth unknotting conjecture affirmatively and hence Unknotting Conjecture can be changed into the following:

Unknotting Theorem

A smooth Sn-knot Kn in Sn+2 is unknotted if and only if the complement Sn+2\Kn is homotopy equivalent to S1 for every n1.

A main idea in our argument is to use the surgery of a surface-link on an orthogonal 2-handle pair, which is much different from the surgery of a surface-link on a single 2-handle. It is known that every surface-link F in R4 is obtained from a higher genus trivial surface-knot F by the surgery of F on a system of mutually disjoint 2-handles, because a handlebody in R4 is obtained from a connected Seifert hypersurface of F by removing mutually disjoint 1-handles (see [6]). Thus, for example, every 2-twist spun 2-bridge knot in [21] is obtained from a trivial torus-knot T in R4 by the surgery of T on a single 2-handle, because it bounds a once-punctured lens space as a Seifert hypersurface.

In Section 2, it is shown that every stably trivial surface-link is a trivial surface-link if and only if the uniqueness of an orthogonal 2-handle pair on every trivial surface-link holds. In Section 3, the uniqueness of every orthogonal 2-handle pair on every surface-link is shown, by which Theorem 1.1 is obtained.

Section snippets

A triviality condition on a stably trivial surface-link

A 2-handle on a surface-link F in R4 is an embedded 2-handle D×I on F with D a core disk such that D×IF=D×I, where I denotes a closed interval containing 0 and D×0 is identified with D. If D is an immersed disk, then call it an immersed 2-handle. Two (possibly immersed) 2-handles D×I and E×I on F are equivalent if there is an equivalence f:R4R4 from F to itself such that the restriction f|F:FF is the identity map and f(D×I)=E×I.

An orthogonal 2-handle pair (or simply, an O2-handle pair) on F

Uniqueness of an orthogonal 2-handle pair

The following theorem is our main result.

Theorem 3.1

Any (not necessarily trivial) surface-link has only unique O2-handle pair.

Theorem 1.1 is proved by Theorem 3.1 and Lemma 2.5, which is done as follows:

Proof of Theorem 1.1

Let F be a stably trivial link. That is, assume that a stabilization F#sT=F#k=1sTk of F is a trivial link for some s1. By Theorem 3.1 and Lemma 2.5, F#k=1s1Tk is a trivial surface-link. Inductively, F is a surface-link, so that any handle-irreducible summand F of F is a trivial S2-link. 

The following

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by Osaka City University Advanced Mathematical Institute (MEXT Joint Usage/Research Center on Mathematics and Theoretical Physics JPMXP0619217849). An idea in this paper together with an idea in [15] was presented at the meeting “Differential Topology 19” held at Ritsumeikan Tokyo Campus on March 12, 2019, organized by Tetsuya Abe and Motoo Tange. The author would like to thank them for giving him a talk chance and the other participants for making some

References (21)

  • M. Freedman

    The disk theorem for four-dimensional manifolds

  • M.H. Freedman et al.

    Topology of 4-Manifolds

    (1990)
  • J.A. Hillman et al.

    Unknotting orientable surfaces in the 4-sphere

    J. Knot Theory Ramif.

    (1995)
  • S. Hirose

    On diffeomorphisms over surfaces trivially embedded in the 4-sphere

    Algebraic Geom. Topol.

    (2002)
  • T. Homma

    On Dehn's lemma for S3

    Yokohama Math. J.

    (1957)
  • F. Hosokawa et al.

    Proposals for unknotted surfaces in four-space

    Osaka J. Math.

    (1979)
  • S. Kamada

    Multiplication of surface-links

  • A. Kawauchi

    A Survey of Knot Theory

    (1996)
  • A. Kawauchi

    Splitting a 4-manifold with infinite cyclic fundamental group, revised

    J. Knot Theory Ramif.

    (2013)
  • A. Kawauchi

    A chord diagram of a ribbon surface-link

    J. Knot Theory Ramif.

    (2015)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text