Abstract
This paper details the success of using long-active reversible contraception (LARC) to prevent unwanted pregnancies in at-risk women. This paper describes the efferctiveness of LARCs when compared to other birth control methods in terms of motivation and response effort.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birgisson, N. E., Zhao, Q., Secura, G. M., Madden, T., & Peipert, J. F. (2015). Preventing unintended pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in review. Journal of Women’s Health, 24, 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2015.5191.
Frost, J. J., & Darroch, J. E. (2008). Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 40(2), 63–117. https://doi.org/10.1363/4009408.
Milligan, J., & Hantula, D. (2008). A prompting procedure for increasing sales in a small pet store. Journal of Organizational Behavioral Management, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v25n03_03.
Odum, A. L. (2011). Delay discounting: I’m a k, you’re a k. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96, 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2011.96-423.
Winner, B., Peipert, J. F., Zhao, Q., Buckel, C., Madden, T., Allsworth, J. E., & Secura, G. M. (2012). Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. New England Journal of Medicine, 366, 1998–2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edgerton, L., Wine, B. Decreasing Contraceptive Response Effort to Decrease Unwanted Pregnancies in At-Risk Women. Behav. Soc. Iss. 28, 13–15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-00007-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-00007-w