Abstract
Mesothelin (MSLN) is a lineage restricted cell surface protein expressed in about 30% of human cancers and high MSLN expression is associated with poor survival in several different cancers. The restricted expression of MSLN in normal tissue and its frequent expression in cancers make MSLN an excellent target for antibody-based therapies. Many clinical trials with agents targeting MSLN have been carried out but to date none of these agents have produced enough responses to obtain FDA approval. MSLN shedding is an important factor that may contribute to the failure of these therapies, because shed MSLN acts as a decoy receptor and allows release of antibodies bound to cell-surface MSLN. We have investigated the mechanism of shedding and show here that members of the ADAM, MMP and BACE families of proteases all participate in shedding, that more than one protease can produce shedding in the same cell, and that inhibition of shedding greatly enhances killing of cells by an immunotoxin targeting MSLN. Our data indicates that controlling MSLN shedding could greatly increase the activity of therapies that target MSLN.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mesothelin (MSLN) is a GPI-anchored membrane protein that is synthesized as a 70 kDa precursor protein and is proteolytically cleaved, generating a 30 kDa polypeptide known as megakaryocyte potentiating factor that is released from the cell and a 40–45 kDa glycoprotein (MSLN)1,2,3,4,5,6 that is connected to the cell surface by phosphatidyl inositol7,8. MSLN binds to MUC16 and has a role in cell adhesion9,10 and tumor progression11. MSLN is shed from the cell surface generating a pool of free antigen in pleural fluid, ascites, and in blood. Serum MSLN is used as a screening biomarker for cancer patients and to monitor responses12,13. Unfortunately, shedding is an impediment to antibody-based therapies, because it provides a sink within tumors that reduces their efficiency and also promote their release from the cell surface before they can kill the cell6.
Sheddases are proteases that cleave membrane-bound protein substrates close to or within the cell membrane and release the ectodomain from the cell. The best known sheddases are members of the ADAM family14,15,16. Substrates for ADAMs include growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules. ADAM17 also known as TACE was shown to mediate MSLN shedding in A431 cells6. However, TACE knockdown only reduced MSLN shedding by 50% indicating other sheddases have a role in shedding. To understand MSLN shedding in more depth, we determined the cut sites generated when MSLN is shed in different cancer cell lines. Using RNAseq data to determine sheddase expression, we knocked down RNAs encoding various sheddases to find which are important for shedding. Our results show that MSLN is cleaved at many sites close to the cell membrane, that ADAM10, ADAM17, BACE2, BACE1, and MMP15 all have a role in MSLN shedding, and that more than one sheddase can catalyze MSLN release in the same cell line.
Results and discussion
To determine the sites at which MSLN is cut, we studied five different cancer cell lines: KLM1 (pancreatic), KB31 (cervical), OVCAR8 (ovarian), A431/H9 cells (epidermoid carcinoma transfected with MSLN), and RH16, a primary mesothelioma cell line. Using culture medium, we immunoprecipitated MSLN with an antibody to the amino terminus and identified the product by immuno-blotting and Coomassie Blue staining. Figure 1a shows an SDS gel in which MSLN appears as a 40–45 kDa broad band typical of a glycosylated protein. A431 cells do not express MSLN. Because a single band with a molecular weight close to that of full-length MSLN was detected, we conclude that the major cleavage site is near the cell membrane. Figure 1b lists the most C-terminal MSLN peptide identified by mass spectrometry (for full-length sequence of the peptide see Supplementary Table 1). It was previously reported that MSLN from human ascites, pleural fluid, or the A431/H9 cell line is cut at two locations near the C terminus6,17. One cleavage is at residue 586 between Y and L, and the other is at residue 591 between L and S (Fig. 1b, cut sites 3 and 6). We have now identified several other cut sites (Fig. 1b). All the cut sites are located close together and close to the plasma membrane. These results establish that the region close to the cell membrane is the principal location of cutting by sheddases. The multiplicity of sites raises the possibility that different enzymes are responsible for shedding in different cells.
