Abstract
In the course of time, there has been an increased usage of commercial products containing nanoparticles formulated from tin oxide (TNPs), cerium oxide (CNPs), aluminum oxide (ANPs), and zinc oxide (ZNPs). Despite the wide use of metal oxide nanoparticles (MONPs), understanding about their toxicity and mechanism of action are still unclear. In the present study, TNPs, CNPs, ANPs, and ZNPs were produced by the method of chemical synthesis and characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The effect of these MONPs on human red blood cells (RBCs) and human skin cells (HaCaT) was investigated. In skin cells, these MONPs showed concentration-dependent cytotoxicity. ZNPs downregulated the glutathione and upregulated lipid peroxidation and lactate dehydrogenase activity which correlates with the increased reactive oxygen production in cells. Genotoxic effect of ZNPs was measured by comet tail assay that showed increased DNA damage in skin cells. Upregulation of Hsp70, Grp 78, and CYP1A1 was observed following ZNPs and ANPs treatment with skin cells. In the case of CNPs and TNPs, the changes were not significant. This study demonstrates the toxic effects of ZNPs and ANPs on skin cells, suggesting caution must be exercised in their use which may be restricted in the cosmetics industry and also products related to human use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali D, Alarifi S, Alkahtani S, AlKahtane AA, Almalik A (2015) Cerium oxide nanoparticles induce oxidative stress and genotoxicity in human skin melanoma cells. Cell Biochem Biophy 71(3):1643–1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-014-0386-6
Alshatwi AA, Subbarayan PV, Ramesh E, Al-Hazzani AA, Alsaif MA, Alwarthan AA (2013) Aluminium oxide nanoparticles induce mitochondrial-mediated oxidative stress and alter the expression of antioxidant enzymes in human mesenchymal stem cells. Food Additiv Contamin: Part A 30(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2012.729160
AshaRani PV, Low Kah Mun G, Hande MP, Valiyaveettil S (2008) Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human cells. ACS Nano 30;3(2):279–290. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn800596w
Auffan M, Rose J, Wiesner MR, Bottero JY (2009) Chemical stability of metallic nanoparticles: a parameter controlling their potential cellular toxicity in vitro. Environ Pollut 157(4):1127–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.10.002
Aula S, Lakkireddy S, Swamy AV, Kapley A, Jamil K, Tata NR, Hembram K (2014) Biological interactions in vitro of zinc oxide nanoparticles of different characteristics. Mater Res Express 1(3):035041. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/1/3/035041
Banerjee A, Pathak S, Vimala DS, Vasan D, Murugesan R, Verma RS (2017) Strategies for targeted drug delivery in treatment of colon cancer: current trends and future perspectives. Drug Discov Today 22:1224–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2017.05.006
Banu AS, Devi SV, Prakash T (2013a) Interaction of sol–gel derived TiO2- and SiO2-based bionanocomposites with erythrocytes and serum proteins. IET Nanobiotechnol 7(1):22–27. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2012.0006
Banu AS, Devi SV, Prakash T (2013b) Interaction of sol–gel derived TiO2-and SiO2-based bionanocomposites with erythrocytes and serum proteins. IET Nanobiotechnol 7(1):22–27. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2012.0006
Buege JA, Aust SD (1972) Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods in Enzymol 52:302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(78)52032-6
Chalew TEA, Schwab KJ (2013) Toxicity of commercially available engineered nanoparticles to Caco-2 and SW480 human intestinal epithelial cells. Cell Biol Toxicol 29(2):101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-013-9241-6
Colon J, Herrera L, Smith J, Patil S, Komanki C, Kupelian P, Seal S, Jenkins DW, Baker CH (2009) Protection from radiation-induced pneumonitis using cerium oxide nanoparticles. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 5(2):225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2008.10.003
Cory AH, Owen TC, Barltrop JA, Cory JG (1991) Use of an aqueous soluble tetrazolium/formazan assay for cell growth assays in culture. Cancer Commun 3(7):207–212. https://doi.org/10.3727/095535491820873191
Devi SV, Prakash T (2013) Kinetics of cisplatin release by in-vitro using poly (D, L-lactide) coated Fe3O4 nanocarriers. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 12(1):60–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2012.2230024
