Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analyzing Spatial Heterogeneity of Housing Prices Using Large Datasets

  • Published:
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an obstacle to the hedonic model’s reliability, housing submarkets have drawn plenty of scholarly attention because they lack an integrated and standardized classification framework and validation methods. By incorporating multiple spatial statistics and data mining techniques into a hybrid spatial data mining method, this study develops an innovative classification methodology that replaces spatial continuity with spatial connectivity. Employing Salt Lake County as the case, we identify 43 housing submarkets based on differentiation among structural differences, the complexity of urban space, and neighborhood characteristics. With the introduction of urban amenities into the validation framework, the comparison between the submarket-based model and non-submarket regression shows our classification not only enhances prediction accuracy but also achieves better theoretical comprehension of local housing markets. Besides contributing to an understanding of urban spatial heterogeneity, our study also provides a feasible spatial modeling method which is capable of processing a large dataset with more than 200,000 observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adair, A. S., Berry, J. N., & McGreal, W. S. (1996). Hedonic modelling, housing submarkets and residential valuation. Journal of Property Research, 13(1), 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (2013). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. In: Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Assunção, R. M., Neves, M. C., Câmara, G., & da Costa Freitas, C. (2006). Efficient regionalization techniques for socio-economic geographical units using minimum spanning trees. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 797–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, T. J. (1999). Modelling the residential sub-market: Breaking the monocentric mould. Urban Studies, 36(7), 1119–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E., Bentley, R., Lester, L., & Beer, A. (2016). Housing affordability and residential mobility as drivers of locational inequality. Applied Geography, 72, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, L. K. (2006). Does neighborhood really matter?: Comparing historically defined neighborhood boundaries with housing submarkets. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x05283254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., & Xie, Y. (1996). Preliminary evidence for a theory of the fractal city. Environment and Planning A, 28(10), 1745–1762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa, S. C., Hamelink, F., Hoesli, M., & MacGregor, B. D. (1999). Defining housing submarkets. Journal of Housing Economics, 8(2), 160–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa, S. C., Hoesli, M., & Peng, V. S. (2003). Do housing submarkets really matter? Journal of Housing Economics, 12(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1051-1377(03)00003-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boustan, L. P. (2013). Local public goods and the demand for high-income municipalities. Journal of Urban Economics, 76, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2013.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasington, D. (1999). Which measures of school quality does the housing market value? Journal of Real Estate Research, 18(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.5555/rees.18.3.g1n4hq8212111j5m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., Niknafs, A., & Charrad, M. M. (2014). Package ‘NbClust. Journal of Statistical Software, 61, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, G., & Marcouiller, D. W. (2013). Natural amenities and their effects on migration along the urban–rural continuum. The Annals of Regional Science, 50(3), 861–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S. H., Bowker, J. M., & Park, W. M. (2006). Measuring the contribution of water and green space amenities to housing values: An application and comparison of spatially weighted hedonic models. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 485–507.

  • Clapp, J. M., & Wang, Y. (2006). Defining neighborhood boundaries: Are census tracts obsolete? Journal of Urban Economics, 59(2), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2005.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, B. (2003). Submarket identification in property markets: A hedonic housing price model for Glasgow (no. 03-09). CSERGE Working Paper EDM.

  • Diao, M., & Ferreira, J., Jr. (2010). Residential property values and the built environment: Empirical study in the Boston, Massachusetts, metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2174, 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, E., Liao, F. H. F., & Kang, H. (2016). Grocery shopping: Geographic scale matters in analyzing effects of the built environment on choice of travel mode. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 95th annual meeting.

  • Dubin, R. A. (1992). Spatial autocorrelation and neighborhood quality. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22(3), 433–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, M. (2011). The synergistic influence of light rail stations and zoning on home prices. Environment and Planning A, 43(9), 2125–2142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J., & Xu, X. (1996). A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Paper presented at the Kdd.

  • Ewing, R., Meakins, G., Hamidi, S., & Nelson, A. C. (2014). Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity - update and refinement. Health & Place, 26, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S., & Rogerson, P. A. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of spatial analysis. Sage.

  • Fovell, R. G., & Fovell, M.-Y. C. (1993). Climate zones of the conterminous United States defined using cluster analysis. Journal of Climate, 6(11), 2103–2135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., & Asami, Y. (2007). Effect of urban landscapes on land prices in two Japanese cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(1–2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, J. (2002). The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy, 19(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00040-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(3), 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L. (2000). The new economics of urban and regional growth. The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, 83–98.

