FLA
Analysis of various transport modes to evaluate personal exposure to PM2.5 pollution in Delhi

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.12.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • On-road PM2.5 exposures in six transport microenvironments ae measured in Delhi.

  • Travelling in auto rickshaws and walking leads to higher exposure.

  • Travelling in AC-cars and the metro had the lowest overall exposure.

  • PM2.5 mass inhaled/km is 28.2 and 5.3 times for walking and rickshaw compared to that for a metro.

Abstract

Access to detailed comparisons of the air quality variations encountered when commuting through a city offers the urban traveller more informed choice on how to minimise personal exposure to inhalable pollutants. In this study we report on an experiment designed to compare atmospheric contaminants, in this case, PM2.5 inhaled during rickshaw, bus, metro, non-air-conditioned car, air-conditioned (AC) car and walking journeys through the city of Delhi, India. The data collection was carried out using a portable TSI SidePak Aerosol Monitor AM520, during February 2018. The results demonstrate that rickshaws (266 ± 159 μg/m3) and walking (259 ± 102 μg/m3) modes were exposed to significantly higher mean PM2.5 levels, whereas AC cars (89 ± 30 μg/m3) and the metro (72 ± 11 μg/m3) had the lowest overall exposure rates. Buses (113 ± 14 μg/m3) and non-AC cars (149 ± 13 μg/m3) had average levels of exposure, but open windows and local factors caused surges in PM2.5 for both transport modes. Closed air-conditioned transport modes were shown to be the best modes for avoiding high concentrations of PM2.5, however other factors (e.g. time of the day, window open or closed in the vehicles) affected exposure levels significantly. Overall, the highest total respiratory deposition doses (RDDs) values were estimated as 84.7 ± 33.4 μg/km, 15.8 ± 9.5 μg/km and 9.7 ± 0.9 μg/km for walking, rickshaw and non-AC car transported mode of journey, respectively. Unless strong pollution control measures are taken, the high exposure to PM2.5 levels will continue causing serious short-term and long-term health concerns for the Delhi residents. Implementing integrated and intelligent transport systems and educating commuters on ways to reduce exposure levels and impacts on commuter's health are required.

Introduction

Approximately 58% of districts in India recorded ambient particulate matter PM2.5 (particulates with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 μm) pollution above the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and 99% above the WHO guidelines in 2015 (Chowdhury et al., 2019). According to the recent Global Burden of Disease study, ambient PM2.5 pollution in India was responsible for more than 673 thousand deaths in 2017 (Stanaway et al., 2018), although the newly developed Global Exposure Mortality Model (GEMM) reported much higher PM2.5-attributed deaths in India (2.219 million in 2015) (Burnett et al., 2018). According to the WHO Global Ambient Air Quality Database of PM2.5 pollution levels in more than 1600 cities in the world in 2018, 13 Indian cities are among the 20 most polluted, with Delhi being the 6th most polluted city (annual average of 143 μg/m3) (World Health Organization, 2018). In winter, the annual average PM2.5 concentration in 2018, reported by four air quality monitoring stations (Anand Vihar, Punjabi Bagh, RK Puram and Okhla) located across the city, was above 300 μg/m3, which is approximately 5 times higher than the Indian NAAQS of 60 μg/m3, and 30 times higher than the WHO guideline of 25 μg/m3 (Nandi, 2018). Traditionally health risk analysis was conducted by assuming that the total population is exposed to the same average PM2.5 concentration in city-level or gridded level (10 km × 10 km or 1 km × 1 km) (Maji, 2020), although personal exposure monitoring campaigns in a city have indicated high space-time variation (Menon and Nagendra, 2018).

