Elsevier

Ecosystem Services

Volume 47, February 2021, 101222
Ecosystem Services

Mapping of the ecosystem services flow from three protected areas in the far-eastern Himalayan Landscape: An impetus to regional cooperation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101222Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Ecosystem services were assessed from PAs in the far-eastern Himalayan landscape.

  • SPHs, SBAs and degraded SPHs were mapped using participatory GIS mapping.

  • Tradeoffs among the ecosystem services were discussed through scenario analysis.

  • The study capitalizes on interregional flow of ES to promote regional cooperation.

  • Intra, inter-country, and regional pathways for cooperation are recommended.

Abstract

The ecosystem services (ES) concept is an essential tool to promote interregional conservation and development, especially in landscapes where ecological, economic, and sociocultural resources are connected. Our study capitalizes on the interregional ES flow among the three countries – China, India, and Myanmar – that share the far-eastern Himalayan Landscape. We used participatory GIS mapping to visualize the ES flow from three protected areas (PAs) in the landscape, and participatory scenario analysis to understand the direction PA management could take. The service provisioning hotspots, the service beneficiary areas (SBAs), and the degraded service provisioning hotspots (dSPHs) were mapped for ES that was of high management priority. The trade-offs among the ES were analysed for the three scenarios – Nature-at-Work, Nature-People Harmony, and People-at-Work. The argument for regional cooperation was affirmed with several dSPHs lying along the border, and SBAs reaching beneficiaries beyond the PAs and one country. The performances of ES under different scenarios indicated that future management of PAs must widen conservation constituencies and capitalize on multiple benefits from PAs, essentially to maximize livelihoods benefits to communities who live in and around PAs. We recommend intra, inter-country, and regional cooperation pathways for the future sustenance of ES from PAs in the landscape.

Keywords

Regional cooperation
Protected Areas Management
Ecosystems Services mapping
Service provisioning hotspots
Service beneficiary areas
Himalayan Landscape

Cited by (0)