Elsevier

Analytica Chimica Acta

Volume 1147, 22 February 2021, Pages 240-258
Analytica Chimica Acta

Review
Analytical strategies for in-vivo evaluation of plant volatile emissions - A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.029Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) are metabolites emitted by the plants.

  • Static, dynamic and direct contact methods are used for the in-vivo BVOCs sampling.

  • GC and PTR-MS are adopted as analytical platforms.

  • The plant volatilome is affected by internal and exogenous factors.

  • Accurate in-situ analysis provides a true signature of the plant biochemical activity.

Abstract

Biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) are metabolites emitted by living plants that have a fundamental ecological role since they influence atmospheric chemistry, plant communication and pollinator/herbivore behaviour, and human activities. Over the years, several strategies have been developed to isolate and identify them, and to take advantage of their activity. The main techniques used for in-vivo analyses include dynamic headspace (D-HS), static headspace (S-HS) and, more recently, direct contact (DC) methods in association with gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectrometry (MS). The aim of this review is to provide insight into the in-vivo characterisation of plant volatile emissions with a focus on sampling, analysis and possible applications. This review first provides a critical discussion of the challenges associated with conventional approaches and their limitations and advantages. Then, it describes a series of applications of in-vivo volatilomic studies to enhance how the information they provide impact on our knowledge of plant behaviour, including the effects of abiotic (damage, flooding, climate) and biotic (insect feeding) stress factors in relation to the plants.

Introduction

All plants emit non-organic volatiles (CO2, O2) during photosynthesis and respiration, but most of them also produce many biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs). These volatiles (chiefly terpenoids, fatty acid degradation products, phenylpropanoids and amino acid-derived products) are produced in different plant organs (leaves, flowers, fruits, but also roots). They are stored in specialised secretory structures, such as glandular trichomes and resin ducts, and are spontaneously released by the plants, even if their emission can vary depending on specific stress conditions. These analytes play a fundamental role in the defence mechanisms against herbivores and pathogens, in the attraction of pollinators and seed dispersers, and as signals in plant–plant communication. Besides their role for the plant, BVOCs can also have important ecological relevance (they can act as precursors of tropospheric phytotoxic compounds) and they also present a wide range of biological activities useful to humans, making them a sustainable and under-exploited source of bioactive compounds [1,2].

The plant volatilome [2,3], is made up of more than 1700 volatile compounds isolated from more than 90 plant families, and its study therefore requires a metabolomic approach [4]. In addition, it is important to avoid alterations to the metabolomic profile so that it can provide a snapshot of the biochemical activity of the investigated biosystem. Specific in-vivo analytical strategies are required to prevent: i) the de-novo formation of compounds biosynthesised in response to any damage resulting from plant collection; ii) possible enzyme-mediated metabolite conversion; and iii) chemical degradation of labile metabolites [5]. Sample preparation plays a fundamental role in this respect, and the development of static and dynamic techniques for the headspace collection of volatiles in combination with a suitable analytical platform (mainly gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS)) has significantly contributed to the development of dedicated analytical strategies for the in-vivo investigation of the plant volatilome, thus improving the understanding of the biosynthesis and ecology of plant BVOC compounds [1,2].

In this article, we first provide a review of the main sampling and analytical approaches developed in the last twenty years for the in-vivo evaluation of plant volatiles, with emphasis on some challenging, but crucial, features of the analytical procedure, such as quantification. The second part of this article focuses on the impact of in-vivo volatilomic studies on our knowledge of plant behaviour, examining the spontaneous emission of BVOCs in healthy plants and how the plant volatilome can be affected by different abiotic and biotic stresses.

Section snippets

Sampling strategies

Research of proper analytical strategies to investigate the volatile profile of plants is fundamental to the correct characterisation of their metabolism and of their relationship with an ecosystem. A sample preparation procedure is usually necessary as most biological systems are too complex for a direct analysis [6]. For this reason, the sampling step is crucial in the development of an analytical method [7,8].

