Elsevier

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volume 144, January 2021, 105920
Biomass and Bioenergy

Biomass-to-hydrogen: A review of main routes production, processes evaluation and techno-economical assessment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105920Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Three processes of H2-generation from biomass were investigated and evaluated.

  • Process improvements, optimisations and techno-economic valuation were described.

  • H2 best yield are obtained through gasification, the thermochemical conversion.

  • H2 yield in fermentative processes is important compared with aqueous phase reforming.

  • Capital investments and operational cost of the process influence Hydrogen cost.

Abstract

Hydrogen is viewed as a sustainable strategic alternative to fossil fuels, especially in the field of road and air transport. Currently, hydrogen production is derived from fossil fuels or is manufactured by splitting water. A novel option, H2-generation from lignocellulosic biomass, based on renewable resources is currently in a pilot-scale demonstration or at a commercial stage. The present study reviews the thermochemical, biological, and electrochemical approaches used for biomass-to-hydrogen. The advantages, limitations, and major improvements of each process are presented. A techno-economic assessment is also established based on the production cost, technology readiness level, and industrial scalability.

The objective is to allow industrial producers to visualise the degree of technological maturity of each option, clarify the necessary development efforts before reaching the commercial stage, determine the most relevant and competitive routes, and assess the suitability of biomass as a feedstock for renewable hydrogen production.

In the reviewed results, the thermochemical process, particularly gasification, partial oxidation, and steam reforming, presented the best yield for H2 production. Steam gasification is the best compromise because it is suitable for wet and dry biomass, and it does not require an oxidising agent. As for biological conversion, dark fermentation is more worthwhile than photo-fermentation due to its lower energy consumption. Additionally, the electrochemical process is feasible for biomass.

The findings of this study indicate that biomass-hydrogen-based processes are promising options that contribute to the H2 production capacity but require improvements to produce larger competitive volumes.

Introduction

Transport (particularly road and air transport) alone is responsible for more than 20% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions [[1], [2], [3]]. To address this substantial environmental problem, the use of renewable energies, including alternative fuels and biofuels, should reduce the overall CO2 emissions in the transport sector. Forecasts through 2050 underline the need for all categories of renewables to account for approximately 27% of the total transport fuel consumption [4].

Hydrogen has been closely linked to the transport and fuel sector for many decades. Not only is this molecule involved in several operations (hydrotreatments) in crude oil refinery but hydrogen is also exploited as a reagent/processing agent for the production of alternative fuels (e.g, liquefaction of micro-algae) [[5], [6], [7]]. Hydrogen can also be used as a “clean” fuel as it is; its combustion generates only water vapor as a by-product [[8], [9], [10]]. Besides crude-oil refining (representing more than 33% of the H2 consumption), hydrogen has been utilised in many other applications, mostly ammonia production (27%) and methanol manufacturing (11%) [11].

Market forecasts underline that H2 production will increase significantly over the next few years, with a growth of 5–10% per year from 50 to 82 Mt by 2050 [12]. The industrial H2 demand is also expected to increase, especially for ammonia and steel production, by about 2 EJ/a for each of these activities in 2050, while the H2 demand for hydrogen-based vehicles is estimated to reach 22 EJ/a by 2050 [12]. These forecasts also demonstrate an increased use of hydrogen in the manufacturing of new biofuels (from algae or plant materials) that will impact the hydrogen market and require higher production volumes in the next few years. With a suitable policy and creation of new infrastructures, a hydrogen economy could emerge after 2030 [13].

Currently, more than 98% of the H2 production is ensured from fossil resources, through either natural gas steam reforming, SMR (accounting for 76% of the global production), or coal gasification (22%) [14]. SMR is currently the most economical option and is responsible for approximately 9 kg of CO2 per kg of H2 produced [14]. The alternative to renewable feedstock instead of natural gas appears to be compulsory to mitigate the release of greenhouse gases and would be a substantial step toward carbon-neutral emissions [8,15,16]. However, only 2% of the current H2 production is from renewable resources, mostly from water electrolysis, an emerging technology, with no significant use of vegetal/algal biomass on the industrial scale currently [11]. Water splitting is one of the most studied processes, mostly electrolysis (TRL 9, available at a small scale), with more innovative approaches such as thermolysis and photolysis (TRL 1–2, under research) [17]. Considering biomass, research has emphasised lignocellulosic matrices (e.g. wood, forestry side-products, agricultural residues, and dedicated energy crops) and their conversion, primarily using thermochemical (gasification, pyrolysis) pathways [[18], [19], [20]]. The maturity level of these proposals is aligned with TRL 7. Other alternatives include biological conversion (TRL 4–5) and electrochemical conversion (TRL 2–4). The hydrogen production costs from biomass remain quite high, ranging from 1.21 to 2.42 $/kg when choosing gasification to 1.21–2.19 $/kg for pyrolysis, which is three times higher than that of SMR (0.75 $/kg) [21]. Even if some scenarios involve an economic production of biomass in 2050, biomass should be at the price of coal (ranging from to 40–100 $/MT for coal and up to 140 $/MT for biomass) to be competitive for energy production [22]. Currently, lignocellulosic biomass is expensive to produce. However, forecasts indicate a decreasing price of biomass at the expense of fossil resources that could be impacted by environmental policies and the CO2 price [23]. Hence, an increase in the H2 costs from coal gasification is expected from $ 1 to 2.7 $/kg in China by 2030 due to taxation [11]. Regarding the cost of hydrogen produced from water by electrolysis, it should decrease from $ 3 to 2.8 $/kg H2 if renewable electricity is used and from 5.3 to 4.8 $/kg H2 using the electricity grid by 2030. These costs would remain higher than those from the biomass conversion forecasts [11].

