Elsevier

Journal of Catalysis

Volume 393, January 2021, Pages 215-229
Journal of Catalysis

On the enhanced sulfur and coking tolerance of Ni-Co-rare earth oxide catalysts for the dry reforming of methane

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2020.11.028Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Sulfur tolerance of Ni-based dry reforming of methane catalysts examined.

  • Both Ce/Zr and Ce/La oxides with Ni are stable at low sulfur concentrations.

  • Only Ni-Co supported on Ce/Zr oxide not rapidly deactivated at >20 ppm sulfur.

  • Ni-Co catalysts also show much lower coking rates in dry reforming.

  • Improved performance linked to strong Co-Ni and strong metal-oxide interactions.

Abstract

Sulfur and coking tolerance of Ni-based dry reforming catalysts were examined. Catalysts utilizing both Ce/Zr and Ce/La oxide supports, some with additional Co, were tested. Long-term reaction runs were conducted with and without sulfur in the feed. Catalysts were also characterized by STEM, XPS, XAFS and XANES and CO chemisorption. Only catalysts where Co was also present, and supported on the Ce-Zr oxide, were capable of extended sulfur tolerance at >20 ppm sulfur. This tolerance, along with a greatly reduced coking rate, is linked to Co in intimate contact with Ni, the mixture existing as clusters anchored and influenced electronically by the oxide support. The activation of methane takes place on these sites. Larger metal aggregates formed by ripening during reaction appear to be spectators. The measured activation energies for dry reforming suggest that CO2 activation takes place at the oxide interface, and is a kinetically significant step.

Introduction

Carbon dioxide or “dry” reforming of methane (DRM) is potentially a better way to utilize greenhouse gases (GHGs) compared to steam reforming, since two GHGs are consumed and made into a useful industrial gas stream of theoretically 1:1 H2/CO, CH4 + CO2 → 2H2 + 2CO.

The rationale and catalyst technology behind DRM have been reviewed extensively over the years [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. However, several challenges remain in order to enable large scale implementation of DRM. The high temperatures required (typically >700 °C) is one, and relatively fast deactivation of non-noble metal (mainly Ni-based) catalysts the other. The former challenge can be addressed by application of hybrid technologies such as oxy-steam CO2 reforming (aka “tri-reforming”) or CH4 bireforming (dry plus steam reforming). The latter challenge has been addressed by the alloying or mixing of Ni with certain other metals (Co, Mn, Mo), and/or the application of supports that slow down or control crystallite ripening and deactivation [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. As the deactivation can be due to coking, active metal sintering, or poisoning by sulfur, chlorine etc., or some combination of these, no support is at present considered optimal for all feeds. The two most important methane sources, natural gas and biogas, can both contain significant amounts of sulfur compounds (up to 100 ppm) in the form of H2S, mercaptans, sulfides and tetrahydrothiophene [32], all of which can eventually lead to catalyst poisoning. Tuning the electronic surroundings of the active sites, adding adsorbent beds and choosing supports that provide more oxygen vancancies are all considered possible ways of designing anti-sulfur poisoning catalysts [33], [34], [35], [36].

We have discussed previously how to design and evaluate catalysts that can minimize coke formation and improve stability in DRM [37], [38]. It was found that mixed rare-earth oxide supports such as CeO2-ZrO2 and CeO2-La2O3 can both lead to low-coking rates in DRM, with Ni-based catalysts. Addition of Co leads to further gains in stability for largely unknown reasons, because although Co(0) can activate CH4 at <430 °C [39], Co/CeO2 is itself a not too active metal at more typical DRM conditions [37]. This study will focus on a comparison of long-term behavior of both supports, how sulfur-tolerant the resulting catalysts are, the Ni-Co interactions, and how the final catalyst states for the two supports actually differ greatly. This last result has implications toward the mechanism of DRM that will be exploited further in subsequent work. Fresh and spent catalysts of both types have been characterized by XAFS, CO chemisorption, STEM, and XPS.

