Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Security: Identifying and Understanding the Levels of Security Work in an Organisation

  • Published:
Asian Journal of Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study undertook an examination of corporate security through the lens of the broader socio-organisational literature to understand its organisational stratum, seating, and function. The methodology applied a survey questionnaire to security practitioners, incorporating two measurement tools to assess work level and time-span of discretion. Findings identified work levels across the corporate security function. These work levels indicate that the corporate security function operates at the operational and tactical strata, with limited strategic executive impact. Furthermore, the corporate security function is positioned within the technostructure, providing analytical support to business operations. The study identified a significant disconnect between the corporate security literature—as written by security practitioners and academia—and the socio-organisational literature, with many points of divergence. These findings suggest the need for study replication and a review of the security literature in regards to executive influence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, D. J., & Morfitt, G. (1994). Time-span of discretion and administrative work in school systems: results of a pilot study. New Orleans: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apollo Education Group. (2015). Operational security industry competency model. ASIS. University of Phoenix.

  • Barefoot, J. K., & Maxwell, D. A. (1987). Corporate security administration and management. Boston: Butterworth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayuk, J. L. (2010). Enterprise security for the executive. Santa Barbara: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, A., & Mendenhall, M. E. (2015). From cross-cultural management to global leadership: Evolution and adaption. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boal, K. B., & Whitehead, C. J. (1992). A critique and extension of the stratified systems theory perspective strategic leadership: a multiorganizational-level perspective. Westport: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D., & Corkill, J. (2014). Corporate security and the stratum of security management corporate security in the 21st century: theory and practice in international perspective (pp. 216–234). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, M., & Stiernstedt, P. (2016). Comparing private security regulation in the European Union. Policing and Society, 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2016.1161624.

  • Campbell, G. K. (2014). The manager’s handbook for business security (2nd ed.). Waltham: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L., & Johnson, R. B. (2014). Educational research quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches (5th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, M., & Brooks, D. (2015). Towards security professionalisation: The cultural journey to employ and develop future security professionals. Australian Security Magazine, develop future security professionals. Australian Security Magazine, Apr/May, 22-23.

  • Coole, M., Brooks, D., & Treagust, D. (2015). The physical security professional: formulating a novel body of knowledge. Journal of Applied Security Research, 10(3), 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2015.1038768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craddock, K. (2002). Requisite organization annotated bibliography: an annotated research bibliography on Elliott Jaques, retrieved 17 Dec 2015, from http://globalro.org/index.php/go-library-3/comprehensive-annotated-ro-bibliography

  • Crump, J. (2015). Corporate security intelligence and strategic decision making (1st ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cubbage, C., & Brooks, D. (2013). Corporate security in the Asia-Pacific region. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., & Moore, W. E. (1945). Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Review, 10(2), 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, M. W., Castaño, N., Magomaeva, A., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2012). Conceptualizing leadership across cultures. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M. (2013). Introduction to sociological theory: theorists, concepts, and their applicability to the twenty-first century. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, B. (2014). Private security regimes: conceptualizing the forces that shape the private delivery of security. Theoretical Criminology, 18(3), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1933). The division of labour in society. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, J. J. (2002). Contemporary security management. Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management. Chicago: Pitman Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. J., Halibozek, E., & Green, G. (2008). Introduction to security (8th ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1985). The new industrial state (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. (2014). The handbook of security (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M., & Howell, C. (2014). Policing organisations: the role of the corporate security function and the implications for suppliers. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 16(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2014.16.1.328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B., Kane, G., & Kotwica, K. (2013). Corporate security organizational structure, cost of services and staffing benchmark.

  • Ivanov, S. (2011). Why organizations fail: a conversation about American competitiveness. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 4(1), 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, E. (1951). The changing culture of a factory a study of authority and participation in an industrial setting. London: Tavistock Publications Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, E. (1976). A general theory of bureaucracy. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, E. (1996). Requisite organization a total system for effective managerial organization and managerial leadership for the 21st century (2nd ed.). Virginia: Carson Hall and Co Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, E. (2002). The life and behavior of living organisms: a general theory. Westport: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laner, S., Crossman, E. R. F. W., & Baker, H. T. (1969). Measurement of responsibility: a critical evaluation of level of work measurement by time-span of discretion. Berkeley: California University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Litterer, J. A. (1963). Organizations: structured behaviour. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludbey, C., & Brooks, D. (2015). Stratum of security practice: using risk as a measure in the stratification of security works. Security Journal, 30, 686–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & Fellenz, M. (2010). Organizational behaviour & management (4th ed.). Hampshire: Cengage Learning EMEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, A. (2006). Corporate security’s professional project: an examination of the modern condition of corporate security management, and the potential for further professionalisation of the occupation. Master of science (by research). Cranfield: Cranfield University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5’s: a synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Science, 26(3), 322–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (2009). Managing (1st ed.). California: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Essentials of organizational behaviour (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Limited.

  • Rossi, I. (2008). Toward a framework for global communication: Durkheim, phenomenology, postmodernism, and the “construction” of place and space. In I. Rossi (Ed.), Frontiers of globalization research (pp. 133–151). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennewald, C. A. (2011). Effective security management (5th ed.). Portland: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Brooks, D. (2012). Security science: the theory and practice of security. Waltham: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2008). The Eigenstructures of world society and the regional cultures of the world. In I. Rossi (Ed.), Frontiers of globalization research (pp. 133–151). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, J., & Jakeman, M. (2009). Security risk management body of knowledge. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, A. (2014). Where next for the professionalization of security? In M. Gill (Ed.), The handbook of security (pp. 919–935). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-67284-4_41.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walby, K., Wilkinson, B., & Lippert, R. K. (2014). Legitimacy, professionalisation and expertise in public sector corporate security. Policing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2014.912650.

  • Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Jonathan Brooks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ludbey, C.R., Brooks, D.J. & Coole, M.P. Corporate Security: Identifying and Understanding the Levels of Security Work in an Organisation. Asian Criminology 13, 109–128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-017-9261-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-017-9261-x

Keywords

Navigation