Abstract
The adaptive memory framework posits that human memory is an evolved cognitive feature, in which stimuli relevant to fitness are better remembered than neutral stimuli. There is now substantial evidence that processing a neutral stimulus in terms of its relevancy to an imagined ancestral survival scenario enhances recall, although there is still disagreement concerning the proximate mechanisms responsible for this effect. Several other mnemonic biases have recently been discovered that similarly appear to reflect evolutionary pressures, including a bias to remember items relevant to an imagined parenting scenario. We tested the generality of this parent processing effect by varying the biological relatedness of the imagined child. We also varied the biological relatedness of a child during an imagined third-person survival processing scenario. Across four experiments, we found evidence that simply altering the described biological relatedness of a child in the parenting scenario and third-person survival processing scenario can affect recall, such that items are better remembered when made relevant to a biological child compared to an adopted child. How these findings inform the general adaptive memory framework is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., & Schooler, L. J. (2000). The adaptive nature of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 557–570). New York: Oxford University Press.
Baker, M. D., Nicole Sloan, H., Hall, A. D., Leo, J., & Maner, J. K. (2015). Mating and memory: can mating cues enhance cognitive performance? Evolutionary Psychology, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915623280.
Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind. Oxford University Press.
Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2012). How adaptive is memory for cheaters? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(6), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412458525.
Bonin, P., Gelin, M., Laroche, B., & Méot, A. (2019a). “Survival processing of the selfish gene?”: adaptive memory and inclusive fitness. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00220-1.
Bonin, P., Thiebaut, G., Witt, A., & Méot, A. (2019b). Contamination is “good” for your memory! Further evidence for the adaptive view of memory. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00188-y.
Bower, G. H., & Gilligan, S. G. (1979). Remembering information related to one’s self. Journal of Research in Personality, 13(4), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(79)90005-9.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol 1). Basic Books.
Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.773.
Butler, A.C., Kang, S.H.K., & Roediger, H.L. (2009). Congruity effects between materials and processing tasks in the survival processing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 35(6), 1477–1486. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017024
Cook, E. W., Hodes, R. L., & Lang, P. J. (1986). Preparedness and phobia. Effects of stimulus content on human visceral conditioning. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.95.3.195.
Coverdale, M. E., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Nairne, J. S. (2019). Survival processing in a novel choice procedure. American Journal of Psychology, 132(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.132.2.0195.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X.
Cunningham, S. J., Brady-Van den Bos, M., Gill, L., & Turk, D. J. (2013). Survival of the selfish: contrasting self-referential and survival-based encoding. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.12.005.
Derringer, C. J., Scofield, J. E., & Kostic, B. (2017). Investigations of a reproductive processing advantage in memory. Memory and Cognition, 45(6), 983–1001. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0709-0.
Domjan, M., & Krause, M. (2017). Generality of the laws of learning: from biological constraints to ecological perspectives. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory: a comprehensive reference (pp. 189–201). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21012-2.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17695343.
Fernandes, N. L., Pandeirada, J. N. S., Soares, S. C., & Nairne, J. S. (2017). Adaptive memory: the mnemonic value of contamination. Evolution and Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.04.003.
Fitzgerald, C. J., & Whitaker, M. B. (2009). Sex differences in violent versus non-violent life-threatening altruism. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(3), 147470490900700. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490900700309.
Fitzgerald, C. J., Thompson, M. C., & Whitaker, M. B. (2010). Altruism between romantic partners: biological offspring as a genetic bridge between altruist and recipient. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(3), 147470491000800. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800312.
Garcia, J., & Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 4(1), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03342209
Gelin, M., Bonin, P., Méot, A., & Bugaiska, A. (2018). Do animacy effects persist in memory for context? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(4), 965–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1307866.
Gemberling, G. A., & Domjan, M. (1982). Selective associations in one-day-old rats: taste–toxicosis and texture–shock aversion learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 96(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077855.
Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2013). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (9th ed.). Belmont: Cengage Learning.
Gretz, M. R., & Huff, M. J. (2019). Did you wash your hands? Evaluating memory for objects touched by healthy individuals and individuals with contagious and non-contagious diseases. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 1271–1278. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3604.
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4.
Horgan, T. G., Broadbent, J., McKibbin, W. F., & Duehring, A. J. (2016). Show versus tell? The effects of mating context on women’s memory for a man’s physical features and verbal statements. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(6), 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515590279.
