Skip to main content
Log in

Alluvial channel hydrodynamics around tandem piers with downward seepage

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we report the turbulent flow structures and the scour geometry around two piers with different diameters. An experiment was conducted on a non-uniform sand bed with two types of tandem arrangements, namely, pier (T1) with a 75 mm front and 90 mm rear, and pier (T2) with a 90 mm front and 75 mm rear, with and without-seepage flows, respectively. A strong wake region was observed behind the piers, but the vortex strength diminished with downward seepage. Streamwise velocity was found to be maximum near the bed downstream of the piers and at the edge of the scour hole upstream of the piers. Quadrant analysis was used to recognize the susceptible region for sediment entrainment and deposition. Upstream of the piers near the bed, the moments, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), and TKE fluxes were found to decrease with downward seepage, in contrast to those in a plane mobile bed without piers. The reduction percentages of scour depth at the rear pier compared with the front one were approximately 40% for T1 and 60% for T2. Downward seepage also resulted in restrained growth of scouring with time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melville B W. Local Scour at Bridge Sites. Auckland: The University of Auckland, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ettema R. Scour at bridge piers. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Auckland: The University of Auckland, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qadar A. The vortex scour mechanism at bridge piers. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Part Research & Theory. Aligarh, 1981

  4. Chiew Y M. Local scour at bridge piers. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Auckland: University of Auckland, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richardson E V, Davis S R. Evaluating Scour at Bridges. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pasiok R, Stilger-Szydlo E. Sediment particles and turbulent flow simulation around bridge piers. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 10(2): 67–79

    Google Scholar 

  7. Melville B W, Coleman S E. Bridge Scour. Lone Tree, CO: Water Resources Publications, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  8. Izadinia E, Heidarpour M, Schleiss A J. Investigation of turbulence flow and sediment entrainment around a bridge pier. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2013, 27(6): 1303–1314

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Baratian-Ghorghi Z, Beheshti A A. Experimental investigation of clear-water local scour of compound piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 136(6): 343–351

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beg M. Characteristics of developing scour holes around two piers placed in transverse arrangement. In: Scour and Erosion. California, 2010

  11. Salim M, Jones J S. Scour around exposed pile foundations. In: North American Water and Environment Congress & Destructive Water. California: ASCE, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Beheshti A A. Experimental investigation of clear-water local scour at pile groups. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 132(10): 1100–1104

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mahjoub Said N, Mhiri H, Bournot H, Le Palec G. Experimental and numerical modelling of the three dimensional incompressible flow behaviour in the near wake of circular cylinders. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(5): 471–502

    Google Scholar 

  14. Palau-Salvador G, Stoesser T, Rodi W. LES of the flow around two cylinders in tandem. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2008, 24(8): 1304–1312

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Aslani-Kordkandi A. Flow field around single and tandem piers. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2013, 90(3): 471–490

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Okajima A, Yasui S, Kiwata T, Kimura S. Flow-induced streamwise oscillation of two circular cylinders in tandem arrangement. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2007, 28(4): 552–560

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sumner D. Two circular cylinders in cross-flow: A review. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2010, 26(6): 849–899

    Google Scholar 

  18. Elhimer M, Harran G, Hoarau Y, Cazin S, Marchal M, Braza M. Coherent and turbulent processes in the bistable regime around a tandem of cylinders including reattached flow dynamics by means ofhigh-speed PIV. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2016, 60: 62–79

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma H D, Chawla A S. Manual of Canal Lining. Technical Report No. l4. Central Board of Irrigation and Power New Delhi, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krishnamurthy K, Rao S. Theory and experiment in canal seepage estimation using radioisotopes. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 1969, 9(3): 277–293

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berenbrock C. Stream Flow Gains and Losses in the Lower Boise River Basin, Idaho, 1996–97. Boise: US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tanji K K, Kielen N C. Agricultural Drainage Water Management in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas. Rome, UN: FAO, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kinzli K D, Martinez M, Oad R, Prior A, Gensler D. Using an ADCP to determine canal seepage loss in an irrigation district. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(6): 801–810

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martin C A, Gates T K. Uncertainty of canal seepage losses estimated using flowing water balance with acoustic Doppler devices. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2014, 517: 746–761

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lu Y, Chiew Y M, Cheng N S. Review of seepage effects on turbulent open channel flow and sediment entrainment. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2008, 46(4): 476–488

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cao D, Chiew Y M. Suction effects on sediment transport in closed-conduit flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2014, 140(5): 04014008

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rao A R, Sreenivasulu G, Kumar B. Geometry of sand-bed channels with seepage. Geomorphology, 2011, 128(3–4): 171–177

    Google Scholar 

  28. Francalanci S, Parker G, Solari L. Effect of seepage-induced nonhydrostatic pressure distribution on bed-load transport and bed morphodynamics. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 134(4): 378–389

    Google Scholar 

  29. Qi M, Chiew Y M, Hong J H. Suction effects on bridge pier scour under clear-water conditions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2013, 139(6): 621–629

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chavan R, Sharma A, Kumar B. Effect of downward seepage on turbulent flow characteristics and bed morphology around bridge piers. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2017, 16(1): 60–72

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wu B, Molinas A, Julien P Y. Bed material load computations for nonuniform sediments. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 130(10): 1002–1012

    Google Scholar 

  32. Marsh N A, Western A W, Grayson R B. Comparison of methods for predicting incipient motion for sand beds. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 130(7): 616–621

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chiew Y M, Melville B W. Local scour around bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1987, 25(1): 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yang S Q, Tan S K, Lim S Y. Velocity distribution and dipphenomenon in smooth uniform open channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 130(12): 1179–1186

    Google Scholar 

  35. Goring D G, Nikora V I. Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002, 128(1): 117–126

    Google Scholar 

  36. Deshpande V, Kumar B. Turbulent flow structures in alluvial channels with curved cross-sections under conditions of downward seepage. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2016, 41(8): 1073–1087

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tennekes H, Lumley J L. A First Course in Turbulence. London: MIT Press, 1972

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Lu S S, Willmarth W W. Measurements of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1973, 60(3): 481–511

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cellino M, Lemmin U. Influence of coherent flow structures on the dynamics of suspended sediment transport in open-channel flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 130(11): 1077–1088

    Google Scholar 

  40. Raupach M R. Conditional statistics of Reynolds stress in rough-wall and smooth-wall turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1981, 108: 363–382

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Maity H, Mazumder B S. Contributions of burst-sweep cycles to Reynolds shear stress over fluvial obstacle marks generated in a laboratory flume. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2012, 27(3): 378–387

    Google Scholar 

  42. Chavan R, Kumar B. Experimental investigation on flow and scour characteristics around tandem piers in sandy channel with downward seepage. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 2017, 16(3), 313–322

    Google Scholar 

  43. Chavan R, Kumar B. Prediction of scour depth and dune morphology around circular bridge piers in seepage affected alluvial channels. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 18(4): 923–945

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kumar V, Raju K G R, Vittal N. Reduction of local scour around bridge piers using slots and collars. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1999, 125(12): 1302–1305

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mia M F, Nago H. Design method of time-dependent local scour at circular bridge pier. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 420–427

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bimlesh Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chavan, R., Huai, W. & Kumar, B. Alluvial channel hydrodynamics around tandem piers with downward seepage. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 14, 1445–1461 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0648-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0648-x

Keywords

Navigation