Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neighbours and Friends? Can Residential Segregation Explain Ethnic Separation? The Case of Milan (Italy)

  • Published:
Spatial Demography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethnic segregation is defined as the degree to which two or more subgroups of population by ethnicity are separated from each other. Whether or not two groups are separated is a debate reflecting on the definition of what ‘separation’ means: sharing the same space where to reside, having the same opportunities for daily encounters or for work, or the space for leisure and cultivation of friendship relations. In this paper, we focus on the relation between ethnic residential segregation and friendship relations. We analyse the residential behaviour and friendship of foreigners in Milan (the nine major citizenships), which is the most important urban area in the national settlement system of Italy and the most attractive area in the migratory Italian panorama. We show how residential behaviour can only partially explain friendship relations between immigrants and natives, since different ethnic groups tend to settle on the territory and interact with others depending on the characteristics of individuals and their immigration history. Data come from the population register (2005–2009) and the 2007 Regional Observatory for Integration and Multi-ethnicity Survey. Results are based on indices of segregation and multilevel multinomial logistic regression models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source Authors’ elaboration on population register data

Fig. 2

Source Authors’ elaboration on population register data

Fig. 3

Source Authors’ elaboration on 2007 Orim data

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The variable language skill was built assigning firstly the highest level of proficiency of Italian (very well) to those who declared to read and write very well and to understand at least enough, whatever their competence in speaking. Then, the lowest level of proficiency of Italian (at all or very little) was attributed to those who stated to have no competence in reading and writing, regardless of speaking and understanding, or to have a scarce ability to understand (whatever speaking, reading and writing). Finally, the medium proficiency was attributed to the remaining foreigners.

  2. Predicted probabilities are calculated on the basis of the regression coefficients of the model through the STATA procedure “predict”.

References

  • Agresti, J. H. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agustoni, A., & Alietti, A. (2009). Società urbane e convivenza interetnica: Vita quotidiana e rappresentazioni degli immigrati in un quartiere di Milano. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algan, Y., Bisin, A., Manning, A., & Thierry, V. (2012). Cultural integration of immigrants in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini, M. (2012). Surviving underground: Irregular migrants, Italian families, invisible welfare. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(4), 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini, M. (2015). L’integrazione quotidiana: famiglie migranti e relazioni di vicinato. In M. V. Calvi, I. Iajini, & M. Bonomi (Eds.), Lingue migranti e nuovi paesaggi (pp. 17–35). Milano: Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R., & Musterd, S. (2010). What scale matters? Exploring the relationships between individuals’ social position, neighbourhood context and the scale of the neighbourhood. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 92, 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, R. (2013). Reproducing and reshaping ethnic residential segregation in Stockholm: The role of selective migration moves. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 95(2), 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baio, G., Blangiardo, G. C., & Blangiardo, M. (2011). Centre sampling technique in foreign migration surveys: A methodological note. Journal of Official Statistics, 27(3), 451–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardotti, M. A., & Zanoni, M. (1996). Le dinamiche migratorie ed il loro impatto residenziale. Un’analisi condotta attraverso lo studio degli indici di segregazione etnica sul territorio provinciale e comunale. Metronomie, 7, 99–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blangiardo, G. C. (ed) (2008). L’immigrazione straniera in Lombardia. La settima indagine regionale. Rapporto 2007. ISMU – ORIM: Milano.

