Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive Control—A Departure from the Certainty-Equivalence Paradigm

  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fundamental study of indirect adaptive control addressed towards a class of uncertain mechanical and aerospace systems is the subject of this paper. We utilize and build upon certain recent techniques within adaptive control that permit nonlinear parameterization of uncertainty, thereby amounting to a significant shift from the classical certainty equivalence methodology. Instead of the more popular direct adaptive control formulations, our focus is restricted to the indirect methods because imposing prior information on properties of physically meaningful plant parameters is convenient within this framework. For two different types of uncertainty parameterizations, namely scalar parameters and proper orthogonal matrix parameters, we present smooth, non-overparameterized (lower order), and stable adaptive control algorithms that provide improved transient performance while at the same time utilize all the available prior information on the unknown parameters. In the particular case when there exists a single scalar uncertain parameter, the most novel attribute of the proposed controller is that adaptation gets automatically frozen once the parameter estimate reaches the corresponding true value, a highly desirable feature that is clearly missing within all existing certainty equivalence adaptive control schemes. Through both analysis and simulations, we have been able to confirm that this “nice” feature amounts to having a proportional term within the parameter update law; and is in fact enabled by a crucial role played by the introduction of certain design functions that are embedded within the new controller. All technical descriptions will be further elaborated by illustrative physical examples as well as numerical simulations of the resulting closed-loop dynamics to demonstrate the potential advantages of this new approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NARENDRA, K. S. and ANNASWAMY, A. M. Stable Adaptive Systems, Prentice Hall, 1989.

  2. IOANNOU, P. A. and SUN, J. Stable and Robust Adaptive Control, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995, pp. 85–134.

    Google Scholar 

  3. SASTRY, S. and BODSON, M. Adaptive Control: Stability, Convergence and Robustness, Prentice Hall, 1989.

  4. NARENDRA, K. S. “Parameter Adaptive Control—The End… or The Beginning?,” Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Decision and Control, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, December 1994.

  5. BAKKER, R. and ANNASWAMY, A. M. “Stability and Robustness Properties of a Simple Adaptive Controller,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 41, pp. 1352–1358.

  6. ASTOLFI, A. and ORTEGA, R. “Immersion and Invariance: A New Tool for Stabilization and Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 48, No. 4, April 2003, pp. 590–606.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. ORTEGA, R., HSU, L., and ASTOLFI, A. “Immersion and Invariance Adaptive Control of Linear Multivariable Systems,” Systems & Control Letters, Vol. 49, 2003, pp. 37–47.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. ORTEGA, R., LORIA, A., NICKLASSON, P. J., and RAMIREZ, H. Passivity-Based Control of Euler-Lagrange Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. SHUSTER, M. D. “A Survey of Attitude Representations,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 4, 1993, pp. 439–517.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. LI, Y., MURATA, M., and SUN, B. “New Approach to Attitude Determination Using Global Positioning System Carrier Phase Measurements,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2002, pp. 130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. SCHAUB, H., TSIOTRAS, P., and JUNKINS, J. L. “Principal Rotation Representations of Proper NxN Orthogonal Matrices,” International Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 33, No. 15, 1995, pp. 2277–2295.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. CAYLEY A. “On the Motion of Rotation of a Solid Body,” Cambridge Mathematics Journal, Vol. 3, 1843, pp. 224–232.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maruthi R. Akella.

Additional information

Dedicated to John L. Junkins on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akella, M.R. Adaptive Control—A Departure from the Certainty-Equivalence Paradigm. J of Astronaut Sci 52, 75–91 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03546422

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03546422

Navigation