ADAM family
To identify the proteases responsible for shedding, we analyzed several RNAseq databases to determine which sheddases are expressed in our cell lines (https://depmap.org/portal/ccle). In KLM1, KB31, and OVCAR8 cells, several members of the ADAM family are expressed, specifically ADAM9, 10, 15, and 17 (Supplementary Table 2). ADAM17 was previously shown to be important for shedding of MSLN in A431/H9 cells6. Figure 2a, b (full image Supplementary Fig. 1) show that lowering ADAM17 expression did not decrease MSLN secretion in KB31 but did decrease shedding in KLM1 cells by 45%. These data identify ADAM17 as a sheddase for KLM1 and indicate that other proteases must be involved in shedding. ADAM9, 10, and 15 also have protease activity14 and are expressed in these cell lines (Supplementary Table 2). Figure 2c, d shows that ADAM10 knockdown diminished shedding in KLM1 and OVCAR8 cells while knockdown of both ADAM17 and ADAM10 produced a greater decrease in shedding than each alone Fig. 2e, f. However, knockdown of ADAM9 and ADAM15 did not lower MSLN shedding (Supplementary Figs. 2–4). Knockdown of ADAM9, 10, and 15 did not decrease KB31 cell shedding (Supplementary Fig. 2).
MMPs
MT-MMPs (membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases) are a subgroup of the MMP family that can also act as canonical sheddases16. MMP14, 15, 17, 24, and 25 are all MT-MMPs. We found that MMP14 is highly expressed in KLM1 cells and MMP15 is highly expressed in KB31, KLM1, and OVCAR8 cells (Supplementary Table 2). We observed that knockdown of MMP15 reduced MSLN expression in KB31 cells (Fig. 3a, b). Knockdown of MMP14 or MMP15 did not reduce MSLN shedding in KLM1 cells (Fig. 3c, d) or OVCAR8 cells (Supplementary Fig 5), but slightly increased shedding.
BACE1 and BACE2
BACE1 and BACE2 can cleave amyloid precursor protein (APP) and have been extensively studied in Alzheimer’s disease18. They have also been implicated in processing other proteins16,19,20. We find that BACE2 and BACE1 RNAs are expressed in many cell lines (Supplementary Table 2). To determine if BACE2 protein is also expressed, we did western blots and observed BACE2 expression in KB31, MS751, T3M4, and AsPC1 cells (Supplementary Fig. 6). To determine if BACE2 is involved in shedding, two siRNAs targeting human BACE2 were transfected into KB31 cells. Western blots show that when BACE2 protein is knocked down (Fig. 4a, full image Supplemental Fig. 7), total cell-associated MSLN is greatly increased (Fig. 4b), cell surface MSLN is increased as measured by flow cytometry (Fig. 4c), and shed MSLN is substantially decreased (Fig. 4d). These data indicate that in KB31 cells, BACE2 knockdown increases cell-associated MSLN by reducing MSLN shedding.
Since BACE1 RNA is also expressed in KB31 cells, albeit at a lower level than BACE2 (Supplementary Table 2), we knocked them down (Fig. 4e) and found that knockdown of BACE1 or BACE2 lowered shed MSLN levels to the same extent (Fig. 4f). However, knocking down both did not further lower MSLN shedding.
Because BACE2 is expressed more abundantly than BACE1 in our cell line panel (Supplementary Table 2), we examined the role of BACE2 in a cervical cancer line, MS751, and two pancreatic cancer lines, AsPC1 and T3M4. Figure 5a shows that siRNAs for BACE2 lower BACE2 protein levels (full image Supplemental Fig. 8). Figure 5b shows that in the medium of these three lines MSLN is significantly decreased. In MS751 there is a 60% decrease, in T3M4 a 55% decrease, and in AsPC1 a 23% decrease. We also knocked down BACE1 in KLM1 and BACE1 and 2 in OVCAR8 but found no decrease in MSLN shedding (Supplementary Fig. 9). In summary, these data indicate that BACE2 but probably not BACE1 has a major role MSLN shedding.
