Dynamical analysis of a prey-predator model incorporating a prey refuge with variable carrying capacity
Introduction
The study of prey refuge impact on the prey-predator systems has received a lot of attention from researchers in theoretical ecology. It has been observed that prey refuge is one of the ecological factors which has a significant potential to change the dynamics of such systems, see for example Chakraborty et al. (2017); Jana and Ray (2016); Kar (2005); Ma et al. (2013); Mukherjee (2016); Samanta et al. (2016); Sundari and Valliathal (2018). Different forms of refuges can be used by prey to reduce predation rate such as spatial or temporal refuge, behavioral or physical refuge, prey aggregation or reducing search activity by prey, for more details see Chakraborty et al. (2017); Jana and Ray (2016). In general, prey refuge plays an important role in stabilizing the dynamics of prey-predator interactions and in preventing the extinction of the prey species, as the prey protects itself from being attacked by predators. Several authors have studied the effect of a prey refuge on stability of prey-predator dynamics, see for exampleChakraborty and Bairagi (2019); González-Olivares and Ramos-Jiliberto (2003); Huang et al. (2006); Ma et al. (2013); Mukherjee (2016); Samanta et al. (2016); Sih (1987); Sundari and Valliathal (2018).
Moreover, changes in physical and biological processes of the environment may result changes in the carrying capacity for a specie which in turn affects the dynamics of prey-predator systems. There are positive changes which lead to an extension and increase in the carrying capacity such as food production and new resources using developing technologies Safuan (2015); Safuan et al. (2013). Evidently, changes in technology modify the carrying capacity of a specie, for example irrigation and fertilization in agriculture will raise the resources which can support an increasing population whereas cropping decreases amount of landMeyer and Ausubel (1999); Waggoner (1995). However, food depletion, pollution, disease, starvation, hunting can be considered as negative factors that results in loss of habitat and hence decline the carrying capacity. Thus, carrying capacity is one of the most significant concept as it controls how quick and up to what level a population can grow Ganguli et al. (2017). In most of the literature, carrying capacity is assumed to be constant. However, in a dynamically changing environment, it is reasonable to consider the carrying capacity as a model variable (i.e., a function of time) Al-Moqbali et al. (2018); Ang and Safuan (2019); Ganguli et al. (2017); Meyer and Ausubel (1999). In addition, in reality, the resources are finite and limited, so there must be some bounds within the growth or the decline of carrying capacity. These assumptions provide more realistic understanding about prey-predator dynamics and can be described by carrying capacity with saturation which was used to model enrichment in an inland sea by a nutrienta Ikeda and Yokoi (1980) and to describe the adoption of new technologies in carrying capacity of the developed world Meyer and Ausubel (1999). Furthermore, in Al-Moqbali et al. (2018), the authors studied prey-predator models with variable carrying capacity. They have assumed that the carrying capacity is modeled by a logistic equation that increases between an initial value (a lower bound for the carrying capacity) and a final value (an upper bound for the carrying capacity). Then, they investigated the effect of variable carrying capacity by analyzing the stability and carrying out the numerical simulations. They observed that for low growth rate of variable carrying capacity, the periodicity in the solutions of the systems decreases its magnitude. Also, the solutions reach the stable equilibrium faster compared to the constant carrying capacity case.
The main objective of this paper is to investigate the effects of incorporating both prey refuge and variable carrying capacity in prey- predator dynamics. We assume that the carrying capacity changes over time and obeys logistic growth or decay model depending on its initial and limiting values and we also assume that a constant proportion of the prey takes refuge, which provides them protection from predator.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: in the next section, we present the proposed mathematical model for the prey-predator interactions with varying carrying capacity and constant prey refuge. In section 3, we present the mathematical analysis of the proposed model: local stability of equilibrium points and transcritical and Hopf bifurcations. Numerical simulations are carried out in section 4 to illustrate the theoretical results and to demonstrate the effect of some model parameters on prey-predator dynamics, namely those related to the varying carrying capacity and the prey refuge. Finally, in Section 5, a brief conclusion is presented.
Section snippets
The Mathematical Model
The proposed mathematical model for prey-predator interactions with varying carrying capacity, constant prey refuge and Holling type-II functional response is given by:subject to the initial conditions:Here, and are denoting the prey population, the predator population and the carrying capacity at any time respectively. The parameters
Analysis of the Proposed Model
In this section, we study the existence of equilibrium points of the proposed system (4) and examine their stability. Moreover, we investigate the occurrence of transcritical bifurcation and Hopf bifurcation for system (4).
Numerical Simulation
In this section, we present numerical simulations of system (4) to demonstrate the obtained theoretical results. As it has been shown in the theoretical analysis above, the dynamics of the system are controlled by a number of parameters such as the prey refuge parameter and the bounds of the scaled variable carrying capacity and . To demonstrator the effect of these parameters in the prey-predator dynamics, we shall fix the values of all other parameters to be and .
Conclusion
In this paper, we have investigated the effects of incorporating both prey refuge and variable carrying capacity in prey- predator dynamics. We have assumed that a constant proportion of the prey takes refuge with a refuge parameter . We also considered a variable carrying capacity that obeys logistic growth or decay model bounded between and . The case represents the increasing carrying capacity case and the case represents the decreasing carrying capacity case. To
CRediT authorship contribution statement
N. Al-Salti: Supervision, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Validation. F. Al-Musalhi: Software, Writing - original draft, Formal analysis, Visualization. V. Gandhi: Writing - original draft, Formal analysis. M. Al-Moqbali: Writing - original draft, Formal analysis. I. Elmojtaba: Supervision, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Validation.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References (21)
- et al.
Harvesting in a toxicated intraguild predator–prey fishery model with variable carrying capacity
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
(2019) - et al.
Complexity in a prey-predator model with prey refuge and diffusion
Ecological Complexity
(2019) - et al.
Interactive effects of prey refuge and additional food for predator in a diffusive predator-prey system
Applied Mathematical Modelling
(2017) - et al.
Dynamic consequences of prey refuges in a simple model system: more prey, fewer predators and enhanced stability
Ecological modelling
(2003) - et al.
Stability analysis of a prey–predator model with holling type iii response function incorporating a prey refuge
Applied Mathematics and Computation
(2006) - et al.
Fish population dynamics under nutrient enrichmenta case of the east seto inland sea
Ecological Modelling
(1980) Stability analysis of a prey–predator model incorporating a prey refuge
Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
(2005)- et al.
The effect of prey refuge in a patchy predator–prey system
Mathematical biosciences
(2013) - et al.
Carrying capacity: a model with logistically varying limits
Technological forecasting and social change
(1999) The effect of refuge and immigration in a predator–prey system in the presence of a competitor for the prey
Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications
(2016)
Cited by (9)
A study of a spatiotemporal delayed predator–prey model with prey harvesting: Constant and periodic diffusion
2023, Chaos, Solitons and FractalsStability analysis of a prey-predator model with additional food, refuge, and variable carrying capacity
2023, AIP Conference ProceedingsStability analysis of Lotka Volterra model for three species with disease
2023, AIP Conference ProceedingsDeterministic and stochastic analysis of a modified Leslie–Gower predator–prey model with Holling-type II functional response
2023, Mathematical Methods in the Applied SciencesStability and Bifurcation Analysis of Two-Species Prey-Predator Model Incorporating External Factors
2022, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos