Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Dynamics of Information Flows with the Key Terms Nanobio- or Bionano- in Global and Russian Information Resources

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a comparative analysis of documents arrays with the keywords nanobio- or bionano- in the Scopus Database, Web of Science Core collection, Russian Science Citation Index and VINITI RAS Database using the analytical tools of these resources. The subject distribution, composition of sources, and key terms are considered. Differences in the relevant document arrays of these databases in the case of identical queries are revealed. The influence of subject indexing in various resources on the formation of specialized Russian publications arrays is shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ISO (2011): “ISO/TC 229 80004-5:2011, Nanotechnologies – Vocabulary – Part 5: Nano/biointerface”: […] “3.1. nanobiotechnology: application of nanoscience (2.2) or nanotechnology (2.3) to biology or biotechnology (Note: This includes the application of nanotechnology to human health and veterinary science.).”

  2. ISO (2011): “ISO/TC 229 80004-5:2011, Nanotechnologies – Vocabulary – Part 5: Nano/biointerface”: […] “3.2. bionanotechnology: application of biology to nanotechnology (2.3), i.e. the use of biological molecules in nanomaterials (2.4), nanoscale (2.1) devices or nanoscale systems.”

  3. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation as of December 1, 2016 No. 642 On the Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation.

  4. The score takes the thematic area of a journal, level of self-citation, and other factors that influence the citation of the journal in the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) into account.

REFERENCES

  1. Meyer, M. and Persson, O., Nanotechnology, interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application, Scientometrics, 1998, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. National Nanotechnology Initiative: The Initiative and Its Implementation Plan, NSTC/NSET Report, July 2000. http://www.nano.gov/node/243.

  3. Metzger, N. and Zare, N., Interdisciplinary research: From belief to reality, Science, 1999, vol. 283, no. 5402, pp. 642–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Science Scitation Index. http://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS530AR16/help/ru_RU/WOS/hp_database.html.

  5. Schummer, J., Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 2004, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 425–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Noorden, R., Chemistry: The trials of new carbon, Nature, 2011, vol. 469, no. 7328, pp. 14–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A European Strategy for Key Enabling Technologies—A Bridge to Growth and Jobs, Brussels: Eur. Comm., 2012. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0341:FIN:EN:PDF.

  8. Terekhov, A.I., Bibliometric spectroscopy of Russia’s nanotechnology: 2000–2014, Scientometrics, 2017, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 1217–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alfimov, M.V., Gokhberg, L.M., and Fursov, K.S., Nanotechnologies: Definitions and classification, Ross. Nanotekhnol., 2009, vol. 5, nos. 7–8, pp. 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kirpichnikov, M.P. and Shaitan, K.V., On the development of nanobiotechnology, Innovatsii, 2007, no. 12, pp. 55–61.

  11. Busygina, T.V., Bibliometric analysis of documentary information flow on nanobiotechnologies based on the abstract database Scopus (publishing house Elsevier), Bibliosfera, 2009, no. 4, pp. 31–42.

  12. Borisova, L.F., Bogacheva, N.S., Markusova, V.A., and Suetina, E.E., Bionanotechnology: A bibliometric analysis using science citation index database (1995–2006), Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2007, vol. 34, pp. 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Friedrichs, S. and Van Beuzekom, B., Revised proposal for the revision of the statistical definitions of biotechnology and nanotechnology, OECD Sci. Technol. Ind. Work. Pap., 2018, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1787/18151965

  14. Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., and Zitt, M., Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: Analysis, Scientometrics, 2007, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 859–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scimago Journal & Country Rank (Scimago). http://www.scimagojr.com.

  16. Rubricator of branches of knowledge of VINITI RAS (RVINITI RAS). http://www.viniti.ru/products/classification-systems/rubricator-viniti.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. All-Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information, Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences, 125315, Moscow, Russia

    N. S. Soloshenko & T. A. Pronina

Authors
  1. N. S. Soloshenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. A. Pronina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to N. S. Soloshenko or T. A. Pronina.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by L. Solovyova

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soloshenko, N.S., Pronina, T.A. The Dynamics of Information Flows with the Key Terms Nanobio- or Bionano- in Global and Russian Information Resources. Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. 47, 207–219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688220030119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688220030119

Keywords:

Search

Navigation