Small-molecule inhibitors to BACEs, ADAMs, and MMPs reduce MSLN shedding
Lanabecestat (LY3314814) and LY2886721 are potent inhibitors of BACE1 and BACE2 that have been used in clinical trials16,21,22. We tested the inhibitors on cell lines where MSLN shedding was affected by BACE2 knockdown. Both drugs inhibited MSLN shedding by over 50% in KB31 and by 30–40% in MS751, T3M4, and AsPC1 cells (Fig. 6a). Neither agent inhibited MSLN shedding in KLM1 and OVCAR8 cells (Fig. 6a), which have very low BACE2 (Supplementary Table 2). We then measured the activities of the ADAM inhibitor TMI-1 and the MMP inhibitor Marimastat on several cell lines. Figure 6b shows that the TMI-1 greatly decreased MSLN shedding in KLM1, as expected from the knockdown experiments, and it also affected OVCAR8 and T3M4. Marimastat inhibited shedding in KB31, KLM1, T3M4, and OVCAR8 cells. Marimastat is a potent broad-spectrum inhibitor of all major MMPs23. We only knocked down membrane-bound MMPs; it is possible other MMPs play a role in MSLN shedding.
Because our knockdown studies showed both MMP15 and BACE inhibited shedding in KB31 cells, we tested inhibitors of these enzymes. Figure 6c shows that Lanabecestat inhibits shedding by 30%, that Marimastat lowers shedding by 50%, and the combination by 80%. This result shows shedding can be mediated by two enzymes in the same cell line. Furthermore, we suspect an additional sheddase is involved, since shedding was not completely inhibited. To determine if this inhibition would result in enhanced immunotoxin action, we treated cells with the inhibitors for 20 h and then added SS1P, an immunotoxin that kills MSLN-expressing cells1. We found that the IC50 changed from 4.6 ng/ml with no inhibitor to 1.1 ng/ml with Marimastat, to 1.3 ng/ml with Lanabecestat and to 0.29 ng/ml with both (Fig. 6d). The inhibitors were also examined in OVCAR8 cells. As shown in Fig. 6e, they stimulated SS1P killing; the IC50 fell from 7.8 to 1.3 ng/ml with TMI-1, to 2.8 ng/ml with Marimastat and to 0.94 ng/ml with both. These data show that in a single cell line more than one protease participates in MSLN shedding and inhibition greatly sensitizes the cells to an agent targeting MSLN.
Do BACEs participate in shedding of other proteins
The unexpected finding that BACEs have a major role in MSLN shedding raises the possibility that they would affect the release/shedding of other proteins. To investigate this, we treated five cell lines with 20 μM Lanabecestat for 20 h and measured the content of several proteins and cytokines in the medium (Supplementary Table 3). As expected MSLN levels were decreased in all the lines, although the decrease in KLM1 was small and not significant.
There was also a small inhibition of shedding of Her1 (EGFR) in four lines and CA125 in one cell line (MS751). There was no effect on the folate receptor, which like MSLN is PI linked or on TGF-β1 and galectin 3. We conclude that the effect of BACEs on MSLN shedding is relatively specific.
MBTPS1 and MEPRIN
MBTPS1 has also been found to have a role in protein processing16. We knocked down MBTPS1 in KB31 and KLM1 cells and found no change in MSLN shedding (Supplementary Fig. 10). Because there is no R residue in the region of MSLN where cutting occurs and cutting by MBTPS1 requires an R residue at P4, this result was expected. We also considered the possibility that meprin may participate in shedding, but CCLE shows that MEP1A and MEP1B RNA levels are very low in our cell line panel.
Conclusion
We show here that MSLN shedding is an unexpectedly complex process, which involves many different enzymes that cleave MSLN at several sites close to the cell membrane. We utilized several inhibitors that greatly decrease MSLN shedding and greatly enhance killing of cells by immunotoxins that target MSLN. Cutting at site 4 was only observed in KB31 cells, in which shedding is inhibited by BACE knockdown and the BACE inhibitor Lanabecestat, which did not inhibit MSLN shedding in KLM1 (Fig. 6a), OVAR8 (Fig. 6a) and RH16 (Supplementary Fig. 11). Cutting at site 3 is likely due to ADAM17, since it is found in cell lines sensitive to ADAM17 knockdown and inhibition by the ADAM inhibitor TMI-1. KB31 cells do not have cut site 3 and are not sensitive to TMI-1. We would expect these inhibitors would also improve the activity of antibody drug conjugates, Chimeric antigen receptor (CARs), and other antibody-based therapies that are being developed to target cancers that express MSLN. Selective inhibitors of MSLN shedding could benefit patients receiving antibody-based therapies targeting MSLN-expressing tumors.