This review aims to describe the different H2-production pathways from biomass and is formatted as follows: In the second section, the two important thermochemical and biological pathways are reviewed as well as the description of the electrochemical conversion potential. A comparison between the processes in terms of their performance in hydrogen yield and their advantages and drawbacks is proposed in the third section. Recent improvements and process optimisations are reviewed in the fourth section, while a techno-economic assessment based on the latest advances in the field is established in the fifth section. An evaluation of hydrogen as a fuel is examined in the sixth section, and key findings are highlighted in the seventh section.

Section snippets

Main production routes for H2 production from biomass

Currently, 98% of the global hydrogen used is produced from fossil fuels, with the predominant production process as steam methane reforming. Other options based on renewable resources are currently in pilot-scale demonstrations or at the commercial stage, namely water splitting and H2-generation from biomass, particularly lignocellulosic feedstock.

Lignocellulosic biomass is derived from agri-food side products, agricultural residues, energy crops, marine residues, and forest by-products [24].

SWOT analysis of the main process used from biomass

Several (thermochemical, biological, and electrochemical) technologies are described below regarding their ability to produce hydrogen from biomass. Table 4 summarises the key advantages and drawbacks of each process.

Thermochemical conversions have the advantage of being available at a large production scale because the technologies used are based on current well-established methods for converting fossil fuels. Therefore, the industrial design has already been established [116]. Despite being

Improvements of thermochemical approaches

Gasification is perhaps the most thoroughly studied process, and its improvement has been abundantly described and updated. One key element of the current research is to find suitable operating conditions and catalysts that can effectively increase the volume of the gas produced and its quality at a low cost [125]. New efficient catalysts are added to promote tar conversion and prevent the formation of unwanted products. Some studies have already reviewed and compared a wide range of available

Techno-economic comparison of hydrogen producing processes

The techno-economic assessment of an industrial hydrogen production facility relies on two major expenses: capital investments (CAPEX) and operational costs (OPEX). The critical issue is to reduce the CAPEX and OPEX of the different processes while increasing the production volume. This approach would allow the reduction of H2 production costs from renewable resources to compete with fossil fuels. In most cases, the CAPEX value was estimated using the software “Aspen Plus” or “Aspen Hysys” in

Hydrogen assessment as fuel in transportation

As a future energy, hydrogen is a potential candidate to ensure a renewable, sustainable, and

secure fuel [177]. Compared with traditional fuels, H2 has the characteristic of being used in both fuel cells and internal combustion engines [5]. In fuel cells (HFC), electricity is generated through a combination of hydrogen and oxygen. This electrochemical reaction is assured by a catalyst that splits H2 into electrons and protons. The positively charged protons cross the cathode, and the negatively

Conclusions

Among the initiatives currently taken to partially overcome global warming, a great deal of research has been conducted on hydrogen as an alternative energy vector. Various conversion pathways have already been investigated to produce H2 from lignocellulosic biomass.

Thermochemical processes are the most common technologies. Gasification is the predominant process globally and should reach the industrial scale (TRL 9) in a few decades. Steam gasification is the best compromise as it does not

Supplementary information

This paper is associated with the S1 document showing, in table form, the H2 yields from various biomasses, estimated in g per kg of dry biomass.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the European Union and the Walloon Region with the European Funds for Regional Development 2014–2020 in the framework of the VERDIR Tropical Plant Factory program (project BioResidu).

References (188)

  • Y. Kalinci et al.

    Biomass-based hydrogen production: a review and analysis

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2009)
  • H. Balat et al.

    Hydrogen from biomass - present scenario and future prospects

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2010)
  • P. Parthasarathy et al.

    Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield - a review

    Renew. Energy

    (2014)
  • W. Liu et al.

    Economic and environmental analyses of coal and biomass to liquid fuels

    Energy

    (2017)
  • G. Fiorese et al.

    The power of biomass: experts disclose the potential for success of bioenergy technologies

    Energy Pol.

    (2014)
  • M. Kammoun et al.

