Abstract
One of the most important decisions an individual can make is to invest in a relationship. For women, the process of mate selection can be time-intensive, and fraught with costs and dangers. However, these risks can be minimised by modelling the mate choices of others. The propensity to imitate another’s mate choices is referred to as mate copying. Most research has focused on this behaviour in nonhumans, but evidence of its existence in humans is emerging. In the current study, 750 women evaluated men’s desirability based on vignettes containing information provided by men’s former partners. A man’s desirability was enhanced in the presence of positive cues (i.e. when he was described as a “good” partner and his former relationship ended mutually). In contrast, a man’s desirability diminished in the presence of negative cues (i.e. when he was described as a “bad” partner and/or his former relationship breakup was female initiated). Overall, the current study adds to the existing body of knowledge on mate copying by demonstrating how females incorporate social learning and innate evolutionary drives to facilitate decision-making and behaviour relating to mate selection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data associated with this research are available at https://osf.io/dhm53/?view_only=ba51e422ea86485d9a93d0afb52a81b2
References
Anderson, R. C. (2018). Mate copying and the effects of sexual history on romantic desirability. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0143-y.
Anderson, R. C., & Surbey, M. K. (2014). I want what she’s having: Evidence for human mate copying. Human Nature, 25, 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9202-7.
Anderson, R. C., & Surbey, M. K. (2018). Human mate copying as a form of nonindependent mate selection: Findings and considerations. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14, 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000151.
Bowers, R. I., Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2011). Generalization in mate-choice copying in humans. Behavioral Ecology, 23, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr164.
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600116.
Candolin, U. (2003). The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews, 78, 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793103006158.
Chu, S. (2012). I like who you like, but only if I like you: Female character affects matechoice copying. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 691–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.029.
Collins, T. J., & Gillath, O. (2012). Attachment, breakup strategies, and associated outcomes: The effects of security enhancement on the selection of breakup strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rp.2012.01.008.
De La Croix, D., & Mariani, F. (2015). From polygyny to serial monogamy: A unified theory of marriage institutions. Review of Economic Studies, 82, 565–607. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv001.
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinised male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2405–2410. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.2184.
DeGue, S., DiLillo, D., & Scalora, M. (2010). Are all perpetrators alike? Comparing risk factors for sexual coercion and aggression. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and treatment, 22, 402–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210372140.
Deng, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2015). Mate-choice copying in single and coupled women: The influence of mate acceptance and mate rejection decisions of other women. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300106.
Doering, J. (2010). Face, accounts, and schemes in the context of relationship breakups. Symbolic Interaction, 33, 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2010.33.1.71.
Duffey, T., & Haberstroh, S. (2014). Developmental relational counseling: Applications for counseling men. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00136.x.
Dunn, M. J., & Dorian, M. V. (2010). Simulated attraction increases opposite sex attractiveness ratings in females but not males. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099305.
Fagundes, C. P. (2012). Getting over you: Contributions of attachment theory for postbreakup emotional adjustment. Personal Relationships, 19, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01336.x.
Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2010). Breakup distress and loss of intimacy in university students. Psychology, 1, 173–177. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2010.13023.
Geary, D. C. (2006). Sexual selection and the evolution of human sex differences. Psychological Topics, 15, 203–238.
Gouda-Vossos, A., Nakagawa, S., Dixson, B. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2018). Mate choice copying in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 4(4), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-018-0099-y.
Grazian, D. (2011). The girl hunt: Urban nightlife and the performance of masculinity as a collective activity. Symbolic Interaction, 30, 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2007.30.2.221.
Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Shebliske, L. J., & Lundgren, S. R. (1993). Social influence, sex differences, and judgements of beauty: Putting the interpersonal back into interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.522.
Hill, S. E., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: Opposite effects for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207313728.
Hunt, J., Bussière, L. F., Jennions, M. D., & Brooks, R. (2004). What is genetic quality? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.035.
Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Social transmission of face preferences among humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1611), 899–903. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0205.
Kirkpatrick, M. (1982). Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution, 36, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0205.
Lewandowski, G. W., Aron, A., & Gee, J. (2007). Personality goes a long way: The malleability of opposite-sex physical attractiveness. Personal Relationships, 14, 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00172.x.
Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G. J. O., Valentine, K. A., Jiang, Y. F., & Balliet, D. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 757–776. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033777.
Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: An examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9151-2.
Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2008). Social influence in human face preference: Men and women are influenced more for long-term than short-term attractiveness decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(2), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.11.007.
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2011). Social learning and human mate preferences: A potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366(1563), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0192.
Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5.
Molleman, L., & Gächter, S. (2018). Societal background influences social learning in cooperative decision making. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.05.007.
Nordell, S. E., & Valone, T. J. (1998). Mate choice copying as public information. Ecology Letters, 1(2), 74–76. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.1998.00025.x.
Norona, J. C., Olmstead, S. B., & Welsh, D. P. (2017). Breaking up in emerging adulthood: A developmental perspective of relationship dissolution. Emerging Adulthood, 5, 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1172/2167696816658585.
Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2008). Breaking up romantic relationships: Costs experiences and coping strategies deployed. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470490800600119.
Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2010). Humans show mate copying after observing real mate choices. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 320–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.001.
Platek, S. M., Burch, R. L., & Gallup, G. G. (2001). The reproductive priming effect. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29, 245–248. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2001.29.3.245.
Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: Do females copy each other? The American Naturalist, 140, 1000–1009. https://doi.org/10.1086/285452.
Reynolds, J. D., & Gross, M. R. (1990). Costs and benefits of female mate choice: Is there a lek paradox? The American Naturalist, 136, 230–243.
Rodeheffer, C. D., Leyva, R. P. P., & Hill, S. E. (2016). Attractive female romantic partners provide a proxy for unobservable male qualities: The when and why behind human female mate choice copying. Evolutionary Psychology, April–June, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916652144
Rosin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2.
Schaller, M. (2011). The behavioural immune system and the psychology of human sociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 366, 3418–3426. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0029.
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.6.894.
Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/p.paid.2005.01.023.
Sprecher, S., Zimmerman, C., & Abrahams, E. M. (2010). Choosing compassionate strategies to end a relationship: Effects of compassionate love for partner and the reason for the breakup. Social Psychology, 41, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000010.
Stanik, C. E. (2009). Romantic relationships: An examination of partner evaluation, women’s mate preferences, and dynamics in long-term relationships (unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Michigan, United States. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/63867/cstanik_1.pdf?sequ ence=1&isAllowed=y.
Stewart, J. G., & Harkness, K. L. (2015). The interpersonal toxicity of excessive reassurance-seeking: Evidence from a longitudinal study of romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34, 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1521/jspc.2015.34.5.392.
Street, S. E., Morgan, T. J. H., Thornton, A., Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N., & Cross, C. P. (2018). Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning. Scientific Reports, 8(1715), 1715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19770-8.
Tobin, D. D., Menon, M., Menon, M., Spatta, B. C., Hodges, E. V., & Perry, D. G. (2010). The intrapsychics of gender: A model of self-socialization. Psychological Review, 117, 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018936.
Uller, T., & Johansson, C. (2003). Human mate choice and the wedding ring effect: Are married men more attractive? Human Nature, 14(3), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1006-0.
Vakiritzis, A., & Roberts, S. C. (2009). Mate choice copying and mate quality bias: Different processes, different species. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 908–911. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp073.
Vakiritzis, A., & Roberts, S. C. (2012). Do women really like taken men? Results from a large questionnaire study. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099225.
Vakirtzis, A., & Roberts, S. C. (2010). Mate quality bias: Sex differences in humans. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 47, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.047.0208.
Vakritzis, A. (2011). Mate choice copying and nonindependent mate choice: A critical review. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 48, 91–107. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.048.0202.
Van Straaten, I., Engels, R. C. M. E., Finkenauer, C., & Holland, R. W. (2008). Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioural mimicry: A seminaturalistic experiment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 902–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9179-y.
Wade, M. J., & Pruett-Jones, S. G. (1990). Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87, 5749–5753. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.15.5749.
Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate choice copying in humans. Human Nature, 18, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9004-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• Humans sometimes use a strategy known as “mate copying” to determine someone’s suitability as a partner
• We show that women are highly attentive to negative cues from about men
• Women dislike men described as “bad” by a former partner
• Women also dislike men who have experienced a female-initiated breakup
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scammell, E., Anderson, R.C. Female Mate Copying: Measuring the Effect of Mate-Relevant Information Provided by Former Partners. Evolutionary Psychological Science 6, 319–327 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00239-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00239-9