Structural abnormalities of chromosome 8 and fetoplacental discrepancy: A second case report and review of fetal phenotype of 8p inverted duplication deletion syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.104118Get rights and content

Abstract

We described a new second case of fetoplacental discrepancy involving first trimester prenatal detection of mosaic isochromosome i (8) (q10). A 32-year-old woman underwent chorionic villous sampling because of increased fetal nuchal translucency. Analysis of direct chromosome preparations was performed by R-banding and FISH using subtelomeric, centromeric and whole chromosome painting probes for chromosome 8 showing the presence of an isochromosome 8q with a complex, female mosaic karyotype: mos 46,XX,i (8) (q10)[13]/46,XX,del (8) (p23)[10]. Cytogenetic analysis of cultured CVS showed an interstitial duplication with concomitant terminal deletion of the short arm of chromosome 8: 46,XX,der (8)del (8) (p23)dup (8) (p?)[18]. Array-CGH analysis from cultured trophoblasts and fetal tissues revealed a 6.69 Mb terminal deletion in 8p23.3p23.1 associated with a 31.49 Mb duplication in 8p23.1p11.1. FISH analysis confirmed the 8p inverted duplication deletion syndrome. Moreover, polymorphic DNA marker analysis demonstrated that the derivative chromosome 8 was of maternal origin. FISH analysis of cultured peripheral blood lymphocytes showed that the mother also carried a cryptic paracentric inversion inv (8) (p23). Our report contributes to expand the fetal phenotype of 8p inverted duplication deletion syndrome and also provides further insight into the underlying mechanism of this rare genomic disorder.

Introduction

Chromosome 8p inverted duplication deletion syndrome (ORPHA: 96092) is a complex and uncommon chromosome disorder characterized by hypotonia, developmental delay, facial dysmorphism, central nervous abnormalities and congenital heart defects (Feldman et al., 1993). This syndrome has an estimated incidence of 1/10,000–30,000 liveborn infants. The most common terminal deletion breakpoint is located in the olfactory receptors gene clusters or defensin repeats (ORDRs) on 8p23.1 region. The invdupdel (8p) is composed of a distal deletion to 8p23.1 followed by an intermediate intact segment, and a proximal mirror duplication of various extensions (Garcia-Santiago et al., 2015). To date, only six prenatal cases of 8p inverted duplication deletion syndrome were recorded, of which two were diagnosed during the first trimester (Chen et al., 2016; MacMillin, 2000) (Table 1).

Constitutional isochromosome i (8) (q10) is rarely observed. To the best of our knowledge, only two cases have been reported. The typical prenatal example of fetoplacental discrepancy with the presence of mosaic isochromosome 8q was first described in 2003 by Soler et al. The fetus carries a mosaic, complex karyotype: mos 46,XX,i (8q)[7]/46,XX,del (8) (p11.2)[28] in CVS and 46,XX,dup (8) (p23p11.2) de novo in amniocytes. Moreover, a newborn male presenting type III truncus arteriosus and facial dysmorphism with isochromosome 8q has also been documented (Silengo et al., 2005).

Here, we report a new second prenatal case of fetoplacental discrepancy with the presence of mosaic isochromosome i (8) (q10)/terminal 8p deletion in direct CVS and invdupdel (8p) in the fetus with increased nuchal translucency, and review the prenatal features of previously reported invdupdel (8p) cases.

Section snippets

Clinical report

A healthy 32 year-old woman was referred for a thorough ultrasound examination at 11 + 4 weeks of gestation. The parents were non-consanguineous, with unremarkable medical and family history. First-trimester ultrasound screening for fetal aneuploidy showed nuchal translucency thickness of 4.5 mm with diffuse lymphedema. Fetal biometry and anatomy were within the normal range for gestational age.

CVS was performed transabdominally at 12 weeks of gestational age under ultrasound guidance by a

Conventional cytogenetics

Chromosome analysis was carried out on CVS and parental blood samples. The direct preparations of CVS and the long-term chorionic villous culture were processed according to the laboratory protocol. Peripheral blood samples of the parents were cultured with RPMI-1640 medium and harvested according to standard procedures. Cytogenetic analysis was performed on R-banding metaphases at 400 and 550 band resolution using CytoVision® software 7.6.

Molecular cytogenetics

FISH analysis was performed on direct CVS preparations

Results

Cytogenetic analysis from direct CVS revealed a female mosaic karyotype: mos 46,XX,i (8) (q10)[13]/46,XX,del (8) (p23)[10]. FISH analysis performed on direct CVS preparations confirmed the presence of the isochromosome i (8) (q10) in 51 of 98 interphase nuclei (52%) and 5 metaphase cells, and another cell line with terminal 8p deletion in 47 of 98 interphase nuclei (48%). Moreover, the large centromeric signal was observed on the isochromosome i (8) (q10) suggesting duplication of the

Discussion

Constitutional isochromosome i (8) (q10) is a relatively uncommon chromosome abnormality. Hitherto, only two cases with isochromosome 8q have been reported, one newborn male presenting multiple congenital anomalies and the other a 12+4-week fetus with the presence of mosaic isochromosome 8q/del (8) (p11.2) in trophoblasts and non-mosaic dup (8) (p23p11.2) in amniocytes (Soler et al., 2003; Silengo et al., 2005).

Here, we describe a 11+4-week fetus with increased nuchal translucency showing a

Funding sources

None.

Disclosures

None declared.

Ethics statement

This work is not a clinical research and considered as routine clinical care.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Minh-Tuan Huynh: Writing - original draft, ideas, designed the study and wrote the manuscript. Anne-Sophie Riteau: performed the ultrasound examination and contributed to the clinical description of the case. Kamran Moradkhani: contributed to the clinical description of the case. Olivier Pichon: performed the techniques (molecular cytogenetics and molecular genetic techniques). Sébastien Richard: performed the techniques (molecular cytogenetics and molecular genetic techniques). Madeleine

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank to the technician staff for their technical assistance in this study.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (4)

  • The embryo battle against adverse genomes: Are de novo terminal deletions the rescue of unfavorable zygotic imbalances?

    2022, European Journal of Medical Genetics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, although the inv-dup del (8p) syndrome is not reported as a mosaic condition (ORPHAcode: 96092; Unique, 2019), some patients are described with a cell line deleted for part or even nearly the entire short arm of the chromosome 8 (Vermeesch et al., 2003; Hand et al., 2010). In contrast, complex mosaics are the rule in chorionic villi with clones that still have the dicentric 8qter->8p23:: >8p23- > qter, 8p deletions of different lengths, 8p translocated derivatives, or even inv-dup del (8p) ending with a portion of another chromosome (Soler et al., 2003; Pramparo et al., 2004; Huynh et al., 2021), leading to a final product that, at least in blood, is characterized by the same deletion in all the cases whereas the concomitant duplication can extend from 8p23.1 up to the second centromere of the original dicentric (Floridia et al., 1996). Ways to stabilize the broken products can even lead to paternal UPD segments in the maternal derivative chromosome 8 (Buysse et al., 2009; Knijnenburg et al., 2017), sometimes driving to wrong interpretations (Oren et al., 2019).

View full text