Skip to main content
Log in

Formulation and Solution of a Generalized Chebyshev Problem: Second Part

  • MECHANICS
  • Published:
Vestnik St. Petersburg University, Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is a continuation of the article “Formulation and solution of a generalized Chebyshev problem: First Part,” in which a generalized Chebyshev problem was formulated and two theories of motion for nonholonomic systems with higher order constraints were presented for its solution. These theories were used to study the motion of the Earth’s satellite when fixing the magnitude of its acceleration (this was equivalent to imposing a third-order linear nonholonomic constraint). In this article, the second theory, based on the application of the generalized Gauss principle, is used to solve one of the most important problems of control theory: finding the optimal control force that translates a mechanical system with a finite number of degrees of freedom from one phase state to another in the specified time period. The application of the theory is demonstrated by solving the model problem of controlling the horizontal motion of a cart bearing the axes of s mathematical pendulums. Initially, the problem is solved by applying the Pontryagin maximum principle, which minimizes the functional of the square of the desired horizontal control force, which transfers the mechanical system from a motionless state to a new motionless state in the specified time period with the cart’s horizontal displacement S (the vibration damping problem is considered). This approach is called the first method for solving the control problem. It is shown that a (2s + 4)-order linear nonholonomic constraint is continuously fulfilled. This suggests applying the second theory of motion for nonholonomic systems with higher order constraints to the same problem (see the previous article), the theory developed at the Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics of St. Petersburg State University. This approach is called the second method for solving the problem. Calculations are performed for the case s = 2 and show that the results of both methods are practically identical for a short motion of the system but they differ substantially for a long motion. This is due to fact that the control determined using the first method contains harmonics with the system’s natural frequencies, which tends to bring the system into resonance. For a short motion this is not noticeable, and for a long motion there are large fluctuations in the system. In contrast, when the second method is used, the control is polynomial in time, which provides a relatively smooth motion of the system. In addition, in order to eliminate the jumps in the control force at the beginning and end of the motion, it is proposed to solve the generalized boundary value problem. Some special cases occurring when using the second method for solving the boundary value problem are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. N. N. Polyakhov, S. A. Zegzhda, and M. P. Yushkov, Theoretical Mechanics (Yurait, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. F. L. Chernous’ko, L. D. Akulenko, and B. N. Sokolov, Vibration Control (Nauka, Moscow, 1980) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii, R. V. Gamkrelidze, and E. F. Mishchenko, The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes (Nauka, Moscow, 1983; Gordon and Breach, New York, 1986).

  4. S. A. Zegzhda, Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, and M. P. Yushkov, Equations of Motion of Nonholonomic Systems and Variational Principles of Mechanics. A New Class of Control Problems (Nauka, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. S. A. Zegzhda, Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, and M. P. Yushkov, Non-Holonomic Mechanics. Theory and Applications (Nauka, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. S. A. Zegzhda, M. P. Yushkov, Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, and E. A. Shatrov, Non-Holonomic Mechanics and Control Theory (Nauka, Moscow, 2018) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. A. Zegzhda, Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, and M. P. Yushkov, Motion Equations of Non-Holonomic Systems and Varitional Principles of Mechanics. New Class of Control Problems (Beijing Institute of Technology Press, Beijing, 2007) [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, M. P. Yushkov, and S. A. Zegzhda, Mechanics of Non-Holonomic systems. A New Class of Control Systems (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. M. P. Yushkov, “Formulation and solution of a generalized Chebyshev problem. I,” Vestn. St. Petersburg Univ.: Math. 52, 436–451 (2019).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. N. N. Polyakhov, S. A. Zegzhda, and M. P. Yushkov, “The extension of Gauss’ principle to the case of high-order nonholonomic systems,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 269, 1328–1330 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. N. Polyakhov, S. A. Zegzhda, and M. P. Yushkov, “Linear transformations of forces and a generalized Gauss principle,” Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron., No. 1, 73–79 (1984).

  12. M. A. Chuev, “The analytical method for the synthesis of mechanism,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Mashinostr. 8, 165–167 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. V. Kostin and V. V. Saurin, “Integro-differential approach to solving problems of linear elasticity,” Dokl. Phys. 50, 535–538 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G. V. Kostin and V. V. Saurin, “Modeling and optimization of elastic system motions by the method of integro-differential relations,” Dokl. Math. 408, 469–472 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. A. Zegzhda, P. E. Tovstik, and M. P. Yushkov, “The Hamilton–Ostrogradskii generalized principle and its application for damping of oscillations,” Dokl. Phys. 57, 447–450 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, “Suppression of the cantilever’s vibration,” Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron., No. 4, 105–112 (2009).

