Elsevier

Basic and Applied Ecology

Volume 50, February 2021, Pages 192-202
Basic and Applied Ecology

Forest cover and heterogeneous pastures shape the diversity of predatory rove beetles in tropical riparian habitats

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2020.12.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Riparian vegetation harbored 27% exclusive rove beetle species and 61% of total abundance.

  • Rove beetle diversity was greater in heterogeneous pastures and micro-basins with <40% of forest cover.

  • Heterogeneous pastures and riparian vegetation support complementary rove beetle assemblages.

  • Abundance decline of riparian species seems to allow rare species to colonize heterogeneous pastures.

Abstract

In tropical landscapes, forest remnants have been reduced to narrow strips of vegetation along rivers and streams surrounded by agricultural land that affects biodiversity, depending on the habitat and landscape characteristics. To assess the effect of riparian forest loss on the diversity of Staphylininae predatory rove beetles, we considered two habitat conditions (river sites with riparian vegetation and sites with heterogeneous pastures) within two micro-basin types (with >70% and <40% forest cover) in a tropical montane cloud forest landscape, Mexico. Beetles were collected using baited pitfall traps during the rainy season of 2014. No differences were found between micro-basin types and, although species richness (0D) was similar between habitat conditions, when the diversity of common (1D) and dominant (2D) species was considered, sites with heterogeneous pastures were almost twice as diverse as those with riparian vegetation. All diversity measurements were greater in sites with heterogeneous pastures of either micro-basin type. Air temperature and canopy cover were the environmental variables that best explained the variation in beetle species composition. The greatest environmental differences related to species composition were detected between habitat conditions and were more evident in sites with heterogeneous pastures and low forest cover in the surroundings. The results suggest that replacing riparian vegetation with heterogeneous pastures, within micro-basins that lost between 30% and 60% of their forest cover, does not significantly reduce the diversity of predatory rove beetle but rather modifies the beetle composition. Effective formulation of management strategies to mitigate the impact of land use modification therefore requires an understanding of the interaction between vegetation remnants and landscape characteristics.

Introduction

In human–dominated landscapes, riparian vegetation acts as a reservoir for many terrestrial taxa and often differs in species composition from neighboring forests or other land use types, increasing regional diversity (Naiman, Decamps & Pollock, 1993; Sabo et al., 2005). At the landscape scale, vegetation associated with watercourses provides habitat and resources for feeding and reproduction in a large number of species (Fahrig et al., 2011; Ries, Fletcher, Battin & Sisk, 2004). Species diversity associated with riparian zones is therefore expected to be influenced both by habitat structural characteristics (e.g., canopy and leaf litter cover) and the surrounding landscape (e.g., land cover types, forest edge density) (Braun, Pires, Stenert, Maltchik & Kotzian, 2018; Marczak et al., 2010).

Riparian zones are complex ecosystems that link water and land environments and provide multiple ecological services such as habitat connectivity and maintenance of biodiversity, riverbank reinforcement, pollution mitigation, nutrient redistribution and delivery and amenity and recreation, all of which are of great value to basin functioning and human well-being (Naiman et al., 1993, Richardson et al., 2007). For these reason, riparian vegetation remnants are an important ecosystem for conservation planning in order to promote structural and functional landscape connectivity to guarantee both the persistence of species and integrity of ecological functions (Rudnick et al., 2012).

The presence and spatial configuration of native vegetation and other land uses such as crops and pastures are among the most important factors that influence species diversity in agricultural landscapes (Fahrig et al., 2011). Intense, but localized, human activity increases landscape heterogeneity, promoting higher species diversity at the local and regional level (Tscharntke et al., 2008). In contrast, landscape homogenization due to the dominance of certain land uses (e.g., treeless pastures) often brings negative impacts on species diversity (Fahrig et al., 2011; Watling, Nowakowski, Donnelly & Orrock, 2011). However, to understand the contribution made by habitat remnants such as riparian vegetation to biodiversity conservation, it is necessary to evaluate their interaction with the surrounding landscape characteristics, which requires studies that consider different spatio-temporal scales (Tscharntke et al., 2012).

Rove beetles (Staphylinidae) make up an important but little-known element of biodiversity in most terrestrial ecosystems, with approximately 65 thousand species described (Irmler & Lipkow, 2018). Necrophilous rove beetles are generalist predators associated with carrion, and some species are associated with specific habitat conditions (Dekeirsschieter, Frederick, Verheggen, Drugmand & Haubruge, 2013; Mądra, Konwerski & Matuszewski, 2014). Rove beetles represent a significant proportion of the predator insect fauna in riparian vegetation (Gutiérrez-Chacon, Zuñiga, Van Bodegom, Chara & Giraldo, 2009). In these environments, Staphylinidae predators have a diet comprised mainly of aquatic invertebrates (some species up 80%) and are therefore considered an important functional component of riverine systems by contributing to the transfer of biomass from aquatic systems to terrestrial food webs (Eyre, Lott & Luff, 2001; Paetzold, Schubert & Tockner, 2005, 2008). The diversity patterns of rove beetles have mainly been explained by microenvironmental conditions and habitat structure (Caballero, León-Cortés & Morón-Ríos, 2009; Irmler & Gürlich, 2007; Irmler & Lipkow, 2018), and a few studies have focused on evaluating the role played by the surrounding landscape supporting the diversity of this insect group (Dauber et al., 2005; Rusch, Birkhofer, Bommarco, Smith & Ekbom, 2014).