Epidemiological studies have linked exposure to PM2.5 with various causes of premature mortality and morbidity (Bowe et al., 2019; Fu et al., 2019; Antonsen et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2017). Health risk studies assume equivalent toxicity for all chemical species in PM2.5, but there is considerable evidence that the chemical composition, and sources of PM2.5 influence its health effects much more, e.g. traffic-related PM2.5, as vehicular exhausted PM2.5 contain a high percentage of black carbon which has much more effects on human health (Matz et al., 2019; Costa et al., 2017; Jerrett et al., 2009; Monrad et al., 2017; Bowatte et al., 2017). In on-road microenvironments, due to the proximity of tailpipe emissions, exposure to traffic-related PM2.5 concentration is higher than those in off-road locations (Chen et al., 2020). The travel-related exposure to on-road PM2.5 pollution has been quantified by several studies for different microenvironments, classified as travel modes, ventilation status type of travel routes, and meteorological conditions. Table 1 summarizes some of the key past studies in various settings from across the world, analysing on-road exposure to PM2.5 pollution. The range of concentrations in the table refers to the reported average values among all the microenvironments. There are only a few studies from India looking at exposure in three-wheeled auto-rickshaws (Apte et al., 2011; Goel et al., 2015). On-road high PM2.5 concentration in vehicles are also observed in Indonesia (87–119 μg/m3), Turkey (30.6–120.4 μg/m3), and China (54.5–71.6 μg/m3), and the lowest values are from cleaner high-income settings in the USA (12–35 μg/m3), Europe (7.3–13.9 μg/m3) and Canada (8.6–71.9 μg/m3) (Table 1).

The cities in India differ significantly from the cities in developed countries represented in Table 1. For instance, ambient PM2.5 concentrations in Indian cities are 4–8 times higher than most high-income settings (Stanaway et al., 2018), and the traffic condition in metropolitan Indian cities is worsening daily due to increasing levels of vehicle ownership and a higher number of old vehicles (Transport Department Government of NCT of Delhi., 2018). The rickshaw and bus are one of the most common forms of public transport in Delhi, providing low-cost mobility and connecting travellers to mass transit. The rickshaw and bus sector provides a livelihood for some of India's poorest citizens and is easily available means of public transport in most of the cities (Choudhary and Gokhale, 2016). Relatively few studies have investigated on-road exposures to PM2.5 pollution, particularly whilst travelling on these modes, in developing-world megacities such as Delhi, where older vehicles are more common and high levels of congestion and travel times lead to higher personal exposure to PM2.5 concentrations.

The objectives of this study are (a) to assess the on-road exposure to PM2.5 in various travel modes, measured using an optical PM monitor, and (b) to estimate the total respiratory deposition doses (RDDs) of PM2.5 in microenvironments in Delhi (more details in supplement material). The modes studied include auto-rickshaw (three-wheelers), bus, metro, non-air-conditioned (non-AC) car, air-conditioned (AC) car and walking.

Section snippets

Study area and route selection

The study was carried out in Delhi, India, which has an area of 1484 km2 and around 16.3 million inhabitants as per the latest census of 2011 (Goverment of India, 2011), making it one of the largest cities in Asia. In March 2018, Delhi had 10.8 million registered vehicles, including 6.96 million motor-cycle/scooter and 3.1 million motor-car (private vehicles) (Transport Department Government of NCT of Delhi., 2018).

For measuring on-road exposure of PM2.5 in February 2018, we selected a route of

Ambient PM2.5 concentration during the study period

The personal exposure whilst travelling in transport modes in Delhi depends on factors such as season of the year and time of the day (for example in winter the PM2.5 concentration is usually higher than other seasons) and whether the journey was conducted in the morning, afternoon or at night (traffic conditions can dictate the temporal variations) (Lin et al., 2020; Chaney et al., 2017). The ambient PM2.5 concentrations are available from monitoring stations along the route and these have

Discussion

The present study found that travelling by rickshaw exposed users to the highest concentrations of PM2.5, followed by walking. Also, it was observed that the high concentrations recorded in this investigation were similar to trends recorded in the previous study in Delhi (Goel et al., 2015). On the other hand, when travelling by metro and AC car, users were exposed to the lowest concentrations of PM2.5 when compared with other modes. Exposure levels recorded on the bus relatively were lower