Di Virgilio AL, Reigosa M, De Mele MFL (2010) Response of UMR 106 cells exposed to titanium oxide and aluminum oxide nanoparticles. J Biomed Res A 92(1):80–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32339
Ellman GL (1959) Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys 82(1):70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6
Farahmandjou M, Zarinkamar M, Firoozabadi TP (2016) Synthesis of cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles using simple CO-precipitation method. Rev Mex Fis 62(5):496–499 ISSN 0035-001X
Filipe P, Silva JN, Silva R, De Castro JC, Gomes MM, Alves LC, Santus R, Pinheiro T (2009) Stratum corneum is an effective barrier to TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticle percutaneous absorption. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 22(5):266–275. https://doi.org/10.1159/000235554
Fu PP, Xia Q, Hwang HM, Ray PC, Yu H (2014) Mechanisms of nanotoxicity: generation of reactive oxygen species. J Food Drug Anal 22(1):64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.005
Handy RD, Von der Kammer F, Lead JR, Hassellöv M, Owen R, Crane M (2008) The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles. Ecotoxicol 17(4):287–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-008-0199-8
Karakoti A, Singh S, Dowding JM, Seal S, Self WT et al (2010) Redox-active radical scavenging nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 39(11):4422–4432. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox5020015
Kim IS, Baek M, Choi SJ (2010) Comparative cytotoxicity of Al2O3, CeO2, TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles to human lung cells. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10(5):3453–3458. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2010.2340
Kruger, Nicholas J (2002) The protein protocols handbook. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 15–21
Li JH, Liu XR, Zhang Y, Tian FF, Zhao GY, Jiang FL, Liu Y (2012) Toxicity of nano zinc oxide to mitochondria. Toxicol Res 1(2):137–144. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TX20016C
Lin YS, Haynes CL (2010) Impacts of mesoporous silica nanoparticle size, pore ordering, and pore integrity on hemolytic activity. J Am Chem Soc 132(13):4834–4842. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja910846q
Mittal S, Pandey AK (2014) Cerium oxide nanoparticles induced toxicity in human lung cells: role of ROS mediated DNA damage and apoptosis. BioMed Res Int 2014:2014–2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/891934
Mosman T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxic assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4
Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311(5761):622–627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114397
Papageorgiou I, Brown C, Schins R, Singh S, Newson R, Davis S, Fisher J, Ingham E, Case CP (2007) The effect of nano-and micron-sized particles of cobalt–chromium alloy on human fibroblasts in vitro. Biomat. 28(19):2946–2958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.034
Pierscionek BK, Li Y, Yasseen AA, Colhoun LM, Schachar RA, Chen W (2009) Nanoceria have no genotoxic effect on human lens epithelial cells. Nanotechnol. 21(3):035102. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/3/035102
Radziun E, Wilczyńska JD, Książek I, Nowak K, Anuszewska EL, Kunicki A, Ząbkowski T (2011) Assessment of the cytotoxicity of aluminium oxide nanoparticles on selected mammalian cells. Toxicol in Vitro 25(8):1694–1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2011.07.010
Rajiv S, Jerobin J, Saranya V, Nainawat M, Sharma A, Makwana P, Mukherjee A (2016) Comparative cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of cobalt (II, III) oxide, iron (III) oxide, silicon dioxide, and aluminum oxide nanoparticles on human lymphocytes in vitro. Hum Exp Toxicol 35(2):170–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327115579208
Rio DC, Ares M, Hannon GJ, Nilsen TW (2010) Purification of RNA using TRIzol (TRI reagent). Cold Spring Harb Protoc 6:5439. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5439
Seliskar M, Rozman D (2007) Mammalian cytochromes P450—importance of tissue specificity. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects 1770(3):458–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2006.09.016
