Abstract
In this article, we present a study of the perturbations occurring in the Earth’s environment on 7 October 2015. We use a multi-instrument approach, including space and ground observations.
In particular, we study the ionospheric conditions at low latitudes. Two ionospheric storms are observed at the low latitude station of Tucumán (\(26^{\circ}\) \(51'\) S, \(65^{\circ}\) \(12'\) W). We observe a negative ionospheric storm followed by a positive one. These ionospheric perturbations were triggered by two sudden storm commencements (SSCs) of a strong geomagnetic storm. Preliminary results show that the main mechanism involved in both ionospheric storms is the prompt penetration of electric fields (PPEFs) from the magnetosphere. Furthermore, in the positive storm, disturbed dynamo electric fields are observed acting in combination with the PPEFs. The impact of the solar wind on the Earth’s environment is analyzed using geomagnetic data and proxies, combined with data acquired in the Tucumán Low Latitude Observatory for the Upper Atmosphere.
We also investigate the solar and interplanetary drivers of this intense perturbation. We find that, although typically interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) are the most geoeffective transient interplanetary events, in this case, a corotating interaction region (CIR) is responsible for these strong perturbations to the geospace.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alves, M.V.: 2006, Geoeffectiveness of coronating interaction regions as measured by index. J. Geophys. Res. 111, 0148. DOI.
Bagiya, M., Krishna, I., Joshi, H., Thampi, S., Tsugawa, T., Ravindran, S., Sridharan, R., Pathan, B.: 2011, Low-latitude ionospheric-thermospheric response to stormtime electrodynamical coupling between high and low latitudes. J. Geophys. Res. 116, A01303. DOI.
Balan, N., Yamamoto, M., Sreeja, V., Batista, I.S., Lynn, K.J.W., Abdu, M.A., Ravindran, S., Kikuchi, T., Otsuka, Y., Shokawa, K., Alex, S.: 2011, A statistical study of the response of the dayside equatorial F2 layer to the main phase of intense geomagnetic storms as an indicator of penetration electric field. J. Geophys. Res. 116, A03323. DOI.
Bianchi, C., Baskaradas, J., Pezzopane, M., Pietrella, M., Umberto, S., Zuccheretti, E.: 2013, Fading in the HF ionospheric channel and the role of irregularities. Adv. Space Res. 52, 403. DOI.
Bilitza, D., Sheik, N., Eyfrig, R.: 1979, A global model for the height of the F2-peak using M3000 values from the CCIR numerical map. Telecommun. J. 46, 549.
Blanc, M., Richmond, A.D.: 1980, The ionospheric disturbance dynamo. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 1669. DOI.
Bothmer, V., Zhukov, A., Daglis, I.: 2007, The Sun as the Prime Source of Space Weather, Springer, Berlin. DOI.
Bradley, P.A., Dudeney, J.R.: 1973, A simple model of the vertical distribution of the electron concentration in the ionosphere. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 35, 2131. DOI.
Buonsanto, M.J.: 1999, Ionospheric storms, a review. Space Sci. Rev. 88, 563. DOI.
Buresova, D., Lastovicka, J.: 2007, Pre-storm enhancements of foF2 above Europe. Adv. Space Res. 39, 1298. DOI.
Buresova, D., Lastovicka, J.: 2008, Pre-storm electron density enhancements at middle latitudes. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 70, 1848. DOI.
Cabrera, M., Zuccheretti, E., Ezquer, R., Sciacca, U., Lopez, J., Molina, M., Baskaradas, J.: 2010, Some considerations for different time-domain signal processing of pulse compression radar. Ann. Geophys. 53(5–6), 1. DOI.
Chi, Y., Shen, C., Luo, B., Wang, Y., Xu, M.: 2018, Geoeffectiveness of stream interaction regions from 1995 to 2016. Space Weather 16, 1542. DOI.
Danilov, A.D.: 2001, F2-region response to geomagnetic disturbances. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 63, 441. DOI.
Danilov, A.D.: 2013, Ionospheric F-region response to geomagnetic disturbances. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 52(3), 343. DOI.
Dasso, S., Shea, M.A.: 2020, Magnetosphere, ionosphere and their connection to Space Weather. Adv. Space Res. 65, 2081. DOI.
Fejer, B.G., Kamide, Y., Slavi, J.A.: 1986, Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling, Terra Scientific Publishing Co., Tokyo, 519.
Fejer, B.G., Larsen, M.F., Farley, D.T.: 1983, Equatorial disturbance dynamo electric fields. Geophys. Res. Lett. 10, 537. DOI.
Fejer, B.G., Scherliess, L.: 1997, Empirical models of storm time equatorial electric fields. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 24,047. DOI.
Fejer, B.G., Scherliess, L., de Paula, E.R.: 1999, Effects of the vertical plasma drift velocity on the generation and evolution of equatorial spread F. J. Geophys. Res. 104(A9), 19,859. DOI.
Fuller-Rowell, T., Codrescu, M., Risbeth, H., Moffett, R., Quegan, S.: 1996, On the seasonal response of the thermosphere and ionosphere to geomagnetic storms. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 2343. DOI.
