Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer ethics among youths in Indonesia: do gender and religiosity matter?

  • Published:
Asian Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study aims to examine the role of religiosity and gender in affecting consumer ethics among Indonesian youths. A convenience sample of 482 students in a large private university in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, participated in the research. Established scales were adopted to measure the key constructs. Intrinsic religiosity and gender were used as the independent variables, while each dimension of consumer ethics was treated as the dependent variables. The results of seven multiple regression analyses indicated that gender and intrinsic religiosity influence consumer ethics dimensions significantly, except for “downloading.” Individuals who live daily life according to their religion are less receptive toward unethical activities than those who do not. Further, females were found to be more ethical than male counterparts on five dimensions of consumer ethics. Males tended to be more supportive of “doing good” for the seller compared to females. In general, the findings suggest that gender and religiosity do matter in influencing consumer ethics among youths in Indonesia. These findings provide important insights for religious leaders, university lecturers, and policy makers in their efforts to reduce unethical acts among the young generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

References

  • Aleassa, H., Pearson, J. M., & McClurg, S. (2011). Investigating software piracy in Jordan: an extension of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 663–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khatib, J. A., Rawwas, M. Y. A., & Vitell, S. J. (1997). Consumer ethics: a cross-cultural investigation. European Journal of Marketing, 31, 736–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arli, D., & Tjiptono, F. (2014). The end of religion? Examining the role of religiousness, materialism, and long-term orientation on consumer ethics in Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. H., & Karson, M. J. (1989). Managers, values, and executive decisions: an exploration of the role of gender, career stage, organizational level, function, and the importance of ethics, relationships and results in managerial decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 747–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, C. R., & Valentine, S. R. (2010). Investigating the effects of gender on consumers’ moral philosophies and ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, S. C., & Ugras, Y. J. (1998). Business students and ethics: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1117–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossuyt, S., & Van Kenhove, P. (2016). Assertiveness bias in gender ethics research: why women deserve the benefit of the doubt. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3026-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSA. (2014). The compliance gap: BSA global software survey June 2014. Washington, DC: BSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, H. K., Sims, R. R., & Teegen, H. (1997). To purchase or to pirate software: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information System, 13(4), 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIA (2017). The world factbook: Indonesia. Resource document. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-factbook/geos/id.html. Accessed 18 January 2017.

  • Crabtree, S. (2010). Religiosity highest in world’s poorest nations. Resource document. http://www.gallup.com/poll/142727/religiosity-highest-world-poorest-nations.aspx. Accessed 13 October 2016.

  • Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: the importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erat, S., & Gneezy, U. (2012). White lies. Management Science, 58(4), 723–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1987). Moral orientation and moral development. In E. F. Kittay & D. T. Meyers (Eds.), Women and moral theory (pp. 19–23). Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: a revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Intellectual Property Alliance (2016). Indonesia: International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) 2016 special 301 report on copyright protection and enforcement. Resource document. http://www.iipawebsite.com/rbc/2016/2016SPEC301INDONESIA.PDF. Accessed 6 June 2016.

  • Izraeli, D., & Jaffe, E. D. (2000). Are there gender differences in the ethics judgments of marketing managers? International Journal of Value-Based Management, 13, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. R., Jang, S. J., Larson, D. B., & De Li, S. (2001). Does adolescent religious commitment matter? A reexamination of the effects of religiosity on delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(1), 22–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, N. K., Pettijohn, C. E., & Burnett, M. S. (2008). Ethics in advertising: differences in industry values and student perceptions. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 12(2), 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, E. J., & Lawton, L. (1998). Religiousness and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. Y., Natter, M., & Spann, M. (2009). Pay what you want: a new participative pricing mechanism. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kracher, B., Chatterjee, A., & Lundquist, A. R. (2002). Factors related to the cognitive moral development of business students and business professionals in India and the United States: nationality, education, sex and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. C. (1995). Ethics of business students: some marketing perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(7), 571–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leatherdale, D. (2015). Do pay-what-you-want pricing strategies really work? Resource document. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-33609867. Accessed 18 January 2017.

