Skip to main content
Log in

Reclaiming contemplation: silence, introspection and the RE classroom

  • Published:
Journal of Religious Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article introduces us to the benefits of contemplative practices integrated to the RE classroom. The author promotes contemplative practices in religious education, investigating how these can be integrated to the curriculum and the multiple modes of inquiry already present. After accounting for contemplation in the West, and especially in the Christian tradition, an analysis of contemplative practices is proposed to the reader’s attention, through various lenses: first-person inquiry, contemplation with children and of children, or in association with transmission and dialogical practices. Examples inspired by practices in higher education or stemming from the author’s own experience show how contemplation can become part of the regular work of the classroom. Just as reclaiming conversation (Turkle in Reclaiming conversation. The power of talk in a digital age, Penguin Press, New York, 2015) is an absolute necessity today in education, reclaiming contemplation is essential to religious education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Philo, Quis rerum div. eres, Sect. 253, and Leg. Alleg., III, Sect. 18. Here the two lists are brought together, and concern certain Hellenistic schools, namely the Stoics (Hadot 2002).

  2. A study conducted in Quebec in 2012 among 97 teenagers shows three areas in which dialogical practices had a positive impact on the students’ relationships. First, a social aspect: the students think that they are more open-minded and respectful of others’ opinions, better listeners and less judgmental; they feel uncomfortable with plain debate where what matters is one’s ideas; they notice they can defend their ideas and positions without getting angry or upset. Second, an intellectual dimension: an increase in critical thinking and intellectual capabilities; a finer ethical judgment; an increased capacity for introspection and examination of their own biases. Third, and not the least, the students can apply what they learnt outside of a classroom environment (Gagnon et al. 2013).

  3. For an example of these practices, see du Val d’Epremesnil (2018b), about an Indian method especially designed to this effect and applicable to the context of the classroom.

  4. Including mindfulness meditation; structured contemplation (in two steps, holding an object of contemplation without analyzing: question, image or statement; deepening understanding by allowing a deeper awareness to emerge); writing journals after structured contemplation; journal reading in pairs, as contemplative interaction, by reading, listening and reflecting back (comparing what is read from someone else’s journal to what was written in the journal), then exchanging about it (reflective inquiry), dialogue being a “stream of meaning between participants”; finally, facilitated class discussions with the instructor and critical thinking, expanding the dialogue to the whole group (Sable 2014, pp. 4–8). Qualitative research was conducted by one-to-one interviews and audio transcripts among eight former students (p. 9), when quantitative methods examined measurable indicators for reflective dispositions using the students’ written work: the journals, term papers, anonymous questionnaires, interviews (pp. 10–11).

  5. I refer here to a 2017 workshop conducted by a Belgian specialist of communities of inquiry (inspector for the Catholic RE course Michel Desmedt), as well as my own experiments in Gihindamuyaga monastery in Rwanda in 2018 (du Val d’Epremesnil 2018a).

References

  • Anderson, E. B. (2013). Stop, look, listen: Contemplative teaching and learning. Christian Education Journal,3(2), 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (2016). Condition de l’homme moderne (2nd ed.). Paris: Calmann-Lévy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbezat, D., & Bush, M. (2014). Contemplative practices in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Joey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeve, L. (2006). The identity of a Catholic University in Post Christian European Societies. Four models. Louvain Studies,31, 238–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, T. (2011). the convergence of liberal education and contemplative education–inevitable. In J. Simmer-Brown & F. Grace (Eds.), Meditation and the classroom (pp. 3–12). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copenhaver, J. D. (2011). Two contemplative practices that animate the practice of religion. In J. Simmer-Brown & F. Grace (Eds.), Meditation and the classroom (pp. 217–221). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Béthune, P.-F. (2007). L’hospitalité sacrée entre les religions. Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Val d’Epremesnil, D. (2018a). Chronique. L’université de paix en Afrique, Butare, Rwanda, du 15 juillet au 5 août 2018. Lumen Vitae, 73(3), 355–359.

  • du Val d’Epremesnil, D. (2018b). Le rayonnement du projet ‘Discovery’ de J.M. Sampath. Analyse critique et intérêt pour repositionner la pédagogie religieuse. In J., Cottin & H., Derroitte (Eds.). Nouvelles avancées en psychologie et pédagogie de la religion (pp. 171–180). Namur, Belgium: Lumen Vitae.

  • du Val d’Epremesnil, D. (2020). Construire du sens, transmettre un sens. Philosophie et religions en éducation religieuse. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.

  • Gagnon, M., Yergeau, S., & Couture, É. (2013). L’apprentissage du vivre-ensemble par la pratique du dialogue philosophique en classe: propos d’adolescents. Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill/Mc Gill Journal of Education,41(1), 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gira, D. (2012). Le dialogue à la portée de tous… (ou presque). Montrouge: Bayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, F. (2011). From content to context to contemplation. One professor’s journey. In J. Simmer-Brown & F. Grace (Eds.), Meditation and the classroom (pp. 47–64). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmitt, M. (1987). Religious education and Human development. Great Wakering: McCrimmons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmitt, M. (2000). Contemporary pedagogies of religious education: What are they? In M. Grimmitt (Ed.), Pedagogies of religious education: Case studies in the research and development of good pedagogic practice in RE. McCrimmons: Great Wakering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, P. (2002). Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique (2nd ed.). Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, P. (2014). Discours et mode de vie philosophique. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (2004). À l’école de John Main, la méditation chrétienne. Ottawa: Novalis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, T. (2004). Opening the contemplative mind in the classroom. Journal of Tranformative Education,2(1), 28–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, G., Mitchell, G., & Pollard, G. (Eds.). (2009). Hovering over the face of the deep. Philosophy, theology and children. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacarrière, J. (2008). Les hommes ivres de Dieu (2nd ed.). Paris: Points/Sagesses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (2011). À l’école de la pensée. Enseigner une pensée holistique. Brussels: De Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, P. (2018). The Contemplative Mind in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panikkar, R. (1995). Éloge du simple. Le moine comme archétype universel. Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roebben, B. (2009). Seeking sense in the City. Berlin: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sable, D. (2014). Reason in the service of the heart: The impacts of contemplative practices on critical thinking. The Journal of Contemplative Inquiry,1, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, F. (2006). Children as theologians God-talk with children, development psychology, and interreligious education. In D. Bates, G. Durka, & F. Schweitzer (Eds.), Education, religion and society essays in honour of John M. Hull (pp. 179–190). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming Conversation. The power of talk in a digital age. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, C. (2011). Experiencing medieval Christian spirituality. In J. Simmer-Brown & F. Grace (Eds.), Meditation and the classroom (pp. 171–174). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Institut Religions, Spiritualités, Cultures, Sociétés (RSCS), Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane du Val d’Eprémesnil.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

du Val d’Eprémesnil, D. Reclaiming contemplation: silence, introspection and the RE classroom. j. relig. educ. 68, 161–171 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-020-00101-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-020-00101-x

Keywords

Navigation