  17. Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, Determination of Control Forces with High Order Constraints (Nauka, Moscow, 2014) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Zegzhda, M. Yushkov, Sh. Soltakhanov, N. Naumova, and T. Shugaylo, “A novel approach to suppression of oscillations,” Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 98, 781–788 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. S. A. Zegzhda and Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, “Application of the generalized Gaussian principle to the problem of damping vibrations of mechanical systems,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 49, 186–191 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. C. A. Zegzhda and M. P. Yushkov, “Mixed problem of dynamics,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 374, 628–630 (2000).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. S. A. Zegzhda, “Application of a generalized Lagrange operator for nonholonomic high-order constraints,” Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron., No. 2, 76–77 (1998).

  22. S. A. Zegzhda and D. N. Gavrilov, “Damping of vibration of an elastic body during its motion,” Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron., No. 3, 73–83 (2012).

  23. S. A. Zegzhda, E. A. Shatrov, and M. P. Yushkov, “A new approach to finding the control that transports a system from one phase state to another,” Vestn. St. Petersburg Univ.: Math. 49, 183–190 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. S. A. Zegzhda, E. A. Shatrov, and M. P. Yushkov, “Suppression of oscillation of a trolley with a double pendulum by means of control of its acceleration,” Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron. 3, 683–688 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. A. Shatrov, “The use of master coordinates in the problem of damping the vibration of a trolley with two pendulums,” Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron. 1, 619–623 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, “On a generalized representation of control forces providing a given program of motion,” Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron., No. 2, 70–75 (1990).

  27. Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, “About one modification of the Polyakhov–Zegzhda–Yushkov principle,” Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron., No. 4, 58–61 (1990).

  28. Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, “Comparative analysis of equations of motion of nonholonomic systems based on the principle of Polyakhov–Zegzhda–Yushkov and Nordheim–Dolapchiev (the Mangeron–Deleanu principle),” in Problems of Mechanics and Control. Nonlinear Dynamic Systems (Permsk. Gos. Nats. Issled. Univ., Perm, 1997), Vol. 29, pp. 136–148 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov and M. P. Yushkov, “The application of a generalized Gauss principle to generating the equations of motion of systems with the third-order nonholonomic constraints,” Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron., No. 3 (15), 77–83 (1990).

  30. Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov and M. P. Yushkov, “Equations of motion of a nonholonomic system with second-order constraint,” Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron., No. 4, 26–29 (1991).

  31. Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov and M. P. Yushkov, “Determination of a minimal derivative of additional force providing a given program motion,” Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat., Mekh., Astron., No. 1, 97–101 (1993).

  32. Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov and M. P. Yushkov, “Determination of a vector structure of high-order constraint reactions,” in Theoretical Mechanics (Mosk. Gos. Tekh. Univ. im. N. E. Baumana, Moscow, 1996), Vol. 22, pp. 30–34 [in Russian].

  33. M. P. Yushkov, “Motion equations of a machine unit with a variator as a nonholonomic system with a nonlinear second-order constraints,” Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 4, 40–44 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  34. V. V. Dodonov and M. P. Yushkov, “Determination of a control moment transferring a rigid body from one angular coordinate position to another by means of minimization of different functionals,” in Proc. 12th All-Russ. Congr. on Fundamental Problems of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Ufa, Russia, Aug. 19–24, 2019 (Bashk. Gos. Univ, Ufa, 2019), Vol. 1, pp. 199–200.

  35. Sh. Kh. Soltakhanov, T. S. Shugaylo, and M. P. Yushkov, “Applying the generalized Gauss principle to damping the vibration of a cargo carried by a bridge crane with the motion phase as one of a rigid body,” in Proc. 12th All-Russ. Congr. on Fundamental Problems of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Ufa, Russia, Aug. 19–24, 2019 (Bashk. Gos. Univ, Ufa, 2019), Vol. 1, pp. 271–273.

  36. K. M. Fazlyeva and T. S. Shugaylo, “Control of the damping the vibration of a three-mass system during its horizontal motion,” in Proc. Seminar on Computer Methods in the Continuum Mechanics, 2018–2019 (S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., St. Petersburg, 2019), pp. 56–67.

  37. T. S. Shugaylo and M. P. Yushkov, “Motion control of a gantry crane with a container,” in Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. on Mechanics — 8th Polyakhov’s Reading, St. Petersburg, Jan. 29 – Feb. 2, 2018 (American Institute of Physics, Melville, N. Y., 2018), in Ser.: AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1959, paper no. 030021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. P. Yushkov.

Additional information

Translated by E. Oborin

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yushkov, M.P. Formulation and Solution of a Generalized Chebyshev Problem: Second Part. Vestnik St.Petersb. Univ.Math. 53, 459–472 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063454120040111

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063454120040111

Keywords:

Navigation