  • Lindenmeier, J., Schleer, C., & Pricl, D. (2012). Consumer outrage: emotional reactions to unethical corporate behavior. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1364–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Chen, Y. (2012). Information ethics: a cross-cultural study of ethical decision-making between U.S. and Chinese business students. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(8), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L. C., & Lu, C. J. (2010). Moral philosophy, materialism, and consumer ethics: an exploratory study in Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysonski, S., & Durvasula, S. (2008). Digital piracy of MP3s: consumer and ethical predispositions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(3), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, A. C., Ingram, R., & Dato-on, M. C. (2006). The business of ethics and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, S. W., & Burnett, J. J. (1990). Consumer religiosity and retail store evaluative criteria. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers-Levy, J., & Loken, B. (2015). Revisiting gender differences: what we know and what lies ahead. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muncy, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (1992). Consumer ethics: an investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research, 24, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, B. J. (1975). Dimensions of religiosity among Catholics. Review of Religious Research, 16(3), 198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D., Rhoads, A., & Vaught, B. (2001). Ethical beliefs of business professionals: a study of gender, age and external factors. Journal of Business, 31(3), 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phau, I., & Kea, G. (2007). Attitudes of university students toward business ethics: a cross-national investigation of Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M. J., Brito, P. Q., Pinto, J., & Higgs-Kleyn, N. (2001). Consumer ethics in the European Union: a comparison of northern and southern view. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., Vitell, S. J., & Al-Khatib, J. (1994). Consumer ethics: the possible effects of terrorism and civil unrest on the ethical values of consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., Patzer, G. L., & Klassen, M. L. (1995). Consumer ethics in cross-cultural settings: entrepreneurial implications. European Journal of Marketing, 29, 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., Patzer, G. L., & Vitell, S. J. (1998). A cross-cultural investigation of the ethical values of consumers: the potential effect of civil war and civil disruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawwas, M. Y. A., Swaidan, Z., & Oyman, M. (2005). Consumer ethics: a cross-cultural study of the ethical beliefs of Turkish and American consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D., & Babin, L. (1997). Making sense of the research on gender and ethics in business: a critical analysis and extension. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(4), 61–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxas, M. L., & Stoneback, J. Y. (2004). The importance of gender across cultures in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(2), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suar, D., & Gochhayat, J. (2016). Influence of biological sex and gender roles on ethicality. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2424-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjiptono, F., Arli, D., & Viviea. (2016). Gender and digital piracy: examining determinants of attitude toward digital piracy among youths in an emerging market. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(2), 168–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Crowdfunding (2017). Crowdfunding. Resource document. https://www.ukcfa.org.uk/what-is-crowdfunding/ Accessed 18 January 2017.

  • UNDP (2016). UNDP human development reports: Indonesia. Resource document. http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/IDN. Accessed 6 June 2016.

  • Valentine, S., Godkin, L., Page, K., & Rittenburg, T. (2009). Gender and ethics: ethical judgements, ethical intentions, and altruism among healthcare professionals. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 24(2), 112–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. G. (2012). Business ethics: concept and cases (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeir, I., & Van Kenhove, P. (2007). Gender differences in double standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2015). A case for consumer social responsibility (CnSR): including a selected review of consumer ethics/social responsibility research. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 767–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (1992). Consumer ethics: an empirical investigation of factors influencing ethical judgments of the final consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(8), 585–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy-Vitell consumer ethics scale: a modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Paolillo, J. G. P. (2003). Consumer ethics: the role of religiosity. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. J. (2005). Religiosity and consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J. (2004). The music industry’s war on piracy. Risk Management, 51(2), 10–16.

  • Wenger, J. L. (2004). Research: the automatic activation of religious concepts: implications for religious orientations. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2016). Semarang. Resource document. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semarang. Accessed 11 October 2016.

  • Yoon, C. (2011). Theory of planned behavior and ethics theory in digital piracy: an integrated model. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, D., Maeda, Y., & Bebeau, M. J. (2011). Gender differences in moral sensitivity: a meta analysis. Ethics and Behavior, 21(4), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fandy Tjiptono.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tjiptono, F., Albert & Elfitasari, T. Consumer ethics among youths in Indonesia: do gender and religiosity matter?. Asian J Bus Ethics 7, 137–149 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-017-0081-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-017-0081-y

Keywords

Navigation