Elsevier

Molecular Catalysis

Volume 499, January 2021, 111298
Molecular Catalysis

Synergistic catalytic hydrogenation of furfural to 1,2-pentanediol and 1,5-pentanediol with LDO derived from CuMgAl hydrotalcite

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2020.111298Get rights and content

Highlights

  • CuMgAl Layer Double Oxides are prepared under certain amount of copper contents.

  • The catalyst is applied in the selective hydrogenolysis of furfural to pentanediols.

  • The catalysis is determined by the synergism between copper and acid-base sites.

  • The catalytic properties of the catalyst can be maintained after five runs.

Abstract

A series of layer double metal oxides (LDO) from CuMgAl hydrotalcite precursors were prepared by urea decomposition under different calcination temperatures in this work. Various characterizations including XRD, SEM, FTIR, XPS, H2-TPR, NH3-TPD and CO2-TPD were carried out to investigate the structural properties of the as-prepared samples. After calcination at certain temperatures, the resulted LDO presents the excellent catalytic property in the selective hydrogenolysis of furfural (FA) to 1,2-pentanediol (1,2-PeD) and 1,5-pentanediol (1,5-PeD). The Cu+/Cu2+ ratio and the acid-base amount from the calcination process play the key role in the catalytic performance towards this reaction. The optimal catalyst (CuMgAlO-S3) with the maximal Cu+/Cu2+ ratio and the acid-base amount exhibits the best catalytic performance towards hydrogenation of furfural to 1,2-pentanediol (selectivity 55.2 %.) and 1,5-pentanediol (selectivity 28.5 %) with more than 80 % of conversion rate, which indicated the selectivity of 1,2- and 1,5-PeDs counted on the synergistic effect of Cu+ and acid-base properties.

Introduction

Biomass-based furfural (FA), as an important building block for future biorefinery field, has become caused extensive concern in both industry and academic researches [1]. Selective catalytic hydrogenation and hydrogenolysis of the Csingle bondO bond are considered to be one of the most effective methods for the conversion of FA and its derivatives to valuable chemicals such as pentanediols (1,2-PeD and 1,5-PeD) [2]. Up to now, it has been confirmed that noble metal catalysts, including supported Ru [3], Rh [4], Pt [5,6], Pd [7], etc [8]. can be efficiently applied in the furfural hydrogenolysis to form 1,2-PeD and 1,5-PeD. However, the drawbacks of high cost and scarcity would suppress the large-scale application of noble metal catalysts in this field [9]. Previous investigations have reported the successes of the noble-metal-free Cu-Cr catalyst for the hydrogenolysis of furfural [10], the potential toxicity of chromite additive is nonnegligible in this system. Therefore, to find out noble-metal-free and environmentally friendly catalysts has become the urgent need in the synthesis of pentanediols.

It was worth noting that copper-based composites [11], especially the samples with well distribution of Cu0 species [12], are useful catalysts in the hydrogenolysis of reactants with carbon-oxygen (Cdouble bondO/Csingle bondO) bond [13], which presents high selectivity towards hydrogenation of Cdouble bondO bonds but inactive to the Cdouble bondC bonds [14]. In addition, the hydrogenation of furfural to pentanediols is a tandem reaction, which consists of the initial transfer from furfural to furfuryl alcohol [15] and followed ring-opening to acquire the target 1,2-PeD and 1,5-PeD. The first step has been verified to be responsible from the Cu0 serving as the active centers [16], while the acidity and alkalinity from the support can determine the ring-opening reaction. Considering for these two aspects, to assemble the well distributed Cu species [17] on the acidic support could be beneficial to this tandem reaction as required. For example, Liu et al. [12] presented the hydrogenation of furfural into pentanediols with Cu-Al2O3 as catalyst. The acidic Al2O3 support evidently has a great influence on the selectivity of pentanediols. However, the excessive acid sites introduced may promote the furfural to be reluctant to polymerization [6] and hydrolysis into levulinic acid [18], which would decline the selectivity of the target products.

Among various catalysts, the Cu based layered double oxide (LDO) exhibits its high activity in different acid promoted reactions [[19], [20], [21], [22], [23]]. This material derived from the laminal layered double hydroxides (LDHs, [M2+1-x M3+x(OH)2] [An−]x/n·mH2O) with calcination at 400−600°C [[24], [25], [26], [27]]. During this laminate collapse and structure topotactic transformation process, more active metal sites can be exposed [28]. Besides, despite hydrotalcite as well as its calcinated derivatives are typical alkaline materials, with the intriguing selection of the acidic M3+ species, such as Al3+, the acidity and alkalinity can be modulated to the approached level to avoid byproducts [29]. Therefore, the association of various transition metal elements in the LDH precursor creates a unique property to assemble different ratio of Cu active sites and the adjustable acidic sites together [30,31]. It can be beneficial in the selective synergistic catalytic reactions with the effect of multifunctional sites [[32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37]].