  • Blau, P. M. (1994). Structural contexts of opportunities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boshman, S. (2012). Residential segregation and interethnic contact in the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 49(2), 353–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, M. L. (2011). Close together but worlds apart? Residential integration and interethnic friendship in Huston. City & Community, 10(2), 182–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. A., & Chung, S.-Y. (2006). Spatial segregation, segregation indices and the geographical perspective. Population, Space and Place, 12, 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, N. (2001). Identifying neighborhood effects on social exclusion. Urban Studies, 38, 2251–2275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadge, W., & Ecklund, E. H. (2007). Immigration and religion. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casacchia, O., Natale, L., & Martino, G. (2012). La presenza straniera all’interno della città. Roma e Parigi a confronto. CISU: Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (2007). Immigration and the new religious pluralism: A European Union/United States Comparison. In T. Banchoff (Ed.), Democracy and the new religious pluralism (pp. 59–83). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerasi, M., & Ferraresi, G. (1974). La residenza operaia a Milano. Roma: Officina Edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cologna, D. (2002). La Cina sotto casa: convivenza e conflitti tra cinesi e italiani in due quartieri di Milano. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, A., & Decimo, F. (2009). Spazi di confidenza: la regolazione della distanza sociale nella collaborazione domestica. In R. Catanzaro & A. Colombo (Eds.), Badanti & Co. Il lavoro domestico straniero in Italia (pp. 253–278). Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J., Dwyer, P., & Waite, L. (2011). ‘Good relations’ among neighbours and workmates? The everyday encounters of accession 8 migrants and established communities in Urban England. Population, Space and Place, 17, 727–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristaldi, F. (2012). Immigrazione e territorio: la segregazione residenziale nelle aree metropolitane. Geotema, 43–45, 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davico, L., & Mela, A. (1999). Aspetti spaziali dei nuovi fenomeni migratori in Piemonte. Sociologia Urbana e Rurale, 59, 33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, M., & van Wichelen, S. (2012). Civilizing migrants: Integration, culture and citizenship. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(2), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza Briggs, X. (2007). “Some of my best friends are…”: Interracial friendships, class, and segregation in America. City & Community, 6, 263–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drever, A. (2004). Separate spaces, separate outcomes? Neighbourhood impacts on minorities in Germany. Urban Studies, 41(8), 1423–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dziak, J. J., Coffman, D. L., Lanza, S. T., & Li, R. (2012). Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria. In The metodology center technical report series #12-119. The Pennsylvania State University.

  • Espinosa, K. E., & Massey, D. S. (1997). Determinants of english proficiency among Mexican migrants to the United States. International Migration Review, 31, 28–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. (1986). Social context and inter-ethnic relations: The case of migrant workers in West German urban areas. European Sociological Review, 2, 30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferruzza, A., Dardanelli, S., Heins, F., & Verrascina, M. (2008). La geografia insediativa degli stranieri residenti: Verona, Firenze e Palermo a confronto. Studi Emigrazione, 171, 602–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granata, E., & Lanzani, A. (2008). La fabbrica delle periferie. Produzione collettiva della scarsità, disagio e conflitti latenti a Milano. In L. Fregolent (Ed.), Periferia e periferie (pp. 273–309). Roma: Aracne Editrice.

