Author Correction: Evolutionary Psychological Science
The original version of this article contained an error in how the results of a prior research study were reported. The 3rd sentence under the section “Inferred Social Value of Male and Female Features” should read as “For example, men valuate women’s waist-to-hip ratio in attractiveness, which although not associated with fertility is associated with women’s maximum reproductive value (Lassek and Gaulin 2018; Singh et al. 2010).” The citations in this correction correspond to the these references:
References
Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2018). Do the low WHRs and BMIs judged most attractive indicate higher fertility? Evolutionary Psychology, 16, 1–16.
Singh, D., Dixson, B. J., Jessop, T. S., Morgan, B., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Cross-cultural consensus for waist–hip ratio and women's attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 176–181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00229-x
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sacco, D.F., Holifield, K., Drea, K. et al. Author Correction: Dad and Mom Bods? Inferences of Parenting Ability from Bodily Cues. Evolutionary Psychological Science 6, 215 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00232-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00232-2