Skip to main content
Log in

The Unique Case of Minneapolis–St. Paul, MN: Locational Attainments and Segregation in the Twin Cities

  • Published:
Spatial Demography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Minneapolis–St. Paul Metropolitan Area has a rapidly growing foreign-born population in part due to its high levels of refugee reception and migrants drawn to the burgeoning high-tech and manufacturing industries. As a result, the Twin Cities are unique in that every major racial group has a sizable foreign-born segment with a wide range of U.S. entry experiences and thus the area offers an opportunity to investigate the dynamics of locational attainments and segregation of a highly diverse non-White population. Accordingly, we examine the residential outcomes of Blacks, Latinos and Asians, investigate how nativity, socioeconomic gains, and acculturation translate into residential contact with Whites, and draw the link between these micro-level locational attainments and overall segregation patterns for the area. We find Latinos and Asians experience traditional spatial assimilation dynamics but a different pattern is seen for Blacks wherein foreign-born Blacks are less segregated than U.S.-born Blacks, reversing the expected role of nativity and acculturation and suggesting a more complicated story of ethnic stratification and assimilation supported by the segmented assimilation framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Briefly, the dissimilarity index is less sensitive to residential exchanges that occur across below-parity neighborhoods, or across above-parity neighborhoods. See Fossett (2017) for a more detailed explanation and analysis of this measurement issue.

References

  • Abdi, C. M. (2012). The newest African-Americans?: Somali struggles for belonging. Bildhaan: An International Journal of Somali Studies,11, 90–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D., & Logan, J. R. (1991). Variations on two themes: Racial and ethnic patterns in the attainment of suburban residence. Demography,28(3), 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D., & Logan, J. R. (1992). Analyzing locational attainments: Constructing individual-level regression models using aggregate data. Sociological Methods and Research,20(3), 367–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D., & Logan, J. R. (1993). Minority proximity to Whites in suburbs: An individual-level analysis of segregation. American Journal of Sociology,98(6), 1388–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althauser, R. P., & Wigler, M. (1972). Standardization and component analysis. Sociological Methods and Research,1(1), 97–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, C. Z. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology,29, 167–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A. V. (2002). Ethnic preferences and ethnic perceptions in multi-ethnic settings. Urban Geography,23(3), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, K., Hall, M., & Tolnay, S. E. (2011). Neighborhood immigration and native out-migration. American Sociological Review,76(1), 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, A. R., & Fossett, M. (2018). White and Latino locational attainments: Assessing the role of race and resources in U.S. metropolitan residential segregation. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity,4(4), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, N., & Massey, D. (1989). Racial identity among Caribbean Hispanics: The effect of double minority status on residential segregation. American Sociological Review,54(5), 790–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D., & Lieberson, S. (1959). Ethnic segregation and assimilation. American Journal of Sociology,64(4), 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eason, J. (2017). Big house on the prairie: Rise of the rural ghetto and prison proliferation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R., Steeh, C., Krysan, M., Jackson, T., & Reeves, K. (1994). Stereotypes and segregation: Neighborhoods in the Detroit area. American Journal of Sociology,100(3), 750–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennelly, K. (2005). Latinos, Africans, and Asians in the North Star State: Immigrant communities in Minnesota. In E. M. Gozdiziak & S. F. Martin (Eds.), Beyond the gateway: Immigrants in a changing America (pp. 111–136). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennelly, K. (2006). State and local policy responses to immigration in Minnesota. Report to the Century Foundation.

