Abstract
Design thinking is a collaborative problem-solving approach that fosters innovation and communication by enhancing learners’ creative thinking abilities. This article discusses the use of domains identified by the Framework for 21st Century Learning (P21 Framework) to conduct a qualitative, exploratory case study to identify design thinking attributes perceived to be instrumental in building students’ capacity for communication, collaboration, critical thinking, and creativity using robots and digital storytelling. The purpose of this study was to understand how students perceive the use of robots to help them build these 21st century competencies and to help identify practical implementation strategies for teachers interested in using robots to support 21st century skills. Sixteen students in a three-week summer camp were grouped and used Sphero Bot robots to design and build an interactive story using the robots as characters. Data collected included classroom observations, student reflections, and student-created artifacts. The P21 Framework recognizes three domains related to design thinking, identified as major contributors to authentic learning, adaptive critical thinking, and new media literacies. This case study addresses two domains relevant to using robotics and digital storytelling within this bounded case, (a) learning and innovation skills and (b) information, media, and technology literacy skills. Five student competencies within these two domains provided the conceptual framework used as a foundation to facilitate reliability of this research. The results of the current study indicate that using robots in this manner to build an interactive story sparked engagement in coding and digital storytelling, offered an authentic context applying design thinking to build 21st century competencies, and encouraged participants to further explore their newly developed skills.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arís, N., & Orcos, L. (2019). Educational robotics in the stage of secondary education: Empirical study on motivation and STEM skills. Education Sciences, 9(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020073.
Bapna, A., Sharma, N., Kaushic, A., & Kumar, A. (2017). Handbook on measuring 21st century skills. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10020.99203.
Battelle for Kids. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning. Partnership For 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York, NY: Harper Business.
Burdick, A., & Willis, H. (2011). Digital learning, digital scholarship and design thinking. Design Studies, 32(6), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.005.
Ching, Y. H., Yang, D., Wang, S., Baek, Y., Swanson, S., & Chittoori, B. (2019). Elementary school student development of STEM attitudes and perceived learning in a STEM integrated robotics curriculum. TechTrends, 590–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00388-0.
Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Davies, R. S. (2011). Understanding technology literacy: A framework for evaluating educational technology integration. TechTrends, 55(5), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0527-3.
Dousay, T. A., & Weible, J. L. (2019). Build-a-bug workshop: Designing a learning experience with emerging technology to foster creativity. TechTrends, 63(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0364-8.
Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.
Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). Bls spotlight on statistics: Stem occupations-past, present, and future. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/1923/.
Gunter, G., Kenny, R., & Vick, E. (2008). Taking educational games seriously: Using the RETAIN model to design endogenous fantasy into standalone educational games. Education Tech Research Development, 56, 511–537.
Hobbs, R., & Jensen, A. (2009). The past , present , and future of media literacy education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1, 1–11.
Information Literacy Glossary | Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL). (n.d.). Retrieved September 3, 2019, from http://www.ala.org/acrl/issues/infolit/overview/glossary
Kandlhofer, M., & Steinbauer, G. (2016). Evaluating the impact of educational robotics on pupils’ technical- and social-skills and science related attitudes. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 679–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.09.007.
Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers and Education, 91, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005.
Koh, J., Chai, C., & Lee, M. (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for pedagogical improvement: Editorial for special Issue on TPACK. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0241-6.
Kopcha, T. J., McGregor, J., Shin, S., Qian, Y., Choi, J., Hill, R., et al. (2017). Developing an integrative STEM curriculum for robotics education through educational design research. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0005-1.
Lench, S., Fukada, E., & Anderson, R. (2015). Essential skills and dispositions: Developmental frameworks for collaboration, communication, creativity and self-direction. National Center for innovation in education. Retrieved from https://www.inflexion.org/download/39291/.
Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., & Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using robotics and game design to enhance children’s self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9628-2.
Mandler, J. M. (2014). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Porter, B. (2004). DigiTales: The art of telling digital stories. Sedalia, CO: Benjamin Porter Consulting.
Rich, P. J., Browning, S. F., Perkins, M. K., Shoop, T., Yoshikawa, E., & Belikov, O. M. (2019). Coding in K-8: International trends in teaching elementary/primary computing. TechTrends, 63(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0295-4.
Saldana, J., & Omasta, M. (2017). Analyzing documents, artifacts, and visual materials. Qualitative Research: Analyzing Life, 63–88. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2011). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design & Technology Education, (17)3, 8-19.
Sidik, I., Awang, M., & Ahmad, A. (2019). The relationship between students' involvement in 21st century classroom learning activities and higher order thinking skills. Malaysian Journal of Education, 44(1), 59–64.
Siew Ming, T., Yit Sim, L., Mahmud, N., Luck Kee, L., Ahmad Zabidi, N., & Ismail, K. (2014). Enhancing 21st century learning skills via digital storytelling: Voices of Malaysian teachers and undergraduates. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.067.
Tharumaraj, J. N., Krishnan, S., & Perumal, R. (2018). Learners’ perspective: 21st century fluencies. The English Teacher, 47(3), 92–103.
Worlitz, J., Branke, M., Troike, M., Hettling, L., & Woll, R. (2018). The contribution of learning, teaching and assessment activities to the development of 21st century STEM competencies. In 2018 IEEE international conference on teaching, assessment, and learning for engineering (TALE) (pp. 316–321). https://doi.org/10.1109/tale.2018.8615320.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stork, M.G. Supporting Twenty-First Century Competencies Using Robots and Digital Storytelling. J Form Des Learn 4, 43–50 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-019-00039-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-019-00039-w