Skip to main content
Log in

Interreligious learning and teaching: unfolding layers of meaning in lived experience to inform possibilities for students in Catholic schools

  • Published:
Journal of Religious Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the question, “What is the individual’s experience of interreligious learning and teaching?” It utilises hermeneutic phenomenology to interpret the rich and hidden meanings of lived experiences. van Manen’s (Phenomenology of practice: meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge, New York, 2014) lifeworld existentials provide a frame for guiding the exploration to uncover insights through lived relation (relationality), lived space (spatiality), lived body (corporeality), lived time (temporality) and lived things (materiality). Current global events have highlighted to the world the tragedy of religious intolerance in extreme forms and the need to cultivate tolerance and sensitivities towards religions and non-religious philosophies and diverse life perspectives. Investigating the phenomena of ‘interreligious learning and teaching’ as it is lived by individuals, offers insight into what could be one’s own or another’s lived experience, and how this might influence one’s religious identity. Such understandings can provide a foundation for seeking out and engaging students in valuable interreligious learning and teaching experiences and pose opportunities or challenges for primary and secondary school contexts to rigorously grapple with the diverse global reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). ABS Census of Population and Housing. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/2071.0~2016~Main%20Features~Religion%20Data%20Summary~70.

  • Brown, P. U., Castle, K., Rogers, K. M., Feuerhelm, C., & Chimblo, S. (2007). The nature of primary teaching: Body, time, space, and relationships. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education,28(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901020601182683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cornille, C. (2008). The (im)possibility of interreligious Dialogue. New York: Crossroad Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council, E. (2019). Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration. Canberra: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggenberger, S., & Nelms, T. (2006). Being family: The family experience when an adult member is hospitalized with a critical illness. Journal of Clinical Nursing,16, 1618–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, T., & Dinan-Thompson, M. (2019a). Identity and dialogue: Learnings from a personal interreligious encounter. In M. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools (pp. 563–573). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, T., & Dinan-Thomspon, M. (2019b). Other Religions and No Religion a classroom approach to interreligious dialogue in religious education. In R. Rymarz & P. Sharkey (Eds.), Moving from theory to Practice: Religious Educator in the classroom (pp. 308–325). Mulgrave, VIC: Vaughan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, C., & Van Vuygt, J. (Eds.). (1997). Identity through time. Reflection on the confessional primary education in a secularized and multicultural society. The Hague: ABKO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, C. (2003). Participatory learning: Religious education in a globalizing society. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com.

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The idea of phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutsebaut, D. (2007). Religion and identity. In D. Pollefeyt (Ed.), Interreligious learning (pp. 279–290). Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huuskes, L. M., Heaven, P. C. L., Ciarrochi, J., Parker, P., & Caltabiano, N. (2016). Is belief in god related to differences in adolescents’ psychological functioning? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,55(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, B. (2003). Lifeworld existentials: Guides to reflection on a child’s spirituality. Journal of Religious Education,51(3), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, B. (2005). Beyond logic—Entering the realm of mystery: Hermeneutic phenomenology as a tool for reflecting on children’s spirituality. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality,10(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Independent Schools Council of Australia. (2018). The changing face of Australian schooling: An ISCA analysis of the ABS 2016 Census of Population and Housing. Deakin West, ACT: Independent Schools Council of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2019). Teaching about religious diversity: Policy and practice from the Council of Europe. In M. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools (pp. 497–509). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lombaerts, H. (2007). The impact of the status of religion in contemporary society upon interreligious learning. In D. Pollefeyt (Ed.), Interreligious learning (pp. 55–86). Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraldo, J. (2010). A call for an alternative understanding of interreligious hermeneutics. In C. Cornille & C. Conway (Eds.), Interreligious hermeneutics (pp. 89–115). Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J. (2004). Building background knowledge for academic achievement: Research on what works in schools. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com.

  • McCrindle, M. (2017). Faith and belief in Australia. Baulkham Hills, NSW: McCrindle Research Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B., & Habel, N. (1982). When religion goes to school: Typology of religion for the classroom. Adelaide, SA: Texts in Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyaert, M. (2010). Absorption or hospitality: Two approaches to the tension between identity and alterity. In C. Cornille & C. Conway (Eds.), Interreligious hermeneutics (pp. 61–88). Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Department of Education and Communities. Regional Aboriginal Education Team, Western Area. (2012). 8 Ways: Aboriginal pedagogy from Western NSW. Dubbo, NSW: RAET, Department of Education and Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollefeyt, D. (Ed.). (2007). Interreligious learning. Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollefeyt, D., & Bouwens, J. (2010). Framing the identity of Catholic schools: Empirical methodology for quantitative research on the Catholic identity of an education institute. International Studies in Catholic Education,2(2), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollefeyt, D., & Bouwens, J. (2014). Identity in Dialogue: Assessing and enhancing Catholic School Identity research methodology and research results in Catholic schools in Victoria, Australia. Zweigniederlassung Zurich: Lit Verlag GmbH and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollefeyt, D., & Bouwens, J. (2019). Lecture: Interconvictional dialogue in the Catholic dialogue school. Cairns, QLD: Catholic Education Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, S., Graham, M., Taket, A., & Shelley, J. (2013). Navigating the terrain of lived experience: The value of lifeworld existentials for reflective analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,12(1), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roebben, B. (2019). New wine in fresh wineskins. Rethinking the theologicity of Catholic religious education. In M. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools (pp. 51–61). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, G. (2018). Life to the full: The changing landscape of contemporary spirituality. Implications for Catholic school religious education. Sydney: Agora for Spiritual, Moral and Religious Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, G. (2020). Re-contextualising Catholic school Religious Education: Educating young people spiritually, morally and religiously for the 21st century. In Paper presented at the international conference on Catholic religious education in schools, Melbourne, February 2020.

  • Roux, C. (2007). Interreligious learning: Teacher’s abilities and didactic challenges. In D. Pollefeyt (Ed.), Interreligious learning (pp. 103–127). Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, P. (2001). Hermeneutic phenomenology. In R. Barnacle (Ed.), Phenomenology: Qualitative research methods (pp. 16–37). Melbourne, VIC: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, P. (2017). Better understanding the context of religious education: The CECV Leuven Project. In R. Rymarz & A. Belmonte (Eds.), Religious education in Australian Catholic schools: Exploring the landscape (pp. 54–76). Mulgrave, VIC: Vaughan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Horst, W. (1995). Show me the way. Possibilities for a Christian upbringing in a post-Christian society. Kampen: Kok.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk-Groeneboer, M. C. H. (2019). Religious education in the secularized Netherlands. In M. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools (pp. 655–663). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: The Althouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedding formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for Learning: Why, what and how. In Cambridge Assessment Network conference, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, September 2006. https://www.dylanwiliam.org/Dylan_Wiliams_website/Papers.html.

  • Wiliam, D. (2014). Formative assessment and contingency in the regulation of learning processes. In Toward a theory of classroom assessment as the regulation of learning. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, April 2014. https://www.dylanwiliam.org/Dylan_Wiliams_website/Papers.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Toni Foley. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Toni Foley and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toni Foley.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the Ethical Standards of James Cook University, Human Research Ethics Committee, ID H7849.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foley, T., Dinan-Thompson, M. & Caltabiano, N. Interreligious learning and teaching: unfolding layers of meaning in lived experience to inform possibilities for students in Catholic schools. j. relig. educ. 68, 141–160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-020-00099-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-020-00099-2

Keywords

Navigation