Conclusion

The present study focusses on the different exposure levels recorded by commuters using six modes of transport in Delhi and the results showed that travellers in open modes of transport (rickshaws and walking) were exposed to the highest PM2.5 concentrations. Inside enclosed modes of transports which used AC, including private cars and the metro, were found to have significantly lower PM2.5 concentrations. The exposure levels for passengers on buses and travellers in non-AC cars were found to

Credit author statement

K. J. Maji: Formal analysis, Data curation, Software, Validation, Writing-original draft, Writing - review & editing. A. Namdeo: Methodology, Resources, Conceptualization, Data curation, Visualization, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration. D. Hoban: Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation. M. Bell: Methodology, Resources, Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Investigation. P. Goodman: Software,

Declaration of competing interest

Kamal Jyoti Maji and Anil Namdeo declares that this manuscript is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of the authors, and there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

This work was part of the Clean Air for Delhi Through Interventions, Mitigations, and Engagement (CADTIME) study supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC ref: NE/P016588/1) and the Indian Ministry of Earth Sciences (MOES). This work uses data downloaded from the public-facing portal for automatic air-quality monitoring of the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) of India.

References (59)

  • S.K. Gupta et al.

    Exposure to traffic-related particulate matter and deposition dose to auto rickshaw driver in Dhanbad, India

    Atmos. Pollut. Res.

    (2019)
  • W. Ham et al.

    Commuter exposure to PM2.5, BC, and UFP in six common transport microenvironments in Sacramento, California

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2017)
  • M.I. Khan et al.

    Technical overview of compressed natural gas (CNG) as a transportation fuel

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2015)
  • S.S.R. Kolluru et al.

    In-vehicle PM2.5 personal concentrations in winter during long distance road travel in India

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2019)
  • S.S.R. Kolluru et al.

    Determinants of commuter exposure to PM2.5 and CO during long-haul journeys on national highways in India

    Atmos. Pollut. Res.

    (2019)
  • P. Kumar et al.

    Commuter exposure to inhalable, thoracic and alveolic particles in various transportation modes in Delhi

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2016)
  • C. Lin et al.

    The relationship between personal exposure and ambient PM2.5 and black carbon in Beijing

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • K.J. Maji

    Substantial changes in PM2.5 pollution and corresponding premature deaths across China during 2015–2019: a model prospective

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • T. Moreno et al.

    Urban air quality comparison for bus, tram, subway and pedestrian commutes in Barcelona

    Environ. Res.

    (2015)
  • B. Onat et al.

    Personal exposure of commuters in public transport to PM2.5 and fine particle counts

    Atmos. Pollut. Res.

    (2013)
  • Z. Qiu et al.

    Commuter exposure to particulate matter for different transportation modes in Xi’an, China

    Atmos. Pollut. Res.

    (2017)
  • C.C.O. Reynolds et al.

    Determinants of PM and GHG emissions from natural gas-fueled auto-rickshaws in Delhi

    Transport. Res. Transport Environ.

    (2011)
  • I. Rivas et al.

    Exposure to air pollutants during commuting in London: are there inequalities among different socio-economic groups?

    Environ. Int.

    (2017)
  • S.H. Tan et al.

    Particle exposure and inhaled dose during commuting in Singapore

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2017)
  • K. Zhang et al.

    Vehicle emissions in congestion: comparison of work zone, rush hour and free-flow conditions

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2011)
  • G. Bowatte et al.

    Traffic-related air pollution exposure over a 5-year period is associated with increased risk of asthma and poor lung function in middle age

    Eur. Respir. J.

    (2017)
  • B. Bowe et al.

    Burden of cause-specific mortality associated with PM 2.5 air pollution in the United States

    JAMA Network Open

    (2019)
  • R. Burnett et al.

    Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am.

    (2018)
  • R.A. Chaney et al.

    Personal exposure to fine particulate air pollution while commuting: an examination of six transport modes on an urban arterial roadway

    PloS One

    (2017)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Variation of PM<inf>2.5</inf> and inhalation dose across transport microenvironments in Delhi

      2024, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
    • Perception of commuters towards air quality in Delhi

      2023, Journal of Transport and Health
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Peer review under responsibility of Turkish National Committee for Air Pollution Research and Control.

    View full text