Elsevier

Geothermics

Volume 90, February 2021, 102019
Geothermics

Uncertainty analysis of wireless temperature measurement (WTM) in borehole heat exchangers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.102019Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Novel analysis of uncertainties related to wireless temperature measurement of vertical temperature profiles in borehole heat exchangers.

  • Temperature profiles measured with the wireless probe show high reliability as a result of high precision (0.011 K) and accuracy (-0.11 K).

  • Wireless probes are also suitable to correct systematic errors of common fiber optic measurements, which are up to -0.93 K in the present study.

  • Future probes should have a slow descent velocity and a small thermal time constant toreduce the dynamic measurement error.

Abstract

The reliability of temperature measurements in open and closed geothermal systems is closely related to their design, quality control and performance evaluation. Thus, wireless and miniaturized probes, which provide highly resolved temperature profiles in borehole heat exchangers (BHEs), experience a growing interest in research. To ensure quality assurance and reliability of these emerging technologies, errors and uncertainties relating to wireless temperature measurements (WTMs) must be determined. Thus, we provide a laboratory analysis of random, systematic and dynamic measurement errors, which lead to the measurement uncertainties of WTMs. For the first time, we subsequently transfer the calculated uncertainties to temperature profiles of the undisturbed ground measured at a BHE site in Karlsruhe, Germany. The resulting precision of 0.011 K and accuracy of -0.11 K ensure a high reliability of the WTMs. The largest uncertainty is obtained within the first five meters of descent and results from the thermal time constant of 4 s. The fast and convenient measurement procedure results in substantial advantages over Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) measurements using fiber optics, whose recorded temperature profiles at the site serve as qualitative comparison. We additionally provide recommendations for technical implementations of future measurement probes. Our work will contribute to an improved understanding and further development of WTMs.

Introduction

Vertical borehole heat exchangers (BHEs) are the most common technology to extract thermal energy from the shallow underground. The standard BHE is a closed loop U-pipe system, where a circulating heat carrier fluid transports the thermal energy from the underground to the heat pump of a building (Florides and Kalogirou, 2007; Hähnlein et al., 2013; Lund et al., 2005; Rivera et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2010). The design of a BHE mainly follow standardized procedures using commercial software (Gaia Geothermal, 2009; Hellström and Sanner, 2000; Spitler, 2000), design tools (Chiasson, 2016; Kavanaugh, 2010), and national guidelines (SIA 384/6-C1:2010, 2010, SIA 384/6-C1:2010, 2010; Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, 2010). These different approaches all require the undisturbed ground temperature (UGT) as a design parameter. The UGT results from the thermal properties of the subsurface as well as the geothermal and surface heat flow and is defined as the ground temperature before the BHE operation (Nordell, 1993; Rees, 2016; Spitler and Bernier, 2016). Although the UGT directly influences the sizing and performance of a BHE, it is probably the most overlooked parameter in the planning and design of BHEs (Beier, 2011; Chiasson, 2016; Gwadera et al., 2017; Ouzzane et al., 2015; Radioti et al., 2017; Spitler and Gehlin, 2015). Various analytical approaches exist for estimating the UGT as a function of time and depth (Fluker, 1958; Givoni and Katz, 1985; Hillel, 1982; Kusuda and Archenbach, 1965; Wu and Nofziger, 1999). The quality of these models strongly depends on the reliability of the collected climate and geological data (Badache et al., 2016). However, temperature measurements at the proposed site with appropriate measurement technologies are not common.

The UGT is also an important parameter for the evaluation of thermal response tests (TRTs), which are essential for the design of large scale BHE fields (Acuña and Palm, 2013; Sanner et al., 2005; Gehlin, 2002; Spitler and Bernier, 2016). The measurement of the UGT is performed before the start of a TRT and directly effects its accuracy (Gehlin and Nordell, 2003). Claesson and Eskilson (1988) propose to measure the average UGT while circulating the heat-carrier fluid of the BHE without extraction or injection of heat. However, the pumping process significantly heats up the system resulting in an increased measured UGT (Gehlin and Nordell, 2003). Thus, measurements of vertical temperature profiles, also referred to as T-logs (Bayer et al., 2016), along the entire length of a borehole evolved as an increasing research focus in recent years. Meanwhile, the measurement of undisturbed and disturbed T-logs in BHEs is mostly carried out over the course of distributed and enhanced thermal response tests (DTRT/ETRT) (Wilke et al., 2019). This is based on distributed temperature sensing (DTS) using fiber optic and hybrid cables (Acuña et al., 2009; Cao et al., 2018; Fujii et al., 2009; Luo et al., 2015; Shim and Song, 2011; Soldo et al., 2016). Alternative devices to fiber optic cables are wired data loggers, which are either manually (Gehlin and Nordell, 2003) or automatically (Aranzabal et al., 2019a, 2020) lowered into a BHE. Raymond et al. (2016), for instance, manually lowered a wired data logger with a measurement frequency of 1 Hz into two BHEs to measure undisturbed T-logs at the site of Saint-Lazara, Canada. The measured T-logs allowed conclusions on the geothermal gradient and seasonal temperature variations at the site.

