Recent advances in contact dynamics and post-capture control for combined spacecraft

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100678Get rights and content

Abstract

The combined spacecraft is increasingly demanded to accomplish various types of space missions. Therefore, the dynamics and control technologies of combined spacecraft are significantly important to ensure the success of future space explorations. Several kinds of combined spacecraft can be obtained by different capturing approaches, and the dynamical property of combined spaceraft varies dramatically between different categories. Therefore, the control system should be designed according to the specific combined spacecraft category and mission requirement. Moreover, the contacting behavior between the end-effector and the target has been a complex problem that may influence significantly the performance of the combined spacecraft control system. Up to now, the complete review of the combined spacecraft contact dynamics and control technologies has rarely been reported. With these motivations, this paper presents the review and prospects of the combined spacecraft contact dynamics and control technologies including the capturing strategy analysis, contact dynamics modeling, inertia parameter estimation and post-capture controller design.

Introduction

When an active spacecraft captures another space object, a combined spacecraft is formed. As the modern space missions become more and more complex, the combined spacecraft is increasingly required to accomplish many specific tasks such as constructing space stations, building extra-large space facilities, capturing small asteroids, repairing non-functional satellites or removing orbit debris [1]. Depending on the mission scenario, various types of objects may be captured by the active spacecraft, such as a malfunctioning satellite, space debris, a module of spacecraft to be installed, or a small asteroid [2] These captured objects are often characterized as the ‘target’. Based on the different mission requirements and constraints, the combined spacecraft can be formed by different approaches including rigid docking and highly flexible tethered net capturing. Therefore, the dynamic property of the combined spacecraft varies dramatically between different capturing strategies. Furthermore, the target being captured may be non-cooperative, which implies that the target has no attitude and orbit maneuver abilities and its inertial parameters are completely unknown to the control system. With non-cooperative targets, the post-capture control process of the combined spacecraft becomes highly risky since the active spacecraft has limited control ability and the connection between the active spacecraft's end-effector and target can be fragile. Thus, the major research facilities around the world, including NASA [3], DLR [4], ESA [5] and JAXA [6], have made a significant amount of efforts to study the dynamics [7] and the post-capture control technologies of combined spacecraft. Since the 1960s, many theoretical research programs and engineering applications have been conducted in this research field [8]. Therefore, this paper presents a brief review of the current technologies and discusses the possible orientation for future works.

The first and most well-known mission scenario related to the combined spacecraft is the construction of space stations [9]. Since the space station is constructed by docking several spacecraft together, it should be considered as a combined spacecraft. It can be seen that the space station is usually formed by firmly docking two or more actively controlled spacecraft, which makes the space station a single rigid body system. Furthermore, the dynamical parameters of the space station are usually known to the control system, and the control of such combined spacecraft is relatively easy. Thanks to this property, many space docking missions have been performed, and the classic post-capture control method of combined spacecraft has been properly verified. During the early days of manned space exploration, the docking and module installation of space station relied mostly on the human-in-the-loop activities [10]. With the development of the automatics and Artificial Intelligence (AI), the next-generation space stations can be constructed in an unmanned process [11], which is much more efficient and less risky. The new construction concept for space stations will also reduce the budget and difficulty for astronaut training, which is favorable for massive human space explorations.

The second motivation for developing a combined spacecraft control technology is to realize the space debris removal operations [12]. Over the last few years, the number of space debris has significantly increased, and it will continue to rise in the future according to the model established in Ref. [13]. The space debris poses a direct threat to the operational spacecraft, and a huge amount of money has to be invested for space debris surveillance. Therefore, the idea of actively removing space debris has long been discussed. The mission scenario is to use an active spacecraft to capture the space debris by several optional methods and carry it away from the current orbit [14]. Unlike the traditional space rendezvous and docking missions, space debris is a non-cooperative target. Its geometrical shape and the inertial parameters are unknown, which means that the post-capture control becomes much more difficult and risky than a space station. Furthermore, the space debris removal mission may be realized by a space manipulator or a tethered spacecraft [15], which means that the combined spacecraft is a flexible multi-body system. If this kind of combined spacecraft is not properly controlled, its different moving parts may collide with each other and cause a catastrophic result. Due to this disadvantage, the orbit debris removal principle is not ready for engineering implementation yet.

