Abstract
Research on some non-human species suggests that an abundance of reproductively viable males relative to females can increase female choosiness and preferences for longer-term mating and resource investment by males. Yet little research has explored the potential influence of mate availability upon women’s preferences for signals of men’s commitment and resource provisioning. Using an experimental mate availability priming paradigm, the present study examined whether women (N = 205) primed with either mate scarcity or abundance would differ in their expectations for engagement ring size and cost. Results demonstrated that women who were primed with the belief that good-quality mates are abundant in the population reported expecting a statistically-significantly larger and more expensive engagement ring relative to women primed with mate scarcity. Results suggest that women flexibly attune their expectations for signals of men’s investment based, in part, upon their perception of the availability of viable mates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M. G., Ghossainy, M. E., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Experimentally inducing disgust reduces desire for short-term mating. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0179-z.
American Gem Society. (n.d.). The history of the diamond as an engagement ring. Retrieved on April 2 2019 from: https://www.americangemsociety.org/page/diamondasengagement.
Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Sexual competition among women: a review of the theory and supporting evidence. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 25–39). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978–1–63463-131-0. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.3.
Arnocky, S., Ribout, A., Mirza, R. S., & Knack, J. M. (2014). Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy and mate-guarding behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.3.
Arnocky, S., Woodruff, N. W., & Schmitt, D. P. (2016). Men’s sociosexuality is sensitive to changes in mate-availability. Personal Relationships, 23(1), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12118.
Bateman, P. W. (1997). Operational sex ratio, female competition and mate choice in the Ephippigerine Bushcricket Steropleurus stali Bolivar. Journal of Orthoptera Research, (6), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/3503541.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and context. Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552210.
Cloud, J. M., & Taylor, M. H. (2019). The effect of mate value discrepancy on hypothetical engagement ring purchases. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0156-6.
Cronk, L., & Dunham, B. (2007). Amounts spent on engagement rings reflect aspects of male and female mate quality. Human Nature, 18(4), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9018-9.
Diamond Council of America. (2010). Bridal jewelry: advanced jewelry sales 6. Retrieved on June 3 2019 from: https://www.diamondcouncil.org/Documents/CourseMaterials/AJS/Lesson6.pdf.
Dubuis, A. (2015). Marriage proposal flops after man’s girlfriend says diamond is TOO SMALL. Daily Mirror. Retrieved on April 11 2019 from: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/marriage-proposal-flops-after-mans-7053841.
Emlen, S., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197(4300), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.327542.
Fayant, M. P., Sigall, H., Lemonnier, A., Retsin, E., & Alexopoulos, T. (2017). On the limitations of manipulation checks: an obstacle toward cumulative science. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.102.
Foschi, M. (2014). Hypotheses, operationalizations, and manipulation checks. In M. J. Webster & J. Sell (Eds.), Laboratory experiments in the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 247–268). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-404681-8.00011-X.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Ackerman, J. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & White, A. E. (2012). The financial consequences of too many men: sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024761.
Hauser, D. J., Ellsworth, P. C., & Gonzalez, R. (2018). Are manipulation checks necessary? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00998.
Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother nature: maternal instincts and how they shape the human species. New York: Ballantine Books.
Hughes, S. M., & Aung, T. (2017). Modern-day female preferences for resources and provisioning by long-term mates. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(3), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000084.
Jirotkul, M. (1999). Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male–male competition in guppies. Animal Behavior, 58(2), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1149.
Lench, H. C., Taylor, A. B., & Bench, S. W. (2014). An alternative approach to analysis of mental states in experimental social cognition research. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0351-0.
Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 947–955. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.947.
Marlowe, F. W., & Berbesque, J. C. (2012). The human operational sex ratio: effects of marriage, concealed ovulation, and menopause on mate competition. Journal of Human Evolution, 63(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.09.004.
Milan, A. (2011). Marital status: overview 2011. Components of statistics Canada, report on the demographic situation in Canada. Retrieved on March 18 2019 from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/91-209-x/2013001/article/11788-eng.htm.
Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind. New York: Doubleday.
Passos, C., Tassino, B., Reyes, F., & Rosenthal, G. G. (2014). Seasonal variation in female mate choice and operational sex ratio in wild populations of an annual fish, Austrolebias reicherti. PLoS One, 9, e101649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101649.
RateSupermarket.ca Team. (2019). The cost of love in Canada study 2018. Retrieved on July 2 2019 from: https://www.ratesupermarket.ca/blog/the-cost-of-love-in-canada-2018/.
Ross, J. (2017).This is the average engagement ring spend in 2017. The Knot. Retrieved on March 27 2019 from: https://www.theknot.com/content/the-knot-2017-jewelry-and-engagement-study.
Saad, G., & Gill, T. (2003). An evolutionary psychology perspective on gift giving among young adults. Psychology & Marketing, 20(9), 765–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10096.
Schweingruber, D., Cast, A. D., & Anahita, S. (2008). “A story and a ring”: audience judgments about engagement proposals. Sex Roles, 58(3–4), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9330-1.
Spielmann, S., MacDonald, G., & Wilson, A. (2009). On the rebound: focusing on someone new helps anxiously attached individuals let go of ex-partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(10), 1382–1394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209341580.
Spielmann, S. S., MacDonald, G., Maxwell, J. A., Joel, S., Peragine, D., Muise, A., & Impett, E. A. (2013). Settling for less out of fear of being single. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1049–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034628.
Stone, E. A., Shakelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Sex ratio and mate preferences: a cross-cultural investigation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.357.37.
Thomas, A. G., & Stewart-Williams, S. (2018). Mating strategy flexibility in the laboratory: preferences for long- and short-term mating change in response to evolutionarily relevant variables. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.10.004.
Waynforth, D., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: evidence from “lonely hearts” advertisements. Behaviour, 132(9), 755–779.
Zaleski, J. (2015). How long is too long to be engaged? The Knot. Retrieved on May 15 2019 from: https://www.theknot.com/content/too-long-to-be-engaged.
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Development Grant (file # DDG-2017-00013) awarded to S. Arnocky.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Locke, A., Desrochers, J. & Arnocky, S. Induced Mate Abundance Increases Women’s Expectations for Engagement Ring Size and Cost. Evolutionary Psychological Science 6, 188–194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00214-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00214-z