Skip to main content
Log in

Truncation method for calculating the resistance of ventilation air-conditioning duct systems under nonfully developed flow boundary conditions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calculating the resistance of ventilation air-conditioning ducts under nonfully developed flow is a crucial problem that must be addressed. Based on the characteristics of the resistance in ventilation air-conditioning ducts, the truncation method—a computational method that is appropriate for nonfully developed flow boundary conditions—was proposed in this study. The resistance distributions in the upstream and downstream ducts from typical local components, including reducers, bends and tee ducts, were investigated. Using the resistance values of the local components under fully developed flow, the resistances that did not belong to nonfully developed flow were truncated and removed. Finally, the calculation steps of the proposed method were discussed, an engineering case study was presented, and the accuracy of the developed model was analyzed. The results showed that for the local components in the system (reducers, bends and tee ducts), their proportions of the total resistance exhibited similar trends under different width-to-height ratios. The resistance of these local components included upstream resistance, downstream resistance and their own resistance. The upstream resistance accounted for 2%–6% of the total resistance, whereas the downstream resistance of the reducers, bends and tee ducts accounted for 40%–60% of the total resistance. A functional relationship was established between the local resistance and cutoff distance of the reducers, bends and tee ducts. Hence, the truncation method can calculate the local resistance from the cutoff distance. Moreover, in the presented engineering case study, the error between the actual measured resistance values and those simulated with the truncation method was only 4.28%, which was far less than that of the results simulated with the traditional calculation methods (53.64%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ai ZT, Mak CM (2013). Pressure losses across multiple fittings in ventilation ducts. The Scientific World Journal, 2013: 195763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qahtani M, Jang Y-J, Chen H-C, Han J-C (2002). Flow and heat transfer in rotating two-pass rectangular channels (AR=2) by Reynolds stress turbulence model. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 45: 1823–1838.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE (2017). ASHRAE Handbook: Fundamentals. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzola J, Humphrey JAC, Iacovides H, Launder BE (1986). Developing turbulent flow in a U-bend of circular cross-section: Measurement and computation. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 108: 214–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazdidi-Tehrani F, Mohammadi-Ahmar A, Kiamansouri M, Jadidi M (2015). Investigation of various non-linear eddy viscosity turbulence models for simulating flow and pollutant dispersion on and around a cubical model building. Building Simulation, 8: 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceylan K, Kelbaliyev G (2003). The roughness effects on friction and heat transfer in the fully developed turbulent flow in pipes. Applied Thermal Engineering, 23: 557–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIBSE (2006). Ventilation and Air Conditioning Requirements. CIBSE Guide B2. London: Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferziger JH, Perić M (2002). Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 3rd edn. Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gao R, Li A (2011). Modeling deposition of particles in vertical square ventilation duct flows. Building and Environment, 46: 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao R, Chen S, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Li A (2016). Coupling effect of ventilation duct bend with different shapes and sizes. Building Simulation, 9: 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao R, Chen S, Li A, Yang Z, Cong B (2017a). Computational fluid dynamics study on the drag and flow field differences between the single and coupled bends. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 38: 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao R, Fang Z, Li A, Liu K, Yang Z, et al. (2017b). Numerical simulation and experimental study on resistance reduction optimization of the cambered surface of elbows under adjacent influence. Procedia Engineering, 205: 3985–3992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao R, Fang Z, Li A, Liu K, Yang Z, et al. (2018a). A novel low-resistance tee of ventilation and air conditioning duct based on energy dissipation control. Applied Thermal Engineering, 132: 790–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao R, Liu K, Li A, Fang Z, Yang Z, et al. (2018b). Biomimetic duct tee for reducing the local resistance of a ventilation and air-conditioning system. Building and Environment, 129: 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao R, Wen S, Li A, Zhang H, Du W, et al. (2019). A novel low-resistance damper for use within a ventilation and air conditioning system based on the control of energy dissipation. Building and Environment, 157: 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idelchik IE (1987). Handbook of hydraulic resistance, 2nd edition. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 109: 260–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JY, Park SO (2009). A new compressible turbulence model for free and wall-bounded shear layers. In: Eckhardt B (ed), Advances in Turbulence XII. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 132. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmiraju M, Cui J (2006). Laminar pressure loss coefficient in close coupled fittings. In: Proceeding of ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, USA.