The third category of mission which involves the combined spacecraft control is the On-Orbit Servicing (OOS) missions [1]. Unlike the space debris removal missions, the objective for the OOS mission is not to remove the target by orbit maneuver, but to carry out many complex actions such as constructing a large space structure or realizing maintenance service for mal-functioning satellites. The concept of extra-large space facilities has long been proposed, and the examples of such spacecraft can be given as the Space Solar Power Station (SSPS) [16,17], the large aperture space telescope [18] and large-scale truss-beam antenna structures [19]. This kind of spacecraft cannot be directly launched into space due to its large size and weight [20], and the space assembly process must be conducted [21]. In the meantime, the orbit maintenance mission has also been widely discussed. Instead of assembling an extremely large spacecraft, the orbit maintenance mission is more focused on building small satellites using existing modules [26], repairing mal-functioning satellites [33], refueling and module upgrading of existing spacecraft [34]. Among the targets being captured, it should be noticed that a malfunctioning satellite may be tumbling on its own, and a module to be installed may have no orbit or attitude control abilities. For this reason, the OOS mission can also be highly risky and difficult. Unlike the space debris removal concept, several OOS missions have been conducted in reality. One of the most well-known missions of orbit maintenance is the repairing mission of the Hubble space telescope [35] carried out by the space shuttle. Another example for orbit maintenance is the orbital express mission [36]. During this mission, a client satellite platform and the cargo carrier spacecraft were launched into space. A space manipulator took the modules onboard the cargo carrier then transported them to the client satellite and installed them in the correct position on the platform [37]. Thanks to the above-mentioned missions, the advanced docking and manipulator servicing technologies are properly validated [39].

By analyzing the above-mentioned mission scenarios related to the combined spacecraft, it can be seen that the combined spacecraft dynamics and control technology is a complex multi-disciplinary area [22]. To realize the safe and efficient control of the combined spacecraft, several different sub research areas must be taken care of including the multi-body dynamic modeling [23], inertial parameter estimation [24] and advanced controller design [25]. In the meantime, depending on the specific mission requirements, some auxiliary technologies should also be investigated. For instance, the space manipulator collision-free kinematics [26] and path planning [28] should be analyzed for space manipulator operation, while the robust docking and capturing mechanism design [29] must be profoundly studied for spacecraft docking missions. Many researchers around the world have achieved a considerable amount of research results in the past few decades to ensure the development of combined spacecraft control technology and the success of various space missions. However, a profound review of the combined spacecraft dynamics and control has rarely been reported. Therefore, in this paper, we present a brief review of this area and discuss the prospects for future research. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Firstly, Sec. 2 presents the major methods to capture the target and to form a combined spacecraft. Then, Sec. 3 discusses the different dynamic models for the combined spacecraft created by the different capturing strategies, and Sec. 4 is focused on the inertial parameter estimation algorithms of the combined spacecraft. Finally, the controller design for different types of combined spacecraft is addressed in Sec. 5 before the conclusion and discussion are given in Sec. 6.

Section snippets

Dynamical properties of different kind of combined spacecraft

To create a combined spacecraft, different approaches have been developed including latching, claw, finger, probe-guiding system, capturing-ring docking [30], and electro-magneto damper mechanism [31]. Depending on the capturing strategy, the obtained combined spacecraft may have different dynamical properties, which will influence dramatically the controller design process. In this section, the conceptions, the dynamical analysis of different kinds of combined spacecraft is presented.

Modeling techniques for combined spacecraft

In this section, the contact dynamic analysis of different kinds of combined spacecraft is conducted. As cited in the previous section, different dynamic models should be adopted to describe different kinds of combined spacecraft. Firstly, for rigid docking and berthing scenario, the classic dual-body dynamics is largely sufficient to describe the motion of the combined spacecraft [98,99]. For the combined spacecraft obtained by space manipulators, the dynamic model is more complicated and it

Inertial parameter estimation and calibration algorithms for combined spacecraft

In the previous section, the different contact forces between the target and the end-effector have been presented, and their impact on the dynamic properties of the combined spacecraft has been illustrated. In this section, a review of the inertial parameter estimation algorithms is presented. As cited in Sec. 1, the target being captured by the active spacecraft may be non-cooperative. It means that the inertial parameters of the combined spacecraft are unknown to the control system.