Section snippets

Catalyst preparation

Ce/La mixed oxides were prepared by a templated sol-gel method adapted from previous work [37], [40], [41], [42], [43]. The precursors for Ce and La were (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6 (98+%, Alfa) and La(NO3)·6H2O (99.9%, Alfa), which were dissolved in 96% water/3% methanol/1% TMAOH surfactant (25% in methanol). The molar ratio Ce/La was 3:1, with a 1/100 wt ratio of the oxides in the sol-gel synthesis mixture. Ammonia solution was used to gradually adjust the pH to 10.3 during aging (90 °C, 2 d). After

Long-term catalyst evaluations

Catalysts from previous work that were found to exhibit low rates of coking and high initial activities were tested over longer periods in a conventional fixed-bed reactor at 775 °C [37]. No Co-only catalysts are included because these were found to be less active than any Ni-based ones. The activities can be quantified as the product of the GHSV (mL/(g·h), typically 44000), and the CH4 conversion, on a molar basis. For a zero-order reaction, this is the same as the average rate of reaction,

.1 Origin of sulfur tolerance

At low sulfur concentrations in the feed, all catalysts tested here are fairly stable. The Ni-only catalysts show some deactivation, but they do so even when sulfur is not present (Fig. 1), so this is not due to sulfur poisoning. But in a high sulfur concentration environment (20–30 ppm), only catalysts where Ni is paired with Co, and Ce with Zr, and the Ce/Zr ratio is low (1:1) can survive over the long term (Fig. 2). The addition of Co in particular is crucial to the sulfur tolerance. Simpler

Conclusions

  • 1)

    Extended sulfur tolerance in Ni-based DRM catalysts at the 20–30 ppm level can be attained by the addition of Co, and supporting the metals on mixed rare earth oxides such as Ce-Zr oxide, that exhibit high concentrations of oxygen defect sites. Extended sulfur tolerance at <1 ppm is possible with both Ce-Zr and Ce-La oxides, and without Co.

  • 2)

    In catalysts containing both transition metals, at least some of the Co is interacting with the Ni. The combination reduces the rate of coking even further,

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant number CBET 1510435). The authors would like to thank Drs. Amitava Roy and Orhan Kizilkaya of the LSU Center for Advanced Structures and Microdevices for help with XAS and XPS. Aberration-corrected STEM imaging was conducted at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility.

References (110)

  • A. Nandini et al.

    K-, CeO2-, and Mn-promoted Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for stable CO2 reforming of methane

    Appl. Catal., A

    (2005)
  • N. Laosiripojana et al.

    Methane steam reforming over Ni/Ce–ZrO2 catalyst: influences of Ce–ZrO2 support on reactivity, resistance toward carbon formation, and intrinsic reaction kinetics

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2005)
  • L. Kapokova et al.

    Dry reforming of methane over LnFe0.7Ni0.3O3−δ perovskites: influence of Ln nature

    Catal. Today

    (2011)
  • G.S. Gallego et al.

    Dry reforming of methane over LaNi1−yByO3±δ (B=Mg, Co) perovskites used as catalyst precursor

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2008)
  • S.Y. Foo et al.

    Evaluation of lanthanide-group promoters on Co–Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for CH4 dry reforming

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2011)
  • P. Djinović et al.

    Influence of active metal loading and oxygen mobility on coke-free dry reforming of Ni–Co bimetallic catalysts

    Appl. Catal. B, Env.

    (2012)
  • H. Cui et al.

    Removal of sulfur compounds from utility pipelined synthetic natural gas using modified activated carbons

    Catal. Today

    (2009)
  • Y. Richardson et al.

    A short overview on purification and conditioning of syngas produced by biomass gasification: catalytic strategies, process intensification and new concepts

    Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.

    (2012)
  • X. Gao et al.

    A comprehensive review of anti-coking, anti-poisoning and anti-sintering catalysts for biomass tar reforming reaction

    Chem. Eng. Sci.: X

    (2020)
  • C. Jiang et al.

    Rapid screening of ternary rare-earth – Transition metal catalysts for dry reforming of methane and characterization of final structures

    J. Catal.

    (2019)
  • D. Terribile et al.

    The synthesis and characterization of mesoporous high-surface area ceria prepared using a hybrid organic/inorganic route

    J. Catal.

    (1998)
  • S. Rossignol et al.