Sharma V, Singh SK, Anderson D, Tobin DJ, Dhawan A (2011) Zinc oxide nanoparticle induced genotoxicity in primary human epidermal keratinocytes. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11(5):3782–3788. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.4250
Siddiqui MA, Ahamed M, Ahmad J, Khan MM, Musarrat J, Al-Khedhairy AA, Alrokayan SA (2012) Nickel oxide nanoparticles induce cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and apoptosis in cultured human cells that is abrogated by the dietary antioxidant curcumin. Food Chem Toxicol 50(3–4):641–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.01.017
Singh P, Nanda A (2014) Enhanced sun protection of nano-sized metal oxide particles over conventional metal oxide particles: an in vitro comparative study. Int J Cosmet Sci 36(3):273–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.12124
Srikanth K, Mahajan A, Pereira E, Duarte AC, Venkateswara Rao J (2015) J. Aluminium oxide nanoparticles induced morphological changes, cytotoxicity and oxidative stress in Chinook salmon (CHSE-214) cells. J Appl Toxicol 35(10):1133–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3142
Tammina SK, Mandal BK, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N (2017) Cytotoxicity study of Piper nigrum seed mediated synthesized SnO2 nanoparticles towards colorectal (HCT116) and lung cancer (A549) cell lines. J Photochem Photobiol B 166:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.11.017
Vimala Devi S, Ramachndran M, Marotta XFS, Pathak S (2019) Comparative study on anti-proliferative potentials of zinc oxide and aluminium oxide nanoparticles in colon cancer cells. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis 90(2):241–247. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i2.6939
Vinardell MP, Sordé A, Díaz J, Baccarin T, Mitjans M (2015) Comparative effects of macro-sized aluminum oxide and aluminum oxide nanoparticles on erythrocyte hemolysis: influence of cell source, temperature, and size. J Nanopart Res 17(2):80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-2893-9
Vinardell M, Llanas H, Marics L, Mitjans M (2017) In vitro comparative skin irritation induced by nano and non-nano zinc oxide. Nanomat 7(3):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7030056
Virgilio AL, Reigosa M, De Mele MF (2010) Response of UMR 106 cells exposed to titanium oxide and aluminum oxide nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res A 92(1):80–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32339
Wise JP Sr, Goodale BC, Wise SS (2010) Silver nanospheres are cytotoxic and genotoxic to fish cells. Aquat Toxicol 97(1):34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.11.016
Yuan JS, Reed A, Chen F, Stewart CN (2010) Statistical analysis of real-time PCR data. BMC Bioinformat 7(1) (2006):85. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-85
Zhang L, Jiang H, Selke MWang XJ (2014) Selective cytotoxicity effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles under UV irradiation. J Biomed Nanotechnol 10(2):278–286. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2014.1790
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to Chettinad Hospital & Research Institute (CHRI), Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), for providing the research facilities.
Funding
The authors are thankful to Chettinad Hospital & Research Institute (CHRI), Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), for providing the research funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SV conducted the experiments and wrote the drafts of the manuscript. RM and SP conceived the study and participated in its design and coordination and also helped to analyze the results and to draft the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All approval related to study was obtained from Chettinad Academy of Research and Education. For study on human cell lines, no human ethical clearance was required.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary File 1
Comet assay images: (a) untreated cells exhibited intact DNA without tail (b) cells exhibiting increased DNA migration after treatment with ZNPs for 48 h. (PNG 16 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Subramaniam, V.D., Murugesan, R. & Pathak, S. Assessment of the cytotoxicity of cerium, tin, aluminum, and zinc oxide nanoparticles on human cells. J Nanopart Res 22, 373 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-05102-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-05102-3