In this regard, herein, we tried to develop the LDO derived from CuMgAl precursor as a better catalyst in the selective furfural hydrogenolysis to form 1,2-PeD and 1,5-PeD. The effects of the copper valence and acid-base property on the catalysts were also explored to shed light on the possible reaction mechanism for the selective hydrogenolysis of furfural.

Section snippets

Preparation of CuMgAl hydrotalcite and CuMgAl mixed oxide samples

All the chemicals used herein were with purity above 99 % and without further purification. The CuMgAl-LDH precursors were synthesized by the coprecipitation method companying with urea [38]. In a typical procedure, Mg(NO3)2·6H2O, Al(NO3)3·9H2O with a molar ratio of Mg/Al = 3:1, Cu(NO3)2·3H2O with n(Cu)/n(Cu + Mg + Al) = 5 % were dissolved in deionized water (50 mL) to acquire solution A. CO(NH2)2 were dissolved in water (50 mL) to acquire solution B (n[CO(NH2)2]/n[NO3] = 2). Solution A and B

Characterization of catalysts

It could be observed from the XRD spectra (Fig. 1a) that the resulted CuMgAl-LDH in this work presents several characteristic diffraction peaks at 11.7° (003), 23.5° (006) and 36.7° (012), which matches well with the typical CuMgAl-CO3-LDH phase [12]. After calcination, all these peaks of CuMgAl-CO3-LDH have been consumed by the thermal treatment, while three broad diffraction peaks at 35.8°,43.7° and 63.8° have appeared, attributed to a mixed phase of MgO and CuO with low-crystallinity.

Conclusions

In summary, the mixed oxides derived from CuMgAl hydrotalcite with different calcination temperature were prepared. It showed remarkable catalytic performance potential towards the hydrogenation of furfural to 1,2-Pentanediol and 1,5-Pentanediol. The optimal reaction conditions were set at 150°C and 6 MPa H2 with CuMgAlO-S3 as catalyst. After reaction, it presented 84.1 % conversion and the selectivity of 1,2-PeD and 1,5-PeD can reach to 55.2 % and 28.5 %, respectively. During the process, the

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Xiaomin Fu: Investigation, Visualization, Conceptualization, Validation, Writing - original draft, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Xiaoqian Ren: Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Conceptualization, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Jiecan Shen: Investigation, Conceptualization, Validation, Writing - review & editing. Yong Jiang: Investigation, Validation, Writing - review & editing. Yuehua Wang: Investigation, Validation, Writing -

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China, funded Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

References (71)

  • S. Chen et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2018)
  • N. Enjamuri et al.

    Catal. Rev.

    (2020)
  • F. Liu et al.

    Green Chem.

    (2018)
  • D.S. Pisal et al.

    ACS Omega

    (2019)
  • T. Tong et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2018)
  • R.F. Ma et al.

    ACS Catal.

    (2017)
  • N.S. Date et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2018)
  • K.F. Huang et al.

    ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.

    (2017)
  • Y. Orooji et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2020)
  • Y. Kai et al.

    Int. J. Chem. React. Eng.

    (2015)
  • V. Sánchez et al.

    Mol. Catal.

    (2020)
  • H. Liu et al.

    Catal. Sci. Technol.

    (2016)
  • C. Pischetola et al.

    Mol. Catal.

    (2020)
  • G. Cui et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2019)
  • C.P. Jiménez-Gómez et al.

    Mol. Catal.

    (2018)
  • L. Zheng et al.

    Chin. J. Catal. (Chinese Version)

    (2010)
  • C. Mondelli et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2020)
  • M.A. Mellmer et al.

    ACS Catal.

    (2015)
  • H. Shan et al.

    Chem. Mater.

    (2013)
  • W. Qiang et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2012)
  • F. Guoli et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2015)
  • Y. Orooji et al.

    J. Alloys. Compd.

    (2020)
  • Z. Ding et al.

    Catalysts

    (2019)
  • M. Ghasemi et al.

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2020)
  • T.S. Rad et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2020)
  • Y. Orooji et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2020)
  • J. Shen et al.

    ChemistrySelect

    (2020)
  • V. Rives et al.

    J. Mater. Chem.

    (2000)
  • W. Liang et al.

    Appl. Catal. A-Gen.

    (2020)
  • L. Jafari Foruzin et al.

    Appl. Clay Sci.

    (2020)
  • R.G. Lima Goncalves et al.

    Appl. Clay Sci.

    (2020)
  • X. Deng et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2020)
  • X. Wu et al.

    ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces

    (2019)
  • S. Miao et al.

    React. Kinet. Mech. Catal.

    (2018)
  • M. Rosset et al.

    React. Kinet. Mech. Catal.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (44)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These two authors contributed equally in composing it.

    View full text