Fuller-Rowell, T.J., Codrescu, M.V., Roble, R.G., Richmond, A.D.: 1997, How does the thermosphere and ionosphere react to a geomagnetic storm? In: Tsurutani, B.T. (ed.) Magnetic Storms, Geophysical Monograph Series 98, Am. Geophys. Union, Washington, 203. DOI.
Fuller-Rowell, T.J., Millward, G.H., Richmond, A.D., Codrescu, M.V.: 2002, Storm-time changes in the upper atmosphere at low latitudes. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 64, 1383. DOI.
Goncharenko, L.P., Foster, J.C., Coster, A.J., Huang, C., Aponte, N., Paxton, L.J.: 2007, Observations of a positive storm phase on September 10, 2005. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 69(10–11), 1253. DOI.
Gonzales, C.A., Kelley, M.C., Fejer, B.G., Vickrey, J.F., Woodman, R.F.: 1979, Equatorial electric fields during magnetically disturbed conditions: 2. Implications of simultaneous auroral and equatorial measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 84(A10), 5803. DOI.
Grandin, M., Aikio, A., Kozlovsky, A.: 2019, Properties and geoeffectiveness of solar wind high-speed streams and stream interaction regions during Solar Cycles 23 and 24. J. Geophys. Res. 124(6), 3871. DOI.
Kamide, Y., Yokoyama, N., Gonzalez, W., Tsurutani, B.T., Daglis, I.A., Brekke, A., Masuda, S.: 1998, Two-step development of geomagnetic storms. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 6917. DOI.
Kane, R.P.: 2005, Ionospheric foF2 anomalies during some intense geomagnetic storms. Ann. Geophys. 23, 2487. DOI.
Kelley, M.C.: 1989, The Earth’s Ionosphere: Plasma Physics and Electrodynamics, Academic Press, San Diego. DOI.
Kelley, M.C., Fejer, B.G., Gonzales, C.A.: 1979, An explanation for anomalous equatorial ionospheric electric field associated with a northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field. Geophys. Res. Lett. 6(4), 301. DOI.
Kikuchi, T., Luehr, H., Schlegel, K., Tachihara, H., Shinohara, M., Kitamura, T.-I.: 2000, Penetration of auroral electric fields to the equator during a substorm. J. Geophys. Res. 105(A10), 23,251. DOI.
Kilpua, E., Koskinen, H.E.J., Pulkkinen, T.I.: 2017, Living Rev. Solar Phys. 14, 5. DOI.
Klimenko, M.V., Klimenko, V.V.: 2012, Disturbance dynamo, prompt penetration electric field and oversheilding in the Earth’s ionosphere during geomagnetic storm. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 90–91, 146. DOI.
Krishna, S.G.: 2020, GPS-TEC Analysis Software Version 2.9.5. Available at: http://seemala.blogspot.in (Accessed 01 October 2020).
Lu, G., Goncharenko, L.P., Richmond, A.D., Roble, R.G., Aponte, N.: 2008, A dayside ionospheric positive storm phase driven by neutral winds. J. Geophys. Res. 113, A08304. DOI.
Mannucci, A.J., Tsurutani, B.T., Lijima, B.A., Komjathu, A., Saito, A., Gonzalez, W.D.: 2005, Dayside global ionospheric response to the major interplanetary events of October 29, 2003 “Halloween storms”. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L12S02. DOI.
Maruyama, N., Richmond, A.D., Fuller-Rowell, T.J., Codrescu, M.V., Sazykin, S., Toffoletto, F.R., Spiro, R.W., Millward, G.H.: 2007, Interaction between direct penetration and disturbance dynamo electric fields in the storm-time equatorial ionosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L17105. DOI.
Matsui, H., Erickson, P.J., Foster, J.C., Torbert, R.B., Argall, M.R., Anderson, B.J., Blake, J.B., Cohen, I.J., Ergun, R.E., Farrugia, C.J., Khotyaintsev, Y.V., Korth, H., Lindqvist, P.A., Magnes, W., Marklund, G.T., Mauk, B.H., Paulson, K.W., Russell, C.T., Strangeway, R.J., Turner, D.L.: 2016, Dipolarization in the inner magnetosphere during a geomagnetic storm on 7 October 2015. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 9397. DOI.
Mayr, H.G., Harris, I., Spencer, N.W.: 1978, Some properties of upper atmosphere dynamics. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 16(4), 539. DOI.
Molina, M.G., Zuccheretti, E., Cabrera, M.A., Bianchi, C., Sciacca, U., Baskaradas, J.: 2016, Automatic ionospheric layers detection: algorithms analysis. Adv. Space Res. DOI.
Newell, P.T., Sotirelis, T., Liou, K., Meng, C.I., Rich, F.J.: 2007, A nearly universal solar wind-magnetosphere coupling function inferred from 10 magnetospheric state variables. J. Geophys. Res. 112, 0148. DOI.
