Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing ASEAN and the EU’s implementation of cultural projects: a historical institutionalist analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asia Europe Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a comparative case study that examines the different ways that the European Union (EU) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) implement cultural projects. It contends that one key difference between the two is that the former emphasizes regional commonality in its activities, while the latter highlights the differences among countries. Applying a historical institutionalist perspective, this paper argues that the disparity between ASEAN and EU cultural projects can be explained by historical differences, which are manifested in ideas that were institutionalized when the two organizations were created. For example, since its establishment after the Second World War, the European bloc has been guided by the vision of creating an ever-closer union, which aligned policy preferences towards deepening integration among Member States. On the other hand, the Southeast Asian bloc has consistently maintained the primacy of state sovereignty and, as such, has favored cultural policies that allowed countries to showcase their respective national cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASEAN (2008) ASEAN Charter. Jakarta, ASEAN Secretariat

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN COCI (2008) Second best of ASEAN performing arts: tapestry of Thai beauty and grace. ASEAN COCI.http://www.aseancultureandinformation.org/coci/files/pictures/second%20BoAPA.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2010

  • ASEAN (2009) Singapore displays crossing of cultures at ASEAN series in Jakarta, Singapore, 30 April. ASEANhttp://www.aseansec.org/PR-BOAP-Singapore.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2010

  • ASEAN COCI (2010) All about ASEAN COCI.http://www.pia.gov.ph/asean-infoculture/default.asp?fi=about&i=achievements. Accessed 20 July 2010

  • Borneman J, Fowler N (1997) Europeanization. Annu Rev Anthropol 26:487–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer S (2009) Politics in time meets the politics of time: historical institutionalism and the EU timescape. J EurPubl Policy 16:307–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Capoccia G (2016) When do institutions “bite”? Historical institutionalism and the politics of institutional change. Comp Pol Stud 49:1095–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2012) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 3rd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • EACEA (2014) Programmes and actions delegated to the EACEA. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/about/programmes_delegated_to_eacea_en.php. Accessed 30 January 2016

  • Field H (1998) EU Cultural policy and the creation of a common European identity. In: Dolby BA, Holland M (ed) Presented at the Joint Conference of APSA and EUSANZ, Christchurch

  • Fontaine P (2000) A new idea for Europe: the Schuman declaration—1950-2000. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas E (1958) The challenge of regionalism. Int Organ 12:440–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas E (1961) International integration: the European and the universal process. Int Organ 15:366–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall PA, Taylor RCR (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Pol Stud 44:936–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immergut EM (1992) Health politics, interests and institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaelberer M (2004) The euro and European identity: symbols, power and the politics of European monetary union. Rev Int Stud 30:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoman T (1992) Foreword to the ASEAN reader: ASEAN conception and evolution. In: Beng OK et al (eds) The 3rd ASEAN reader. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, pp xiii–xxix

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert WJM, van der Meer F (2011) Small, slow, and gradual reform: what can historical institutionalism teach us? Int J PublAdm 34:475–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi Y (2008) A vision towards the East Asia Union: possible or not? In: Kikuchi Y (ed) Towards an ASEAN community: beyond cross-cultural diversity. The Japan Foundation, Tokyo, pp 29–43

  • Kühnhardt L (2006) European integration: challenge and response. Center for European Integration Studies, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacaba JF (ed) (2000) The films of ASEAN. Quezon City, ASEAN-COCI

    Google Scholar 

  • March JG, Olsen JP (2008) Elaborating the “new institutionalism”. In: Binder SA, Rhodes RAW, Rockman B (eds) The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.003.0001

  • Murugappan R (2010) More pop than culture. The Star Online http://www.thestar.com.my/story/?file=%2F2010%2F4%2F25%2Fsoundnstage%2F6010852&sec=soundnstage. Accessed 16 Sept 2017

  • Myanmar Times(2010). Myanmar dancers perform in Jakarta. Myanmar Timeshttps://www.mmtimes.com/national-news/5763-myanmar-dancers-perform-in-jakarta.html. Accessed on 16 September 2017

  • Narine S (1997) ASEAN and the ARF: the limits of the “ASEAN way”. Asian Surv 37:961–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narine S (2008) Forty years of ASEAN: a historical review. Pac Rev 21(4):411–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P (2004) Politics in time: history, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P (2015) Power and path dependence. In: Mahoney J, Thelen K (eds) Advances in comparative historical analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P, Skocpol T (2002) Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In: Milner H, Katznelson I (eds) Political science. State of the discipline. American Society for Public Administration (APSA), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Price S, Thonemann P (2010) The birth of classical Europe: a history from Troy to Augustine. Penguin, New York

  • Probst L (2003) Founding myths in Europe and the role of the Holocaust. New GerCrit 90:45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst L (2006) “Normalization” through Europeanization: the role of the Holocaust. In: Taberner S, Cooke P (eds) German culture, politics, and literature into the twenty-first century: beyond normalization. Camden House, New York, pp 61–74

  • Ragin CC (1981) Comparative sociology and the comparative method. Int J Comp Sociol 22:102–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC, Zaret D (1983) Theory and method in comparative research: two strategies. Soc Forces 61:731–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DB (2010) Historical institutionalism, political development, and the study of American Bureaucracy. In: Durant RF (ed) The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238958.003.0002

  • Rothstein B (1992) Explaining Swedish corporatism: the formative movement. ScandPolit Stud 15:173–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders E (2008) Historical institutionalism. In: BinderS A, RhodesR A W, RockmanB (eds) The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.003.0003

  • Sassatelli M (2002) Imagined Europe: the shaping of a European cultural identity through EU cultural policy. Eur J Soc Theory 5:435–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saukkolin J (2012) European capital of culture Turku: final report of the Turku 2011 Foundation about the realisationof the capital of culture year. Turku 2011 Foundation http://www.turku2011.fi/sites/default/files/liitteet/turku2011_finalreport_eng_web.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2014

  • Shore C (1993) Inventing the ‘People’s Europe’: critical approaches to European community ‘cultural policy’. Man 28:779–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore C (2006) “In unoplures” (?) EU cultural policy and the governance of Europe. Cult Anal 5:7–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohr F (2016) Explaining path dependency and deviation by combining multiple streams framework with historical institutionalism: a comparative analysis of German and Swedish labor market policies. J Comp Pol Anal: Res Pract 18:257–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo S (2008) Historical institutionalism. In: Della Porta D, Keating M (eds) Approaches in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 118–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser NJ (1976) Comparative methods in the social sciences. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1978) Economy and society. University of California Press, Berkeley

  • Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and method, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This paper was made possible through financial support from the Ateneo Center for Asian Studies and a Faculty Development Grant from the Ateneo de Manila University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Enverga III.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Enverga, M. Comparing ASEAN and the EU’s implementation of cultural projects: a historical institutionalist analysis. Asia Eur J 16, 65–80 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-017-0493-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-017-0493-2

Navigation