Abstract
Couto and Sandaker (2016) proposed two complementary processes, selection of cultures and cultural-selection, as successors to the metacontingency in the process of cultural-level selection. They argued that the selective processes in the metacontingency were limited to within-groups selection, and might be included in the discussion pertaining to the selection of cultural practices. Further, they argued that the selection processes outlined in the metacontingency model failed to address the selection of cultural-social environments, which they suggested might result in the selection of between cultures, or between groups, features and would be more in line with the third level of selection processes which Skinner (1981; 1988) described as resulting in the evolution of cultures. This article incorporates an understanding of feedback from systems theory that is broader than the common application of the concept in the field of behavior analysis, and considers several examples that illustrate how positive-feedback loops between multiple metacontingencies may result in the between-groups, cultural-level selective processes described by Couto and Sandaker, and how such systems may emerge via processes of self-organization.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abernathy, W. B. (2009). Walden Two revisited: Optimizing behavioral systems. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29(2), 175–192. doi:10.1080/01608060902874567
Ashby, W. R. (1957). An introduction to cybernetics. London, England: Chapman & Hall, LTD.
Campbell, C. B. G. (1984). Behaviorism and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 7(4), 484. doi: 10.1017/S014525X00026777
Couto, K. C., & Sandaker, I. (2016). Natural, behavioral and cultural selection-analysis: An integrative approach. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 54–60. doi: 10.5210/bsi.v.25i0.6891
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Dawkins, R. (1984). Replicators, consequences, and displacement activities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(4), 487–488. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00026790
Forrester, J. W. (1968). Principles of systems. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 161–179.
Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 133–151.
Glenn, S. S., & Malott, M. E. (2004). Complexity and selection: Implications for organizational change. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 89–106. doi:10.5210/bsi.v13i2.378
Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., Todorov, J. C., Tourinho, E. Z., & Vasconcelos, L. A., (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 11–27. doi: 10.5210.bsi.v25i0.6634
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Hayes, L. J., Dubuque, E. M., Fryling, M. J., & Pritchard, J. K. (2009). A behavioral systems analysis of behavior analysis as a scientific system. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29(3–4), 315–332.
Houmanfar, R., & Rodrigues, N. J. (2006). The metacontingency and the behavioral contingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 13–30. doi: 10.5210/bsi.v15i1.342
Houmanfar, R., Rodrigues, N. J., & Ward, T. A. (2010). Emergence and metacontingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 53–78. doi: 10.5210/bsi/v19i0.3065
Hudson, C. G. (2000). From Social Darwinism to self-organization: Implications for social change theory. Social Service Review, 74, 533–559. doi: 10.1086/516424
Hunter, C. S. (2012). Analyzing behavior and cultural selection contingencies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 44, 43–54. https://doi.org/www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid+S0120-05342012000100005&lng=en&nrm=iso
Jepsen, G. L., Simpson, G. G., & Mayr, E. (1949). Genetics, paleontology, and evolution. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Kauffman, S. A. (2000). Investigations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kauffman, S. A. (2008). Reinventing the sacred: A new view of science, reason, and religion. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Krispin, J. V. (2016). What is the metacontingency? Deconstructing claims of emergence and cultural-level selection. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 28–41. doi: 10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6816
Malott, M. E. (2003). Paradox of organizational change. Reno, NV: Context Press.
Marr, J. (1996). A mingled yarn. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 19–33.
Marr, J. (2006). Behavior analysis and social dynamics: Some questions and concerns. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 57–67. doi: 10.5210/bsi.v15i1.345
Mattaini, M. A. (2004). Systems, metacontingencies, and cultural analysis: Are we there yet? Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 124–130. doi: 10.5210/bsi.v13i2.20
Mattaini, M. A. (2006). Will cultural analysis become a science? Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 68–80. doi: 10.5210/bsi.v15i1.380
Mattaini, M. A. (2007). Editorial: Technical language in cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 16, 1–4.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications, Inc.
Nicolis, G. & Prigogine, I. (1989). Exploring complexity. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Prigogine, I. (1996). The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Toronto, Canada: Bantam Books.
Sandaker, I. (2009). A selectionist perspective on systematic and behavioral change in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29, 276–293. doi: 10.1080/01608060903092128
Senge, P. M. (1991). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday Currency.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Free Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504. doi:10.1126/science.7244649
Skinner, B. F. (1988). Responses to commentaries. In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1989). Recent issues in the analysis of behavior. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
Todorov, J. C. (2013). Conservation and transformation of cultural practices through contingencies and metacontingencies. Behavior and Social Issues, 22, 64–73. doi:10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4812
Ulanowicz, R. E. (2009). A third window. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. New York, NY: George Braziller.
Weiner, N. (1961). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. London, England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krispin, J. Positive Feedback Loops of Metacontingencies: A New Conceptualization of Cultural-Level Selection. Behav. Soc. Iss. 26, 95–110 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v26i0.7397
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v26i0.7397