In this study, we examined how the diversity and species composition of predatory rove beetles vary in a tropical montane cloud forest (TMCF) landscape in central Veracruz, Mexico, with respect to: i) forest cover at the micro-basin scale (micro-basins dominated by forest and micro-basins dominated by pastures), ii) habitat condition (sites with native riparian vegetation and sites with heterogeneous pastures) and iii) habitat condition as a function of micro basin type. In addition, we determined which site and microsite environmental variables explained species composition. We tested the hypothesis that modification of the environmental conditions (e.g., microclimate and availability of microhabitats), due to the replacement of native riparian vegetation with cattle pastures, will reduce rove beetle diversity, and we expect this reduction to become more evident as the area of TMCF decreases at the micro-basin scale.

Section snippets

Study area

The upper basin of the La Antigua River is located on the eastern slope of the mountain Cofre de Perote in the central region of the state of Veracruz, in Mexico. The rivers and its tributaries drain in a southeasterly direction toward the Gulf of Mexico over an elevation range from 600 to 4200 m a.s.l. The climate is humid (temperatures vary from 10 to 22 °C and annual precipitation is between 600 and 2000 mm; Muñoz‐Villers & López‐Blanco, 2008). The basin has been recognized as a priority

Diversity patterns

A total of 1917 Staphylininae rove beetles were captured, representing 51 species from 19 genera (Appendix A: Table 2 in Supplementary material). Sampling coverage was greater than 97% for micro-basin type and close to 98% for habitat condition. For habitat, depending on the micro-basin type, the sample coverage reaches 95% (Appendix A: Table 2 in Supplementary material). The highest numbers of beetles were caught in the micro-basin with greater forest cover (15% more individuals compared to

Species diversity

Contrary to our hypothesis, all diversity measures were similar between micro-basin types and, although total species richness (0D) was similar between sites with riparian vegetation and heterogeneous pastures, when common (1D) and dominant (2D) species were considered, the rove beetle diversity increased two–fold in both habitat conditions regardless of the micro-basin type. It was also notable, and contrary to expectation, that pastures tended to be more diverse and contain a different set of

Conclusion

Our study supports the notion that heterogeneity within and among human land use contributes to buffering the impact of forest loss at landscape scale. Pastures with isolated and scattered trees and shrubs promote microhabitat availability along rivers and streams, which could function as a semi-natural cover that, combined with different riparian vegetation cover at the micro-basin scale, supports a complementary and diverse Staphylininae predatory rove beetle assemblage. The replacement of

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We thank José Luis Navarrete-Heredia for his generous help in rove beetle identification. Rosario Landgrave provided the maps of the study area. D. Méndez-Rojas acknowledges the scholarship from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT No. 300335). Funding was provided by CONACyT (projects CB 2008-101542-F and CB-285962).

References (64)

  • U. Caballero et al.

    Response of rove beetles (Staphylinidae) to various habitat types and change in Southern Mexico

    Journal of Insect Conservation

    (2009)
  • A. Chao et al.

    Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: A framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies

    Ecological Monographs

    (2014)
  • A. Chao et al.

    Unveiling the species-rank abundance distribution by generalizing good-turing sample coverage theory

    Ecology

    (2015)
  • A. Chao et al.

    Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: Standardizing samples by completeness rather than size

    Ecology

    (2012)
  • El bosque mesófilo de montaña en México: Amenazas y oportunidades para su conservación y manejo sostenible

    (2010)
  • G. Cottam et al.

    The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling

    Ecology

    (1956)
  • G. Cumming et al.

    Error bars in experimental biology

    Journal of Cell Biology

    (2007)
  • J. Dauber et al.

    Local vs. landscape controls on diversity: A test using surface-dwelling soil macroinvertebrates of differing mobility

    Global Ecology and Biogeography

    (2005)
  • J. Dekeirsschieter et al.

    Diversity of forensic rove beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) associated with decaying pig carcass in a forest biotope

    Journal of Forensic Sciences

    (2013)
  • J.B. Dunning et al.

    Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes

    Oikos

    (1992)
  • M.D. Eyre et al.

    The rove beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) of exposed riverine sediments in Scotland and northern England: Habitat classification and conservation aspects

    Journal of Insect Conservation

    (2001)
  • L. Fahrig et al.

    Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes

    Ecology Letters

    (2011)
  • J.G. García-Franco et al.

    Composición florística de un bosque mesófilo del centro de Veracruz, México

    Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México

    (2008)
  • M.Á. García-Martínez et al.

    Value of riparian vegetation remnants for leaf-litter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a human-dominated landscape in central Veracruz, Mexico

    Environmental Entomology

    (2015)
  • J.C. Gering et al.

    Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: Implications for regional conservation of diversity

    Conservation Biology

    (2003)
  • C. Gutiérrez-Chacon et al.

    Rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) in Neotropical riverine landscapes: Characterising their distribution

    Insect Conservation and Diversity

    (2009)
  • M.O. Hill

    Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences

    Ecology

    (1973)
  • H. Hoffmann et al.

    Riverine fen restoration provides secondary habitat for endangered and stenotopic rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

    Insect Conservation and Diversity

    (2018)
  • H. Hoffmann et al.

    Effects of fen management and habitat parameters on staphylinid beetle (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) assemblages in north-eastern Germany

    Journal of Insect Conservation

    (2016)
  • T.C. Hsieh et al.

    iNEXT: An R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (H ill numbers)

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    (2016)
  • U. Irmler et al.

    What do rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) indicate for site conditions

    Faunistisch-Ökologische Mitteilungen

    (2007)
  • U. Irmler et al.

    Effect of environmental conditions on distribution patterns of rove beetles

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text