Methods
Materials
Inhibitors LY2886721, Lanabecestat, and Marimastat were from Selleck Chemicals and TMI-1 was from Tocris Sciences. Anti-ADAM17 and anti-ADAM9 were from Cell Signaling Technology (Cat:3976S and 4151S, 1:000 dilution), anti-BACE2 antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc-271212, 1:1000 dilution), and anti-MSLN antibody (mouse monoclonal MN, 1 ug/ml) was from our lab. siRNAs against human ADAM17: s13719 (siADAM17_1) and si13720 (siADAM17_2) and one siRNA targeting ADAM10: s1004 were from Thermo Fisher Scientific. All other On-Target Plus siRNA and negative control siRNA luciferase GL2 were from Dharmacon.
Cell culture
KB31, KLM1, AsPC1, and A431/H9 cells were described before24,25, T3M4 were from M. Ho (NCI). OVCAR8 and MS751 cells were purchased from ATCC. KB31, KLM1, T3M4, and AsPC1 were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium. MS751 cells were grown in EMEM medium. All culture media were supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% pen–strep. Cells were maintained at 5% CO2 at 37 °C. All cells were tested regularly for mycoplasma contamination.
Knockdown experiments
All cells were transfected using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol in 6 well or 96 well. Either 5 × 10e5 cells were plated in each well of six-well plates, or 5000 cells were plated in each well of 96-well plates. After 24 h on plate, siRNAs were transfected at a final concentration of 60 nM in a volume of 2 ml or 100 µl, respectively. siRNA oligo sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 4.
Soluble MSLN assay
Cell culture media was collected after siRNA transfection or inhibitor treatment at indicated times. The culture media were centrifuged at 3000 r.p.m. table-top centrifuge for 10 min, diluted 5–10-fold in diluent #100 and assayed using the R-PLEX human MSLN antibody set following the manufacturer’s instructions (Mesoscale Discovery, Rockville, MD). The electrochemiluminescence was measured on a MESO QuickPlex SQ instrument. Shed MSLN levels are highly dependent on cell density and growth conditions. In these studies, the ratio of cells to medium is higher in six-well plate format leading to higher MSLN levels, which varied from 5 to 50 ng/ml under different experimental conditions. The MSLN levels were usually normalized using WST-8 assays to correct for differences in cell growth.
Real time PCR
RNAs were made using the Triazole reagent (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription and cDNA synthesis used the Quantitect Reverse transcription kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen). Primers are listed in Supplementary Table 4. The PCR reaction was performed using Quantifast SYBR green PCR master kits (Qiagen).
Western blotting
Cell pellets were prepared in lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA with 1% NP40 and protease inhibitors. SDS-PAGE was run with an equal amount of protein on a NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris gel under reducing conditions. Protein was transferred onto a PVDF membrane and subjected to western blot analysis using appropriate antibodies. Full blots are shown in Supplementary Figs. 1, 7, 8, 11 and 12.
Detection of surface MSLN expression by flow cytometry
KB31 cells were transfected with BACE2 siRNA for 48 h, harvested, and stained with MN antibody conjugated to AlexaFluor-647 and analyzed using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer. Data were analyzed using the FlowJo v10.4.2 software. Data were collected in duplicate and the experiment was repeated three times. Results are represented as mean ± SD from one experiment.
Cytotoxicity assays
In total, 10,000 cells were seeded in 96-well plates with various inhibitors at indicated concentration. After 20 h of treatment, serial dilutions of SS1P were added in triplicate. Cells were incubated for an additional 72 h before running a WST-8 cell viability assay (Dojindo Molecular Technologies). Cell death was calculated with GraphPad Prism v7.05 relative to DMSO control samples. Viability is expressed as the percentage of reading at OD450 with SS1P compared to control treatments without SS1P treatment.