    Preparation of zirconia-ceria soft materials

    Catal. Today

    (1999)
  • K.B. Bischoff

    An extension of the general criterion for importance of pore diffusion with chemical reactions

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1967)
  • P.B. Weisz et al.

    Interpretation of Measurements in Experimental Catalysis

  • I. Atribak et al.

    Combined removal of diesel soot particulates and NOx over CeO2–ZrO2 mixed oxides

    J. Catal.

    (2008)
  • M.-M. Millet et al.

    Surface titration of upported Ni catalysts by O2-pulse thermal analysis

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2018)
  • H. Tillborg et al.

    X-ray and UV photoemission studies of mono-, bi- and multilayers of physisorbed molecules: O2 and N2 on graphite

    Surf. Sci.

    (1993)
  • Y.C.G. Kwan et al.

    Identification of functional groups and determination of carboxyl formation temperature in graphene oxide using the XPS O 1s spectrum

    Thin Solid Films

    (2015)
  • M.C. Biesinger et al.

    Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2011)
  • R.I.R. Blyth et al.

    XPS studies of graphite electrode materials for lithium ion batteries

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2000)
  • H.-W. Tien et al.

    The production of graphene nanosheets decorated with silver nanoparticles for use in transparent, conductive films

    Carbon

    (2011)
  • T. Staudt et al.

    Ceria reoxidation by CO2: a model study

    J. Catal.

    (2010)
  • D.K. Kim et al.

    Mechanistic study of the unusual catalytic properties of a new NiCe mixed oxide for the CO2 reforming of methane

    J. Catal.

    (2007)
  • A. Kambolis et al.

    Ni/CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts for the dry reforming of methane

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2010)
  • H.-S. Roh et al.

    Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Ni incorporated into Ce–ZrO2 catalysts

    Appl. Catal., A

    (2004)
  • I.G. Osojnik Crnivec et al.

    Effect of synthesis parameters on morphology and activity of bimetallic catalysts in CO2–CH4 reforming

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2012)
  • Y.J.O. Asencios et al.

    Synthesis of NiO–MgO–ZrO2 catalysts and their performance in reforming of model biogas

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2011)
  • A. Löfberg et al.

    Ni/CeO2 based catalysts as oxygen vectors for the chemical looping dry reforming of methane for syngas production

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2017)
  • G. Zhou et al.

    Oxidation entropies and enthalpies of ceria-zirconia solid solutions

    Catal. Today

    (2007)
  • P. Fornasiero et al.

    Modification of the redox behavior of CeO2 induced by structural doping with ZrO2

    J. Catal.

    (1996)
  • M. Boaro et al.

    The dynamics of oxygen storage in ceria-zirconia model catalysts measured by CO oxidation under stationary and cycling feedstream compositions

    J. Catal.

    (2000)
  • L. Pino et al.

    Hydrogen production by methane tri-reforming process over Ni–ceria catalysts: effect of La-doping

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2011)
  • S. Das et al.

    Silica-Ceria sandwiched Ni core–shell catalyst for low temperature dry reforming of biogas: coke resistance and mechanistic insights

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2018)
  • M.A. Goula et al.

    Syngas production via the biogas dry reforming reaction over Ni supported on zirconia modified with CeO2 or La2O3 catalysts

    Intl. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2017)
  • P. Ferreira-Aparicio et al.

    New trends in reforming technologies: from hydrogen industrial plants to multifuel microreformers

    Catal. Rev.

    (2005)
  • T. Montini et al.

    Fundamentals and catalytic applications of CeO2 based materials

    Chem. Rev.

    (2016)
  • K. Chang et al.

    Application of ceria in CO2 conversion catalysis

    ACS Catal.

    (2020)
  • S. Kawi et al.

    Progress in synthesis of highly active and stable nickel-based catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane

    ChemSusChem

    (2015)
  • Y. Kathiraser et al.

    Inverse NiAl2O4 on LaAlO3–Al2O3: unique catalytic structure for stable CO2 reforming of methane

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2013)
  • M.S. Aw et al.

    Progress in the synthesis of catalyst supports: synergistic effects of nanocomposites for attaining long-term stable activity in CH4−CO2 dry reforming

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (48)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text