The main challenge in the evaluation of plant BVOC emissions is their complexity,

Overview of analytical platforms

After sampling, the next fundamental step for the determination of the volatile profile of a plant sample is its analysis with the adoption of an appropriate analytical platform. When BVOCs are retained in a trapping system, two approaches to desorb the analytes can be adopted: i) solvent back-extraction (mainly with carbon disulfide, methylene chloride, hexane or dichloromethane) [20,38,40,44,50,53,54] and ii) thermal treatment [15,[32], [33], [34],37,42,43,55,57,64,70,74,87]. Organic solvents

Applications

BVOCs are spontaneously released by healthy plants, but their amounts can vary or de-novo compounds can be biosynthesised when the living system is subjected to induced stress (such as mechanical or herbivore damage, lack or excess of specific nutrients, light variations or high or low temperatures) [98] (Fig. 4). This section reports a series of applications of the in-vivo evaluation of volatiles on undamaged plants or in presence of specific biotic or abiotic stress; the text is organized on

Conclusions and future trends

The in-vivo evaluation of the volatiles emitted by a plant is a fundamental step towards clarifying its behaviour when it is submitted to stress or to a multitrophic interaction. The correct choice of sampling approach in combination with a compatible analytical platform is essential to obtaining meaningful information about the plant metabolome, but it requires the development of dedicated analytical tools.

From the analytical point of view, the in-vivo collection of plant volatiles has

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The work was financially supported by the ‘Ricerca Locale’ (Ex60%2019) project of the University of Turin, Turin (Italy). This article is based upon work from the Sample Preparation Study Group and Network supported by the Division of Analytical Chemistry of the European Chemical Society.

Carlo Bicchi has been Full Professor of Pharmaceutical Biology at the University of Torino since 1990. His main fields of research are development of analytical technologies for profiling and fingerprinting of biologically active secondary (specialised) metabolites in particular characterizing the volatile fraction of vegetable matrices including important food crops (tea, coffee, cocoa, hazelnuts and olive oil). Analytical technologies include: sample preparation techniques; GC, GC-MS,

References (120)

  • N.C. Bouvier-Brown et al.

    Large emissions of sesquiterpenes and methyl chavicol quantified from branch enclosure measurements

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2009)
  • S.N. Matsunaga et al.

    Determination and potential importance of diterpene (kaur-16-ene) emitted from dominant coniferous trees in Japan

    Chemosphere

    (2012)
  • M.M. McCartney et al.

    Coupling a branch enclosure with differential mobility spectrometry to isolate and measure plant volatiles in contained greenhouse settings

    Talanta

    (2016)
  • S. Pressley

    Monoterpene emissions from a Pacific Northwest Old-Growth Forest and impact on regional biogenic VOC emission estimates

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2004)
  • C.-Y. Lin et al.

    Monitoring the dynamic emission of biogenic volatile organic compounds from Cryptomeria japonica by enclosure measurement

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2015)
  • I. Vedel-Petersen et al.

    Volatile organic compound emission profiles of four common arctic plants

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2015)
  • E. Crespo et al.

    On-line detection of root-induced volatiles in Brassica nigra plants infested with Delia radicum L. root fly larvae

    Phytochemistry

    (2012)
  • G. Farré-Armengol et al.

    Enhanced emissions of floral volatiles by Diplotaxis erucoides (L.) in response to folivory and florivory by Pieris brassicae (L.)

    Biochem. Systemat. Ecol.

    (2015)
  • N. Yassaa et al.

    Evaluation of monoterpenic biogenic volatile organic compounds in ambient air around Eucalyptus globulus, Pinus halepensis and Cedrus atlantica trees growing in Algiers city area by chiral and achiral capillary gas chromatography

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2000)
  • N.C. Bouvier-Brown et al.

    Quantifying sesquiterpene and oxygenated terpene emissions from live vegetation using solid-phase microextraction fibers

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2007)
  • N. Yassaa et al.

    Enantiomeric monoterpene emissions from natural and damaged Scots pine in a boreal coniferous forest measured using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2007)
  • S. Huang et al.

    Solid-phase microextraction: an appealing alternative for the determination of endogenous substances - a review

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2019)
  • D.A. Vereen et al.

    Solid phase microextraction for the determination of volatile organics in the foliage of Fraser fir (Abies fraseri)

    Microchem. J.

    (2000)
  • G. Flamini et al.

    Odour gradients and patterns in volatile emission of different plant parts and developing fruits of grapefruit (Citrus paradisi L.)

    Food Chem.

    (2010)
  • G. Moreno-Martin et al.

    In-vivo solid phase microextraction for quantitative analysis of volatile organoselenium compounds in plants

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2019)
  • F. Fernandes et al.

    Headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/ion trap-mass spectrometry applied to a living system: Pieris brassicae fed with kale

    Food Chem.

    (2010)
  • A. Giorgi et al.