Nishida, A., Iwasaki, T., Nagata, T.: 1966, The origin of fluctuations in the equatorial electrojet: a new type of geomagnetic variation. Ann. Geophys. 22, 478.
Prölss, G.W.: 1991, Thermosphere-ionosphere coupling during disturbed conditions. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 43, 537. DOI.
Prölss, G.: 2004, Physics of the Earth’s Space Environment, Springer, Berlin. DOI.
Retterer, J.M., Kelley, M.C.: 2010, Solar wind drivers for low-latitude ionosphere models during geomagnetic storms. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 72, 344. DOI.
Richardson, I.G.: 2018, Solar wind stream interaction regions throughout the heliosphere. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 15, 1. DOI.
Richardson, I.G., Cane, H.V.: 2010, Near-Earth interplanetary coronal mass ejections during Solar Cycle 23 (1996 – 2009): catalog and summary of properties. Solar Phys. 264, 189. DOI.
Richardson, I., Cane, H.: 2012, Solar wind drivers of geomagnetic storms over more than four solar cycles. J. Space Weather Space Clim. DOI.
Scherliess, L., Fejer, B.G.: 1997, Storm time dependence of equatorial disturbance dynamo zonal electric fields. J. Geophys. Res. 102(A12), 24,037. DOI.
Shimazaki, T.: 1955, World-wide variations in the height of the maximum electron density of the ionospheric F2 layer. J. Radio Res. Labs. Japan 2(7), 85.
Snyder, C.W., Neugebauer, M., Rao, U.R.: 1963, The solar wind velocity and its correlation with cosmic-ray variations and with solar and geomagnetic activity. J. Geophys. Res. 1896(68), 0148. DOI.
Sunda, S., Vyas, B.M., Khekale, P.V.: 2013, Storm time spatial variations in TEC during moderate geomagnetic storms in extremely low solar activity conditions (2007 – 2009) over Indian region. Adv. Space Res. 52(1), 158. DOI.
Tsurutani, B., Mannucci, A., Lijima, B., Ali Abdu, M., Sobral, J.H.A., Gonzalez, W.: 2004, Global dayside ionospheric uplift and enhancement associated with interplanetary electric fields. J. Geophys. Res. 109, A08302. DOI.
Tsurutani, B., McPherron, R., Gonzalez, W., Lu, G., Gopalswamy, N., Guarnieri, F.: 2006, Magnetic Storms Caused by Corotating Solar Wind Streams, Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 167. DOI.
Tsurutani, B.T., Verkhoglyadova, O.P., Mannucci, A.J., Saito, A., Araki, T., Yumoto, K., Tsuda, T., Abdu, M.A., Sobral, J.H.A., Gonzalez, W.D., McCreadie, H., Lakhina, G.S., Vasyliunas, V.M.: 2008, Prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) and their ionospheric effects during the great magnetic storm of 30 – 31 October 2003. J. Geophys. Res. 113, A05311. DOI.
Zhang, J., Richardson, I.G., Webb, D.F.: 2008, Interplanetary origin of multiple-dip geomagnetic storms. J. Geophys. Res. 113, 0148. DOI.
Zolesi, B., Cander, J.: 2014, Ionospheric Prediction and Forecasting, Springer, Berlin. DOI.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. (grant CIUNT E689), Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT) (grant PICT-2018-0447) and CONICET.
Sergio Dasso acknowledges partial support from grants UBACyT-UBA-20020160100072BA, and PIP-CONICET-11220130100439CO.
We also acknowledge the Tucumán Space Weather Center (TSWC), FACET-UNT, Tucumán, Argentina and the Laboratorio de Telecomunicaciones at UNT that currently maintains the Tucumán Low Latitude Observatory for Upper Atmosphere and provide the operative data.
We also aknowledge Laboratorio de Telecomunicaciones from Universidad Nacional de Tucumán that currently maintains the Tucumán Low Latitude Observatory for the Upper Atmosphere.
We acknowledge use of NASA/GSFC Space Physics Data Facility OMNIWeb service, and OMNI data.
The geomagnetic indices used in this article was provided by the WDC for Geomagnetism, Kyoto (http://wdc.kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp/wdc/Sec3.html).
We aknowledge the Red Argentina de Monitoreo Satelital Continuo (RAMSAC) for providing the GNSS data (https://www.ign.gob.ar/NuestrasActividades/Geodesia/Ramsac).
We acknowledge the CIRES/NCEI geomagnetism team for providing the Prompt Penetration Equatorial Electric Field Model (PPEEFM).
We acknowledge Ian Richardson for very useful discussions during the FRESWED meeting in San Juan, Argentina.
The authors would like to thank the reviewer of this article for his/her constructive comments, which helped to improve this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection:
Towards Future Research on Space Weather Drivers
Guest Editors: Hebe Cremades and Teresa Nieves-Chinchilla
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Molina, M.G., Dasso, S., Mansilla, G. et al. Consequences of a Solar Wind Stream Interaction Region on the Low Latitude Ionosphere: Event of 7 October 2015. Sol Phys 295, 173 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01728-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01728-7