Combined spacecraft control

The review of the control strategies of combined spacecraft is addressed in this section. As cited in the previous sections, the post-capture control of a combined spacecraft is a highly risky process. This is the reason why the human-in-the-loop control scheme is still a promising solution to the combined spacecraft control problems [295]. In this paper, however, the discussion will be more focused on the autonomous control approaches of the combined spacecraft. As cited previously, different

Prospects

In previous sections, the current technologies related to the combined spacecraft are properly reviewed. In this section, a comprehensive analysis of the previous technologies and the possible orientations for future researches are presented.

Conclusion

The combined spacecraft is the key to the success of many space missions such as on-orbit servicing, space debris removal and manned space explorations. For this reason, the combined spacecraft dynamics and control technologies are becoming increasingly important. Based on the review and discussion of this paper, it can be seen that the current available technologies can already realize the accurate modeling and control of a combined spacecraft to achieve certain mission objectives. Thanks to

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11972182 and 61525301), sponsored by Qing Lan Project, Funded by Science and Technology on Space Intelligent Control Laboratory (Grant No. HTKJ2019KL502012). The authors fully appreciate their financial supports.

References (343)

  • A. Flores-Abad et al.

    A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing

    Prog. Aero. Sci.

    (2014)
  • T. Rybus

    Obstacle avoidance in space robotics: review of major challenges and proposed solutions

    Prog. Aero. Sci.

    (2018)
  • B. Dasgupta et al.

    A Newton-euler formulation for the inverse dynamics of the stewart platform manipulator

    Mech. Mach. Theor.

    (1998)
  • X. Ge et al.

    Assessment of space station on-orbit maintenance task complexity

    Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.

    (2020)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Research of flexible beam impact dynamics based on space probe-cone docking mechanism

    Adv. Space Res.

    (2012)
  • A. Boesso et al.

    ARCADE small-scale docking mechanism for micro-satellites

    Acta Astronaut.

    (2013)
  • M. Henrey et al.

    A versatile, bio-inspired hexapod for scaling smooth vertical surfaces

    Jou. Bion. Eng

    (2014)
  • K. Daneshjou et al.

    Multibody dynamical modeling for spacecraft docking process with spring-damper buffering device: a new validation approach

    Adv. Space Res.

    (2018)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Accurate shape description of flexible beam undergoing oblique impact based on space probe-cone docking mechanism

    Adv. Space Res.

    (2013)
  • J. Bourdon et al.

    Position control design and validation applied to ATV during docking to ISS

    IFAC Proceedings Volumes

    (2004)
  • D. Yu et al.

    Error modeling of parallel robots for semi-physical simulation platform of space docking mechanism

    Procedia Engineering

    (2011)
  • S. Nishida et al.

    Space debris removal system using a small satellite

    Acta Astronaut.

    (2009)
  • Y. Shen et al.

    Research on lettuce growth technology onboard Chinese Tiangong II Spacelab

    Acta Astronaut.

    (2018)
  • S. Yano et al.

    Improvements in and actual performance of the Plant Experiment Unit onboard Kibo, the Japanese experiment module on the international space station

    Adv. Space Res.

    (1 March 2013)
  • C. Sallaberger

    Canadian space robotic activities

    Acta Astronaut.

    (1997)
  • R. Boumans et al.

    The European Robotic Arm for the International Space Station, Robotics and Autonomous Systems

    (1998)
  • Y. Ohkami et al.

    Autonomous rendezvous and docking by engineering test satellite VII: a challenge of Japan in guidance, Navigation and control—breakwell memorial lecture

    Acta Astronaut.

    (2003)
  • Y. Umetani et al.

    Continuous path control of space manipulators mounted on OMV

    Acta Astronaut.

    (1987)
  • S. Nokleby

    Singularity analysis of the Canadarm2

    Mech. Mach. Theor.

    (2007)
  • J. Si et al.

    Dynamics modeling and simulation of self-collision of tether net for space debris removal

    Adv. Space Res.