However, the small diameter of a BHE generally limits the selection of suitable measurement technologies for T-logs. Moreover, the measurement of T-logs, particularly when carried out with fiber optics, are time-consuming, cost-intensive, and require cumbersome handling, while wired data loggers unintentionally displace the fluid in the BHE (Raymond et al., 2016). In addition, strongly twisted or inclined BHEs can produce a discrepancy between the cable length of a wired logger and actual depth of the BHE (LQS-EWS, 2011). For this reason, different concepts of miniaturized wireless temperature probes were recently developed. Pioneers in the field of wireless temperature measurements (WTM) were Rohner et al. (2005), who developed a cylindrical probe, later called NIMO-T, with an adjustable weight depending on the actual requirements (Wagner and Rohner, 2008). This device records pressure and temperature at pre-selected time intervals during the descent. Bayer et al. (2016) used the NIMO-T for measurements in the urban environment of Zurich, showing a relation between the perturbation of the T-logs and the lifetime of buildings and asphalted streets. Martos et al. (2008) and Martos et al. (2011) introduced a spherical sensor system, containing a Pt100-sensor embedded in a polyoxymethylene (POM) shell, for T-log measurements over the course of a TRT. This probe has a density very close to the thermal fluid of a BHE and is therefore only suitable for measurements during a pumping process. Knowledge about flow rate and BHE diameter enables the calculation of the probe’s velocity indicating its position in the BHE. Due to the small density difference between BHE fluid and probe, this particular device is less suitable for measurements of the UGT. Aranzabal et al. (2019b) further developed this sensor system and compared it with various measurement technologies including wired data loggers, fiber optics, and GEOsniff®. The latter is a spherical sensor system, which is commercially available on the market and the further development of NIMO-T (Gottlieb et al., 2018).

Questions regarding errors and measurement uncertainties, which relate to WTMs have not yet been addressed and discussed. However, these investigations are essential for the suitability and development of this type of probe as well as the reliability of the recorded data. Thus, we analyze this by using the GS as a representative device for WTMs. In the following, we first describe the principle of WTMs and related basic equations. Then, we provide a quantitative analysis of statistic, random, and dynamic measurement errors by investigating their major causes under various boundary conditions. Based on this, we discuss the expanded measurement uncertainty U and evaluate its impact on the wirelessly measured UGT in BHEs. We compare them with T-logs measured with common stationary measurement technologies including fiber optics and punctual Pt100-sensors. This allows valuable conclusions on potential optimization needs and appropriate application fields of WTMs.

Section snippets

Wireless temperature measurement (WTM)

In our study, we perform WTMs using the GEOsniff® (GS). Fig. 1 shows a summary of the WTM procedure carried out with the GS.

The GS has a spherical shape with a diameter of 20 mm and includes sensors for temperature and pressure. The shell protects the sensor system and is composed of two half-spheres consisting of anodized aluminum and polyoxymethylene (POM). The analogue sensor signals are converted into digital formats. A Pt1000-sensor (Heraeus Sensor Technology, 2017) for temperature

Calibration procedure

The automated calibration yields several benefits compared to conventional calibration procedures, which are predominantly manually performed. The position of each GS and therefore, the orientation of the temperature sensor in the calibration bath, as well as the distance to the reference thermometer, remains stable over the entire dwell time. Thus, discrepancies between each calibration procedure can be avoided. The average accuracy of the used GSs amounts to -0.11 K for the given temperature

Conclusion

The measurement of reliable T-logs is indispensable for the design and monitoring of geothermal systems. T-log measurements of the undisturbed ground temperature and during TRTs are particularly important for large scale BHE fields. Thus, we analyzed the errors and uncertainties of WTM in BHEs by means of the GS measurement sphere to provide insights into the significance and reliability of this emerging measurement technology. The applied methods, which are based on experimental laboratory and

Funding

This work was supported by Ministry of the Environment, Climate Protection and the Energy Sector Baden-Wurttemberg [grant number L75 16014-16019]; and the Federal Ministry of Economics and Energy [grant number 03ET1386C].