  • Fennelly, K., & Palasz, N. (2003). English language proficiency of immigrants and refugees in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. International Migration,41(5), 93–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossett, M. (1988). Community-level analysis of racial socioeconomic inequality: A cautionary note. Sociological Methods and Research,16(4), 454–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossett, M. (2017). New methods for measuring and analyzing segregation. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galster, G. (1990). Racial discrimination in housing markets during the 1980s: A review of the audit evidence. Journal of Planning Education and Research,9(3), 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2013). Residential integration on the new frontier: Immigrant segregation in established and new destinations. Demography,50, 1873–1896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., & Stringfield, J. (2014). Undocumented migration and the residential segregation of Mexicans in new destinations. Social Science Research,47, 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iceland, J. (2014). A portrait of America: The demographic perspective. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iceland, J., & Nelson, K. A. (2008). Hispanic segregation in metropolitan America: Exploring the multiple forms of spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review,73(5), 741–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iceland, J., & Scopilliti, M. (2008). Immigrant residential segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1990–2000. Demography,45(1), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iceland, J., Weinberg, D., & Hughes, L. (2014). The residential segregation of detailed Hispanic and Asian groups in the United States: 1980–2010. Demographic Research,31, 593–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iceland, J., Weinberg, D., & Steinmetz, E. (2002). Racial and ethnic residential segregation in the United States: 1980–2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F. L., & Kelley, J. (1984). Decomposing differences between groups: A cautionary note on measuring discrimination. Sociological Methods and Research,12(3), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieschnick, R., & McCullough, B. D. (2003). Regression analysis of variates observed on (0,1): Percentages, proportions and fractions. Statistical Modeling,3(3), 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, E. M. (1955). Components of a difference between two rates. Journal of the American Statistical Association,50(272), 1168–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krysan, M., & Crowder, K. (2017). Cycle of segregation: Social processes and residential stratification. New York: Russell Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., Parisi, D., Taquino, M. C., & Grice, S. M. (2010). Residential segregation in new Hispanic destinations: Cities, suburbs, and rural communities compared. Social Science Research,39(2), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S. (1981). A piece of the pie: Black and White immigrants since 1880. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. (1978). Growth, politics, and the stratification of places. American Journal of Sociology,84(2), 404–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. (2011). Separate and unequal: The neighborhood gap for Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians in Metropolitan America. US2010 project report. Russell Sage Foundation American Communities Project. Brown University.

  • Logan, J. R., Foster, A., Ke, J., & Li, F. (2018). The uptick in income segregation: Real trend or random sampling variation? American Journal of Sociology,124(1), 185–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1985). Spatial assimilation as a socioeconomic outcome. American Sociological Review,50(1), 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2007). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid. Cambridge: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., & Lundy, G. (2001). Use of Black English and racial discrimination in urban housing markets: New methods and findings. Urban Affairs Review,36(4), 452–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., & Mullen, B. (1984). Processes of Hispanic and Black spatial assimilation. American Journal of Sociology,89(4), 836–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napierala, J., & Denton, N. (2017). Measuring residential segregation with the ACS: How the margin of error affects the dissimilarity index. Demography,54(1), 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics,11(6), 619–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Political Science,530, 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, D. A., Yoshioka, H., & Yun, M. (2011). MVDCMP: Multivariate decomposition for nonlinear response models. The Stata Journal,11(4), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., Bischoff, K., Owens, A., & Townsend, J. B. (2018). Has income segregation really increased? Bias and bias correction in sample-based segregation estimates. Demography. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0721-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., & Firebaugh, G. (2002). Measures of multi-group segregation. Social Forces,67, 281–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S., & Turner, M. (2005). Housing discrimination in metropolitan America: Explaining changes between 1989 and 2000. Social Problems,52(2), 152–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A., & Wilson, J. H. (2006). From ‘there’ to ‘here’: Refugee resettlement in metropolitan America., Living cities census series Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., Crowder, K., & Pais, J. (2008). Inter-neighborhood migration and spatial assimilation in a multi-ethnic world: Comparing Latinos, Blacks, and Anglos. Social Forces,87(1), 415–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. A. (1992). Discrimination in urban housing markets: Lessons from fair housing audits. Housing Policy Debate,3(2), 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. A., Santos, S., Levy, D. K., Wissoker, D., Aranda, C., & Pitingolo, R. (2013). Housing discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities 2012. Washington: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winship, C. (1977). A revaluation of indexes of residential segregation. Social Forces,55(4), 1058–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Z., & Myers, D. (2007). Convergence or divergence in Los Angeles: Three distinctive ethnic patterns of immigrant residential assimilation. Social Science Research,36(1), 254–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M. (1997). Segmented assimilation: Issues, controversies, and research on the new second generation. International Migration Review,31(4), 975–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubrinsky, C., & Bobo, L. (1996). Prismatic metropolis: Race and residential segregation in the City of Angels. Social Science Research,25(4), 335–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Census Bureau. All results have been reviewed to ensure that no confidential information is disclosed.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amber R. Crowell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crowell, A.R., Fossett, M. The Unique Case of Minneapolis–St. Paul, MN: Locational Attainments and Segregation in the Twin Cities. Spat Demogr 8, 1–31 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-019-00056-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-019-00056-0

Keywords

Navigation