    (2019)
  • Flores-Abad A., Crespo L., A Robotic Concept for the NASA Asteroid-Capture Mission, Space conference and exposition,...
  • Doggett, W. R,Dorsey, J. T,Jones, T. C, Improvements to the Tendon-Actuated Lightweight In-Space MANipulator...
  • G. Hirzinger et al.

    DLR's robotics technologuies for on-orbit servicing

    Adv. Robot.

    (2004)
  • K. Wormnes et al.

    ESA Technologies for Space Debris Remediation

    (2013)
  • X. Cyril et al.

    Postcapture dynamics of a spacecraft-manipulator-payload system

    AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics

    (2000)
  • J.N. Pelton
    (2016)
  • Patane S., Joyce E., Snyder M., Shestople P., Archinaut: In-Space Manufacturing and Assembly for Next-Generation Space...
  • G. Reuter et al.

    An intelligent, free-flying robot. SPIE

    space station automation IV

    (1988)
  • D. Kessler et al.

    Collision frequency of artificial satellites: the creation of a debris belt

    Journal of Geophysics. Res: Space Phys.

    (1978)
  • M. Lavagna et al.

    Debris Removal Mechanism Based on Tethered Nets

  • Oegerle W., Concept for a Large Scalable Space Telescope: In-Space Assembly, Proc. SPIE 6265, Space Telescopes and...
  • P. Staritz et al.

    A robot for assembly, inspection and maintenamce of large scale orbital facilities

    IEEE International conference on robotics and automation

    (2001)
  • V. Wagenen et al.

    Prepares-self assembling space-craft for LEO demonstration

  • Lillie C., On-Orbit Assembly and Servicing for Future Space Observatories, 19 - 21 September 2006, San Jose,...
  • P. Williams

    Optimal Control of a Tethered Payload Capture Maneuver

  • J. Weise et al.

    An intelligent building blocks concept for on-orbit-satellite servicing

  • J. Carusone et al.

    Experiments in end-effector tracking control for structurally flexible space manipulators

    IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom.

    (1993)
  • F. Feng et al.

    Design schemes and comparison research of the end-effector of large space manipulator

    Chin. J. Mech. Eng.

    (2012)
  • T. Nguyen-Huynh et al.

    Capture of Spinning Target with Space Manipulator Using Magneto Rheological Damper

  • C. Parrish

    The Ranger Telerobotic Shuttle Experiment: an On-Orbit Satellite Servicer

    (1999)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Composite adaptive attitude control for combined spacecraft with inertia uncertainties

      2022, Aerospace Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Extensive work in combined spacecraft inertia identification has been done in the past few years. Li et al. [1] introduced the review of the combined spacecraft dynamics and control technologies, including the capturing strategy, dynamics model, inertia parameter estimation and post-capture controller design. In [2], the inertia redistribution of the robotic arm is used to identify the inertia distribution of the spacecraft combination system.

    • A concentrated sunlight energy wireless transmission system for space solar energy harvest

      2022, Energy Conversion and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Space energy wireless transmission was not a new concept when first proposed in the 1960s,[22] but it was always a conceptually feasible but practically unfeasible option because the unaffordable aerospace launch cost prevents such a concept from further engineering applications. Nowadays, the launch and flight cost has been reduced [4344] and the carrying capacity of spacecraft has also been boosted [45], which paves the way for the engineering of the space energy wireless transmission system. Further, advancements in space robots and mechanical arms [46] will also make the launch and assembly of the CSEWTS-based resource satellite feasible and simple.

    • Coordinated trajectory planning of a dual-arm space robot with multiple avoidance constraints

      2022, Acta Astronautica
      Citation Excerpt :

      With the increasing number of noncooperative targets, on-orbit missions are becoming increasingly complex and diversified [1]. As one of the most effective methods to capture noncooperative targets, space robots have drawn much attention, and different kinds of space robotic systems have been proposed [2–4]. Compared with single-arm space robots, multi-arm space robots have wider operation space and higher flexibility that allows them to perform more complex capture missions [5].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Professor, Department of Astronautics Engineering.

    2

    Ph.D. candidate, Department of Astronautics Engineering.

    View full text