    Google Scholar 

  • IREF. (2007). Il Welfare ‘fatto in casa’. Indagine nazionale sui collaboratori domestici stranieri che lavorano a sostegno delle famiglie italiane, Rapporto di ricerca. Roma: IREF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. H., & Recoquillon, C. (2014). Ethnic place identity within a parisian neighborhood. Geographical Review, 104(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. S., Anderson, C. J., & Keller, B. (2013). Multilevel Modeling. In L. Rutkowski, M. von Davier, & D. Rutkowski (Eds.), A handbook of international large-scale assessment: Background, technical issues, and methods of data analysis. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klauss, D. R. (2005). Geografie dell’immigrazione. Spazi multietnici nelle città: In Italia, Campania, Napoli. Napoli: Liguori Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouvo, A., & Lockmer, C. (2013). Imagine all the neighbours: Perceived neighbourhood ethnicity, interethnic friendship ties and perceived ethnic threat in four Nordic countries. Urban Studies, 50(16), 3305–3322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzani, A. (1998). Modelli insediativi, forme di coabitazione e mutamento dei luoghi urbani. Urbanistica, 111, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzani, A. (2002). Metamorfosi urbane: Centri e periferie a Milano. In G. A. Micheli (Ed.), Dentro la città. Forme dell’habitat e pratiche sociali. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzani, A., Merlini, C., & Zanfi, F. (2014). Quando «un nuovo ciclo di vita» non si dà. Fenomenologia dello spazio abbandonato e prospettive per il progetto urbanistico oltre il paradigma del riuso. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 109, 28–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. P. (1999). Culture and language. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 95–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Alba, R., & Zhang, W. (2002). Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinović, B. (2013). The inter-ethnic contacts of immigrants and natives in the Netherlands: A two-sided perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(1), 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (1985). Ethnic residential segregation: A theoretical synthesis and empirical review. Sociology and Social Research, 69, 315–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid: segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazza, A., & Punzo, A. (2016). Spatial attraction in migrants’ settlement patterns in the city of Catania. Demographic Research, 35(5), 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheli, G. A. (2013). Anziani, relazioni di cura e affetti. In S. Pasquinelli & G. Rusmini (Eds.), Badare non basta. Il lavoro di cura: Attori, progetti, politiche (pp. 57–74). Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouw, T., & Entwisle, B. (2006). Residential segregation and interracial friendship in school. American Journal of Sociology, 112(2), 394–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munch, S. (2009). “It’s all in the mix”: Constructing ethnic segregation as a social problem in Germany. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 13(1), 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musterd, S. (2005). Social and ethnic segregation in Europe: Levels, causes, and effects. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(3), 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pétsimeris, P., & Rimoldi, S. M. L. (2015). Socio-economic divisions of space in Milan in the post-Fordist era. In T. Tammaru, S. Marcińczak, M. van Ham, & S. Musterd (Eds.), Socio-economic segregation in European capital cities. East meets west. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact: Theory research and new perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1230–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1996). Self-employment and the earnings of immigrants. American Sociological Review, 61(2), 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., & Goss, K. A. (2002). Introduction to Putnam RD democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarcinelli, A. S. (2011). Vivere ai margini tra Milano e Baranzate. Cronaca delle politiche di abbandono di un campo rom di frontiera. In G. Lucarno (Ed.), La frontiera dell’immigrazione. Dinamiche geografiche e sociali, esperienze per l’integrazione a Baranzate (pp. 67–83). Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlueter, E. (2012). The inter-ethnic friendships of immigrants with host-society members: Revisiting the role of ethnic residential segregation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semyonov, M., & Glickman, A. (2009). Ethnic residential segregation, social contacts, and anti-minority attitudes in European societies. European Sociological Review, 25(6), 693–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strozza, S., Benassi, F., Ferrara, R., & Gallo, G. (2016). Recent demographic trends in the major Italian Urban agglomerations: The role of foreigners. Spatial Demography, 4(1), 39–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgis, P., Brunton-Smith, I., Kuha, J., & Jackson, J. (2014). Ethnic diversity, segregation and the social cohesion of neighbourhoods in London. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(8), 1286–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tammaru, T., Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., & Musterd, S. (Eds.). (2015). Socio-economic segregation in European capital cities. East meets west. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Laan Bouma-Doff, W. (2007). Confined contact: Residential segregation and Etnic bridges in the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 44(5/6), 997–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Niejenhuis, C., van der Werf, M. P., & Otten, S. (2015). Predictors of immigrants’ second-language proficiency: A dutch study of immigrants with a low level of societal participation and second-language proficiency. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 236, 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voas, D., & Fleischmann, F. (2012). Islam moves west: Religious change in the first and second generations. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 525–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanfrini, L., & Sarli, A. (eds.) (2009). Migrants’ associations and Philippine institutions for development (First year’s activity). Mapid Italian report. Quaderni Ismu, 1, 88–93.

  • Zelinsky, W., & Lee, B. (1998). Heterolocalism: an alternative model of the sociospatial behaviour of immigrant ethnic communities. International Journal of Population Geography, 4, 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, A. R., & Woon, L. L. (1999). Why Islam is like Spanish: Cultural incorporation in Europe and the United States. Politics and Society, 27(1), 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano Bicocca, Via Bicocca degli Arcimboldi 8, 20136, Milan, Italy

    Stefania M. L. Rimoldi & Laura Terzera

Authors
  1. Stefania M. L. Rimoldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Terzera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania M. L. Rimoldi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 332 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rimoldi, S.M.L., Terzera, L. Neighbours and Friends? Can Residential Segregation Explain Ethnic Separation? The Case of Milan (Italy). Spat Demogr 5, 193–214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-017-0031-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-017-0031-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation