Abstract
The present paper advocates for the use of phenomenology in the study of the self, presenting the findings from a phenomenological study on the participants’ engagement with challenges to the self brought about by their experience studying postmodern thought. Accordingly, the present study utilised Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis to investigate the influence of postmodernism on the self, beliefs, and values. Seven participants took part in semi-structured interviews, in which four themes and 14 subthemes were identified in response to postmodernism: ‘ambivalence’; ‘uncertainty’; ‘responses to uncertainty’; and ‘self as an exception’. These findings were both consistent and inconsistent with criticisms of postmodernism, as participants expressed a sense of postmodernism as destabilising, however, the need for action and stability frequently led participants to respond with the strengthening of their beliefs, or an unwillingness to refute them. The experiences and responses of participants to postmodernism challenge the view that postmodern thinking has a negative influence upon individuals and their beliefs and demonstrate the efficacy of phenomenological approaches in understanding experiences of the self, particularly where they encounter challenges and complexity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, B., Watson, P. J., Chen, Z. J., & Morris, R. J. (2017). Postmodernism, positive psychology and post-traumatic growth within a Christian ideological surround. The Journal of Positive Psychology,12(5), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1228004.
Biggerstaff, D., & Thompson, A. R. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A qualitative methodology of choice in healthcare research. Teaching Qualitative Methods,5(3), 214–224.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). In M. Carmichael (Ed.), Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Charlick, S. J., Fielder, A., Pincombe, J., & McKellar, L. (2017). ‘Determined to breastfeed’: A case study of exclusive breastfeeding using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Women and Birth,30, 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.01.002.
Cousineau, M. J. (2017). Revisiting the sociology of identities and selves with discursive resources. Sociology Compass,11(e12541), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12541.
DeMarree, K. G., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2015). Reducing subjective ambivalence by creating doubt: A metacognitive approach. Social Psychological and Personality Science,6(7), 731–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615581497.
DeMarree, K. G., Morrison, K. R., Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Self-ambivalence and resistance to subtle self-change attempts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,37(5), 674–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211400097.
Dunn, T., & Castro, A. (2012). Postmodern society and the individual: The structural characteristics of postmodern society and how they shape who we think we are. The Social Science Journal,49, 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socij.2012.02.001.
Eisenberg, E. M. (1998). Flirting with meaning. Journal of Language and Social Psychology,17(1), 97–108.
Ferraro, A. M., Guarnaccia, C., Lacolino, C., & Giannone, F. (2016). Postmodernity: Clinical and social reflections about new forms of psychopathology. Giornale italiano di psicopatologia,22(4), 229–235.
Finlay, L. (2011). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Phenomenology for therapists (pp. 139–147). Chichester: Wiley.
Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. New York: Washington Square Press.
Frie, R. (2011). Identity, narrative, and lived experience after postmodernity: Between multiplicity and continuity. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology,42, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916211X567488.
Gebauer, J. E., Maio, G. R., & Pakizeh, A. (2013). Feeling torn when everything seems right: Semantic incongruence causes felt ambivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,39(6), 777–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213481679.
Gergen, K. J. (1994). Exploring the postmodern: Perils or potentials? American Psychologist,49(5), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.49.5.412.
Hertler, S. C., Krauss, H. H., & Ward, A. W. (2017). The postmodern self: Personal persistence and its absence in contemporary life narratives. Journal of Humanistic Psychology,57(2), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167815586666.
Hirsch, K. A. (2014). Postmodernism and the self: How social saturation influences who we think we are. (Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation), Texas A & M University, Ann Arbor.
Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology,11(1), 223–255. https://doi.org/10.10080/14792772043000040.
Kvale, S. (1992). Psychology and postmodernism. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Lester, D. (2012). A multiple self theory of the mind. Comprehensive Psychology,1(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.09.28.CP.1.5.
Lyotard, J. F. (1993). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Retrieved from Minneapolis: http://faculty.georgetown.edu/irvinem/theory/Lyotard-PostModernCondition1-5.html.
Macleod, R., Shepherd, L., & Thompson, A. R. (2016). Posttraumatic stress symptomatology and appearance distress following burn injury: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology,35(11), 1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000391.
Moskaliuk, J., & Matschke, C. (2018). Impact of information incongruity and authors group membership on assimilation and accomodation. Journal of Computer Assisted learning,34, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12235.
Noguti, V., & Bokeyar, A. L. (2014). Who am I? The relationship between self-concept uncertainty and materialism. International Journal of Psychology,49(5), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12031.
Ovadia, S. (2003). Suggestions of the postmodern self: Value changes in American high school students, 1976–1996. Sociological Perspectives,46(2), 239–256.
Parker, I. (1998). Against postmodernism: Psychology in cultural context. Theory and Psychology,8(5), 601–627.
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York: The Viking Press.
Pillaud, V., Cavazza, N., & Butera, F. (2018). The social utility of ambivalence: Being ambivalent on controversial issues is recognized as competence. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00961.
Reich, T., & Wheeler, S. C. (2016). The good and bad of ambivalence: Desiring ambivalence under outcome uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,110(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa000047.
Schneider, I. K., & Schwarz, N. (2017). Mixed feelings: The case of ambivalence. Current Opinion in Behavioural Sciences,15, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.012.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Susen, S. (2015). The ‘postmodern turn’ in the social sciences. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “Big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry,16(10), 837–851.
Trepte, S., & Loy, L. S. (2017). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.
Tricarico, G. (2016). The individuation process in post-modernity. Psychological Perspectives,59(4), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332925.2016.1240529.
van Harreveld, F., Nohlen, H. U., & Schneider, I. K. (2015). The ABC of ambivalence: Affective, behavioural, and cognitive consequences of attitudinal conflict. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,52, 285–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.002.
van Harreveld, F., & Pligt, J. V. D. (2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model. Personality and Social Psychology Review,13(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308324518.
Whitsitt, D. R. (2010). Illness and meaning: A review of select writings. Journal of Humanistic Psychology,50(1), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167809342549.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Professor Deborah Turnbull for her support and contribution to this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Antwerpen, N., Oster, C. Postmodern Thought and the Self: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Hum Stud 43, 107–127 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09534-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09534-2