  • Goodman, A. C., & Thibodeau, T. G. (2003). Housing market segmentation and hedonic prediction accuracy. Journal of Housing Economics, 12(3), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1051-1377(03)00031-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A. (2002). A spatial filtering specification for the auto-Poisson model. Statistics & Probability Letters, 58(3), 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubesic, T. H., Wei, R., & Murray, A. T. (2014). Spatial clustering overview and comparison: Accuracy, sensitivity, and computational expense. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(6), 1134–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.958389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. (1970). Use of dummy variables in testing for equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions: A note. The American Statistician, 24(1), 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, D. (2008). Regionalization with dynamically constrained agglomerative clustering and partitioning (REDCAP). International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(7), 801–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701674970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamidi, S., & Ewing, R. (2014). A longitudinal study of changes in urban sprawl between 2000 and 2010 in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 128, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979). Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C: Applied Statistics, 28(1), 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbich, M., Brunauer, W., Hagenauer, J., & Leitner, M. (2013). Data-driven regionalization of housing markets. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.707587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., Wiel, M. A. V. D., & Zeileis, A. (2006a). A Lego system for conditional inference. American Statistician, 60(3), 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., & Zeileis, A. (2006b). Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(3), 651–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huh, S., & Kwak, S. J. (1997). The choice of functional form and variables in the hedonic price model in Seoul. Urban Studies, 34(7), 989–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, E. C., Liang, C., & Yip, T. L. (2018). Impact of semi-obnoxious facilities and urban renewal strategy on subdivided units. Applied Geography, 91, 144–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S., & Thill, J.-C. (2009). Delineating urban housing submarkets with fuzzy clustering. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 36(5), 865–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iceland, J., & Sharp, G. (2013). White residential segregation in US metropolitan areas: Conceptual issues, patterns, and trends from the US census, 1980 to 2010. Population Research and Policy Review, 32(5), 663–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarosz, B. (2008). Using Assessor parcel data to maintain housing unit counts for small area population estimates. In S. H. Murdock & D. A. Swanson (Eds.), Applied demography in the 21st century: Selected papers from the biennial conference on applied demography, San Antonio, Texas, January 7–9, 2007 (pp. 89–101). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia, P., & Gaughan, A. E. (2016). Dasymetric modeling: A hybrid approach using land cover and tax parcel data for mapping population in Alachua County, Florida. Applied Geography, 66, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim, C., & Chen, W. Y. (2007). Consumption preferences and environmental externalities: A hedonic analysis of the housing market in Guangzhou. Geoforum, 38(2), 414–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, F., Yin, H., & Nakagoshi, N. (2007). Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: A case study in Jinan City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(3–4), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korinek, K., & Maloney, T. N. (Eds.). (2010). Migration in the 21st century: Rights, outcomes, and policy. Routledge.

  • Kulldorff, M. (1997). A spatial scan statistic. Communications in Statistics-Theory and methods, 26(6), 1481–1496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2006). The 3Ds + R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 11(3), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2006.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Wei, Y. H. D., Yu, Z., & Tian, G. (2016). Amenity, accessibility and housing values in metropolitan USA: A study of Salt Lake County, Utah. Cities, 59, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.07.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Wei, Y. H. D., & Korinek, K. (2017). Modelling urban expansion in the transitional greater Mekong region. Urban Studies, 55, 1729–1748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017700560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Wei, Y. H. D., Wu, Y., & Tian, G. (2018). Analyzing housing prices in Shanghai with open data: Amenity, accessibility and urban structure. Cities.

  • Liao, F. H. F., Farber, S., & Ewing, R. (2015). Compact development and preference heterogeneity in residential location choice behaviour: A latent class analysis. Urban Studies, 52(2), 314–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, J. H., & Lowry, M. B. (2014). Comparing spatial metrics that quantify urban form. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 44, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manganelli, B., Pontrandolfi, P., Azzato, A., & Murgante, B. (2014). Using geographically weighted regression for housing market segmentation. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, 9(2), 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennis, J., & Guo, D. (2009). Spatial data mining and geographic knowledge discovery—An introduction. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(6), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh, F., & Legendre, P. (2014). Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: Which algorithms implement Ward’s criterion? Journal of Classification, 31(3), 274–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osland, L., & Thorsen, I. (2013). Spatial impacts, local labour market characteristics and housing prices. Urban Studies, 0042098012474699.