    Chemical characterisation and technical assessment of agri-food residues, marine matrices, and wild grasses in the South Mediterranean area: a considerable inflow for biorefineries

    Waste Manag.

    (2020)
  • V. Stenberg et al.

    Exploring novel hydrogen production processes by integration of steam methane reforming with chemical-looping combustion (CLC-SMR) and oxygen carrier aided combustion (OCAC-SMR)

    Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control.

    (2018)
  • C. Xu et al.

    Hydrogen rich syngas production from biomass gasification using synthesized Fe/CaO active catalysts

    J. Energy Inst.

    (2018)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Gasification of biomass with oxygen-enriched air in a pilot scale two-stage gasifier

    Fuel

    (2015)
  • S. Rapagná et al.

    Development of catalysts suitable for hydrogen or syn-gas production from biomass gasification

    Biomass Bioenergy

    (2002)
  • P. Basu

    Gasification theory and modeling of gasifiers

  • H. Yang et al.

    Biomass gasification for synthetic liquid fuel production

  • Pekka Simell et al.

    Catalytic hot gas cleaning of gasification gas

    Catal. Today

    (1996)
  • A. Erkiaga et al.

    Steam gasification of biomass in a conical spouted bed reactor with olivine and γ-alumina as primary catalysts, Fuel Process

    Technol.

    (2013)
  • I. Ahmed et al.

    Evolution of syngas from cardboard gasification

    Appl. Energy

    (2009)
  • H. Yang et al.

    Pyrolysis of palm oil wastes for enhanced production of hydrogen rich gases

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2006)
  • H.B. Goyal et al.

    Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources: a review

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2008)
  • C. Di Blasi

    Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis

    Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.

    (2008)
  • L. Garcia et al.

    Catalytic steam reforming of bio-oils for the production of hydrogen: effects of catalyst composition

    Appl. Catal. Gen.

    (2000)
  • C. Font Palma

    Modelling of tar formation and evolution for biomass gasification: a review

    Appl. Energy

    (2013)
  • S. Koppatz et al.

    Comparison of the performance behaviour of silica sand and olivine in a dual fluidised bed reactor system for steam gasification of biomass at pilot plant scale

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2011)
  • A. Demirbaş

    Gaseous products from biomass by pyrolysis and gasification: effects of catalyst on hydrogen yield

    Energy Convers. Manag.

    (2002)
  • E. Kirtay

    Recent advances in production of hydrogen from biomass

    Energy Convers. Manag.

    (2011)
  • M. Van de Velden et al.

    Fundamentals, kinetics and endothermicity of the biomass pyrolysis reaction

    Renew. Energy

    (2010)
  • F. Safari et al.

    Non-catalytic conversion of wheat straw, walnut shell and almond shell into hydrogen rich gas in supercritical water media

    Chin. J. Chem. Eng.

    (2016)
  • P.M. Lv et al.

    An experimental study on biomass air-steam gasification in a fluidized bed

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2004)
  • A.C.C. Chang et al.

    Biomass gasification for hydrogen production

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2011)
  • A. Kumar et al.

    Steam-air fluidized bed gasification of distillers grains: effects of steam to biomass ratio, equivalence ratio and gasification temperature

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2009)
  • A. Arregi et al.

    Evaluation of thermochemical routes for hydrogen production from biomass: a review

    Energy Convers. Manag.

    (2018)
  • L. Devi et al.

    Catalytic decomposition of biomass tars: use of dolomite and untreated olivine

    Renew. Energy

    (2005)
  • Y. Lu et al.

    Hydrogen production by biomass gasification in supercritical water over Ni/γAl2O3 and Ni/CeO2-γAl2O3 catalysts

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2010)
  • A.V. Bridgwater

    Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2003)
  • L. Barelli et al.

    Hydrogen production through sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming and membrane technology: a review

    Energy

    (2008)
  • J. Yao et al.

    Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production based on dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasification, biogas steam reforming, and alkaline water electrolysis processes

    Energy Convers. Manag.

    (2017)
  • C. Pirez et al.

    Steam reforming, partial oxidation and oxidative steam reforming for hydrogen production from ethanol over cerium nickel based oxyhydride catalyst

    Appl. Catal. Gen.

    (2016)
  • D. Rennard et al.

    Production of synthesis gas by partial oxidation and steam reforming of biomass pyrolysis oils

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2010)
  • J.R. Salge et al.

    Catalytic partial oxidation of ethanol over noble metal catalysts

    J. Catal.

    (2005)
  • M. Tóth et al.

    Partial oxidation of ethanol on supported Rh catalysts: effect of the oxide support

    J. Mol. Catal. Chem.

    (2016)
  • L. He et al.

    Hydrogen from biomass: advances in thermochemical processes

  • M. Kumar et al.

    A comparative analysis of hydrogen production from the thermochemical conversion of algal biomass

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2019)
  • Cited by (243)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text