  • Li T, Li A (2006). Numerical and experimental study of ratio of net closed coupled/uncoupled of 90° ells in Z-shape. Fluid Machinery, 2006(8): 9–14. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li A, Chen X, Chen L, Gao R (2014). Study on local drag reduction effects of wedge-shaped components in elbow and T-junction close-coupled pipes. Building Simulation, 7: 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li A, Chen X, Chen L (2015). Numerical investigations on effects of seven drag reduction components in elbow and T-junction close-coupled pipes. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 36: 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Ye W-B, Zhang D-B, Hong Y, Huang S-M (2017). Effects of exhaust location and number on thermal comfort performance under stratum ventilation. Computational Thermal Sciences: An International Journal, 10: 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu L, Chen M (2000). A theoretical model for Reynolds-stress and dissipation-rate budgets in near-wall region. Science in China Series A: Mathematics, 43: 199–204.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mays LW (1999). Hydraulic Design Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DS (1978). Internal Flow System. Cranfield, UK: BHRA Fluid Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modi PP, Jayanti S (2004). Pressure losses and flow maldistribution in ducts with sharp bends. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 82: 321–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumma S, Mahank T, Ke Y (1997). Close coupled ductwork fitting pressure drop. HVAC&R Research, 3: 158–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntinas GK, Shen X, Wang Y, Zhang G (2018). Evaluation of CFD turbulence models for simulating external airflow around varied building roof with wind tunnel experiment. Building Simulation 11: 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park HM (2016). A continuum mechanical modeling of fully-developed forced convection of nanofluids in a coaxial cylinder. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 97: 818–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters TWJ, Henkes RAWM (1992). The Reynolds-stress model of turbulence applied to the natural-convection boundary layer along a heated vertical plate. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 35: 403–420.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pletcher RH, Tannehill JC, Anderson DA (2013). Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, 3rd edn. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Popiel CO, Wojtkowiak J (2000). Friction factor in U-type undulated pipe flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 122: 260–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmeyer WJ (2002). Pressure loss coefficients for close coupled pipe ells. ASHRAE Transactions 108(1): 390–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramgadia AG, Saha AK (2019). Study of fully-developed turbulent flow and heat transfer in a rotating wavy-walled duct. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 144: 118578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez S (2019). Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics and Turbulence Modeling. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sami S, Cui J (2004). Numerical study of pressure losses in close-coupled fittings. HVAC&R Research, 10: 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su J, Rupp J, Garmory A, Carrotte JF (2015). Measurements and computational fluid dynamics predictions of the acoustic impedance of orifices. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 352: 174–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taghinia J, Rahman M, Siikonen T (2015). Simulation of indoor airflow with RAST and SST-SAS models: A comparative study. Building Simulation, 8: 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villalpando F, Reggio M, Ilinca A (2011). Assessment of turbulence models for flow simulation around a wind turbine airfoil. Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, 2011: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye W (2017). Design method and modeling verification for the uniform air flow distribution in the duct ventilation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 110: 573–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye X, Kang Y, Zuo B, Zhong K (2017). Study of factors affecting warm air spreading distance in impinging jet ventilation rooms using multiple regression analysis. Building and Environment, 120: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yongson O, Badruddin IA, Zainal ZA, Aswatha Narayana PA (2007). Airflow analysis in an air conditioning room. Building and Environment, 42: 1531–1537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmrhal V, Schwarzer J (2009). Numerical simulation of local loss coefficients of ventilation duct fittings In: Proceedings of the 11th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Glasgow, UK.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research project was sponsored by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0702800), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51878533 and No. 51508442), and Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (No. 2019JM-233). Industrialization fund of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education (No. 19JC023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ran Gao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, R., Guo, W., Yang, C. et al. Truncation method for calculating the resistance of ventilation air-conditioning duct systems under nonfully developed flow boundary conditions. Build. Simul. 14, 1237–1249 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0734-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0734-y

Keywords

Navigation