Skip to main content
Log in

Research on Coordinated Control Strategy of ITER Power Supplies and Reactive Power Compensation System

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stable operation of the ITER power supply is inseparable from the optimal control of the reactive power compensation (RPC, consisting of thyristor controlled reactor and turned filters) system. However, the traditional RPC control scheme with high latency can no longer meet the actual reactive power demand from the load side under the severe working conditions of the plasma control system. A new control law has been proposed and analyzed for RPC system based on the Lyapunov’s theory by designing a Lyapunov function, which derivative is always negatively definite globally. With the help of the Lyapunov’s asymptotic stability analysis, a new controller, which called Q Lyapunov-function-based control (QLC), has been designed to realize good dynamic performance comparing to the existed solutions. The simulation results show that the reactive power consumption of the grid side controlled by QLC has been greatly reduced during the transient change of the reactive power generated by the loads. Hence, the AC busbar voltage will have strong robustness. Moreover, it is also shown that the RPC system can be stabilized globally for handling severe signal disturbances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Tao et al., ITER coil power supply and distribution system, in 2011 IEEE/NPSS 24th Symposium on Fusion Engineering, Chicago, IL (2011), pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/sofe.2011.6052201

  2. A.D. Mankani et al., The ITER reactive power compensation and harmonic filtering (RPC & HF) system: stability & performance, in IEEE/NPSS 24th Symposium on Fusion Engineering (2011)

  3. C. Finotti, E. Gaio, I. Benfatto, I. Song, J. Tao, Continuous state space model of the ITER pulsed power electrical network for stability analysis. Fusion Eng. Des. 139, 62–73 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R.A. Otto, T.H. Putman, L. Gyugyi, Principles and applications of static, thyristor-controlled shunt compensators. IEEE Trans. Power Apparat. Syst. PAS-97(5), 1935–1945 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1109/tpas.1978.354690

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Finotti et al., Improvement of the dynamic response of the ITER reactive power compensation system. Fusion Eng. Des. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.05.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Rahmani, A. Hamadi, K. Al-Haddad, A Lyapunov-function-based control for a three-phase shunt hybrid active filter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 59(3), 1418–1429 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2011.2163370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Komurcugil, O. Kukrer, A new control strategy for single-phase shunt active power filters using a Lyapunov function. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 53(1), 305–312 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2005.862218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Hua, C. Li, C. Lee, Control analysis of an active power filter using Lyapunov candidate. IET Power Electron. 2(4), 325–334 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-pel.2008.0235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Komurcugil, O. Kukrer, Lyapunov-based control for three-phase PWM AC/DC voltage-source converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 13(5), 801–813 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/63.712278

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. P.K. Kalra, An approach for handling the nonlinearities of HVDC system for stability analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 5(3), 371–377 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/63.56529

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Parrish, E. McVey, A theoretical model for single-phase silicon-controlled rectifier systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 12(5), 577–579 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1967.1098677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matlab web site www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/

  13. L. Ljung, Convergence analysis of parametric identification methods. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 23(5), 770–783 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1978.1101840

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. IEEE Guide for Planning DC Links Terminating at AC Locations Having Low Short-Circuit Capacities, in IEEE Std 1204-1997 (1997), pp. 1–216. https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeestd.1997.85949

  15. IEEE Working Group, Static VAr compensator models for power flow and dynamic performance simulation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 9(1), 229–240 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1109/59.317606

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements and Disclaimers

This work was supported by the ITER Implementing Agreement No. 1(ITER ref No. 4300001754). The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the ITER Organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Tao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, D., Tao, J., Fan, R. et al. Research on Coordinated Control Strategy of ITER Power Supplies and Reactive Power Compensation System. J Fusion Energ 39, 491–499 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-020-00270-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-020-00270-5

Keywords

Navigation