Skip to main content
Log in

Truthmakers and Normative Conflicts

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By building on work by Kit Fine, we develop a sound and complete truthmaker semantics for Lou Goble’s conflict tolerant deontic logic \(\mathbf {BDL}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angell, R. B., Three systems of first degree entailment, Journal of Symbolic Logic 47:147, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angell, R. B., Deducibility, entailment and analytic containment, in R. Sylvan, and J. Norman, (eds.), Directions in Relevant Logic, Kluwer, 1989, pp. 119–144.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Anglberger, A., J. Korbmacher, and F. Faroldi, An exact truthmaker semantics for permission and obligation, in O. Roy, A. Tamminga, and M. Willer, (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems: DEON 2016, College Publications, 2016, pp. 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carnap, R., Meaning and Necessity, Second Edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Correia, F., Semantics for analytic containment, Studia Logica 77:87–104, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferguson, T., Faulty Belnap computers and subsystems of FDE, Journal Logic and Computation 26(5):1617–1636, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fine, K., Permission and possible worlds, Dialectica 68(3):317–336, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fine, K., Angellic content, Journal of Philosophical Logic 42(2):199–226, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fine, K., Truthmaker semantics, in B. Hale, C. Wright, and A. Miller, (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Second Edition, Wiley, New York, 2017, pp. 556–577.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Fraassen, B., Facts and tautological entailments, The Journal of Philosophy 66:477–487, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goble, L., Prima facie norms, normative conflicts, and dilemmas, in D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden, and L. van der Torre, (eds.), Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, College Publications, London 2013, pp. 241–351.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goble, L., Deontic logic (adapted) for normative conflicts, Logic Journal of the IGPL 22(2):206–235, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansson, S., The varieties of permission, in D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden, and L. van der Torre, (eds.), Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, College Publications, London, 2013, pp. 195–240.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sartre, J.-P., Existentialism is a humanism, Trans, Philip Mairet, in W. Kaufmann (ed.), Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, Meridian, New York, 1957/1946, pp. 287–311.

  15. Straßer, C., Adaptive Logics for Defeasible Reasoning, Springer, Berlin, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Straßer, C., and M. Beirlaen, An Andersonian deontic logic with contextualized sanctions, in T. Ågotnes, J. Broersen, and D. Elgesem, (eds.). Deontic Logic in Computer Science. 11th International Conference, DEON 2012, Bergen, Norway, July 16–18, 2012. Proceedings, Springer, 2012, pp. 151–169.

  17. Yablo, S., Aboutness, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For very helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper we would like to thank O. Foisch, Hannes Leitgeb, Frederik Van De Putte and the audiences at Trends in Logic (Lublin, 2017), at Hyperintensional Logics and Truthmaker Semantics (Ghent, 2017) and at the third PIOTR workshop at the University of Bayreuth. This research was partly financed by the DFG as part of the PIOTR-Project at the University of Bayreuth.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Anglberger.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Special Issue: Permissions, Obligations and Beyond Edited byPiotr Kulicki and Olivier Roy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anglberger, A., Korbmacher, J. Truthmakers and Normative Conflicts. Stud Logica 108, 49–83 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-019-09862-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-019-09862-5

Keywords

Navigation