    Effect of biotic and abiotic stresses on volatile emission of Achillea collina Becker ex Rchb

    Nat. Prod. Res.

    (2015)
  • J.C. Verdonk et al.

    Regulation of floral scent production in petunia revealed by targeted metabolomics

    Phytochemistry

    (2003)
  • G. Flamini et al.

    Phytochemical typologies in some populations of Myrtus communis L. On caprione promontory (east liguria, Italy)

    Food Chem.

    (2004)
  • G. Flamini et al.

    Composition of the essential oils and in vivo emission of volatiles of four Lamium species from Italy: L. purpureum, L. hybridum, L. bifidum and L. amplexicaule

    Food Chem.

    (2005)
  • C. Bicchi et al.

    Sorptive tape extraction in the analysis of the volatile fraction emitted from biological solid matrices

    JChromatogr A

    (2007)
  • E.R. Scott et al.

    Interactive effects of drought severity and simulated herbivory on tea (Camellia sinensis) volatile and non-volatile metabolites

    Environ. Exp. Bot.

    (2019)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Equilibrium in-fibre standardisation technique for solid-phase microextraction

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2005)
  • R.A. Miller et al.

    A novel micromachined high-field asymmetric waveform-ion mobility spectrometer

    Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.

    (2000)
  • N. Reyes-Garcés et al.

    Coupling needle trap devices with gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry detection as a simple approach for on-site quantitative analysis

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2013)
  • D. Tholl et al.

    Practical approaches to plant volatile analysis

    Plant J.

    (2006)
  • M.E. Maffei et al.

    Plant volatiles: production, function and pharmacology

    Nat. Prod. Rep.

    (2011)
  • C. Bicchi et al.

    The Plant Volatilome: Methods of Analysis

  • S. Risticevic et al.

    Application of in vivo solid phase microextraction (SPME) in capturing metabolome of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) fruit

    Sci. Rep.

    (2020)
  • S. Risticevic et al.

    Capturing plant metabolome with direct-immersion in vivo solid phase microextraction of plant tissues

    Anal. Chem.

    (2016)
  • M. mossaddegh et al.

    In Vivo solid–phase microextraction: an efficient sample preparation method for plant and tissue bioanalysis

    Biquarterly Iranian Journal of Analytical Chemistry

    (2019)
  • A. Manzo et al.

    Volatile fingerprint of Italian populations of orchids using solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry

    Molecules

    (2014)
  • N. Kfoury et al.

    Direct contact sorptive extraction: a robust method for sampling plant volatiles in the field

    J. Agric. Food Chem.

    (2017)
  • X. Deng et al.

    A direct quantitative analysis method for monitoring biogenic volatile organic compounds released from leaves of Pelargonium hortorum in situ

    Anal. Bioanal. Chem.

    (2004)
  • B. Sgorbini et al.

    Headspace Sampling and Gas Chromatography of Plants: a Successful Combination to Study the Composition of a Plant Volatile Fraction

  • L. Boggia et al.

    Direct contact - sorptive tape extraction coupled with gas chromatography - mass spectrometry to reveal volatile topographical dynamics of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) upon herbivory by Spodoptera littoralis boisd

    BMC Plant Biol.

    (2015)
  • O. Wahlroos et al.

    Quantitative determination of volatile compounds from food and evaluation of the gas flushing method for their concentration

    Acta Chem. Scand.

    (1966)
  • V. Herout

    [Gas chromatography of terpendoids]

    Planta Med.

    (1967)
  • J. Beauchamp et al.

    Ozone induced emissions of biogenic VOC from tobacco: relationships between ozone uptake and emission of LOX products

    Plant Cell Environ.

    (2005)
  • U. Effmert et al.

    Volatile composition, emission pattern, and localization of floral scent emission in Mirabilis jalapa (Nyctaginaceae)

    Am. J. Bot.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from plants: From release to detection

      2023, TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dynamic headspace extraction, as the first step of GC-MS pretreatment, is often used as the main method for the collection of VOCs of living plants [35]. The device, mechanism and research progress of dynamic headspace extraction have been reviewed in recent years (Fig. 5) [36,37]. In a recent study of novel dynamic headspace extraction for optimized in-tube extraction [38], a new technique was developed to overcome the drawbacks of conventional headspace extraction techniques, which allows for rapid extraction of target compounds while being virtually non-damaging to the sample.