Gene expression analysis in cancer cell lines
In searching for candidate MSLN sheddases, ADAMs, BACEs, and MMPs mRNA levels were compiled from cell lines with high MSLN expression. Expression data for OVCAR8, T3M4, AsPC1, and MS751 were downloaded from the Broad Institute Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), and expression of genes in KB31 and KLM1 cells was determined by previous RNAseq experiments performed by our group.
In gel trypsin digestion
The Coomassie stained gel bands were chopped to small pieces and destained using 50% ACN/25 mM NH4HCO3, pH 8.4. After removal of organic solvent, the gel pieces were vacuum dried for 45 min. The dried gel pieces were rehydrated in 50 μl of trypsin (20 ng/μl) resuspended in 25 mM NH4HCO3 and incubated on ice for 30 min. Excess trypsin was removed and replaced with 30 μl of 25 mM NH4HCO3, pH 8.4. The samples were incubated at 37 °C overnight. The peptides were extracted from the gel bands with 70% (v/v) ACN/0.1% TFA. The extracts were lyophilized, desalted using C18 columns (Thermo scientific), and reconstituted in 0.1% TFA.
Mass spectrometry acquisition and data analysis
The samples were injected on to Easy nLC 1000 HPLC (Thermo Scientific) coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). The Easy nLC was configured with Acclaim Pepmap100 C18 2 cm trap column followed by 25 cm analytical column (Thermo Scientific) and the samples ran on a 90 min gradient at 250 nl/min. The precursor scans were performed in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 60,000 with a mass range of 375–1500m/z, followed by MS/MS analysis at a resolution of 7500 in the ion trap. Normalized collison energy was 29, and charge state 1 and unassigned charge states were excluded. Acquired MS/MS spectra were searched against human Uniprot protein database or Mesothelin (Uniprot number Q13421 iso #1) using the SEQUEST algorithm in the Proteome Discoverer 2.2 (Thermo Scientific, CA). Enzyme was set to Trypsin (Semi), precursor ion tolerance was set at 10 ppm, and the fragment ions tolerance was set at 0.6 Da along with methionine oxidation included as dynamic modification. Peptide validation was done by either the Percolator or Target Decoy PSM Validator with FDR set at 0.1%.
Statistics and reproducibility
All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The error bars represent the SD of triplicates or more as indicated in the figure legends. All experiments were repeated at 2–3 times. Statistical differences between groups were measured by unpaired T-test, two-tailed, using GraphPad Prism 7. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. All data are available upon request.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Original mass spectra has been deposited in MassIVE (https://massive.ucsd.edu) under the identifier MassIVE: MSV000085950. The source data behind graphs can be found in Source Data. All other data generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Hassan, R. et al. Mesothelin immunotherapy for cancer: ready for prime time? J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 4171–4179 (2016).
Morello, A., Sadelain, M. & Adusumilli, P. S. Mesothelin-targeted CARs: driving T cells to solid tumors. Cancer Discov. 6, 133–146 (2016).
Baldo, P. & Cecco, S. Amatuximab and novel agents targeting mesothelin for solid tumors. Onco Targets Ther. 10, 5337–5353 (2017).
O’Hara, M. H., Stashwick, C., Plesa, G. & Tanyi, J. L. Overcoming barriers of car T-cell therapy in patients with mesothelin-expressing cancers. Immunotherapy 9, 767–780 (2017).
Awuah, P., Bera, T. K., Folivi, M., Chertov, O. & Pastan, I. Reduced shedding of surface mesothelin improves efficacy of mesothelin-targeting recombinant immunotoxins. Mol. Cancer Ther. 15, 1648–1655 (2016).
Zhang, Y., Chertov, O., Zhang, J., Hassan, R. & Pastan, I. Cytotoxic activity of immunotoxin SS1P is modulated by TACE-dependent mesothelin shedding. Cancer Res. 71, 5915–5922 (2011).
Chang, K. & Pastan, I. Molecular cloning of mesothelin, a differentiation antigen present on mesothelium, mesotheliomas, and ovarian cancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 136–140 (1996).
Chang, K., Pai, L. H., Batra, J. K., Pastan, I. & Willingham, M. C. Characterization of the antigen (CAK1) recognized by monoclonal antibody K1 present on ovarian cancers and normal mesothelium. Cancer Res. 52, 181–186 (1992).
Rump, A. et al. Binding of ovarian cancer antigen CA125/MUC16 to mesothelin mediates cell adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 9190–9198 (2004).
Gubbels, J. A. A. et al. Mesothelin-MUC16 binding is a high affinity, N-glycan dependent interaction that facilitates peritoneal metastasis of ovarian tumors. Mol. Cancer 5, 50 (2006).
Avula, L. R. et al. Mesothelin enhances tumor vascularity in newly forming pancreatic peritoneal metastases. Mol. Cancer Res. 18, 229–239 (2020).
Scholler, N. et al. Soluble member(s) of the mesothelin/megakaryocyte potentiating factor family are detectable in sera from patients with ovarian carcinoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11531–11536 (1999).
Hassan, R. et al. Detection and quantitation of serum mesothelin, a tumor marker for patients with mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 12, 447–453 (2006).
Edwards, D. R., Handsley, M. M. & Pennington, C. J. The ADAM metalloproteinases. Mol. Asp. Med. 29, 258–289 (2008).
Weber, S. & Saftig, P. Ectodomain shedding and ADAMs in development. Development 139, 3693–3709 (2012).
Lichtenthaler, S. F., Lemberg, M. K. & Fluhrer, R. Proteolytic ectodomain shedding of membrane proteins in mammals-hardware, concepts, and recent developments. EMBO J. 37, e99456 (2018).
Hellstrom, I. et al. Mesothelin variant 1 is released from tumor cells as a diagnostic marker. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 15, 1014–1020 (2006).
Luo, Y. et al. Mice deficient in BACE1, the Alzheimer’s beta-secretase, have normal phenotype and abolished beta-amyloid generation. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 231–232 (2001).
Yan, R. et al. Membrane-anchored aspartyl protease with Alzheimer’s disease beta-secretase activity. Nature 402, 533–537 (1999).
Farzan, M., Schnitzler, C. E., Vasilieva, N., Leung, D. & Choe, H. BACE2, a beta -secretase homolog, cleaves at the beta site and within the amyloid-beta region of the amyloid-beta precursor protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9712–9717 (2000).
Kumar, D. et al. Secretase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: long road ahead. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 148, 436–452 (2018).
Sakamoto, K. et al. BACE1 inhibitor Lanabecestat (AZD3293) in a phase 1 study of healthy Japanese subjects: pharmacokinetics and effects on plasma and cerebrospinal fluid Aβ peptides. J. Clin. Pharm. 57, 1460–1471 (2017).
Rassmussen, H. S. & McCann, P. P. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition as a novel anticancer strategy: a review with special focus on batimastat and marimastat. Pharm. Ther. 75, 69–75 (1997).
Hollevoet, K. et al. In vitro and in vivo activity of the low-immunogenic antimesothelin immunotoxin RG7787 in pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 13, 2040–2049 (2014).
Liu, X. F., FitzGerald, D. J. & Pastan, I. The insulin receptor negatively regulates the action of Pseudomonas toxin-based immunotoxins and native Pseudomonas toxin. Cancer Res. 73, 2281–2288 (2013).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Liang Cao for assistance with mesothelin ELISA assays and Drs. Oleg Chertov, Sudipto Das, and Andresson Thorkell for sequence analysis. We thank Ms. Cynthia Hurlbert for editorial assistance. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NCI, CCR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
I.P. designed research; X.L., A.C., and T.A. performed research; C.-H.T. provided analytic tools; X.L., A.C., T.A., and I.P. analyzed data; I.P., X.L., and A.C. wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
I.P. has patents to immunotoxins targeting mesothelin that have all been assigned to NIH. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Chan, A., Tai, CH. et al. Multiple proteases are involved in mesothelin shedding by cancer cells. Commun Biol 3, 728 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01464-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01464-5
This article is cited by
-
Targeting Mesothelin in Solid Tumours: Anti-mesothelin Antibody and Drug Conjugates
Current Oncology Reports (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.