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Simon Schüppler: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Visualization. Roman Zorn: Conceptualization, Validation, Resources, Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Hagen Steger: Validation, Resources, Writing - review & editing. Philipp Blum: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing - review & editing, Supervision.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge funding support from the Ministry of the Environment, Climate Protection and the Energy Sector Baden-Wurttemberg for the project GeoSpeicher.bw (grant number L75 16014-16019) in the context of BWPLUS and the funding support from the Federal Ministry of Economics and Energy for the project "Qualitätssicherung bei Erdwärmesonden II" (grant number 03ET1386C). The authors would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable input.

References (84)

  • H. Fujii et al.

    An improved thermal response test for U-tube ground heat exchanger based on optical fiber thermometers

    Geothermics

    (2009)
  • B. Givoni et al.

    Earth temperatures and underground buildings

    Energy Build.

    (1985)
  • S. Hähnlein et al.

    Sustainability and policy for the thermal use of shallow geothermal energy

    Energy Policy

    (2013)
  • T. Klotzbücher et al.

    Biodegradability and groundwater pollutant potential of organic anti-freeze liquids used in borehole heat exchangers

    Geothermics

    (2007)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Thermal performance investigation of borehole heat exchanger with different U-tube diameter and borehole parameters

    Energy Procedia

    (2014)
  • J.W. Lund et al.

    Direct application of geothermal energy: 2005 Worldwide review

    Geothermics

    (2005)
  • J. Luo et al.

    Experimental investigation of a borehole field by enhanced geothermal response test and numerical analysis of performance of the borehole heat exchangers

    Energy

    (2015)
  • M. Ouzzane et al.

    New correlations for the prediction of the undisturbed ground temperature

    Geothermics

    (2015)
  • G. Radioti et al.

    Effect of undisturbed ground temperature on the design of closed-loop geothermal systems: a case study in a semi-urban environment

    Appl. Energy

    (2017)
  • J. Raymond et al.

    Extending thermal response test assessments with inverse numerical modeling of temperature profiles measured in ground heat exchangers

    Renew. Energy

    (2016)
  • J.A. Rivera et al.

    Increased ground temperatures in urban areas: estimation of the technical geothermal potential

    Renew. Energy

    (2017)
  • V. Soldo et al.

    Vertical distribution of shallow ground thermal properties in different geological settings in Croatia

    Renew. Energy

    (2016)
  • J.D. Spitler et al.

    Vertical borehole ground heat exchanger design methods

  • J.D. Spitler et al.

    Thermal response testing for ground source heat pump systems—an historical review

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2015)
  • T. Vogt et al.

    Estimation of seepage rates in a losing stream by means of fiber-optic high-resolution vertical temperature profiling

    J. Hydrol. (Amst)

    (2010)
  • H. Yang et al.

    Vertical-borehole ground-coupled heat pumps: a review of models and systems

    Appl. Energy

    (2010)
  • J. Acuña et al.

    Distributed thermal response test on a U-pipe borehole heat exchanger

  • N. Aranzabal et al.

    Novel instrument for temperature measurements in borehole heat exchangers

    IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.

    (2019)
  • N. Aranzabal et al.

    Temperature measurements along a vertical borehole heat exchanger: a method comparison

    Renew. Energy

    (2019)
  • Frank Bernhard

    Handbuch Der Technischen Temperaturmessung, 2. Auflage Ed

    (2014)
  • D. Cao et al.

    A field study on the application of distributed temperature sensing technology in thermal response tests for borehole heat exchangers

    Bull Eng Geol Environ

    (2018)
  • A.D. Chiasson

    Geothermal Heat Pump and Heat Engine Systems: Theory and Practice

    (2016)
  • B. Des Tombe et al.

    Estimation of temperature and associated uncertainty from fiber-optic raman-spectrum distributed temperature sensing

    Sensors

    (2020)
  • Deutsche Akkreditierungsstelle GmbH (DAkkS)

    Kalibrierung Von Widerstandsthermometern: DKD-R 5-1

    (2010)
  • L. Eggeling et al.

    Auswirkungen Der Grundwasserbeschaffenheit Auf Bau Und Betrieb Oberflächennaher Geothermieanlagen

    (2020)
  • Eurachem

    Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement

    (2012)
  • B.J. Fluker

    Soil temperatures

    Soil Sci.

    (1958)
  • Gaia Geothermal

    Ground Loop Design: Geothermal Design Studio. User’s Manual

    (2009)
  • S. Gehlin

    Thermal Response Test: Method Development and Evaluation

    (2002)
  • S. Gehlin et al.

    Determining Undisturbed Ground Temperature for Thermal Response Test. ASHRAE 109, pt. 1

    (2003)
  • K.-H. Grote et al.

    Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering

    (2008)
  • Cited by (5)

    View full text