    • Identifying foliar volatile organic compounds of Plectranthus and Coleus (Lamiaceae) as predictive markers of genus using GC×GC-TOFMS and machine learning

      2022, Journal of Chromatography Open
      Citation Excerpt :

      Plants produce volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as secondary metabolites which may function as molecular signals mediating ecological interactions of the plant with other organisms in the environment [16–19]. They can be obtained in situ, from particular organs (leaves, flowers, roots, or fruit), or in vivo from a whole plant [20,21]. The primary extraction methods include liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), steam distillation/hydrodistillation [22], supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) [22,23] and solid-phase extraction (SPE) [24].

    • Supercritical fluid extraction as a suitable technology to recover bioactive compounds from flowers

      2022, Journal of Supercritical Fluids
      Citation Excerpt :

      Amino acid-derived products, fatty acid degradation products, herbivore-inducted volatiles, hormones, lipoxygenase pathway volatiles, phenylpropanoids and terpenoids, among other compounds from vegetal metabolism procedures, integrate this numerousness volatile fraction. The different plant organs (e.g., flowers, fruits, leaves, roots, secretory structures -glandular trichomes and resin ducts- and stalks) produce and store specific volatilome compounds [49,50]. This fingerprint is also involved in the plant chemical communication process in combination with other physical systems (e.g., electrical, hydraulic and mechanical signs) [51] and the flower scent profile exhibits differences under different spatial and temporal patterns [52].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Carlo Bicchi has been Full Professor of Pharmaceutical Biology at the University of Torino since 1990. His main fields of research are development of analytical technologies for profiling and fingerprinting of biologically active secondary (specialised) metabolites in particular characterizing the volatile fraction of vegetable matrices including important food crops (tea, coffee, cocoa, hazelnuts and olive oil). Analytical technologies include: sample preparation techniques; GC, GC-MS, Fast-GC, Multidimensional GC, Enantioselective GC, HPLC, HPLC-MS, SFE and SFC, Chemometric elaboration. He has authored or co-authored more than 290 publications in internationally recognized journals and 350 oral presentations.

    Cecilia Cagliero is Associate Professor in Pharmaceutical Biology at the Department of Drug Science and Technology of the University of Turin (Italy) where she obtained the PhD in Science and High Technology in 2010. Her research activity, documented by 60 articles (H-index 20), is focused towards the development of advanced approaches for the characterisation of volatile and nonvolatile fractions of plants. In the occasion of the 2016 International Symposium on Capillary Chromatography she received the Leslie Ettre Award and on October 2018, she was included in the “The Top 40 Under 40 Power List” by The Analytical Scientist.

    Arianna Marengo is Assistant Research Fellow at the Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Torino (Italy). She graduated with honour in Cellular and Molecular Biology, at the University of Torino (Italy), in 2013 and she obtained a doctoral degree in Earth and Environmental Sciences and Technologies at the University of Cagliari (Italy), in 2017. Her research is focused on the phytochemical and biomolecular characterisation of plant species of pharmaceutical, cosmetic and healthy interest. She has published 22 articles and she joined different university laboratories in Italy, France and USA, for short research training periods.

    Giulia Mastellone graduated with honour in Pharmacy, at University of Torino (Italy) in April 2020 with a thesis carried out during a traineeship of six months at the University of La Laguna (Tenerife, Spain). She is currently a PhD student at the University of Torino (Italy) under the supervision of Cecilia Cagliero. Her research interest includes the development of sustainable and innovative analytical strategies for the characterisation of botanicals. She is author of two articles published in peer-review International Journals.

    Patrizia Rubiolo has been Full Professor of Pharmaceutical Biology and since 2018 Head of the Department of Drug Science and Technology of the University of Turin. Her main field of research is devoted to the study of the biologically active specialised metabolites in plants and in their derivatives through the application of innovative methods of sampling and analysis, in particular through the adoption of solvent-free sampling techniques coupled with GC-MS and LC-MS analytical platforms. Research activity is documented by more than 140 publications in international journals with a H-index of 34 and 3876 citations (June2020).

    Barbara Sgorbini is Associate Professor of Pharmaceutical Biology at the Department of Drug Science and Technology of the University of Turin. Her main field of research is devoted to the study of the volatile bioactive secondary metabolites in plants and in their derivatives (in particular essential oils), by adopting innovative sample preparation techniques (especially solvent-free sampling techniques) combined with GC-MS analytical platforms. Her research activity is documented by more than 70 publications in International Journals.

    1

    Both authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text