  • Park, S., & Lah, T. J. (2006). The impact of WTE facility on housing value. International Review of Public Administration, 10(2), 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, A., Zude, M., Käthner, J., Ünlü, M., Kanber, R., Hetzroni, A., Gebbers, R., & Ben-Gal, A. (2015). Getis–Ord’s hot-and cold-spot statistics as a basis for multivariate spatial clustering of orchard tree data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 111, 140–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal, N. C., Hodges, D. G., & Merrett, C. D. (2009). A hedonic analysis of the demand for and benefits of urban recreation parks. Land Use Policy, 26(4), 975–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, J. (1991). The maze of urban housing markets: Theory, evidence, and policy. University of Chicago Press.

  • Royuela, V., & Duque, J. C. (2013). HouSI: Heuristic for delimitation of housing submarkets and price homogeneous areas. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 37, 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, H. A., & Polasky, S. (2009). The value of views and open space: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA. Land Use Policy, 26(3), 837–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • She, B., Zhu, X., Ye, X., Guo, W., Su, K., & Lee, J. (2015). Weighted network Voronoi diagrams for local spatial analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 52, 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, H., & Weber, C. (1999). On the asymptotic theory of permutation statistics. Mathematical Methods of Statistics, 8(2), 220–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 323–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, G., Wei, Y. H. D., & Li, H. (2017). Combined effects of accessibility and environmental health risk on housing Price: A case of Salt Lake County, UT. Applied Geography, 89, 12–21.

  • Torrens, P. M. (2008). A toolkit for measuring sprawl. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 1(1), 5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Y., Sun, H., & Yu, S. M. (2007). Spatial autocorrelations and urban housing market segmentation. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 34(3), 385–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Census 2000. Available online https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/phc-1-46.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2019.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Census 2010. Available online https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/saltlakecountyutah,ut/PST045218 Accessed 10 May 2019.

  • Waltert, F., & Schläpfer, F. (2010). Landscape amenities and local development: A review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C. A. (2001). The definition and identification of housing submarkets. Environment and Planning A, 33(12), 2235–2253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. H. D. (2015). Spatiality of regional inequality. Applied Geography, 61, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. H. D. (2016). Towards equitable and sustainable urban space. Sustainability, 8(8), 804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. H. D., & Ewing, R. (2018). Urban expansion, sprawl and inequality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177, 259–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. H. D., Xiao, W., Wen, M., & Wei, R. (2016). Walkability, land use and physical activity. Sustainability, 8(1), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. H. D., Xiao, W., Simon, C. A., Liu, B., & Ni, Y. (2018). Neighborhood, race and educational inequality. Cities, 73, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C. M. (1999). Urban housing markets: Theory and policy. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 3, 1559–1594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmsson, M. (2004). A method to derive housing sub-markets and reduce spatial dependency. Property Management, 22(4), 276–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, S., Haining, R., & Ma, J. (1997). Regionalisation tools for the exploratory spatial analysis of health data. In Recent developments in spatial analysis (pp. 83–100): Springer.

  • Wu, F. (1996). Changes in the structure of public housing provision in urban China. Urban Studies, 33(9), 1601–1627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C., & Sharma, R. (2012). Housing submarket classification: The role of spatial contiguity. Applied Geography, 32(2), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C., Ye, X., Du, Q., & Luo, P. (2017). Spatial effects of accessibility to parks on housing prices in Shenzhen, China. Habitat International, 63, 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., Fang, C., Lin, G., Gong, H., & Qiao, B. (2007). Tempo-spatial patterns of land use changes and urban development in globalizing China: A study of Beijing. Sensors, 7(11), 2881–2906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D., Wei, Y. H. D., & Wu, C. (2007). Modeling spatial dimensions of housing prices in Milwaukee, WI. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 34(6), 1085–1102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the constructive comments of Robert Argenbright.

Funding

The study was funded by National Institute for Transportation & Communities (69A3551747112) and the Ford Foundation (0155–0883).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-9155, USA

    Yangyi Wu & Yehua Dennis Wei

  2. Department of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA

    Han Li

Authors
  1. Yangyi Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yehua Dennis Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Han Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yehua Dennis Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Wei, Y.D. & Li, H. Analyzing Spatial Heterogeneity of Housing Prices Using Large Datasets. Appl. Spatial Analysis 13, 223–256 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-019-09301-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-019-09301-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation