Abstract
We introduce a projective Riesz s-kernel for the unit sphere \(\mathbb {S}^{d-1}\) and investigate properties of N-point energy minimizing configurations for such a kernel. We show that these configurations, for s and N sufficiently large, form frames that are well-separated (have low coherence) and are nearly tight. Our results suggest an algorithm for computing well-separated tight frames which is illustrated with numerical examples.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Depending on the context, we either consider X to be a multiset, allowing for repetition, or as an ordered list.
The chordal distance between the lines \(\ell (x)\) and \(\ell (y)\) is given by \(\min \{\Vert x-uy\Vert :u\in \mathbb {H}, |u|=1\}\).
References
Bachoc, F., Ehler, M., Gräf, M.: Optimal configurations of lines and a statistical application. Adv. Comput. Math. 43(1), 113–126 (2017)
Benedetto, J., Fickus, M.: Finite normalized tight frames. Adv. Comput. Math. 18(2–4), 357–385 (2003)
Benedetto, J., Kolesar, J.D.: Geometric properties of Grassmannian frames for \({\mathbb{R}}^2\) and \({\mathbb{R}}^3\). EURASIP J Adv. Signal Process 1, 049850 (2006)
Bétermin, L., Sandier, E.: Renormalized energy and asymptotic expansion of optimal logarithmic energy on the sphere. Constr. Approx. 47(1), 39–74 (2018)
Bilyk, D., Glazyrin, A., Matzke, R., Park, J., Vlasiuk, O.: Optimal measures for p-frame energies on spheres. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.00885 (2019)
Bodmann, B.G., Haas, J.I.: Frame potentials and the geometry of frames. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 21, 1344–1384 (2014)
Borodachov, S.V., Hardin, D.P., Saff, E.B.: Asymptotics for discrete weighted minimal Riesz energy problems on rectifiable sets. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 360(3), 1559–1580 (2008)
Borodachov, S.V., Hardin, D.P., Saff, E.B.: Discrete Energy on Rectifiable Sets. Springer, New York (2019)
Brauchart, J.S., Saff, E.B., Sloan, I.H., Womersley, R.S.: QMC designs: optimal order Quasi Monte Carlo integration schemes on the sphere. Math. Comput. 83(290), 2821–2851 (2014)
Brauchart, J.S., Reznikov, A.B., Saff, E.B., Sloan, I.H., Wang, Y.G., Womersley, R.S.: Random point sets on the sphere-hole radii, covering, and separation. Exp. Math. 27(1), 62–81 (2018)
Cahill, J., Mixon, D.G., Strawn, N.: Connectivity and irreducibility of algebraic varieties of finite unit norm tight frames. SIAM J. Appl. Algebra Geom. 1(1), 38–72 (2017)
Cai, T., Fan, J., Jiang, T.: Distributions of angles in random packing on spheres. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 14(1), 1837–1864 (2013)
Candes, E., Strohmer, T., Voroninski, V.: Phaselift: exact and stable signal recovery from magnitude measurements via convex programming. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 66(8), 1241–1274 (2013)
Casazza, P.G., Cahill, J., Haas, J.I., Tremain, J.: Constructions of biangular tight frames and their relationships with equiangular tight frames. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.01786 (2017)
Chen, X., Powell, A.M.: Random subspace actions and fusion frames. Constr. Approx. 43(1), 103–134 (2016)
Chen, X., Gonzalez, V., Goodman, E., Kang, S., Okoudjou, K.: Universal optimal configurations for the \(p\)-frame potentials. Adv. Comput. Math. 46, 4 (2020)
Choquet, G.: Diametre transfini et comparaison de diverses capacités. Sémin. Brelot Choquet Deny. Théorie Potentiel 3(4), 1–7 (1958)
Cohn, H., Kumar, A.: Universally optimal distribution of points on spheres. J. Am. Math. Soc. 20(1), 99–148 (2007)
Cohn, H., Kumar, A., Minton, G.: Optimal simplices and codes in projective spaces. Geom. Topol. 20(3), 1289–1357 (2016)
Conway, J.H., Hardin, R.H., Sloane, N.J.A.: Packing lines, planes, etc.: packings in Grassmannian spaces. Exp. Math. 5(2), 139–159 (1996)
Delsarte, P., Goethals, J.M., Seidel, J.J.: Bounds for systems of lines, and Jacobi polynomials. Geom. Comb. 30, 193–207 (1991)
Ehler, M.: Random tight frames. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 18(1), 1–20 (2012)
Ehler, M., Okoudjou, K.: Minimization of the probabilistic p-frame potential. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 142(3), 645–659 (2012)
Fejes, L., Tóth, L.: On the sum of distances determined by a pointset. Acta Math. Hungar. 7(3–4), 397–401 (1956)
Fickus, M., Mixon, D.G.: Tables of the existence of equiangular tight frames. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.00253 (2015)
Fickus, M., Jasper, J., Mixon, D.G.: Packings in real projective spaces. SIAM J Appl. Algebra Geom. 2(3), 377–409 (2018)
Goyal, V.K., Kovačević, J., Kelner, J.A.: Quantized frame expansions with erasures. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 10(3), 203–233 (2001)
Gross, D., Krahmer, F., Kueng, R.: A partial derandomization of phaselift using spherical designs. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 21(2), 229–266 (2015)
Hamilton, L., Moitra, A.: The Paulsen problem made simple. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS 2019)
Hardin, D.P., Saff, E.B., Whitehouse, J.T.: Quasi-uniformity of minimal weighted energy points on compact metric spaces. J. Complex. 28(2), 177–191 (2012)
Hardin, D.P., Leblé, T., Saff, E.B., Serfaty, S.: Large deviation principles for hypersingular Riesz gases. Constr. Approx. 48(1), 61–100 (2018)
Holmes, R.B., Paulsen, V.I.: Optimal frames for erasures. Linear Algebra Appl. 377, 31–51 (2004)
Kuijlaars, A.B.J., Saff, E.B.: Asymptotics for minimal discrete energy on the sphere. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 350(2), 523–538 (1998)
Landkof, N.S.: Foundations of Modern Potential Theory. Springer, New York (1972)
Lee, J.M.: Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, pp. 1–29. Springer, New York (2003)
Levenshtein, V.I.: Designs as maximum codes in polynomial metric spaces. Acta Appl. Math. 29(1–2), 1–82 (1992)
Mattila, P.: Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces: Fractals and Rectifiability, vol. 44. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Schwartz, R.E.: Five point energy minimization: a synopsis. Constr. Approx. 51, 537–564 (2020)
Strohmer, T., Heath Jr., R.W.: Grassmannian frames with applications to coding and communication. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 14(3), 257–275 (2003)
Sustik, M.A., Tropp, J.A., Dhillon, I.S., Heath Jr., R.W.: On the existence of equiangular tight frames. Linear Algebra Appl. 426(2–3), 619–635 (2007)
Welch, L.: Lower bounds on the maximum cross correlation of signals (Corresp). IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 20(3), 397–399 (1974)
Zhou, Z., Ding, C., Li, N.: New families of codebooks achieving the Levenstein bound. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 60(11), 7382–7387 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Pete Casazza.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
X. Chen: The research of this author was supported by the U. S. National Science Foundation under Grant DMS-1908880. D. P. Hardin and E. B. Saff: The research of these authors was supported, in part, by the U. S. National Science Foundation under Grant DMS-1516400.
Appendix A
Appendix A
1.1 Uniform Measure
Given the hypersphere \(\mathbb {S}^{d-1}\), let \(C_r(x)\) be the hyperspherical cap centered at x, with r being the Euclidean distance of the furthest point to x. That is,
Recalling that \(\sigma _{d-1}\) denotes the normalized surface measure, the following asymptotic formula holds:
and also the estimate
where
Both estimates can be found in Sect. 3 of [33].
Lemma A.1
When \({\mathbb {H}}={\mathbb {R}}\), the uniform measure on \({\mathcal {D}}\) is \((d-1)\)-regular. Moreover, we have the estimate
Proof
\({\mathcal {D}}\) is the projective space embeded in \({\mathbb {R}}{\mathbb {M}}_{d\times d}^h\). \(p_x\) and \(p_y\) are furthest away if \(x\perp y\), so \(\text {diam}({\mathcal {D}})=\sqrt{2}\).
For any point \(p_x=F(x)\in {\mathcal {D}}\) and any \(r\le \text {diam}({\mathcal {D}})=\sqrt{2}\), suppose in the set \(B(p_x,r)\cap {\mathcal {D}}\), \(p_y\) is the point that is furthest away from \(p_x\). We can pick y so that \(\langle x,y\rangle \ge 0\). Then \(\Phi ^{-1}(B(p_x,r))\) is the union of the spherical cap centered at x with boundary point y together with its antipodal image, see Fig. 7. By (3.3),
By (A.2),
\(\square \)
1.2 Expected Value of Coherence
Let \(X=\{x_i\}\in {\mathcal {S}}(d,N)\) be a random configuration on the sphere where each point is selected from a uniform distribution on the sphere. Let \(\Theta =\min _{i\ne j}\arccos \langle x_i,x_j\rangle \), so
It is proven in [12, Theorem 2] that \(F_N(t):=\Pr (N^{2/(d-1)}\Theta \le t)\rightarrow F(t)\) where \(F(t)=1-\exp \Big (-\frac{\gamma _d}{2(d-1)}t^{d-1}\Big )\) is supported on \((0,\infty )\).
In order to compute the expected value of \(\Theta ^2\), we define \(G_N(s):=\Pr (N^{4/(d-1)}\Theta ^2\le s)=F_N(\sqrt{s})\rightarrow F(\sqrt{s})\). By a similar argument as the one in [10, Corollary 3.4], we get
By (A.5), we have
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Hardin, D.P. & Saff, E.B. On the Search for Tight Frames of Low Coherence. J Fourier Anal Appl 27, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00041-020-09790-2
Received:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00041-020-09790-2