Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of plan parameters affecting the delivery quality assurance passing rate of the Tomo direct method in Radixact X9

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Delivery quality assurance (DQA) is the process of establishing a treatment plan and verifying that the pre-treatment dose is delivered without any problems through a simulation. If the result does not meet certain criteria, the dose delivered to the patient is judged to be inaccurate, and the measurement or the treatment plan should be reconsidered. Therefore, it is important to analyze the plan parameters that influence the DQA outcome. The plan parameters have been studied for LINAC-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy and the Tomo helical method but not for the Tomo direct (TD) method. In this study, we perform this investigation using the TD method. A Radixcat X9 machine was used to collect data. Furthermore, in the TD method, we set the passing rate for each gamma analysis criterion as 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm. Next, the plan parameters influencing the DQA passing rate were confirmed by Pearson’s correlation analysis and regression analysis. Based on the gamma analysis, the mean passing rates of 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm were 97.9299 and 99.8472, respectively. The plan parameters influencing the DQA passing rate during the Pearson correlation analysis were IECZ (2%/2 mm: p = 0.008), duration (2%/2 mm: p = 0.002), and planning target volume (2%/2 mm: p = 0.030 and 3%/3 mm: p = 0.034). Based on these results, a regression analysis was performed. As a result of the regression analysis, duration (2%/2 mm: p = 0.047) was identified as the most significant plan parameter for the DQA passing rate. However, statistically for the gamma analysis criterion of 3%/3 mm, there were no significant plan parameters. As the beta of the duration has a negative relationship with the passing rate, reducing the duration improves the passing rate. When confirming the passing rate for each group in a duration of 60 s, it was confirmed that the passing rate was high if it was set to less than 240 s. So, we recommend setting the duration to 240 s or less.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Stathakis, C. Esquivel, A. Gutierrez, C.R. Buckey, N. Papanikolaou, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 67, 1629 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K.H. Chang, D.W. Kim, J.H. Choi, H.-B. Shin, C.-S. Hong, D.M. Jung, J.H. Kim, J. Kim, M. Han, H. Lee, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 76, 257 (2020)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Kim, C.-S. Kay, H.-S. Jang, Y.-N. Kang, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 75, 1043 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. K.C. Keum, J. Korean Med. Assoc. 51, 619 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Li, Q. Zhou, L.-F. Shen, H. Li, Z.-Z. Li, Z. Yang, M.-J. Lei, X.-Y. Yang, Z.-J. Zhang, Y.-M. Hu, BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 1–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Squires, Y. Hu, M. Byrne, B. Archibald-Heeren, S. Cheers, B. Bosco, A. Teh, A. Fong, J. Med. Radiat. Sci. 64, 281 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Valdes, R. Scheuermann, C. Hung, A. Olszanski, M. Bellerive, T. Solberg, Med. Phys. 43, 4323 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. F.K.H. Lee, S.K.Y. Chan, R.M.C. Chau, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 16, 23 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K.C. Um, C.H. Lee, S.D. Jeon, H.K. Song, G.M. Back, J. Korean Soc. Radiat. Ther. 31, 65 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Franco, U. Ricardi, J. Nucl. Med. Radiat. Ther. 3 (2012).

  11. Q. Yue, R. Li, J. Yang, J. Duan, Int. J. Med. Phys. Clin. Eng. Radiat. Oncol. 3, 218 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Bresciani, A.D. Dia, A. Maggio, C. Cutaia, A. Miranti, E. Infusino, M. Stasi, Med. Phys. 40, 121711 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Chapman, R. Barnett, S. Yartsev, Med. Dosim. 39, 159 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S.T. Ellefson, W.S. Culberson, B.P. Bednarz, L.A. DeWerd, J.E. Bayouth, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 18, 161 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Kozelka, J. Robinson, B. Nelms, G. Zhang, D. Savitskij, V. Feygelman, Med. Phys. 38, 5021 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D.A. Low, W.B. Harms, S. Mutic, J.A. Purdy, Med. Phys. 25, 656 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. B.E. Nelms, M.F. Chan, G. Jarry, M. Lemire, J. Lowden, C. Hampton, V. Feygelman, Med. Phys. 40, 111722 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D.G. Kang, S.I. Park, S.H. Kim, M.J. Chung, K.-M. Lee, J.H. Lee, J. Radiat. Res. 56, 397 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. D.-G. Kim, M.-Y. Han, H.-R. Han, J. Korean Neuropsychiatr. Assoc. 43, 141 (2004)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Chatterjee, A.S. Hadi, Regression Analysis by Example (Wiley, New York, 2015).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Advanced Institute for Radiation Fusion Medical Technology (AIRFMT) at Catholic University of Korea. This study was supported by Research Fund Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-nam Kang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Oh, T., Seol, Y. et al. Analysis of plan parameters affecting the delivery quality assurance passing rate of the Tomo direct method in Radixact X9. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 78, 73–80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-020-00024-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-020-00024-8

Keywords

Navigation