Hou, C., & Liu, Z. (2019). The survival processing advantage of face: the memorization of the (un)trustworthy face contributes more to survival adaptation. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(2), 147470491983972. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919839726.
Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Cohen, S. M. (2008). The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information. Memory and Cognition, 36(6), 1151–1156. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1151.
Kazanas, S. A., & Altarriba, J. (2015). The survival advantage: underlying mechanisms and extant limitations. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(2), 147470491501300. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300204.
Klein, S. B. (2013). Does optimal recall performance in the adaptive memory paradigm require the encoding context to encourage thoughts about the environment of evolutionary adaptation? Memory & Cognition, 41(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0239-8.
Kole, J. A., & Healy, A. F. (2011). Memory for details about people: familiarity, relatedness, and gender congruency. Memory & Cognition, 39(4), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0051-2.
Krause, M. A., Trevino, S., Cripps, A., Chilton, K., Sower, E., & Taylor, J. P. (2019). Inclusive fitness does not impact the survival processing effect. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 6(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.06.01.02.2019.
Kroneisen, M. (2018). Is he important to me? Source memory advantage for personally relevant cheaters. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(3), 1129–1137. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1345-1.
Miller, R. R., & Matute, H. (1996). Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(4), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.125.4.370.
Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2016). Adaptive memory: the evolutionary significance of survival processing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635613.
Nairne, J. S., Thompson, S. R., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2007). Adaptive memory: survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(2), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.263.
Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Thompson, S. R. (2008). Adaptive memory: the comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 19(2), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02064.x.
Nairne, J. S., VanArsdall, J. E., Pandeirada, J. N. S., Cogdill, M., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Remembering the living: episodic memory is tuned to animacy. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2099–2105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480803.
Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Fernandes, N. L. (2017a). Adaptive memory. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory: a comprehensive reference (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 279–293). Oxford: Elsevier.
Nairne, J. S., VanArsdall, J. E., & Cogdill, M. (2017b). Remembering the living. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416667711.
New, J., Krasnow, M. M., Truxaw, D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2007). Spatial adaptations for plant foraging: women excel and calories count. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1626), 2679–2684. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0826.
Pandeirada, J. N. S., Fernandes, N. L., Vasconcelos, M., & Nairne, J. S. (2017). Adaptive memory: remembering potential mates. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(4), 147470491774280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917742807.
Sandry, J., Trafimow, D., Marks, M. J., & Rice, S. (2013). Adaptive memory: Evaluating alternative forms of fitness-relevant processing in the survival processing paradigm. PLoS One, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060868.
Schaller, M. (2018). The parental care motivational system and why it matters (for everyone). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(5), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418767873.
Schaller, M. (2020). Evolutionary psychology meets socio-ecological psychology: the motivational psychologies of disease-avoidance and parental care. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.020.
Scofield, J. E., Buchanan, E. M., & Kostic, B. (2018). A meta-analysis of the survival-processing advantage in memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 997–1012. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1346-0.
Seitz, B. M., Polack, C. W., & Miller, R. R. (2018). Adaptive memory: is there a reproduction-processing effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(8), 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000513.
Seitz, B. M., Blaisdell, A. P., Polack, C. W., & Miller, R. R. (2019). The role of biological significance in human learning and memory. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 32.
Seligman, M. E. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77(5), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029790.
Stewart-Williams, S. (2007). Altruism among kin vs. nonkin: effects of cost of help and reciprocal exchange. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.01.002.
Thorndike, E. (1911). Animal intelligence: experimental studies. Retrieved from https://www.worldcat.org/title/animal-intelligence-experimental-studies/oclc/844297 Accessed 12 June 2019
Weinstein, Y., Bugg, J. M., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes? Memory and Cognition, 36(5), 913–919. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.5.913.
Acknowledgments
They are grateful to Crystal Casado, Michelle Jeon, and Tori Pena for their efforts in collecting the data.
Funding
This research was supported in part by NIMH grant 33881. Benjamin Seitz is supported by National Science Foundation grant DGE-1650604.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 19 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seitz, B.M., Polack, C.W. & Miller, R.R. Adaptive Memory: Generality of the Parent Processing Effect and Effects of Biological Relatedness on Recall. Evolutionary Psychological Science 6, 246–260 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00233-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00233-1